NAVN Navan, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
27.20
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
NAVN
$27.20
—
Key stats
$27.20
Pre-market
$27.10
-0.37%
- 52-Week Range
- $8.11 – $30.88
- YTD
- +67.38%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 28.85
- Straddle Price
- $4.62
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 24.36
- Market Cap
- $7.0B
- Open
- $26.80
- Day Range
- $26.55 – $27.28
- Volume
- 1,341,548
- Prev Close
- $26.96
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.32 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.24% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.96% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +62.8pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +19.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -26.4% |
| Book / Price | 43.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $24.66 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $23.88 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 148.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.5B |
| Market Cap | $3B |
Peers used for multiples: AAPL, AVGO, GOOGL, MSFT, NVDA, SABR, TRIP, TRVG
60-Day Conviction
42%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 25, 2026
$27.15
α -0.2%
rank 87%
conviction
13%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 24, 2026
$27.33
α +0.5%
rank 87%
conviction
15%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 22, 2027
$27.53
α +1.2%
rank 96%
conviction
42%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $17.52 | 21% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 29.1× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 22.9× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $143.59 | 17% | median 12.1× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 10.9× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $24.66 | 62% | stability 72% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $27.64 | 0% | 6 strikes · skew +0.15 |
As of 2026-10-27 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $7.0B
- Employees
- 3,700
- List Date
- 2025-10-30
- CIK
- 0001639723
- Headquarters
- Palo Alto, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.navan.com
Navan Inc is engaged in providing an end-to-end, AI-powered software platform for managing business travel and expense (T&E). The company's platform enables users to manage corporate travel bookings, payments, and expense processes, while providing tools for customers to control and optimize spending and for suppliers to access demand. Geographically, the company operates in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries, with the majority of its revenue generated from the United States.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -29.35% | -29.35% |
| Feb | -- | -9.73% | -9.73% |
| Mar | -- | 32.80% | 32.80% |
| Apr | -- | 38.37% | 38.37% |
| May | -- | 15.70% | 15.70% |
| Jun | -- | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Jul | -- | 8.39% | 8.39% |
| Aug | -- | 5.75% | 5.75% |
| Sep | -- | -23.14% | -23.14% |
| Oct | 1.37% | 26.51%* | 13.94% |
| Nov | -3.13% | -- | -3.13% |
| Dec | 9.35% | -- | 9.35% |
| Total | 7.38% | 51.73% | 29.55% |
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $23.88
SMA 50: $24.66
SMA 200: $19.28
Current: $27.20
EMA 12: $25.44
EMA 26: $24.46
MACD: 0.9805 | Signal: 0.5188
BULLISH
ADX (14): 29.55
TREND
+DI: 30.25
−DI: 12.59
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 69.44
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 91.24
Stoch %D: 90.07
Williams %R: -1.27
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $28.12
BB Lower: $19.64
NEUTRAL
OBV: 124,969,994
Vol SMA 20: 2,599,412
Vol ROC: -40.30%
ATR: $1.05
True Range: $0.73
HV 20: 30.8%
HV 30: 41.4%
HV 60: 66.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 248
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-10-30T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
NAVN Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 7/10
Navan presents a conflicted technical setup with deteriorating momentum despite proximity to all-time highs. The stock trades at $25.20, above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, but shows critical bearish divergences: MACD has crossed below its signal line (histogram: -0.60), Stochastic oscillators are severely overbought (95.59/%K, 94.72/%D), and the Bollinger Bands upper band sits at $25.00—essentially at current price with limited upside.
