Super Micro Computer, Inc. Common Stock(SMCI)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $19.48 – $62.36
- YTD
- -19.27%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 55.63
- Straddle Price
- $5.72
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.22
- Market Cap
- $16.0B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.58% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.33% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.48% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | -20.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj -25bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-6.8B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 16.5% |
| Book / Price | 45.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.4% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -20.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.62 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $33.39 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $28.99 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 121.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $3.4B |
| Market Cap | $17B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $81.58 | 13% | median 39.2× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $48.85 | 13% | median 20.9× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $81.70 | 3% | median 7.2× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | $276.59 | 8% | median 5.0× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $33.39 | 36% | stability 64% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $44.23 | 28% | 37 strikes · skew +0.66 |
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS (3571)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $16.0B
Super Micro Computer Inc provides high-performance server technology services to cloud computing, data centers, high-performance computing, and the Internet of Things embedded markets. Its solutions include servers, storage systems, modular blade servers, workstations, full-rack scale solutions, networking devices, server sub-systems, and server management. These turn-key solutions are designed, developed, validated, and installed for AI datacenters. The company has one operating segment that develops and provides high-performance server solutions based upon a, modular and open-standard archit…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +8.93% | 18 |
| Feb | +8.13% | 18 |
| Mar | -1.85% | 19 |
| Apr | -1.02% | 19 |
| May | +16.06% | 19 |
| Jun | +0.03% | 19 |
| Jul | +1.68% | 19 |
| Aug | -6.95% | 18 |
| Sep | +1.34% | 17 |
| Oct | -3.18% | 17 |
| Nov | +4.79% | 17 |
| Dec | +3.28% | 17 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | After-Close | 15.40% | 14.75% | 0.96x | Within |
| 2024-11-05 | After-Close | 30.11% | 6.16% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-02-11 | After-Close | 21.14% | 6.35% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2025-05-06 | After-Close | 11.94% | 2.53% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2025-08-05 | After-Close | 15.90% | 10.90% | 0.69x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | After-Close | 11.15% | 10.26% | 0.92x | Within |
| 2026-02-03 | After-Close | 13.42% | 14.57% | 1.09x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-05 | After-Close | 14.44% | 24.44% | 1.69x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 55.63
- IV Rank (7D)
- 94.34
- Avg IV
- 110.5%
- Straddle (30D)
- $5.72
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.51
- P/C Volume
- 0.22
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 3.47
- Correlation (SPY)
- 50.3%
- R²
- 0.25
- Ann. Volatility
- 87.1%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.6%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $628.84M | 23.34% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $416.50M | 15.46% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $246.79M | 9.16% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Tidal Investments LLC | $219.21M | 8.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $173.30M | 6.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $145.75M | 5.41% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $135.74M | 5.04% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $86.13M | 3.20% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $75.71M | 2.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $68.31M | 2.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $63.35M | 2.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $51.76M | 1.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | BARCLAYS PLC Custodian | $45.77M | 1.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $44.72M | 1.66% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $41.66M | 1.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $38.09M | 1.41% | 2025-09-30 |
| 17 | Caption Management, LLC | $32.79M | 1.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Walleye Trading LLC | $30.45M | 1.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $16.75M | 0.62% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $14.95M | 0.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $12.76M | 0.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $10.31M | 0.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $10.10M | 0.37% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $9.95M | 0.37% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | Man Group plc | $9.34M | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $324.48M | 13.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $309.60M | 12.75% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $194.77M | 8.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $138.78M | 5.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $111.57M | 4.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | WHITEBOX ADVISORS LLC | $104.74M | 4.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN Custodian | $99.53M | 4.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $92.40M | 3.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $80.85M | 3.33% | 2025-09-30 |
