ASNS ACTELIS NETWORKS INC
OTC LinkStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- OTC Link
ACTELIS NETWORKS INC
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: Actelis Networks (ASNS)
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
- Recent negative news headlines on company's decline
- High volatility, reflecting high risk profile
Primary Risks:
- Uncertainty surrounding M&A announcements
- Potential for further declines in stock price due to market sentiment
Investment Thesis: Actelis Networks' (ASNS) recent performance has been marred by significant price swings and negative news headlines. The company's acquisition of Exaware could provide a catalyst for future growth, but the high risk profile and volatility suggest caution is warranted.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent decline in ASNS stock price can be attributed to negative news headlines, including the 33% overnight crash following the announcement of a binding term sheet to acquire Exaware. The company's recent earnings miss and market uncertainty have also contributed to the bearish sentiment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: BEARISH (Short-term), NEUTRAL (Medium-term), BULLISH (Long-term)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $0.07
- Upper Bollinger Band: $0.10
- Moving Average 50: $0.14
Momentum Signals: RSI (14): 37.46 (neutral) MACD: -0.01 / Signal: 0.00 / Histogram: -0.02 (bearish)
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 209780.25 On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1388066821.27 Volume Rate of Change: -53.31%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The news headlines have been primarily negative, with the 33% overnight crash and recent earnings miss contributing to the bearish sentiment.
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE (due to recent negative news headlines)
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming M&A announcements and potential product launches could provide catalysts for future growth
Market Narrative: The negative news headlines have contradicted the company's previous positive momentum, highlighting the need for caution in the short-term.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 3.62 (vs SPY) - high risk profile
- Alpha: -2.48 - relatively underperforming compared to market
- Correlation: 0.17 - low correlation with market, indicating potential for significant price swings
Volatility Regime: High volatility, reflecting the stock's susceptibility to large price movements.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $0.07 and $0.09 should be monitored; however, the high risk profile suggests that losses could exceed these levels.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Actelis Networks is a small-cap stock with limited sector performance visibility.
Institutional Activity: Limited institutional activity data available, but recent price swings suggest institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has low correlation with the market (R-squared interpretation), indicating potential for significant price movements.
Relative Valuation: ASNS trades within its 52-week range, reflecting a lack of clear relative value.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- $0.07: Support level
- $0.10: Resistance level
- $0.14: Previous support level turned resistance
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: $0.12 (potential breakout/breakdown level)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming M&A announcements and product launches could provide catalysts for future growth.
Risk Management: Monitor the stock's price action, with potential stops at $0.07 or lower. Consider reducing position size due to high volatility.
Note: This analysis is based on the provided data and should not be considered as personalized investment advice.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-06 | Yaron Altit | Exec VP International Sales | Grant (A) | +30,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | MAURICE NIEL RANSOM | Director | Grant (A) | +138,889 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Yoav Efron | CFO and Deputy CEO | Grant (A) | +138,889 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Elad Domanovitz | Chief Technology Officer | Grant (A) | +30,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Mark DeVol | CRO Americas | Grant (A) | +100,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Hemi Kabir | Vice President Operations | Grant (A) | +30,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Tuvia Barlev | CEO | Grant (A) | +694,444 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Eyal Aharon | Vice President R&D | Grant (A) | +30,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Michal Winkler-Solomon | Vice President Marketing | Grant (A) | +30,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Gideon Marks | Director | Grant (A) | +138,889 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-06 | Julie Anne Kunstler | Director | Grant (A) | +138,889 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-04-02 | Tuvia Barlev | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Sell (S) | +8,965 | $1.11 | $10.0K | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-19 | Bret Harrison | Senior VP Sales, Americas | Grant (A) | +5,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-12-15 | Tuvia Barlev | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Sell (S) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-12-12 | Michal Winkler-Solomon | Vice President Marketing | Sell (S) | −205 | $1.11 | -$228 | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CARL L GORDON | Director | 1,868,966 | $145.6K | $5.00M | 4 | 2018-06-07 |
| 2 | SV Life Sciences Fund VI Strategic Partners, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 1,354,172 | $105.5K | $25.00M | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| 3 | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 10%+ Owner | 722,179 | $56.3K | $0 | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| 4 | NeoMed Innovation V Ltd | 10%+ Owner | 567,639 | $44.2K | $9.00M | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| 5 | Section 32 Fund 1, LP | 10%+ Owner | 451,362 | $35.2K | $0 | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| 6 | GV 2016 GP, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 451,362 | $35.2K | $0 | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| 7 | EMBL Ventures Verwaltungs GmbH | 10%+ Owner | 370,454 | $28.9K | $1.00M | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| 8 | Claudio Nessi | Director | 288,560 | $22.5K | $3.00M | 4 | 2018-06-07 |
| 9 | MICHAEL GRAY | President, CEO and CFO | 250,000 | $19.5K | $0 | 2 | 2018-11-28 |
| 10 | Alexandria Venture Investments, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 225,680 | $17.6K | $0 | 1 | 2017-11-20 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.