CNA Financial Corporation(CNA)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$48.17
- 52-Week Range
- $41.53 – $50.72
- YTD
- +2.77%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.7
- Straddle Price
- $3.12
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.36
- Market Cap
- $12.7B
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.50% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.00% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.85% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +61.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -1.1% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $2.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 11.2% |
| Book / Price | 84.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Bank Quality Adj | ×0.57 (target ROE vs peer median) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 14.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.27 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $45.07 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $44.25 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 34.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $2.5B |
| Market Cap | $13B |
Peers used for multiples: ACGL, AIG, ALL, BRK.B, CB, CINF, HIG, PGR, TRV, WRB
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$75.27
Current Price
$48.36
Deviation
+50.0%
Forward-Return Rank
LONG
gates ✓
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -1.5% ⚠ | +0.82 | +1.26 | 87.8% | — |
| 42d | -1.6% ⚠ | +1.34 | +1.53 | 90.5% | — |
| 63d | -2.1% ⚠ | +0.97 | +1.34 | 86.2% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $94.68 | 53% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $34.65 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $26.91 | 16% | median 10.6× · 10 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 7.8× · 10 peers |
| Peer P/B | $72.77 | 24% | median 1.8× · 10 peers |
| Peer P/S | $50.07 | 8% | median 1.6× · 10 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $45.07 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-26 · updated 2026-06-26 20:59:30.580000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- FIRE, MARINE & CASUALTY INSURANCE (6331)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $12.7B
CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) is an insurance holding company that provides commercial property and casualty insurance. The company operates under five segments: Specialty, Commercial and International being its core business, and two segments for its non-core businesses, which are Life and Group and Corporate and Other. CNAF, through its segments, provides professional, financial, specialty property, and casualty products to small businesses and medium-scale organizations. It has its business spread across Continental Europe, United Kingdom, and Canada. The majority of the revenues are gen…
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.55% | 23 |
| Feb | -1.19% | 23 |
| Mar | +0.99% | 23 |
| Apr | +3.10% | 23 |
| May | +0.47% | 23 |
| Jun | -0.58% | 23 |
| Jul | +0.50% | 22 |
| Aug | -0.26% | 22 |
| Sep | -0.94% | 23 |
| Oct | +0.59% | 23 |
| Nov | +0.98% | 23 |
| Dec | +1.90% | 23 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $44.55
SMA 50: $45.09
SMA 200: $46.29
Current: $48.36
EMA 12: $45.97
EMA 26: $45.17
MACD: 0.8013 | Signal: 0.4732
BULLISH
ADX (14): 28.59
TREND
+DI: 32.23
−DI: 14.00
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 71.84
OVERBOUGHT
Stoch %K: 91.79
Stoch %D: 92.70
Williams %R: -1.49
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $48.28
BB Lower: $40.83
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: 9,796,771
Vol SMA 20: 626,718
Vol ROC: 54.02%
ATR: $1.01
True Range: $1.50
HV 20: 23.4%
HV 30: 22.3%
HV 60: 26.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-26T21:15:09.669000
Date Range: 2024-06-28T00:00:00 – 2026-06-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
7 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-29 | Pre-Market | 5.26% | 1.50% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2024-10-21 | Pre-Market | 7.45% | 1.78% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2025-02-10 | Pre-Market | 5.56% | 1.18% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2025-05-05 | Pre-Market | 5.68% | 0.49% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-08-04 | Pre-Market | 4.73% | 4.03% | 0.85x | Within |
| 2025-11-03 | Pre-Market | 9.32% | 1.12% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2026-02-09 | Pre-Market | 8.31% | 2.06% | 0.25x | Within |
| 2026-05-04 | Pre-Market | 6.66% | 8.68% | 1.30x | Exceeded |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.7
- IV Rank (7D)
- 39.7
- Avg IV
- 57.3%
- Straddle (30D)
- $3.12
- Straddle (7D)
- $3.12
- P/C Volume
- 0.36
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- -0.02
- Correlation (SPY)
- -1.0%
- R²
- 0.00
- Ann. Volatility
- 20.9%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 272,300,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
2 filers$27.55K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $22.96K | 83.33% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $4.59K | 16.67% | 2026-03-31 |
1 filers$13.78K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $13.78K | 100.00% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-03-20
