VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited
XNYS 13.26 +0.00% After hoursStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- 52-Week Range
- $12.02 – $20.49
- YTD
- -25.13%
- Straddle Price
- $1.43
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.47
- Market Cap
- $6.2B
- Open
- $12.92
- Day Range
- $12.83 – $13.28
- Volume
- 2,227,952
- Prev Close
- $12.94
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.88% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.79 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.85% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.93% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +52.2pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $12.79 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $13.06 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 13.9% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $6B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $10.91 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 23.8× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 16.6× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 10.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.0× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $12.79 | 73% | stability 80% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $13.04 | 27% | 12 strikes · skew +0.19 |

- Industry (SIC)
- RETAIL-CATALOG & MAIL-ORDER HOUSES (5961) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $6.2B
- Employees
- 15,145
- List Date
- 2012-03-23
- CIK
- 0001529192
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-19
- EPS Forecast
- $0.41
- Homepage
- https://www.vip.com
Vipshop is a leading Chinese online discount retailer offering branded products at attractive discounts of 10%-90% off their original price through daily flash sales. It operates warehousing, retailing, product procurement, software development, and information technology support in-house while outsourcing to third-party logistics providers for distribution and shipments. Branded products on Vipshop's platform are sourced mostly through a consignment model with global brand partners. As of March 31, 2025, Eric Ya Shen, chair and CEO, had 64.5% voting rights. Leading Chinese social media firm a…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.11% | 11.23% | 7.65% | -8.52% | 9.95% | -3.39% | 2.30% |
| Feb | 27.59% | -8.83% | -6.53% | 17.31% | 13.17% | 1.04% | 7.29% |
| Mar | -22.92% | 6.38% | -0.13% | -14.51% | 2.75% | -6.37% | -5.80% |
| Apr | 2.09% | -18.07% | 4.11% | -13.96% | -11.27% | -4.19% | -6.88% |
| May | -24.14% | 17.57% | -5.85% | 7.28% | 1.77% | -2.07% | -0.91% |
| Jun | -16.51% | 8.44% | 9.42% | -20.51% | 6.21% | -8.55% | -3.58% |
| Jul | -12.75% | -10.02% | 12.55% | 3.57% | -0.07% | 13.50% | 1.13% |
| Aug | -12.49% | 29.87% | -15.74% | -5.00% | 10.71% | -15.76% | -1.40% |
| Sep | -30.64% | -26.93% | -1.23% | 26.45% | 17.11% | -4.50% | -3.29% |
| Oct | 2.20% | -18.10% | -10.48% | -12.91% | -15.43% | 3.54% | -8.53% |
| Nov | -18.04% | 49.66% | 11.79% | -2.68% | 11.78% | -0.53%* | 8.66% |
| Dec | -12.13% | 19.34% | 13.41% | -1.97% | -12.56% | -- | 1.22% |
| Total | -75.98% | 40.74% | 14.58% | -30.42% | 31.32% | -26.25% | -7.67% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
VIPS (Vipshop) - Comprehensive Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 7/10
Vipshop presents a conflicted technical picture with deteriorating momentum and bearish options positioning, offset partially by low systemic risk and positive recent news sentiment. The stock is trading below its key moving averages amid a strong downtrend, with concerning volume dynamics and elevated implied volatility suggesting market participants are pricing in continued downside risk.
Key Drivers:
- Bearish MACD crossover with negative histogram (-0.38) indicating momentum loss
- Strong directional downtrend (ADX 30.75 in trending regime, -DI 28.42 > +DI 18.86)
- Significant institutional selling pressure (OBV deeply negative, volume declining -43.78%)
- Elevated options market bearish bias (Put/Call ratio 4.09 suggesting protective hedging)
Primary Risks:
- Continued technical deterioration below SMA 20 support
- Elevated implied volatility (IV 99.5%) not yet reflected in realized moves
- Negative alpha (-0.56) indicating underperformance vs market expectations
Investment Thesis: Vipshop is in a technical downtrend with sellers in control, though the stock's low beta (0.74) provides defensive characteristics. While recent news headlines are moderately positive and the company operates in a growing e-commerce sector, the bearish technical setup and options market positioning suggest downside risk dominates near-term price action. The substantial IV premium over historical volatility indicates options markets expect larger moves than currently realized.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive headlines (Zacks Industry Outlook, Q2 profit growth) provide limited support given the magnitude of technical deterioration. News themes align with growth narratives but fail to arrest the technical downtrend, suggesting fundamental positivity is being overwhelmed by broader market or sector headwinds.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Price ($12.33) trading below SMA 20 ($12.47), SMA 50 ($13.67), and SMA 200 ($15.20)
- All moving averages in bearish alignment (20 > 50 > 200 is inverted)
- ADX 30.75 confirms strong downtrend in effect (reading >25 indicates established trend)
- -DI (28.42) significantly exceeds +DI (18.86), confirming directional weakness
Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
- Price has broken below all major moving averages, particularly the critical SMA 50 ($13.67)
- Distance from SMA 200 ($15.20) indicates 19.2% decline from 200-day average—significant underperformance
