ENX Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund
XASE
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- List Date
- 2002-08-28
- CIK
- 0001177162
- Homepage
- https://www.eatonvance.com
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund is principally engaged in managing investment funds and providing investment management and advisory services to high-net-worth individuals and institutions. It is a non-diversified, closed-end investment company. Its objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax, including alternative minimum tax, and, in state specific funds, taxes in specified state.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for ENX:
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Bullish MACD signal indicating a potential uptrend
- Low volatility, with Beta close to market average
- Recent news headlines are neutral, providing no significant catalysts
Primary risks:
- Potential reversal if RSI reaches overbought levels (>70)
- Limited institutional interest, as indicated by low volume activity
Investment thesis: ENX is a stable stock with a strong technical foundation, supported by a bullish MACD signal and low volatility. However, the lack of recent catalysts and relatively high RSI levels suggest that the stock may be due for a correction.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent news headlines are neutral, with no significant market-moving events or announcements. This has allowed the stock to trend upward without any major disruptions.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Uptrend, Medium-term: Neutral, Long-term: Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $9.95 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $10.04 (resistance)
Momentum Signals: RSI: 62.87 (neutral), MACD: Bullish signal, Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 44241.45 (low volume)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1551907.00 (in line with price action)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines regarding management changes, share repurchases, and earnings reports
Sentiment Assessment: Positive sentiment due to recent uptrend and bullish MACD signal
Catalyst Identification: No significant catalysts in the near term; earnings reports may provide a potential trigger
Market Narrative: The neutral news headlines have not disrupted the existing trend, allowing the stock to continue its upward movement.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta = 0.01)
Volatility Regime: Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 and lower Bollinger Band provide some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ENX is outperforming its sector, with a relative strength of 1.2
Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest as indicated by low volume activity
Correlation Analysis: ENX has a low correlation with the market (R-squared = 0.01), indicating some independence from broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: ENX is trading within its historical range, with no significant deviation from mean reversion signals.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support at SMA 20: $9.95
- Resistance at Upper Bollinger Band: $10.04
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above resistance (Upper Bollinger Band) would indicate a stronger uptrend
- Breakdown below support (SMA 20) could signal a correction
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No significant catalysts in the near term; earnings reports may provide a potential trigger
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels can be set at SMA 20 to mitigate potential losses.
Overall, ENX appears to be a stable stock with a strong technical foundation. However, the lack of recent catalysts and relatively high RSI levels suggest that the stock may be due for a correction. Risk management is crucial in this market environment.
ENX Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
ENX Institutional Ownership (13F)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ENX Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-06-23| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-23 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +1,972 | $9.18 | $18.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-18 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +59,418 | $9.16 | $544.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-16 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +50,976 | $9.16 | $467.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-12 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +14,130 | $9.17 | $129.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-10 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +30,842 | $9.16 | $282.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-09 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +17,984 | $9.15 | $164.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-05 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +29,804 | $9.13 | $272.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-03 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +17,744 | $9.16 | $162.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-24 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +23,238 | $9.11 | $211.7K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-22 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +41,456 | $9.14 | $378.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-21 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +21,018 | $9.19 | $193.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-17 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +90,208 | $9.13 | $823.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-15 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +47,076 | $9.05 | $426.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-10 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +100,914 | $9.27 | $935.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-08 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +98,136 | $9.55 | $937.2K | EDGAR |
ENX Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $10.00| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 3,898,946 | $38.99M | $12.27M | 45 | 2025-06-23 |
| 2 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | 3,897,960 | $38.98M | $18.21M | 33 | 2025-06-18 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $232.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $153.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $118.0M | $189.0B | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $55.5M | $76.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 5 | VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | Vanguard | 0.10% | $37.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $37.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.21% | $27.9M | $13.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 8 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.06% | $23.0M | $40.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 9 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $21.8M | $57.1B | 2026-10-23 |
| 10 | EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.22% | $19.6M | $9.1B | 2026-10-23 |
| 11 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $19.5M | $33.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $15.3M | $30.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 13 | EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $14.5M | $14.9B | 2026-10-23 |
| 14 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $14.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.47% | $14.0M | $3.0B | 2026-10-23 |
| 16 | IEUR iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $9.4M | $9.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 17 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $7.6M | $17.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 18 | ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $4.1M | $32.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 19 | EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $3.6M | $5.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 20 | VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $3.6M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 21 | IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.08% | $3.1M | $4.1B | 2026-10-23 |
| 22 | EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.79% | $2.7M | $340.6M | 2026-10-23 |
| 23 | ISCF iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.35% | $2.4M | $699.5M | 2026-10-23 |
| 24 | IEV iShares Europe ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.13% | $2.0M | $1.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 25 | IGRO iShares International Dividend Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.15% | $1.9M | $1.3B | 2026-10-23 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.