PONY Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
XNAS
5.01
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $4.90 – $22.46
- YTD
- -68.82%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 77.59
- Straddle Price
- $1.03
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.65
- Market Cap
- $2.1B
- Open
- $5.07
- Day Range
- $4.94 – $5.07
- Volume
- 2,487,216
- Prev Close
- $4.93
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.19% |
| Beta vs SPY | 2.32 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 17.98% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 17.85% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +79.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $6.95 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $6.22 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 708.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.3B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 35.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 5.5× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 17.3× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $6.95 | 72% | stability 70% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $4.57 | 28% | 11 strikes · skew +0.10 |

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN (7373) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $2.1B
- Employees
- 1,669
- List Date
- 2024-11-27
- CIK
- 0001969302
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-24
- Homepage
- https://www.pony.ai
Pony AI Inc is an artificial intelligence technology company that is principally engaged in the operation and development of autonomous vehicles. It operates fully driverless robotaxis through the PonyPilot mobile app in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen. The company operates a fleet of robotaxis. The Group conducts its operations mainly in the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the United States of America (U.S.) through subsidiaries. Key revenue is generated from the Peoples Republic of China.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -13.36% | -13.63% | -13.50% |
| Feb | -- | 21.93% | 7.42% | 14.68% |
| Mar | -- | -41.40% | -32.43% | -36.91% |
| Apr | -- | 15.21% | 7.17% | 11.19% |
| May | -- | 125.00% | 1.42% | 63.21% |
| Jun | -- | -24.36% | -35.59% | -29.98% |
| Jul | -- | 1.82% | 8.63% | 5.23% |
| Aug | -- | 10.20% | -11.93% | -0.87% |
| Sep | -- | 58.49% | -6.84% | 25.83% |
| Oct | -- | -18.85% | -19.71%* | -19.28% |
| Nov | 8.50% | -25.63% | -- | -8.56% |
| Dec | 11.59% | 2.47% | -- | 7.03% |
| Total | 21.08% | 33.49% | -68.59% | -4.68% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: PONY
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- High volatility, reflecting a strong market sentiment
- Negative news headlines contributing to the bearish sentiment
- Technical indicators showing mixed signals
Primary Risks:
- High beta indicating high risk relative to the market
- Volatility regime is currently higher than historical levels
Investment Thesis: PONY's stock price has been trending downward due to negative news and high volatility. While there are some bullish technical signals, they are overshadowed by the bearish sentiment and high risk profile.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been predominantly negative, with three out of six articles having a bearish tone. This has contributed to the overall bearish assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL
- Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels: The current price is trading below the middle band of the Bollinger Bands, indicating an oversold condition. The lower band represents a strong support level at $7.35.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (41.63)
- MACD signal: BULLISH (Histogram crossing above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: OVERSOLD
Volume Analysis: The volume is trending upward, indicating institutional interest and a potential bounce in the short term.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Three out of six recent news articles have had a bearish tone, contributing to the overall bearish assessment.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment: BEARISH (3/6 positive headlines)
Catalyst Identification: The upcoming earnings report could be a catalyst for the stock price, but the current sentiment is negative.
Market Narrative: The technical signals are mixed, with some bullish indicators being overshadowed by the bearish news sentiment and high risk profile.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 3.01 (High risk relative to market)
- Stock Volatility: 0.72 (Higher than historical levels)
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: 25.6% (Medium volatility), Current IV: 98.0% (High implied volatility)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: PONY is trading lower than its sector peers, reflecting a strong market sentiment.
Institutional Activity: The volume trend suggests institutional interest and potential buying activity in the short term.
Correlation Analysis: The stock price has been trending downward due to high correlation with other stocks in the sector.
Relative Valuation: PONY is trading within a trading range, indicating a potential bounce or breakout.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support level at $7.35 (Lower Bollinger Band)
- Resistance level at $8.56 (Upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Potential breakout above the upper band
- Potential breakdown below the lower band
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: The upcoming earnings report could be a catalyst for the stock price, but the current sentiment is negative.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $6.60 (50% Fibonacci level) to mitigate potential losses.
Overall, PONY's stock price has been trending downward due to high volatility and negative news headlines. While there are some bullish technical signals, they are overshadowed by the bearish sentiment and high risk profile. The upcoming earnings report could be a catalyst for the stock price, but the current sentiment is negative.
