GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·7d ago
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
ETF 99.02 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GDXJ
$99.02
—
Key stats
$99.02
- 52-Week Range
- $89.83 – $157.49
- YTD
- -12.53%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.07
- Straddle Price
- $10.45
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.59
- Open
- $99.85
- Day Range
- $98.78 – $101.06
- Volume
- 2,601,498
- Prev Close
- $99.62
About
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2009-11-10
- Has Options
- Yes
- Homepage
- https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/investments/etf/
Fund profile
holdings as of Nov 11, 2026issuer datathrough Jun 2026flows, SEC filings
- Expense ratio
- 0.52% issuer, Nov 13, 2026
- Assets
- $7.3B issuer-reported, Nov 11, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 2.66% paid annual
- Average daily volume
- $477M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 157 top 10 are 41.0%
- Listed
- Nov 10, 2009 NYSE Arca
- Last fee change
- +1 bp filed Apr 29, 2026
- Tracking difference
- -3.26 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Cost54
Liquidity100
Scale100
Diversification68
Moves with. Gold (60% of its variance, beta 1.38); US large-cap stocks (10% of its variance, beta 0.80). These factors explain 80% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (the Fund) seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (the Junior Gold Miners Index or the Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 157 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Metals & Mining ETFs
Fund flows
through Jun 2026SEC filings- Jun 2026
- −$95M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$438M −6.2% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$1.2B −16.9% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | −$95M |
| May 2026 | −$202M |
| Apr 2026 | −$141M |
| Mar 2026 | −$222M |
| Feb 2026 | −$685M |
| Jan 2026 | +$115M |
| Dec 2025 | −$135M |
| Nov 2025 | −$179M |
| Oct 2025 | +$18M |
| Sep 2025 | +$213M |
| Aug 2025 | +$135M |
| Jul 2025 | −$21M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
Similar funds
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF | 33% | 0.51% | $25.3B | +6.7% | compare |
| GOEXGlobal X Gold Explorers ETF (NEW) | 27% | 0.65% | $107M | +5.0% | compare |
| SILJAmplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 21% | 0.69% | $3.0B | +1.4% | compare |
| SILGlobal X Silver Miners ETF (NEW) | 19% | 0.65% | $3.7B | +10.0% | compare |
| AUMIThemes Gold Miners ETF | 19% | 0.35% | $20M | +4.2% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
Look-through: what the holdings say
weights as of Nov 11, 2026issuer data- Holdings vs fair value
- +27.4% 71% under, 2% over · 52% covered
- Insider buying
- 0% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 10% net selling
- 13F holders
- +6.2% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 0.8% of weight in 7 days; 0.8% in 14
Holdings reporting in the next 14 days · weighted implied move this week 0.09%
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
What changed in the portfolio
Nov 3, 2026 → Nov 4, 2026| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New position | Torex Resources Inc | — | 1.07% | — |
0 new, 0 exited, 0 increased and 0 decreased between the fund's two latest holdings reports; turnover 0.8%. Full holdings and history
Under the hood
fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025SEC census- Authorized participants
- 6 active of 40 with agreements; top 3 did 95%
- Created · redeemed
- $565M · $1.8B over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 99% creations 95% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 4.66% of assets on loan on average; earned 4.6 bp
- Return vs index
- -3.26 pts after fees; -1.87 before; daily s.d. 0.70
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-11-12
Holdings
157
AUM
$7.3B
Provider
VanEck
Inception
2009-11-10
Exchange
ARCX
Data As Of
2026-11-12
Expense Ratio
0.52%
Dividend Yield
2.68%
Distribution
Annual
Recent distributions
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-22 | 2025-12-26 | $2.6494 | CD |
| 2024-12-23 | 2024-12-24 | $1.1144 | CD |
| 2023-12-18 | 2023-12-22 | $0.2736 | CD |
| 2022-12-19 | 2022-12-23 | $0.1825 | CD |
| 2021-12-20 | 2021-12-27 | $0.7454 | CD |
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 50 of 157 holdings
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGI | Alamos Gold Inc | 6.55% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| EQX | Equinox Gold Corp | 6.25% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| CDE | Coeur Mining Inc | 6.17% | Equity (US) | US |
| — | Endeavour Mining Plc | 5.61% | Equity (Foreign) | GB |
| IAG | Iamgold Corp | 5.40% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv | 2.56% | Equity (Foreign) | MX |
| — | Lundin Gold Inc | 2.21% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| HL | Hecla Mining Co | 2.14% | Equity (US) | US |
| AG | First Majestic Silver Corp | 2.10% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| BTG | B2gold Corp | 1.91% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | G Mining Ventures Corp | 1.88% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| OGC | Oceanagold Corp | 1.83% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Dundee Precious Metals Inc | 1.75% | Equity (US) | — |
| HMY | Harmony Gold Mining Co Ltd | 1.60% | Equity (Foreign) | ZA |
| EGO | Eldorado Gold Corp | 1.54% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| BVN | Cia De Minas Buenaventura Saa | 1.47% | Equity (Foreign) | PE |
| SSRM | Ssr Mining Inc | 1.44% | Equity (US) | — |
| — | Perseus Mining Ltd | 1.39% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| — | Discovery Mining Ltd | 1.37% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| OR | Or Royalties Inc | 1.35% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Ramelius Resources Ltd | 1.31% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| — | Artemis Gold Inc | 1.24% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Zhaojin Mining Industry Co Ltd | 1.16% | Equity (Foreign) | CN |
