Autodesk Inc(ADSK)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$195.24
After hours
$195.24
+0.00%
- 52-Week Range
- $185.50 – $329.09
- YTD
- -31.91%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 16.11
- Straddle Price
- $21.40
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.87
- Market Cap
- $41.4B
Fair Value
+45.6% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.41% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.91% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.73% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +20.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 25.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +9.7% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $2.7B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 45.9% |
| Book / Price | 7.6% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 91.1% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 36.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.78 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +3.8% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $228.85 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $211.28 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 17.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $42B |
Peers used for multiples: AAPL, AMAT, AMBQ, AMD, DDD, META, NVDA, SNPS
Blended Fair Value
$284.34
Current Price
$195.24
Deviation
+45.6%
Forward-Return Rank
LONG
gates ✓
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | +0.5% | +1.95 | +1.43 | 89.5% | — |
| 42d | -0.3% ⚠ | +1.90 | +1.40 | 87.8% | — |
| 63d | +1.8% | +2.11 | +1.51 | 89.2% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $284.84 | 21% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $247.75 | 10% | median 33.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $469.31 | 10% | median 34.3× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $157.92 | 2% | median 10.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $544.08 | 6% | median 14.2× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $228.85 | 30% | stability 72% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $230.46 | 21% | 34 strikes · skew +0.26 |
As of 2026-06-29 · updated 2026-06-29 20:59:30.874000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $41.4B
Founded in 1982, Autodesk is a multinational software company best known for pioneering computer-aided design, or CAD, with its AutoCAD product. Nowadays, Autodesk provides design software for a variety of verticals, including architecture & construction, manufacturing, and media & entertainment. Autodesk products have been used in some of the world's most iconic landmarks, like Burj Khalifa, and well-known movie titles like Avatar.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.91% | 23 |
| Feb | -1.17% | 23 |
| Mar | +1.70% | 23 |
| Apr | +5.33% | 23 |
| May | +1.81% | 23 |
| Jun | -2.62% | 23 |
| Jul | +2.14% | 22 |
| Aug | +3.37% | 22 |
| Sep | +1.46% | 23 |
| Oct | +4.35% | 23 |
| Nov | +2.98% | 23 |
| Dec | +0.46% | 23 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $209.48
SMA 50: $227.89
SMA 200: $265.82
Current: $195.24
EMA 12: $198.86
EMA 26: $210.48
MACD: -11.6187 | Signal: -0.5308
BEARISH
ADX (14): 29.38
TREND
+DI: 17.07
−DI: 29.17
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 36.30
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 18.50
Stoch %D: 14.41
Williams %R: -76.97
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $246.97
BB Lower: $171.99
NEUTRAL
OBV: 23,883,497
Vol SMA 20: 3,531,473
Vol ROC: -54.14%
ATR: $8.88
True Range: $7.57
HV 20: 50.7%
HV 30: 44.7%
HV 60: 43.3%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-29T21:15:20.681000
Date Range: 2024-07-01T00:00:00 – 2026-06-29T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
7 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-29 | After-Close | 7.15% | 4.83% | 0.68x | Within |
| 2024-11-26 | After-Close | 9.91% | 1.28% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2025-02-27 | After-Close | 7.73% | 8.61% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-22 | After-Close | 5.79% | 2.52% | 0.44x | Within |
| 2025-08-28 | After-Close | 9.83% | 0.98% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2025-11-25 | After-Close | 6.75% | 1.77% | 0.26x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | After-Close | 7.35% | 5.38% | 0.73x | Within |
| 2026-05-28 | After-Close | 8.38% | 4.73% | 0.56x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 16.11
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 52.9%
- Straddle (30D)
- $21.40
- Straddle (7D)
- $8.53
- P/C Volume
- 0.87
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.60
- Correlation (SPY)
- 21.8%
- R²
- 0.05
- Ann. Volatility
- 34.2%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 214,250,000 (as of 2026-04-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
37 filers$328.87M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $47.98M | 14.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $45.34M | 13.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $30.88M | 9.39% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $30.83M | 9.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $25.02M | 7.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA Custodian | $20.35M | 6.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $20.33M | 6.18% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $18.48M | 5.62% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | ADAPT Investment Managers SA | $17.95M | 5.46% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $11.20M | 3.41% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $8.76M | 2.66% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $7.78M | 2.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $6.30M | 1.91% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $5.27M | 1.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Walleye Capital LLC | $4.98M | 1.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $4.16M | 1.27% | 2025-09-30 |
| 17 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $3.93M | 1.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $3.02M | 0.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.97M | 0.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $2.66M | 0.81% | 2025-09-30 |
| 21 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $2.51M | 0.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $1.77M | 0.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.53M | 0.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $1.05M | 0.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $694.26K | 0.21% | 2026-03-31 |
43 filers$495.87M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $120.18M | 24.24% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $91.95M | 18.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $49.60M | 10.00% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $44.96M | 9.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $24.90M | 5.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $22.46M | 4.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | ADAPT Investment Managers SA | $17.95M | 3.62% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $17.55M | 3.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $15.30M | 3.08% | 2025-09-30 |