Investment Thesis: While the stock has rallied 33% above its 200-day MA ($18.96), the combination of overbought momentum indicators, bearish MACD crossover, and a highly unfavorable put/call volume ratio (4.52:1) suggests institutional profit-taking is likely. Recent legal action headlines introduce reputational and legal risk, offsetting the June earnings beat catalyst.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive June earnings news (beat + guidance raise on 2026-06-10) created initial momentum, but has been overshadowed by three class action lawsuits filed between April-July 2026. The October 12 analyst upgrade citing 27.5% upside appears disconnected from the technical deterioration and options market bearish positioning.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Confidence | |-----------|-----------|------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | BEARISH | High | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | MIXED/NEUTRAL | Medium | | Long-term (3-12 months) | BULLISH | Medium |
Rationale:
- Price at $25.20 trades above both SMA 50 ($25.02) and SMA 200 ($18.96), technically bullish
- However, price is slightly above the 50-day MA (only +$0.18), indicating weakening uptrend momentum
- ADX at 25.63 confirms a strong trend regime, but the quality of that trend is deteriorating given MACD bearish crossover
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Interpretation | |-------|------|-----------------| | $25.00 | Resistance | Bollinger Band Upper limit; strong technical ceiling | | $25.02 | Support | SMA 50—currently holding but barely | | $21.79 | Support | SMA 20; Bollinger Band Middle | | $18.96 | Support | SMA 200; key long-term support line | | $18.58 | Support | Bollinger Band Lower; capitulation level |
Critical Observation: The stock is wedged between its upper Bollinger Band ($25.00) and current price ($25.20), leaving minimal upside room before hitting the ceiling. A move below $25.02 (SMA 50) would trigger a medium-term trend reversal.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 63.39 — NEUTRAL/CAUTION
- RSI sits in neutral zone (30-70) but trending toward overbought (>70)
- Not yet in extreme overbought, but momentum is slowing into resistance
- Suggests limited fuel for further upside from current levels
MACD: 0.04 / Signal: 0.63 / Histogram: -0.60 — BEARISH CROSSOVER
- MACD (0.04) has crossed below signal line (0.63), generating a classic bearish crossover
- Negative histogram (-0.60) confirms momentum reversal from bullish to bearish
- This crossover typically precedes 3-5% pullbacks in trending stocks
- Timeline Risk: This signal is relatively recent and suggests selling pressure may accelerate
Stochastic Oscillators (%K: 95.59 / %D: 94.72) — SEVERELY OVERBOUGHT
- Stochastic values above 80 indicate overbought conditions; these readings above 95 are extreme
- Williams %R (-2.41) also confirms extreme overbought state
- Historical pattern: Overbought Stochastics typically precede short-term pullbacks of 2-4%
- High Mean Reversion Risk: Current price is vulnerable to profit-taking
Bollinger Bands: OVERBOUGHT SIGNAL
- Price ($25.20) trades above upper band ($25.00), indicating overbought condition
- Band width (29.50) shows moderate volatility; bands are moderately compressed
- No squeeze condition present, but upper band resistance is active
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends:
- Volume SMA 20: 3,482,538 shares/day (baseline)
- Volume Rate of Change: +32.93% (volume surging relative to average)
- Interpretation: Elevated volume on recent move suggests strong institutional participation, but could indicate accumulation or distribution
On-Balance Volume (OBV): 114,705,498
- OBV remains elevated and positive overall
- Institutional Interest Signal: The 33% volume surge coupled with overbought technicals suggests this volume may be profit-taking rather than new accumulation (especially given put/call ratio below)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary (Last 10 Articles — Key Themes)
| Date | Headline | Sentiment | Impact | |------|----------|-----------|--------| | 2026-10-12 | Wall Street sees 27.5% upside | POSITIVE | Fundamental bullish case, but technicals diverge | | 2026-07-13 | Kuehn Law class action notice | NEGATIVE | Legal risk; reputational damage | | 2026-07-02 | Grabar Law Office class action | NEGATIVE | Second lawsuit reinforces governance concerns | | 2026-06-12 | Stock jumped on Q1 results | POSITIVE | Earnings beat catalyst (catalyst now 4 months old) | | 2026-06-10 | Q1 earnings beat + raised FY guidance | POSITIVE | Primary driver of current rally | | 2026-04-23 | Bronstein law firm class action filed | NEGATIVE | First public legal action; suggests internal issues |
Sentiment Assessment
Aggregate Sentiment: MIXED-TO-NEGATIVE
- Positive Headlines: 3 (analyst upgrade, earnings beat, stock jump explanation)
- Negative Headlines: 3 (three separate class action lawsuits)
- Narrative Shift: June-July represents a critical inflection point where positive earnings momentum was immediately countered by multiple legal actions
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days):
- None identified; no earnings or product announcements pending
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Class Action Litigation Risk: Lawsuits filed April, July 2026 likely moving toward settlement discussions or discovery phases; potential for negative news flow
- Options expiration cycle (36 DTE expected move = $4.08, suggesting $21.12-$29.28 range possible)
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- Next earnings cycle approaching (quarterly pattern suggests late November/early December 2026)
- Analyst coverage appears active (27.5% upside call suggests ongoing institutional research)
- Legal resolution timeline (class actions typically settle in 12-24 months)
Market Narrative Analysis
Conflict Between Technical and News Signals:
| Signal | Data | Interpretation | |--------|------|-----------------| | Fundamental (News) | Analyst upside, Q1 beat, guidance raise | BULLISH case persists | | Technical | MACD bearish cross, extreme Stochastic, overbought BB | SHORT-TERM BEARISH | | Options Market | 4.52:1 put/call volume ratio, elevated puts | BEARISH SENTIMENT | | Divergence | Analysts bullish; technicians + options traders bearish | Market voting with feet |
Interpretation: The Wall Street analyst upgrade (Oct 12) appears to be a lagging indicator relative to price momentum, while active options traders are positioning defensively. This suggests institutional smart money may be fading the analyst call.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: 1.08 (vs SPY)
Risk Classification: MODERATE-TO-HIGH
- Beta of 1.08 indicates NAVN moves 8% more than the S
Generated
News
All NAVN news →
Earnings History
2 of 4 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
19.31%
Avg Actual Move
21.33%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-15 | After-Close | 14.69% | 11.86% | 0.81x | Within |
| 2026-03-25 | After-Close | 25.96% | 43.28% | 1.67x | Exceeded |
| 2026-06-10 | After-Close | 19.89% | 8.43% | 0.42x | Within |
| 2026-09-09 | After-Close | 16.71% | 21.75% | 1.30x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
NAVN Options Activity & IV Rank
NAVN IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 69.7%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $4.62
7-DTE Move: $4.62
Days to Exp: 25 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 14
Put Volume: 341
P/C Volume: 24.357
BEARISH
Call OI: 522
Put OI: 645
P/C OI: 1.236
Total OI: 1,167
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $3.45
ATM Put: $1.18
Call %: 12.7%
Put %: 4.3%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 998
Chain OI: 19,304
Last Updated: 10/26/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 65th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
65%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.74
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.72
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.62
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.72: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.62: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 11 ATM contracts, 5k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
100%
+32.0
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · ATM 77.9% / Wing 109.9%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)28.9MediumOct 26
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$4.62Oct 26
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.0673
Alpha: 52.76%
Correlation: 0.1586
R-Squared: 2.5%
Stock Volatility: 85.7%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 247
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 247
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own NAVN
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $98.3M | #344 of 3716 | +51.2% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $14.8M | #1322 of 6285 | +6.5% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $3.9M | #1060 of 1945 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $2.9M | #1774 of 3138 | -58.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $37K | #3496 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
NAVN Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 110,870,125 (as of 2026-04-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
7 filers$23.36M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $9.95M | 42.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.63M | 15.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $3.53M | 15.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $2.12M | 9.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.80M | 7.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.75M | 7.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | SYMMETRY PEAK MANAGEMENT LLC | $571.75K | 2.45% | 2026-06-30 |
7 filers$10.34M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $5.11M | 49.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.34M | 22.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.42M | 13.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $958.25K | 9.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $235.56K | 2.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $233.27K | 2.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $45.74K | 0.44% | 2026-06-30 |
NAVN Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-23Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Ilan Ezra Twig | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −36,040 | $21.27 | -$766.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-23 | Ariel M. Cohen | Chairperson and CEO | Sell (S) | −50,647 | $21.27 | -$1.08M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-23 | Michael Eric Sindicich | President | Sell (S) | −8,977 | $21.27 | -$191.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Ariel M. Cohen | Chairperson and CEO | Mixed | −168,378 | $30.14 | -$11.86M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Clara Liang | Director | Award (A) | +438 | $28.56 | $12.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Anre D Williams | Director | Award (A) | +412 | $28.56 | $11.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Sandesh Kaveripatnam | Director | Award (A) | +394 | $28.56 | $11.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Benjamin A Horowitz | Director | Award (A) | +657 | $28.56 | $18.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | ZEEV VENTURES VIII, L.P. | Director | Award (A) | +3,940 | $28.56 | $112.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-10 | ZEEV VENTURES II, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −40,056,230 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-09 | Lightspeed Strategic Partners I L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | −50,665,850 | $25.36 | -$2.28M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | Lightspeed General Partner Select II, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | −35,466,095 | $25.36 | -$1.59M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Lightspeed Venture Partners Select II, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −73,983 | $24.65 | -$1.82M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Lightspeed General Partner Opportunity Fund, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −105,690 | $24.65 | -$2.61M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Shai Weiss | Director | Award (A) | +4,150 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
