Franklin Resources, Inc.(BEN)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $21.11 – $34.92
- YTD
- +40.95%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 0.78
- Straddle Price
- $2.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.11
- Market Cap
- $17.3B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.58% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.08% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 7.56% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +15.8pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 24.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +11.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.9B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 5.6% |
| Book / Price | 76.1% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Bank Quality Adj | ×0.59 (target ROE vs peer median) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 100.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 10.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.10 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +11.7% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $32.26 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $33.47 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 18.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $10.8B |
| Market Cap | $17B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $32.16 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $27.08 | 21% | |
| Peer P/E | $10.91 | 8% | median 12.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 15.0× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $38.07 | 12% | median 1.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $49.54 | 4% | median 4.4× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $32.26 | 30% | stability 56% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $33.29 | 24% | 18 strikes · skew +0.83 |
- Industry (SIC)
- INVESTMENT ADVICE (6282)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $17.3B
Franklin Resources provides investment services for individual and institutional investors. At the end of May 2026, Franklin had $1.780 trillion in managed assets, composed primarily of equity (40%), fixed-income (26%), multi-asset/balanced (12%) funds, alternatives (17%), and money market funds (5%). Distribution tends to be weighted between retail investors (57% of assets under management) and institutional accounts (40%), with high-net-worth clients accounting for the remainder. Franklin is one of the more global of the US-based asset managers we cover, with 30% of its AUM invested in globa…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.11% | 23 |
| Feb | -0.31% | 23 |
| Mar | -0.39% | 23 |
| Apr | +1.34% | 23 |
| May | +0.31% | 23 |
| Jun | -0.11% | 23 |
| Jul | +3.23% | 23 |
| Aug | -1.09% | 22 |
| Sep | -1.61% | 23 |
| Oct | +1.71% | 23 |
| Nov | +3.52% | 23 |
| Dec | -0.14% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-26 | Pre-Market | 9.47% | 2.06% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2024-11-04 | After-Close | 6.10% | 0.34% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2025-01-31 | Pre-Market | 6.45% | 11.61% | 1.80x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-02 | Pre-Market | 6.79% | 6.86% | 1.01x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-01 | Pre-Market | 8.96% | 2.08% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2025-11-07 | Pre-Market | 7.10% | 4.39% | 0.62x | Within |
| 2026-01-30 | After-Close | 5.28% | 2.42% | 0.46x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | Pre-Market | 6.61% | 6.74% | 1.02x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 0.78
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 45.4%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.90
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.98
- P/C Volume
- 0.11
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.20
- Correlation (SPY)
- 55.0%
- R²
- 0.30
- Ann. Volatility
- 27.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.6%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $10.40M | 27.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $8.48M | 22.27% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $5.10M | 13.39% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Walleye Capital LLC | $2.78M | 7.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.73M | 7.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC Custodian | $1.81M | 4.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.40M | 3.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.29M | 3.39% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.14M | 2.98% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $812.53K | 2.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ Custodian | $779.46K | 2.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $481.85K | 1.26% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Walleye Trading LLC | $479.49K | 1.26% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $408.63K | 1.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC Custodian | $3.10M | 13.50% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $2.79M | 12.16% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $2.61M | 11.37% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $2.52M | 10.99% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | Walleye Capital LLC | $2.34M | 10.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $2.09M | 9.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.63M | 7.09% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.37M | 5.97% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.11M | 4.84% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $1.04M | 4.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.02M | 4.45% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ Custodian | $779.46K | 3.39% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $276.35K | 1.20% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $273.99K | 1.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | Karen Matsushima King | Director | Grant (A) | +1,005 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | John Y Kim | Director | Grant (A) | +983 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Karen Matsushima King | Director | Grant (A) | +83 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-02 | Karen Matsushima King | Director | Grant (A) | +1,451 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-02 | John Y Kim | Director | Grant (A) | +1,420 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-04 | Anthony Noto | Director | Award (A) | +7,593 | $27.00 | $205.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | Mariann H Byerwalter | Director | Award (A) | +7,593 | $27.00 | $205.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | Anthony Noto | Director | Award (A) | +7,593 | $27.00 | $205.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | John W Thiel | Director | Award (A) | +7,593 | $27.00 | $205.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | John Y Kim | Director | Grant (A) | +7,592 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-04 | Karen Matsushima King | Director | Grant (A) | +7,592 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-04 | Alexander S Friedman | Director | Grant (A) | +7,592 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-04 | Seth H. Waugh | Director | Grant (A) | +7,592 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-04 | GEOFFREY Y YANG | Director | Award (A) | +7,593 | $27.00 | $205.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | JENNIFER M JOHNSON | Chief Executive Officer | Gift (G) | −2,352 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RUPERT H JR JOHNSON | Vice Chairman | 103,016,780 | $3.36B | -$98.65M | 8 | 2019-12-30 |
| 2 | CHARLES B JOHNSON | 10%+ Owner | 94,168,072 | $3.07B | -$234.93M | 43 | 2025-12-29 |
| 3 | LOUIS E WOODWORTH | Director | 3,746,253 | $122.24M | -$8.05M | 54 | 2009-03-11 |
| 4 | JENNIFER M JOHNSON | Chief Executive Officer | 3,541,084 | $115.55M | -$12.03M | 69 | 2026-01-12 |
| 5 | GREGORY E JOHNSON | Executive Chairman | 3,083,554 | $100.62M | -$74.49M | 64 | 2025-12-29 |
| 6 | Charles Endler Johnson | Director | 2,025,455 | $66.09M | $0 | 6 | 2019-02-13 |
| 7 | Adam Benjamin Spector | EVP, Head Global Distribution | 593,282 | $19.36M | $0 | 15 | 2025-09-03 |
| 8 | Matthew Nicholls | Co-President, CFO & COO | 548,947 | $17.91M | $0 | 22 | 2025-12-03 |
| 9 | ANNE M TATLOCK | Director | 531,422 | $17.34M | -$2.92M | 34 | 2015-03-11 |
| 10 | Daniel Gamba | Co-President, Chief Commercial | 442,870 | $14.45M | $0 | 1 | 2025-10-16 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-14 | Sethi Alok | Officer | 22,000 | $643.8K | 2023-12-14 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-05 | Sethi Alok | Officer | 25,000 | $634.5K | 2023-12-05 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-10 | Byerwalter Mariann H | Director | 6,011 | $144.3K | 2023-10-10 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | 0000038777-26-000171 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-28 | 0000038777-26-000100 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | 0000038777-26-000051 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-30 | 0000038777-26-000032 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | 0000038777-25-000279 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-15 | 0000038777-25-000273 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-07 | 0000038777-25-000234 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-08 | 0000038777-25-000189 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-01 | 0000038777-25-000133 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-09 | 0000038777-25-000127 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | 0000038777-26-000101 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-30 | 0000038777-26-000033 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-01 | 0000038777-25-000135 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | 0000038777-25-000075 | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-31 | 0000038777-25-000017 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | 0000038777-24-000115 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-29 | 0000038777-24-000069 | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-29 | 0000038777-24-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | 0000038777-23-000106 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-01 | 0000038777-23-000072 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 25.6 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.9 |
| TTM Revenue | $9.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.7B |
| TTM EPS | $1.31 |
| ROE | 5.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.99% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.19 |