CLB Core Laboratories Inc.
XNYS
10.22
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $9.13 – $20.36
- YTD
- -39.71%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 43.52
- Straddle Price
- $1.38
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.15
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
- Open
- $9.80
- Day Range
- $9.80 – $10.35
- Volume
- 526,976
- Prev Close
- $9.91
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.09 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.93% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.79% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +114.8pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 32.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -7.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 8.8% |
| Book / Price | 58.3% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 19.5% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 2.1% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.41 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +25.7% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $11.15 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $9.99 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 98.9% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.1B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $-0.10 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $10.32 | 11% | median 19.8× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $9.22 | 11% | median 8.3× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $10.13 | 11% | median 1.7× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $19.32 | 11% | median 1.7× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.15 | 56% | stability 75% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $9.36 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew -0.20 |

- Industry (SIC)
- OIL & GAS FIELD SERVICES, NEC (1389) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
- Employees
- 3,300
- List Date
- 1995-09-21
- CIK
- 0001958086
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-28 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.17 (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- Houston, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.corelab.com
Core Laboratories Inc is a providers of proprietary and patented reservoir description and production enhancement services and products to the oil and gas industry, through client relationships. The company operates its business in two segments; Reservoir Description, and Production Enhancement. It provides data and analytics to aid well operators in determining optimal methods for recovering, processing, and refining hydrocarbons from a well. It also manufactures the associated lab equipment for its services. The company generates majority of its revenue from Reservoir Description segment.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 19.15% | 9.17% | 34.10% | -9.83% | -7.06% | 15.28% | 10.13% |
| Feb | 4.87% | -0.43% | -7.44% | -0.40% | -11.60% | -10.21% | -4.20% |
| Mar | -21.85% | 14.98% | -15.36% | 10.48% | 7.53% | -2.84% | -1.18% |
| Apr | -6.38% | -19.83% | -4.50% | -7.76% | -24.10% | -9.06% | -11.94% |
| May | 42.95% | 10.60% | -0.73% | 19.29% | -7.96% | -2.84% | 10.22% |
| Jun | -6.05% | -31.07% | -0.43% | 13.29% | 8.17% | -16.01% | -5.35% |
| Jul | -14.70% | -4.49% | 16.55% | 22.57% | -8.45% | -9.98% | 0.25% |
| Aug | -16.66% | -10.38% | -12.36% | -15.83% | 9.31% | 16.06% | -4.98% |
| Sep | 1.06% | -16.64% | -3.65% | -1.33% | 5.28% | -21.71% | -6.17% |
| Oct | -10.46% | 31.04% | -8.19% | -1.61% | 26.71% | 4.71%* | 7.03% |
| Nov | -13.66% | 10.05% | -15.75% | 7.67% | -6.50% | -- | -3.64% |
| Dec | -0.45% | -5.72% | -2.27% | -17.61% | 4.16% | -- | -4.38% |
| Total | -32.11% | -25.89% | -26.22% | 9.89% | -13.20% | -36.08% | -20.60% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for CLB:
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market with neutral momentum
- Recent news headlines are generally positive, supporting the stock's recent gains
- Options activity indicates moderate volatility and bullish sentiment
Primary Risks:
- Potential breakdown below SMA 50 support level
- Increased selling pressure if IV rank remains low
Investment Thesis: CLB is currently trading within a range-bound market, with technical indicators suggesting a neutral momentum. Recent positive news headlines have supported the stock's recent gains, but options activity indicates moderate volatility and bullish sentiment. The company's earnings information is not available, but its beta and alpha values suggest a defensive positioning. Overall, CLB presents a relatively low-risk investment opportunity with potential for long-term growth.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines are generally positive, supporting the stock's recent gains. Headlines 3-5 have had a significant impact on the stock price, with positive sentiment driving the upward trend.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Range-bound (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: Uptrend (1-3 months)
- Long-term: Neutral (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: The SMA 50 ($11.66) serves as a key support level, while the upper Bollinger Band ($12.74) represents resistance.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (58.81), indicating no strong buying or selling pressure
- MACD signal: Bullish, with a positive crossover above the signal line
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, with no significant price action
Volume Analysis: The volume SMA 20 ($487819.79) suggests moderate institutional interest, while the OBV (-9467227.55) indicates a decrease in buying pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are generally positive, supporting the stock's recent gains. News headlines 3-5 have had a significant impact on the stock price, with positive sentiment driving the upward trend.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is Positive (Headlines 3-5), indicating a bullish market narrative.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming events or catalysts that could drive future price movements are not available. However, the options activity suggests moderate volatility and bullish sentiment, which may continue to support the stock's upward trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Analysis: Beta: 0.98 (vs SPY), indicating a defensive positioning
Volatility Regime: The current volatility level is Moderate (0.56), with no significant increases or decreases in recent trading activity.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Low (1.9%), suggesting historically low volatility
- Current IV: 77.9%, indicating moderate implied volatility
- Expected Move: $1.75 (42 DTE), 7-DTE: $1.25, suggesting a potential price movement
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The energy sector is currently trading within a range-bound market, with no significant upward or downward trends.