NAVN Insider Holdings
35 insiders · @ $27.20
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lightspeed General Partner Opportunity Fund, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 12,630,655 | $343.55M | -$2.61M | 1 | 2026-07-02 |
| 2 | AH 2022 Annual Fund, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 10,408,860 | $283.12M | $133.79M | 1 | 2025-12-29 |
| 3 | Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-A, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 10,408,860 | $283.12M | $159.39M | 1 | 2026-01-06 |
| 4 | AH Equity Partners LSV I, L.L.C. | 10%+ Owner | 10,408,860 | $283.12M | $293.96M | 2 | 2026-01-06 |
| 5 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III-B, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 7,789,538 | $211.88M | $202.33M | 2 | 2026-01-06 |
| 6 | Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-B, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 6,757,090 | $183.79M | $8.39M | 1 | 2026-01-09 |
| 7 | Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Opportunity Fund, Ltd. | 10%+ Owner | 6,134,518 | $166.86M | -$90.98M | 1 | 2026-06-18 |
| 8 | AH Parallel Fund V, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 6,026,111 | $163.91M | $93.52M | 1 | 2025-12-19 |
| 9 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 5,574,551 | $151.63M | $0 | 1 | 2025-11-04 |
| 10 | ZEEV VENTURES VI, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 4,586,757 | $124.76M | $0 | 1 | 2025-11-03 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
NAVN Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 23, 2026Directors 19
- Anre D Williams · since Oct 29, 2025
- Ariel M. Cohen · since Oct 29, 2025
- Arif Janmohamed · since Oct 29, 2025
- Benjamin A Horowitz · since Oct 29, 2025
- Clara Liang · since Oct 29, 2025
- Ilan Ezra Twig · since Oct 29, 2025
- Michael R Kourey · since Oct 29, 2025
- Oren Zeev · since Oct 29, 2025
- Sandesh Kaveripatnam · since Oct 29, 2025
- Shai Weiss · since Jan 28, 2026
- Zeev Opportunity Fund I, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures II, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures III, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures IV, L.P. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures Ii-A, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures V, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures Vi, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures Vii, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
- Zeev Ventures Viii, L.p. (entity) · listed since Aug 2026
Officers 4
- Ariel M. Cohen · Chairperson and CEO · since Oct 29, 2025
- Michael Eric Sindicich · President · since Oct 29, 2025
- Aurelien Pierre Leon Nolf · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 2, 2026
- Ilan Ezra Twig · Chief Technology Officer · since Oct 29, 2025
10% owners 55
- AH 2022 Annual Fund, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Equity Partners 2022 Annual Fund, L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Equity Partners LSV I, L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Equity Partners LSV II, L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Equity Partners LSV III, L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Equity Partners V (Parallel), L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Equity Partners V, L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Parallel Fund V, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Parallel Fund V-A, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Parallel Fund V-B, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- AH Parallel Fund V-Q, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Ah 2022 Annual Fund-B, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Ah 2022 Annual Fund-Qc, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz Fund V, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-A, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-B, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-Q, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund I, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund I-B, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund I-Q, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund II, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund II-B, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund II-Q, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III-B, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Benjamin A Horowitz · since Oct 29, 2025
- CLF Partners, LP (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Affiliates X, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed General Partner Opportunity Fund, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed General Partner Select II, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed General Partner Select III, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed General Partner X, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Management Company, L.L.C. (entity) · on file since Jul 2026
- Lightspeed Opportunity Fund, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Strategic Partners General Partner I L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Strategic Partners I L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Strategic Partners Ultimate General Partner I L.L.C. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Opportunity Fund, Ltd. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Select II, Ltd. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Select III, Ltd. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner X, Ltd. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Venture Partners Select II, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Venture Partners Select III, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Lightspeed Venture Partners X, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Marc L Andreessen · since Oct 29, 2025