| — | K92 Mining Inc | 1.15% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Torex Resources Inc | 1.10% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Montage Gold Corp | 1.09% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Genesis Minerals Ltd | 1.06% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| — | Vault Minerals Ltd | 1.05% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| CGAU | Centerra Gold Inc | 1.02% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Capricorn Metals Ltd | 1.02% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| AUGO | Aura Minerals Inc | 1.00% | Equity (Foreign) | BR |
| — | Greatland Resources Ltd | 0.95% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| ARIS | Aris Mining Corp | 0.93% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| AYA | Aya Gold & Silver Inc | 0.91% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| SKE | Skeena Resources Ltd | 0.88% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd/Canada | 0.83% | Equity (US) | — |
| — | Pan African Resources Plc | 0.82% | Equity (US) | — |
| — | Westgold Resources Ltd | 0.79% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| TFPM | Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp | 0.75% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| FSM | Fortuna Silver Mines Inc | 0.73% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Wanguo Gold Group Ltd | 0.72% | Equity (US) | — |
| — | Regis Resources Ltd | 0.72% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| — | Emerald Resources Nl | 0.70% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| EXK | Endeavour Silver Corp | 0.66% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| SA | Seabridge Gold Inc | 0.65% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| AAUC | Allied Gold Corp | 0.65% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Hochschild Mining Plc | 0.62% | Equity (US) | — |
| SVM | Silvercorp Metals Inc | 0.60% | Equity (Foreign) | CA |
| — | Pdi Gold Ltd | 0.60% | Equity (Foreign) | AU |
| PPTA | Perpetua Resources Corp | 0.50% | Equity (US) | — |
Geographic Breakdown
Non-Equity Breakdown
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF ·
NPORT-P period 2026-06-30
(filed 2026-08-26)
Net assets:
$7.08B
· 117 total positions
· equity 99.92%
· non-equity 1.05%
Non-equity holdings
— 1 positions,
1.05% of NAV
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 1.05% | $74.3M | 1 |
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -13.73% | -6.58% | 5.67% | -9.19% | 7.90% | 9.62% | -1.05% |
| Feb | -13.60% | 10.93% | -15.23% | -9.46% | -0.96% | 25.88% | -0.41% |
| Mar | 0.04% | 3.37% | 13.47% | 16.55% | 17.65% | -22.57% | 4.75% |
| Apr | 1.56% | -10.89% | -1.68% | 3.21% | 7.89% | -7.11% | -1.17% |
| May | 10.44% | -6.95% | -5.71% | 10.69% | 11.22% | 3.39% | 3.85% |
| Jun | -14.83% | -19.17% | -7.38% | -6.52% | -2.66% | -14.53% | -10.85% |
| Jul | -1.82% | 1.72% | 3.29% | 9.98% | -4.97% | -3.64% | 0.76% |
| Aug | -5.48% | -11.61% | -0.83% | 2.36% | 23.10% | 29.65% | 6.20% |
| Sep | -10.48% | 4.51% | -9.36% | 11.69% | 19.37% | -6.81% | 1.49% |
| Oct | 12.83% | -4.81% | 7.41% | 3.66% | -6.24% | -15.55% | -0.45% |
| Nov | -2.20% | 17.46% | 15.08% | -6.22% | 18.68% | 1.91%* | 7.45% |
| Dec | 2.07% | -3.99% | -3.88% | -8.77% | 5.08% | -- | -1.90% |
| Total | -33.35% | -27.58% | -3.73% | 14.12% | 139.78% | -12.12% | 12.85% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $103.03
SMA 50: $111.89
SMA 200: $116.64
Current: $99.02
EMA 12: $103.24
EMA 26: $105.50
MACD: -2.2601 | Signal: 0.4275
BEARISH
ADX (14): 18.33
RANGE
+DI: 25.51
−DI: 34.75
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 42.02
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 37.41
Stoch %D: 52.83
Williams %R: -72.65
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $112.46
BB Lower: $93.59
NEUTRAL
OBV: 122,716,215
Vol SMA 20: 4,976,825
Vol ROC: -66.92%
ATR: $4.78
True Range: $2.28
HV 20: 63.2%
HV 30: 57.9%
HV 60: 52.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-15T00:00:00 – 2026-11-13T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish MACD signal
- High volatility (beta = 1.44)
- Recent negative news headlines
Primary Risks:
- Technical breakdown below $108.53 support level
- Options market pricing a significant move ($13.10) which could lead to increased uncertainty and volatility
Investment Thesis: GDXJ's recent performance is driven by the gold mining sector's rally, but the bearish MACD signal suggests potential reversal. The high volatility and negative news headlines increase the risk profile.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Neutral (News Headlines 1-3 are positive, while News Headline 6 is negative)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Downtrend
- Medium-term: Range-bound
- Long-term: Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- $108.53 (lower Bollinger Band)
- $110.42 (SMA 20)
- $121.66 (SMA 50)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): Neutral (36.77)
- MACD: Bearish (-1.47 / Signal: -0.82 / Histogram: -0.65)
- Bollinger Bands: Squeeze (neutral signal)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: Increasing
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): Increasing
- Volume Rate of Change: Increasing
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are mixed, with positive sentiment from the gold mining sector's performance and central banks' buying activity. However, negative sentiment is introduced by Nvidia's signal for stocks and precious metals.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (Positive and Negative headlines balance out)
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming events: Earnings releases and market developments
Market Narrative: The news headlines contradict the technical signals to some extent, as the positive sentiment from the gold mining sector and central banks' buying activity is not reflected in the bearish MACD signal.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 1.44 (High volatility)
- Alpha: 0.42
- Correlation: 0.35
- Stock Volatility: 0.49 (Interpretation: High volatility - stock moves more than market)
Options Market Signals: The options market is pricing a significant move ($13.10), which could lead to increased uncertainty and volatility.