- EMA alignment bearish: Price below EMA 12 ($12.46) and EMA 26 ($12.78)
Long-term (3-12 months): BEARISH
- SMA 200 at $15.20 indicates stock is 19.2% below its long-term trend
- Bearish moving average structure suggests downtrend has been established for extended period
- Limited technical evidence of mean reversion tendency forming
Support/Resistance Levels
Critical Support Levels (in order of importance):
- Bollinger Band Lower ($11.97) — Current price 2.9% above; this represents first major technical support
- SMA 20 ($12.47) — Recently breached; acts as dynamic resistance if tested from below
- $12.00 — Psychological level and proximity to Bollinger lower band
- SMA 50 ($13.67) — Significant distance (10.9% above current price); major support breach already occurred
Resistance Levels (in order of importance):
- SMA 20 ($12.47) — Currently acting as resistance; stock would need to reclaim this for short-term bullish signal
- Bollinger Band Upper ($12.98) — 5.3% above current price; would represent mean reversion to upper band
- SMA 50 ($13.67) — 10.9% above; psychological 200-day resistance if recovery occurs
- $13.00 — Psychological round level and proximity to Bollinger upper band
Volatility Analysis of Levels:
- Bollinger Band Width of 8.04 is relatively narrow, indicating low volatility compression (potential for breakout)
- ATR of $0.31 suggests normal daily moves are approximately 2.5% from current price
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 37.17 — NEUTRAL TO BEARISH BIAS
- Reading in neutral zone (30-70 range), neither overbought nor oversold
- Position below 50 centerline (reading 37.17) indicates bias toward sellers
- NOT yet oversold (<30), meaning further downside technically possible without RSI reversal signal
- Pattern suggests room for additional weakness before oversold conditions trigger reversal buyers
MACD: -0.31 / Signal: 0.07 / Histogram: -0.38 — BEARISH CROSSOVER
- MACD line (-0.31) trading below signal line (0.07), confirming bearish crossover
- Negative histogram (-0.38) and widening represents increasing downside momentum
- MACD positioned in negative territory, indicating momentum firmly bearish
- Critical Signal: No evidence of MACD bottoming; histogram becoming more negative suggests momentum accelerating downward
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 51.28 / %D 51.61 — NEUTRAL
- Both readings near midpoint (50), indicating no extreme directional bias yet
- %K and %D very close together (within 0.33 points), suggesting low momentum energy
- Position implies neither strong buy nor sell signal from stochastic perspective
Williams %R: -60.91 — BEARISH
- Deep in bearish territory (readings between 0 and -100, where more negative = more bearish)
- -60.91 indicates stock trading closer to its lows than highs over recent period
- Suggests bearish pressure but not yet at extreme (-80 to -100) reversal levels
Momentum Interpretation: The MACD bearish signal combined with Williams %R deep bearish reading creates convergent bearish momentum signals, partially offset by RSI not yet reaching oversold. This suggests the downtrend has momentum behind it, but potential exhaustion/reversal scenarios remain possible if RSI drops below 30.
Bollinger Bands Position
Current Status: NEUTRAL with bearish lean
- Price ($12.33) positioned 28% above lower band ($11.97) and 4.7% below upper band ($12.98)
- Stock trading slightly below middle band ($12.47)
- Width of 8.04 indicates bands are moderately expanded (not in squeeze phase)
- Interpretation: Price has shifted from upper band territory toward middle, suggesting mean reversion downward from overbought conditions or that seller momentum is pushing price down within normal volatility range
Potential Scenarios:
- Continued Weakness: Price could test and potentially breach lower band ($11.97) if negative momentum accelerates
- Mean Reversion: Upper band ($12.98) represents technical ceiling for near-term recovery scenario
- Squeeze Formation: Bands currently not in compression; further tightening would precede potential volatility expansion
Volume Analysis
Volume Rate of Change: -43.78% — SEVERE CONCERN
- Volume has declined 43.78% below its 20-day average (current vs average 2,860,020.85)
- Bearish Interpretation: Declining volume on downtrend suggests institutional players are reducing participation; potential warning sign that selling may be nearing completion OR that institutional interest is waning
- This metric indicates market fatigue or lack of conviction among traders
On-Balance Volume: -22,367,613.85 — STRONGLY NEGATIVE
- Deeply negative OBV reading indicates cumulative volume is biased toward down days
- This reflects persistent selling pressure over extended period
- OBV decline confirms volume is flowing into down moves more than up moves
- Red Flag: Negative OBV this extreme suggests institutional or large player distribution
Volume Interpretation: The combination of -43.78% volume decline and deeply negative OBV presents conflicting signals:
- Bearish view: Volume decline could indicate exhaustion of selling, potentially setting stage for reversal
- Cautionary view: Negative OBV indicates sellers have maintained upper hand; low volume may simply mean weak
VIPS Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 67th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $18.1M | #1202 of 6285 | +368.8% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $3.5M | #2263 of 3716 | +81.0% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $3.4M | #1120 of 1945 | -92.0% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $11K | #3984 of 4729 | +47.3% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