Institutional Activity: The volume SMA 20 ($487819.79) suggests moderate institutional interest in the stock.
Correlation Analysis: The correlation between CLB and SPY is 0.22, indicating a relatively low correlation.
Relative Valuation: CLB is trading within its normal price range, with no significant deviations from its historical volatility.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 50 ($11.66)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($12.74)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Technical breakdown below SMA 50 support level
- Breakout above upper Bollinger Band resistance
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No time-sensitive catalysts are available, but the options activity suggests moderate volatility and bullish sentiment.
Risk Management: A stop-loss level could be set at $11.66 (SMA 50) to manage risk in case of a technical breakdown. Position sizing considerations suggest a conservative approach given the low IV rank.
Please let me know if you would like me to revise or expand on this analysis!
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | After-Close | 11.53% | 0.77% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2023-11-01 | After-Close | 10.61% | 1.09% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2024-01-31 | After-Close | 11.92% | 4.69% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2024-04-24 | After-Close | 14.70% | 3.27% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2024-07-24 | After-Close | 10.45% | 10.58% | 1.01x | Exceeded |
| 2024-10-23 | After-Close | 11.86% | 10.89% | 0.92x | Within |
| 2025-01-29 | After-Close | 11.46% | 4.26% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2025-04-23 | After-Close | 15.12% | 3.81% | 0.25x | Within |
| 2025-07-23 | After-Close | 15.85% | 5.86% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2025-10-22 | Pre-Market | 19.10% | 6.06% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2026-02-04 | Pre-Market | 13.11% | 0.15% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2026-04-29 | After-Close | 10.84% | 15.32% | 1.41x | Exceeded |
| 2026-07-29 | Pre-Market | 17.54% | 7.67% | 0.44x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
CLB Options Activity & IV Rank
CLB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 19th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $4.3M | #2213 of 6285 | +140.1% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $169K | #2914 of 3138 | -71.3% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $2K | #4395 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CLB Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $212.03K | 56.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $120.00K | 31.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $39.61K | 10.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $6.99K | 1.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walleye Capital LLC | $3.50K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
CLB Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-05| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-05 | Sow Hang Teo | CAO & Treasurer | Mixed | +151 | $9.76 | -$966 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | Mark Damian Tattoli | SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary | Mixed | +424 | $9.76 | -$2.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Lawrence Bruno | Chairman and CEO | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $10.78 | $53.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Mark Damian Tattoli | SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary | Mixed | +151 | $10.64 | -$1.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Sow Hang Teo | CAO & Treasurer | Mixed | +242 | $10.64 | -$2.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | Mark Damian Tattoli | SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary | Mixed | +153 | $14.07 | -$1.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-08 | Katherine Murray | Director | Exer (M) | +8,069 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Curt Anastasio | Director | Exer (M) | +8,069 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Kwaku Temeng | Director | Exer (M) | +8,069 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Harvey Robert Klingensmith | Director | Exer (M) | +8,069 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Robert F Martinovich | Director | Exer (M) | +8,069 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Martha Z. Carnes | Director | Exer (M) | +8,069 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-17 | Sow Hang Teo | CAO & Treasurer | Grant (A) | +7,526 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-17 | Gwendolyn Gresham | SVP | Grant (A) | +33,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-17 | Mark Damian Tattoli | SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary | Grant (A) | +33,490 RSU | — | EDGAR |
CLB Insider Holdings
12 insiders · @ $10.22| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawrence Bruno | Chairman and CEO | 262,438 | $2.68M | $158.5K | 25 | 2026-08-04 |
| 2 | Christopher Scott Hill | SVP & CFO | 142,413 | $1.46M | $0 | 40 | 2026-02-17 |
| 3 | Martha Z. Carnes | Director | 54,397 | $555.9K | $23.0K | 12 | 2026-04-07 |
| 4 | Gwendolyn Gresham | SVP | 52,527 | $536.8K | $0 | 13 | 2026-02-17 |
| 5 | Harvey Robert Klingensmith | Director | 50,031 | $511.3K | $0 | 7 | 2026-04-07 |
| 6 | Kwaku Temeng | Director | 33,597 | $343.4K | $0 | 6 | 2026-04-07 |
| 7 | Mark Damian Tattoli | SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary | 30,059 | $307.2K | $0 | 29 | 2026-10-05 |
| 8 | Katherine Murray | Director | 29,290 | $299.3K | $0 | 4 | 2026-04-08 |
| 9 | Michael Straughen | Director | 24,552 | $250.9K | $12.6K | 11 | 2025-04-02 |
| 10 | Curt Anastasio | Director | 23,805 | $243.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-04-07 |
CLB Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 5, 2026Directors 7
- Martha Z. Carnes · since Jul 1, 2016
- Lawrence Bruno · listed since Feb 2020
- Harvey Robert Klingensmith · since May 20, 2020
- Kwaku Temeng · since May 19, 2021
- Katherine Murray · since May 19, 2022
- Curt Anastasio · since Jun 28, 2023
- Robert F Martinovich · since May 21, 2025
Officers 5
- Lawrence Bruno · Chairman and CEO · listed since Jan 2021
- Christopher Scott Hill · SVP & CFO · listed since Feb 2019
- Mark Damian Tattoli · SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary · since Jul 2, 2021
- Gwendolyn Gresham · SVP · since Feb 4, 2021
- Sow Hang Teo · CAO & Treasurer · since Mar 21, 2024
Changes in the last 10 years (23)
| May 21, 2025 | Robert F Martinovich became a director |