PONY Options Activity & IV Rank
PONY IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 17th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $7.4M | #1804 of 6285 | -43.2% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $2.3M | #2499 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Tiger Global Hedge fund Chase Coleman | $2.2M | #43 of 46 | -89.3% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $2.1M | #193 of 251 | -76.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $13K | #3896 of 4729 | +84.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
PONY Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MASTERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $6.95M | 23.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $4.16M | 13.77% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $3.86M | 12.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.85M | 9.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $2.80M | 9.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.45M | 8.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $2.14M | 7.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $1.29M | 4.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.18M | 3.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $963.27K | 3.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $924.35K | 3.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian | $248.12K | 0.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Walleye Capital LLC | $241.16K | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $78.53K | 0.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Hudson Bay Capital Management LP | $42.40K | 0.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $25.33K | 0.08% | 2025-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.27M | 30.95% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.32M | 21.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.18M | 11.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.11M | 10.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $789.52K | 7.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Capital LLC | $501.10K | 4.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $426.73K | 4.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $387.12K | 3.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $323.87K | 3.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian | $221.01K | 2.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $34.75K | 0.33% | 2026-06-30 |
PONY Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Jun Peng | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | +3,000,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-29 | Ning Zhang | Vice President | Mixed | +15,726 | $7.10 | -$110.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-29 | Tiancheng Lou | Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | +5,521 | $6.89 | -$177.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-29 | Haojun Wang | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +20,962 | $7.10 | -$97.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-29 | Luyi Mo | Vice President | Mixed | +12,581 | $7.10 | -$88.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Tiancheng Lou | Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | — | $6.93 | -$216.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Ning Zhang | Vice President | Mixed | +17,570 | $6.86 | -$119.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Luyi Mo | Vice President | Mixed | +14,630 | $6.86 | -$99.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Haojun Wang | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +20,961 | $6.86 | -$94.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-16 | Jackson P Tai | Director | Grant (A) | +6,692 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-16 | Luyi Mo | Vice President | Grant (A) | +200,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-16 | Haojun Wang | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +300,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-16 | Mark Qiu | Director | Grant (A) | +6,692 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-16 | Asmau Ahmed | Director | Grant (A) | +6,692 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-16 | Ning Zhang | Vice President | Grant (A) | +200,000 RSU | — | EDGAR |
PONY Insider Holdings
5 insiders · @ $5.01| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haojun Wang | Chief Financial Officer | 1,477,217 | $7.40M | -$192.0K | 4 | 2026-09-29 |
| 2 | Ning Zhang | Vice President | 661,359 | $3.31M | -$229.3K | 4 | 2026-09-29 |
| 3 | Luyi Mo | Vice President | 362,737 | $1.82M | -$187.5K | 4 | 2026-09-29 |
| 4 | Tian Gao | VP, Chief of Staff, GC | 331,369 | $1.66M | $0 | 1 | 2026-03-27 |
| 5 | Tiancheng Lou | Chief Technology Officer | 196,546 | $984.7K | $0 | 4 | 2026-09-29 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | Global X | 0.19% | $18.8M | — | 2026-10-16 |
| 2 | BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | Global X | 0.46% | $14.6M | — | 2026-10-16 |
| 3 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.13% | $3.3M | $2.5B | 2026-10-15 |
| 4 | SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $3.2M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 5 | IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | Nport | 0.50% | $914,439 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | Fidelity | 0.36% | $760,233 | $210.7M | 2026-10-15 |
| 7 | FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | First Trust | 0.07% | $692,985 | $1.0B | 2026-10-16 |
| 8 | TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | Nport | 0.18% | $452,139 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 9 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $400,418 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | Nport | 0.36% | $304,598 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | Fidelity | 1.18% | $264,389 | $22.4M | 2026-10-15 |
| 12 | CARZ First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF | First Trust | 0.46% | $206,651 | $44.5M | 2026-10-16 |
| 13 | BCEM Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF | Nport | 0.44% | $189,742 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | HAIL State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 1.08% | $178,635 | $16.6M | 2026-10-15 |
| 15 | APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $130,761 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 16 | EVAV Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares | Direxion | 2.99% | $103,968 | — | 2025-10-23 |
| 17 | PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | Invesco | 0.07% | $59,165 | — | 2026-10-17 |
| 18 | AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X ETF | Direxion | 0.12% | $29,986 | — | 2026-10-16 |
| 19 | BGEG Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF | Nport | 0.24% | $27,751 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.00% | $19,201 | $616.8M | 2026-10-15 |
| 21 | TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index Fund | Nport | 0.01% | $17,377 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 22 | EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | Nport | 0.03% | $15,356 | — | 2026-05-29 |
| 23 | BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $12,694 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 24 | GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.01% | $12,677 | $130.2M | 2026-10-15 |
| 25 | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $8,814 | — | 2026-07-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (2 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.