VIPS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 105 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.76M | 78.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Walleye Capital LLC | $286.42K | 8.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $278.46K | 7.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Trading LLC | $165.75K | 4.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Raiffeisen Bank International AG | $30.62K | 0.87% | 2026-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $3.32M | 61.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.07M | 19.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | PEAK6 LLC | $664.33K | 12.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $271.83K | 5.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $54.37K | 1.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Capital LLC | $15.91K | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
VIPS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-15| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | Tianmin Li | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −2,394 | $64.06 | -$153.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-15 | Chun Liu | Director | Sell (S) | −181 | $63.85 | -$11.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | Yuhua Wang | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −2,499 | $64.95 | -$162.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | Donghao Yang | Director | Sell (S) | −479 | $64.80 | -$31.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | Chun Liu | Director | Sell (S) | −174 | $67.31 | -$11.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | Tianmin Li | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −2,518 | $67.45 | -$169.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-11 | Yuhua Wang | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −2,589 | $69.12 | -$178.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-11 | Donghao Yang | Director | Sell (S) | −397 | $69.30 | -$27.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-13 | Chun Liu | Director | Sell (S) | −145 | $77.88 | -$11.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | Tianmin Li | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −2,482 | $77.88 | -$193.3K | EDGAR |
VIPS Insider Holdings
4 insiders · @ $13.26| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donghao Yang | Director | 244,703 | $3.24M | -$58.6K | 2 | 2026-09-10 |
| 2 | Tianmin Li | Chief Technology Officer | 60,665 | $804.4K | -$516.5K | 3 | 2026-10-15 |
| 3 | Yuhua Wang | Chief Financial Officer | 48,868 | $648.0K | -$341.3K | 2 | 2026-09-10 |
| 4 | Chun Liu | Director | 16,051 | $212.8K | -$34.6K | 3 | 2026-10-15 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | Nport | 2.46% | $120.8M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $41.9M | $146.6B | 2026-11-11 |
| 3 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $38.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.14% | $38.2M | $27.5B | 2026-11-11 |
| 5 | VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $37.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Nport | 0.23% | $23.6M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 7 | EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $9.1M | $28.4B | 2026-11-11 |
| 8 | MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.15% | $8.7M | $5.6B | 2026-11-11 |
| 9 | DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.08% | $7.5M | $8.9B | 2026-11-11 |
| 10 | JIVE JPMorgan International Value ETF | JPMorgan | 0.14% | $6.8M | $4.8B | 2026-11-12 |
| 11 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $6.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $6.1M | $6.3B | 2026-11-11 |
| 13 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $5.9M | $57.6B | 2026-11-11 |
| 14 | SPEM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.04% | $5.9M | $16.6B | 2026-11-11 |
| 15 | PXH Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | Invesco | 0.21% | $4.1M | — | 2026-11-11 |
| 16 | AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | Avantis | 0.25% | $3.8M | $1.5B | 2026-11-11 |
| 17 | DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $3.8M | $12.1B | 2026-11-11 |
| 18 | DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.04% | $3.7M | $9.2B | 2026-11-11 |
| 19 | SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $3.2M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 20 | PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | Invesco | 4.06% | $3.2M | — | 2026-11-11 |
| 21 | VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $2.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 22 | EMGF iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.13% | $2.4M | $1.9B | 2026-11-11 |
| 23 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $2.3M | $18.0B | 2026-11-11 |
| 24 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 25 | SEEM SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Nport | 0.34% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
VIPS vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN Amazon.Com Inc | $2.89T | 21.6 | +15.4% | +17.7% | 30 |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. American Depositary Sh | $110.4B | — | — | −31.8% | 94 |
| CVNA Carvana Co. | $78.2B | 47.6 | +50.3% | −9.6% | 6 |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | $37.1B | — | — | −5.5% | 47 |
| WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | $29.5B | 26.0 | +2.2% | +35.2% | 74 |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | $27.4B | — | +7.4% | −35.0% | 8 |
| HTHT H World Group Limited American Depositar | $15.8B | — | — | +5.0% | 60 |
| VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited | $6.2B | — | — | −25.1% | 46 |
| GCT GigaCloud Technology Inc Class A Ordinar | $2.3B | 14.3 | +27.4% | +71.9% | 13 |
| Peer median | $33.3B | 23.8 | +15.4% | −0.2% | 38 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.