| 10 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $67.95M | 2.80% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | HIGHBRIDGE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $67.24M | 2.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $60.05M | 2.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $56.02M | 2.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $55.70M | 2.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $55.27M | 2.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | PEAK6 LLC | $51.63M | 2.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | LMR Partners LLP | $49.40M | 2.03% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA /FI/ Custodian | $40.99M | 1.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $38.51M | 1.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $37.03M | 1.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | Sculptor Capital LP | $26.90M | 1.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $25.59M | 1.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. | $24.61M | 1.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | CANTOR FITZGERALD, L. P. | $22.77M | 0.94% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $22.36M | 0.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | TALLY C LIU | Director | Exer (M) | +2,691 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Susan Mogensen | Director | Exer (M) | +5,383 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Judy L. Lin | Director | Exer (M) | +5,383 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | DAVID E WEIGAND | SVP, Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +9,687 | $27.65 | -$277.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Liang Chiu-Chu Sara Liu | Director | Mixed | +741 | $27.65 | -$24.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | ROBERT L BLAIR | Director | Exer (M) | +5,383 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Scott Angel | Director | Exer (M) | +5,383 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Vikranth Malyala | SVP, Chief Business Officer | Mixed | +3,801 | $27.65 | -$108.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Charles Liang | President and CEO | Mixed | +741 | $27.65 | -$24.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-12 | Kenneth Cheung | SVP, Chief Accounting Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-28 | Liang Chiu-Chu Sara Liu | Director | Gift (G) | −340,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-28 | Charles Liang | President and CEO | Gift (G) | −340,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Kenneth Cheung | SVP, Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +801 | $35.37 | -$15.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Charles Liang | President and CEO | Mixed | +2,863 | $35.37 | -$118.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Liang Chiu-Chu Sara Liu | Director | Mixed | +2,863 | $35.37 | -$118.7K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Liang | President and CEO | 41,060,379 | $992.84M | -$121.30M | 172 | 2026-07-02 |
| 2 | Liang Chiu-Chu Sara Liu | Director | 25,966,779 | $627.88M | -$121.57M | 169 | 2026-07-02 |
| 3 | Yih-Shyan Wally Liaw | Director | 15,278,712 | $369.44M | -$5.26M | 65 | 2026-02-19 |
| 4 | Hwei-Ming Fred Tsai | Director | 6,136,000 | $148.37M | -$6.66M | 56 | 2021-05-12 |
| 5 | Alex Hsu | Chief Operating Officer | 1,746,940 | $42.24M | -$568.0K | 21 | 2021-02-18 |
| 6 | Shiow-Meei S Liaw | 10%+ Owner | 1,594,360 | $38.55M | -$3.01M | 11 | 2011-06-02 |
| 7 | SHIU LEUNG CHAN | Director | 429,170 | $10.38M | $4.29M | 16 | 2024-02-05 |
| 8 | Saria Tseng | Director | 298,890 | $7.23M | $0 | 7 | 2021-08-05 |
| 9 | TALLY C LIU | Director | 288,738 | $6.98M | -$835.9K | 20 | 2026-07-02 |
| 10 | Michael S McAndrews | Director | 216,000 | $5.22M | $0 | 6 | 2021-05-12 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-26 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 20,216 | $742.0K | 2026-05-26 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-22 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 136,126 | $4.78M | 2026-05-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 54,670 | $1.78M | 2026-05-20 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 20,000 | $622.5K | 2026-05-19 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 67,879 | $2.04M | 2026-05-18 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 30,000 | $997.5K | 2026-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 144/A | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 10,000 | $355.5K | 2026-05-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Former Director | 10,000 | $330.0K | 2026-05-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | YIH-SHYAN W LIAW | Director | 10,000 | $355.5K | 2026-05-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-26 | Sherman Tuan | Board of Director | 48,630 | $1.60M | 2025-11-26 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | 0001375365-26-000015 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | 0001375365-26-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-20 | 0001375365-26-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-20 | 0001375365-26-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-03 | 0001375365-26-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-29 | 0001375365-26-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-26 | 0001375365-26-000004 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-02 | 0001375365-26-000001 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-29 | 0001375365-25-000031 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-04 | 0001375365-25-000029 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-28 | 0001375365-25-000027 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-25 | 0001375365-25-000004 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-28 | 0001375365-23-000036 | EDGAR |
| 2022-08-29 | 0001375365-22-000103 | EDGAR |
| 2021-08-27 | 0001375365-21-000060 | EDGAR |
| 2020-08-31 | 0001375365-20-000064 | EDGAR |
| 2019-12-19 | 0001375365-19-000079 | EDGAR |
| 2019-05-17 | 0001375365-19-000039 | EDGAR |
| 2016-08-26 | 0001628280-16-019274 | EDGAR |
| 2015-09-10 | 0001628280-15-007025 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 0001375365-26-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-06 | 0001375365-26-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-07 | 0001375365-25-000030 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-12 | 0001375365-25-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-25 | 0001375365-25-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-25 | 0001375365-25-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-06 | 0001375365-24-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-02 | 0001375365-24-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-03 | 0001375365-23-000041 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-05 | 0001375365-23-000028 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 13.2 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.1 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7 |
| TTM Revenue | $33.7B |
| TTM Net Income | $1.2B |
| TTM EPS | $1.89 |
| ROE | 16.5% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.89 |