| 10 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $10.25M | 2.07% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | Oribel Capital Management, LP | $9.96M | 2.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $9.31M | 1.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Walleye Trading LLC | $8.76M | 1.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $8.74M | 1.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $4.57M | 0.92% | 2025-09-30 |
| 16 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $4.07M | 0.82% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG\ Custodian | $3.76M | 0.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC Custodian | $2.87M | 0.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $2.71M | 0.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.61M | 0.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $2.51M | 0.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.47M | 0.50% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Walleye Capital LLC | $2.44M | 0.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.03M | 0.41% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | Centiva Capital, LP | $1.92M | 0.39% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-23
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | JOHN T CAHILL | Director | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $189.20 | $378.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | Omar Abbosh | Director | Award (A) | +1,553 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | KAREN BLASING | Director | Award (A) | +2,143 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Blake Irving | Director | Award (A) | +2,112 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | rami rahim | Director | Award (A) | +2,019 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Ram R. Krishnan | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Jeff Epstein | Director | Award (A) | +2,019 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Ayanna Howard | Director | Award (A) | +2,019 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Anna C Simons | Director | Award (A) | +2,019 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | JOHN T CAHILL | Director | Award (A) | +2,174 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Stacy J Smith | Director | Award (A) | +2,640 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-17 | Andrew Anagnost | President and CEO | Buy (P) | +2,460 | $202.66 | $498.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | Janesh Moorjani | EVP, Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +2,500 | $197.67 | $494.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-29 | Stacy J Smith | Director | Buy (P) | +3,435 | $231.17 | $794.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-14 | Steven M Blum | EVP, Chief Operating Officer | Award (A) | +12,921 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
57 insiders · @ $195.24
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eminence GP, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 13,082,588 | $2.55B | $0 | 1 | 2015-12-11 |
| 2 | Scott D. Ferguson | Director | 12,898,042 | $2.52B | $0 | 2 | 2016-03-14 |
| 3 | CAROL BARTZ | Executive Chairman | 1,138,178 | $222.22M | -$85.15M | 39 | 2008-09-09 |
| 4 | Andrew Anagnost | President and CEO | 202,963 | $39.63M | -$57.87M | 68 | 2026-06-17 |
| 5 | Amarpreet Hanspal | SVP & Chief Product Officer | 114,799 | $22.41M | -$5.93M | 30 | 2017-07-11 |
| 6 | George M Bado | EVP, Sales and Services | 106,772 | $20.85M | -$8.68M | 17 | 2010-12-22 |
| 7 | Ruth Ann Keene | EVP, Corp Affairs, CLO | 88,857 | $17.35M | -$870.0K | 12 | 2026-04-14 |
| 8 | Richard Scott Herren | Chief Financial Officer | 81,804 | $15.97M | -$7.40M | 28 | 2020-05-28 |
| 9 | Jay Bhatt | Sr. VP, AEC | 80,641 | $15.74M | -$6.44M | 21 | 2011-09-23 |
| 10 | STEVEN M WEST | Director | 79,920 | $15.60M | -$3.76M | 15 | 2016-06-17 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-09-29
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-29 | AYANNA M HOWARD | Director | 917 | $298.0K | 2025-09-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-05 | LORRIE NORRINGTON | Director | 1,478 | $477.8K | 2025-09-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-05 | BLUM FAMILY DECLARATION OF TR U/A DTD 04/20/2006 | Officer | 22,420 | $7.26M | 2025-09-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-03 | Ruth Keene | Officer | 2,761 | $870.0K | 2025-09-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-29 | AYANNA M HOWARD | Director | 3,159 | $1.03M | 2025-08-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-29 | REBECCA PEARCE | Officer | 6,129 | $1.98M | 2025-08-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-03 | REBECCA PEARCE | Officer | 3,251 | $1.02M | 2025-07-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-30 | REBECCA PEARCE | Officer | 3,110 | $964.1K | 2025-06-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-24 | REBECCA PEARCE | Officer | 2,544 | $775.9K | 2025-06-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-17 | REBECCA PEARCE | Officer | 486 | $145.8K | 2025-06-17 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-05-29
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-28 | 0001213900-26-062125 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | 0000769397-26-000041 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-24 | 0000769397-26-000024 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-26 | 0000769397-26-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-22 | 0000769397-26-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-25 | 0000769397-25-000126 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-28 | 0000769397-25-000114 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-14 | 0001213900-25-063446 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-20 | 0000769397-25-000075 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-06 | 0001193125-25-137060 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-03 | 0000769397-26-000015 | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-06 | 0000769397-25-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2024-06-10 | 0000769397-24-000090 | EDGAR |
| 2023-03-14 | 0000769397-23-000036 | EDGAR |
| 2022-03-14 | 0000769397-22-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2021-03-19 | 0000769397-21-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2020-03-19 | 0000769397-20-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2019-03-25 | 0000769397-19-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-22 | 0000769397-18-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2017-03-21 | 0000769397-17-000014 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | 0000769397-26-000044 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-26 | 0000769397-25-000129 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-02 | 0000769397-25-000117 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-29 | 0000769397-25-000071 | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-03 | 0000769397-24-000181 | EDGAR |
| 2024-09-03 | 0000769397-24-000150 | EDGAR |
| 2024-06-10 | 0000769397-24-000091 | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-04 | 0000769397-23-000193 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-29 | 0000769397-23-000159 | EDGAR |
| 2023-06-01 | 0000769397-23-000110 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 28.5 |
| P/B Ratio | 13.0 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $7.5B |
| TTM Net Income | $1.5B |
| TTM EPS | $6.85 |
| ROE | 45.9% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.78 |