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | Jeffrey John Neuenschwander | SVP & General Counsel | Sell (S) | −3,287 | $45.97 | -$151.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Jeffrey John Neuenschwander | SVP & General Counsel | Mixed | +2,179 | $47.03 | -$64.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Jane Elizabeth Possell | EVP & CIO | Mixed | +12,882 | $47.03 | -$329.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Robert Joseph Hopper | EVP & Chief Actuary | Mixed | +7,130 | $47.03 | -$600.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Amy Marie Smith | SVP & Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +2,986 | $47.03 | -$84.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Elizabeth Ann Aguinaga | EVP, Chief HR Officer | Mixed | +8,376 | $47.03 | -$541.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Daniel Paul Franzetti | EVP & CAO | Mixed | +15,076 | $47.03 | -$847.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | SCOTT R LINDQUIST | EVP & CFO | Mixed | +18,629 | $47.03 | -$874.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Mark Steven James | EVP, Chief Risk & Rein Off | Mixed | +7,660 | $47.03 | -$319.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Douglas Worman | Chairman and CEO | Mixed | +69,013 | $47.03 | -$1.74M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-06 | Dino Robusto | Executive Chairman | Sell (S) | −6,250 | $47.62 | -$297.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-01 | Dino Robusto | Executive Chairman | Sell (S) | −6,250 | $46.92 | -$293.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-14 | Amy Marie Smith | SVP & Chief Accounting Officer | Gift (G) | −900 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-03 | Dino Robusto | Executive Chairman | Sell (S) | −6,250 | $45.28 | -$283.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-01 | Dino Robusto | Executive Chairman | Sell (S) | −6,250 | $46.25 | -$289.1K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
38 insiders · @ $48.36
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LOEWS CORP | 10%+ Owner | 248,414,738 | $12.01B | $240.40M | 22 | 2023-08-02 |
| 2 | THOMAS F MOTAMED | Former Chairman and CEO | 789,136 | $38.16M | $970.4K | 36 | 2017-03-02 |
| 3 | Dino Robusto | Executive Chairman | 661,838 | $32.01M | -$2.77M | 24 | 2026-01-06 |
| 4 | Douglas Worman | Chairman and CEO | 276,811 | $13.39M | -$4.60M | 18 | 2026-03-17 |
| 5 | Kevin James Leidwinger | President & COO, Commerical | 143,446 | $6.94M | $0 | 7 | 2022-03-17 |
| 6 | Michael Anthony Costonis | EVP, Head of Marketing | 124,664 | $6.03M | $0 | 8 | 2023-03-17 |
| 7 | D Craig Mense | EVP | 118,149 | $5.71M | -$3.97M | 15 | 2019-01-04 |
| 8 | Kevin Gene Smith | President & COO, Specialty | 111,817 | $5.41M | $0 | 7 | 2022-03-17 |
| 9 | Daniel Paul Franzetti | EVP & CAO | 108,706 | $5.26M | -$2.56M | 11 | 2026-03-17 |
| 10 | JAMES S TISCH | Director | 106,100 | $5.13M | $2.24M | 1 | 2009-11-18 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-03-19
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | JEFFREY NEUENSCHWANDER | Officer | 3,287 | $151.1K | 2026-03-19 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $300.7K | 2026-02-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-02 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $297.6K | 2026-01-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-01 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $293.2K | 2025-12-01 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-03 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $283.0K | 2025-11-03 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-01 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $289.1K | 2025-10-01 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-04 | Scott R. Lindquist | Officer | 8,380 | $410.2K | 2025-09-04 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-03 | Scott R. Lindquist | Officer | 10,000 | $489.2K | 2025-09-03 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-02 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $306.2K | 2025-09-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-04 | Robusto Dino | Officer | 6,250 | $281.2K | 2025-08-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-05-04
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-04 | 0000021175-26-000029 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-29 | 0000021175-26-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-09 | 0000021175-26-000008 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-03 | 0000021175-25-000093 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-03 | 0000021175-25-000095 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-12 | 0001104659-25-076869 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-11 | 0001104659-25-076205 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-04 | 0000021175-25-000072 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-07 | 0000021175-25-000064 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | 0000021175-25-000047 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-10 | 0000021175-26-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-11 | 0000021175-25-000008 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-06 | 0000021175-24-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-07 | 0000021175-23-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-08 | 0000021175-22-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-09 | 0000021175-21-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-11 | 0000021175-20-000017 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-13 | 0000021175-19-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-14 | 0000021175-18-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-15 | 0000021175-17-000040 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-04 | 0000021175-26-000031 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-03 | 0000021175-25-000097 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-04 | 0000021175-25-000074 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | 0000021175-25-000049 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-04 | 0000021175-24-000095 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-29 | 0000021175-24-000056 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-06 | 0000021175-24-000039 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-30 | 0000021175-23-000065 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-31 | 0000021175-23-000056 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-01 | 0000021175-23-000039 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 10.8 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.2 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.2 |
| TTM Revenue | $15.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $1.2B |
| TTM EPS | $4.47 |
| ROE | 11.2% |
| Dividend Yield | 8.32% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.27 |