- Oren Zeev · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Opportunity Fund I, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures II, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures III, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures IV, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures Ii-A, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures V, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures Vi, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures Vii, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
- Zeev Ventures Viii, L.p. (entity) · since Oct 29, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (86)
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures Viii, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures Vii, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures Vi, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures V, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures Ii-A, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures IV, L.P. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures III, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Ventures II, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Zeev Opportunity Fund I, L.p. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2026 | Lightspeed Management Company, L.L.C. first on file as a 10% owner |
| Apr 13, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Anne Mary Giviskos as Chief Accounting Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 24, 2026 | Ilan Ezra Twig no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Mar 24, 2026 | Ariel M. Cohen no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Mar 2, 2026 | Aurelien Pierre Leon Nolf became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan 28, 2026 | Shai Weiss became a director |
| Dec 12, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Amy Butte as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures Viii, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures Vii, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures Vi, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures V, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures Ii-A, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures IV, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures III, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Ventures II, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Zeev Opportunity Fund I, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Sandesh Kaveripatnam became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Oren Zeev became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Oren Zeev became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Michael R Kourey became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Michael Eric Sindicich became President |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Marc L Andreessen became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Venture Partners X, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Venture Partners Select III, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Venture Partners Select II, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner X, Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Select III, Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Select II, Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Ultimate General Partner Opportunity Fund, Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Strategic Partners Ultimate General Partner I L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Strategic Partners I L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Strategic Partners General Partner I L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Opportunity Fund, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed General Partner X, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed General Partner Select III, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed General Partner Select II, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed General Partner Opportunity Fund, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Lightspeed Affiliates X, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ilan Ezra Twig became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ilan Ezra Twig became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ilan Ezra Twig became Chief Technology Officer |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Clara Liang became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CLF Partners, LP became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Benjamin A Horowitz became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Benjamin A Horowitz became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Arif Janmohamed became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ariel M. Cohen became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ariel M. Cohen became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ariel M. Cohen became Chairperson and CEO |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Anre D Williams became a director |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Anne Mary Giviskos became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III-B, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund II-Q, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund II-B, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund II, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund I-Q, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund I-B, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund I, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-Q, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-B, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz Fund V-A, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Andreessen Horowitz Fund V, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Amy Butte became Chief Financial Officer |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ah 2022 Annual Fund-Qc, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Ah 2022 Annual Fund-B, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Parallel Fund V-Q, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Parallel Fund V-B, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Parallel Fund V-A, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Parallel Fund V, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Equity Partners V, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Equity Partners V (Parallel), L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Equity Partners LSV III, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Equity Partners LSV II, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Equity Partners LSV I, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH Equity Partners 2022 Annual Fund, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 29, 2025 | AH 2022 Annual Fund, L.P. became a 10% owner |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
NAVN Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-21
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
7 filings
· $13.6M notice value
· 3 unique filers
· 57% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
THE LIHI COHEN GST TRUST (5, $12.6M) · Ilan Twig (1, $770K) · Michael E. Sindicich (1, $192K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | Ilan Twig | Officer, Director | 36,040 | $769.8K | 2026-09-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-21 | Michael E. Sindicich | Officer | 8,977 | $191.7K | 2026-09-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-21 | Ariel M. Cohen | Officer, Director | 50,647 | $1.08M | 2026-09-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-27 | THE SHAI COHEN GST TRUST | Director, Officer | 75,000 | $2.20M | 2026-08-27 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-27 | ARIEL COHEN | Director, Officer | 168,378 | $4.94M | 2026-08-27 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-27 | THE SIVAN COHEN GST TRUST | Director, Officer | 75,000 | $2.20M | 2026-08-27 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-27 | THE LIHI COHEN GST TRUST | Director, Officer | 75,000 | $2.20M | 2026-08-27 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-13 | 2008 Zeev Children's Trust | Affiliate | 400,000 | $10.37M | 2026-07-13 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | Lightspeed Management Company, L.L.C. | Affiliate | 8,983 | $227.3K | 2026-07-08 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce,Fenner & S… | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Lightspeed Management Company, LLC | Affiliate | 10,569 | $260.4K | 2026-07-01 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce,Fenner & S… | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
56 ETFs hold NAVN
25 shown · $406.72M total exposure · 0.07% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $88.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $72.3M | $74.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $62.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.55% | $36.4M | $6.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 5 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.20% | $26.6M | $13.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $26.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $20.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $17.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $12.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.11% | $9.7M | $8.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 11 | FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | Fidelity | 0.11% | $6.1M | $5.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $4.7M | $4.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 13 | FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.05% | $4.1M | $8.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 14 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $3.9M | $96.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 15 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $3.8M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 16 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.14% | $2.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 18 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.02% | $1.6M | $10.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 19 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.10% | $1.4M | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 20 | ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $1.3M | $2.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 21 | AWAY Amplify Travel Tech ETF | Amplify | 4.51% | $1.0M | $22.9M | 2026-10-26 |
| 22 | BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | JPMorgan | 0.11% | $798,755 | $734.0M | 2026-10-26 |
| 23 | FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF | Fidelity | 0.08% | $782,487 | $998.1M | 2026-10-23 |
| 24 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $759,517 | $20.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 25 | TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | Nport | 0.26% | $634,541 | — | 2026-07-31 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (4 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '27 | 2026-07-31 | $232.79M | $-29.12M | $-0.11 | $25.19M |
| Q1 '27 | 2026-04-30 | $220.23M | $-20.51M | $-0.08 | $-6.80M |
| Q4 '26 | 2026-01-31 | $177.92M | $-72.76M | $2.87 | $34.98M |
| Q3 '26 | 2025-10-31 | $194.93M | $-225.39M | $-4.58 | — |
Q2 2027 • period ending 2026-07-31 • filed 2026-09-10
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
2.44
P/S
4.02
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
3.49
ROE
-30.7%
ROA
-22.2%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.10
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$3.02B
as of 2026-10-26
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
11.76M
SI % of Float
10.03%
Days to Cover
2.70
Short Vol Ratio
65.0%
Free Float
117.22M
Float %
49.0%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-08-14