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: $108.53, $110.42
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels and position sizing
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: GDXJ is outperforming the gold mining sector in the short-term.
Institutional Activity: Increasing volume and on-balance volume suggest institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves relatively independently of the market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative Valuation: GDXJ is trading within its historic range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- $108.53 (lower Bollinger Band)
- $110.42 (SMA 20)
- $121.66 (SMA 50)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $132.30 (upper Bollinger Band) or breakdown below $108.53
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings releases and market developments could impact the stock's performance.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: $105.00, position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance.
Generated
News
All GDXJ news →
Investing.comT3·4mo ago
BenzingaT3·7mo ago
BenzingaT3·7mo ago
BenzingaT3·7mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·7mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
Investing.comT3·10mo ago
Investing.comT3·12mo ago
BenzingaT3·12mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
GDXJ Options Activity & IV Rank
GDXJ IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 48.6%
7-DTE IV: 50.1%
Expected Move: $10.45
7-DTE Move: $5.49
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-12-11)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 20,030
Put Volume: 11,753
P/C Volume: 0.587
BULLISH
Call OI: 170,560
Put OI: 97,322
P/C OI: 0.571
Total OI: 267,882
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $5.50
ATM Put: $4.95
Call %: 5.6%
Put %: 5.0%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 31,783
Chain OI: 267,882
Last Updated: 11/13/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 17th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
17%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.12
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.38
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.50
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.38: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.50: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 214 ATM contracts, 87k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Put vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Call vs ATM
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Reading them together
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 13 · ATM 46.0% / Put —
30 DTE / 10d put
56%
+4.2
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 13 · ATM 48.1% / Put 52.4%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)50.8MediumNov 13
IV Rank (30 DTE)44.1MediumNov 13
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$10.45Nov 13
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.1597
Alpha: -10.52%
Correlation: 0.5196
R-Squared: 27.0%
Stock Volatility: 56.7%
Market Volatility: 13.6%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
GDXJ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 223 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
18 filers$572.31M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $175.03M | 30.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $136.65M | 23.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $86.21M | 15.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $66.38M | 11.60% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $54.21M | 9.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $19.49M | 3.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $12.39M | 2.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $6.05M | 1.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | K2 PRINCIPAL FUND, L.P. | $5.95M | 1.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $3.96M | 0.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Vontobel Holding Ltd. | $2.05M | 0.36% | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $1.47M | 0.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Beacon Pointe Advisors, LLC | $1.25M | 0.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | PEAK6 LLC | $422.48K | 0.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Tidal Investments LLC | $334.05K | 0.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | STG SECURITIES, LLC | $235.80K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. | $196.50K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Sequoia Financial Advisors, LLC | $9.82K | <0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
16 filers$509.30M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jain Global LLC | $136.56M | 26.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $99.58M | 19.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $99.04M | 19.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $66.38M | 13.03% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $35.30M | 6.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | K2 PRINCIPAL FUND, L.P. | $19.16M | 3.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Anson Funds Management LP | $14.74M | 2.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $13.86M | 2.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $10.41M | 2.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $6.46M | 1.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Marshall Wace, LLP Custodian | $3.65M | 0.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $1.92M | 0.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Spruce Point Capital Management, LLC | $982.50K | 0.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $589.50K | 0.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Vontobel Holding Ltd. | $455.80K | 0.09% | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | Pavaki Capital Management LLC | $227.90K | 0.04% | 2026-09-30 |
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
6.27M
SI % of Float
8.49%
Days to Cover
1.50
Short Vol Ratio
42.8%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-10-30 • Short volume 2026-11-13
Constituent Performance
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
Constituents
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|