| Mar 21, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Kevin Daniels as CAO & Treasurer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 21, 2024 | Sow Hang Teo became CAO & Treasurer |
| Jun 28, 2023 | Curt Anastasio became a director |
| May 19, 2022 | Katherine Murray became a director (predecessor company) |
| Jul 2, 2021 | Mark Damian Tattoli became SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary (predecessor company) |
| May 19, 2021 | Kwaku Temeng became a director (predecessor company) |
| Feb 4, 2021 | Gwendolyn Gresham became SVP (predecessor company) |
| Jan 5, 2021 | Mark F Elvig listed as SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary (previously VP, Counsel & Secretary) in SEC filings (predecessor company) |
| Jan 5, 2021 | Lawrence Bruno listed as Chairman and CEO (previously President & COO) in SEC filings (predecessor company) |
| May 20, 2020 | Harvey Robert Klingensmith became a director (predecessor company) |
| May 20, 2020 | Eeuwijk Monique van Dijken became a director (predecessor company) |
| May 19, 2020 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| May 19, 2020 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 31, 2020 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc became a 10% owner (predecessor company) |
| Mar 31, 2020 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC became a 10% owner (predecessor company) |
| Feb 4, 2020 | Lawrence Bruno first listed as a director in an SEC filing (predecessor company) |
| Jan 3, 2020 | Lawrence Bruno listed as President & COO (previously President) in SEC filings (predecessor company) |
| May 23, 2019 | Gregory Barry Barnett became a director (predecessor company) |
| Feb 14, 2019 | Christopher Scott Hill listed as SVP & CFO (previously VP and CFO) in SEC filings (predecessor company) |
| Sep 5, 2018 | Christopher Scott Hill listed as VP and CFO (previously Chief Accounting Officer) in SEC filings (predecessor company) |
| May 25, 2018 | Kevin Daniels became CAO & Treasurer (predecessor company) |
| Feb 8, 2018 | Lawrence Bruno became President (predecessor company) |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (12)
- Michael Straughen · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2025
- Eeuwijk Monique van Dijken · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 3, 2023
- Gregory Barry Barnett · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 4, 2022
- Margaret Ann van Kempen · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 5, 2021
- Mark F Elvig · Last reported as SVP, Gen Counsel & Secretary in an SEC filing dated Feb 23, 2021
- Jan Willem Sodderland · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 11, 2020
- David M Demshur · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2020
- Lucia van Geuns · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2019
- Charles L Dunlap · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2019
- Monty L Davis · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Feb 15, 2018
- Richard L Bergmark · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 15, 2018
- Michael C Kearney · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 5, 2017
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $11.7M | $74.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $10.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $6.2M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $5.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $4.4M | $13.9B | 2026-10-23 |
| 6 | VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $4.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | XES State Street® SPDR® S&P® Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 1.07% | $3.8M | $351.5M | 2026-10-23 |
| 8 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $3.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 9 | OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | VanEck | 0.15% | $2.9M | $1.9B | 2026-10-23 |
| 10 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $2.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $2.6M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.03% | $2.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 13 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $1.7M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 14 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $1.4M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 15 | DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | Nport | 0.06% | $1.3M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $1.1M | $2.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 17 | CCNR ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | Nport | 0.21% | $896,069 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 18 | CVAR Cultivar ETF | Nport | 2.02% | $868,564 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 19 | IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.24% | $813,661 | $339.8M | 2026-10-23 |
| 20 | FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.03% | $733,112 | $2.3B | 2026-10-23 |
| 21 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $719,208 | $96.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 22 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $604,331 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 23 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $569,033 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $535,685 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 25 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.02% | $481,844 | $3.2B | 2026-10-23 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $124.61M | $5.96M | $0.13 | $7.81M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $121.80M | $-789.00K | $-0.02 | $3.96M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $138.25M | $4.41M | $0.10 | $7.95M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $134.52M | $14.52M | $0.31 | $8.50M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $130.16M | $10.64M | $0.22 | $13.92M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $123.58M | $-154.00K | — | $6.66M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $129.24M | $6.72M | $0.14 | $20.61M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $134.40M | $12.00M | $0.25 | $13.10M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $130.58M | $9.03M | $0.19 | $17.15M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $129.64M | $3.22M | $0.07 | $5.53M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $128.21M | $2.20M | $0.04 | $19.43M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $125.34M | $9.26M | $0.19 | $-212.00K |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.