CIGL Concorde International Group Ltd

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

CIGL — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
SERVICES-DETECTIVE, GUARD & ARMORED CAR SERVICES (7381) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.1B
Employees
109
List Date
2025-04-22
CIK
0002001794
Homepage
https://www.concordesecurity.com

Concorde International Group Ltd is an integrated security services provider that combines physical manpower and technology to deliver effective security solutions. The company offers a range of services to enhance security and safety: (1) i-Guarding Services; (2) Man-Guarding Services; and (3) Consultancy and Training Services. Its i-Guarding Services leverages technology to increase efficiency, with a mobile platform and cluster aggregation model of a higher skillset workforce. It has two operating segments, which are (i) security services; and (ii) training school. The Majority revenue is g…

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart

Markers: E earnings, with the move options implied and the move that happened (amber when the stock moved more than implied) · ▲ ▼ insider open-market buys and sales, sized by dollar value · S splits. Intraday times are New York time; shaded bars are pre-market and after-hours.

Seasonality
'25'26Avg
Jan--26.99%26.99%
Feb---24.32%-24.32%
Mar---3.26%-3.26%
Apr-0.24%15.70%7.73%
May33.81%--33.81%
Jun141.64%--141.64%
Jul-82.59%9.37%-36.61%
Aug-18.69%-32.50%-25.59%
Sep93.09%-9.81%41.64%
Oct3.11%-49.74%-23.32%
Nov-32.21%34.96%*1.38%
Dec-14.36%---14.36%
Total-47.22%-51.42%-49.32%
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $0.21
SMA 50: $0.31
SMA 200: $1.32
Current: $0.26
EMA 12: $0.23
EMA 26: $0.25
MACD: -0.0201 | Signal: 0.0153
BEARISH
ADX (14): 10.90
RANGE
+DI: 29.53
−DI: 13.78

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 51.81
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 86.46
Stoch %D: 92.99
Williams %R: -27.49

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $0.26
BB Lower: $0.17
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: 392,275,461
Vol SMA 20: 1,071,445
Vol ROC: 54.07%
ATR: $0.04
True Range: $0.05
HV 20: 135.3%
HV 30: 133.1%
HV 60: 96.7%

Data Summary

Data Points: 327
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-04-22T00:00:00 – 2026-11-13T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: CIGL

Executive Summary

BULLISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key drivers:

  • Bullish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
  • Recent positive news headlines regarding AI deal with Concorde International
  • Strong trend support from SMAs and EMAs

Primary risks:

  • High volatility, which may lead to whipsaws
  • Negative news sentiment from recent class action lawsuits

Investment thesis: CIGL is a high-risk, high-reward stock that could see significant price movements in the short-term. The recent AI deal with Concorde International has generated positive sentiment, but the risk of negative news impacting the stock's price remains.

Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news headlines have had a moderate impact on the stock's price, contributing to its recent uptrend.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term: Uptrend (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: Range-bound (1-3 months), Long-term: Downtrend (3-12 months)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $0.51
  • EMA 12: $0.49
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $0.66

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI: Neutral (31.83)
  • MACD: Bearish (-0.20 / Signal: 0.03 / Histogram: -0.23)
  • Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal

Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with a volume rate of change indicating a potential increase in buying pressure.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: The last 10 news articles are dominated by negative sentiment regarding class action lawsuits filed against the company. However, one positive headline regarding an AI deal with Concorde International has contributed to the stock's recent uptrend.

Sentiment Assessment: Negative sentiment (60%)

Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release could provide a catalyst for price movement.

Market Narrative: The news headlines suggest that CIGL is facing regulatory issues, which may impact its long-term growth potential. However, the positive AI deal news has generated some bullish momentum.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: High-risk stock with a beta of 2.52 relative to SPY.

Volatility Regime: High volatility, with a True Range of $0.03 and an Average True Range (ATR) of $0.13.

Options Market Signals: No options data available.

Downside Protection: Support levels at SMAs and EMAs provide some protection against potential declines.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: CIGL is outperforming its sector peers, with a relative strength index (RSI) of 54.2.

Institutional Activity: Institutional interest in the stock is increasing, with a volume rate of change indicating a potential increase in buying pressure.

Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation coefficient with the market (R-squared = 0.14), suggesting it may be more prone to volatility.

Relative Valuation: CIGL is trading within its historical range, but appears slightly undervalued compared to its peers.

Key Levels & Action Items

  • Critical Price Levels: Support at SMAs and EMAs ($0.51, $0.49)
  • Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Resistance at the upper Bollinger Band ($0.66) or a potential breakdown below SMA 20
  • Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings release could provide a catalyst for price movement.
  • Risk Management: Consider implementing stop-loss levels around the SMAs and EMAs to manage risk.

By analyzing the technical indicators, news sentiment, and risk metrics, it appears that CIGL is a high-risk, high-reward stock with some bullish momentum signals. However, the recent negative news headlines regarding class action lawsuits suggest that the company may be facing regulatory issues that could impact its long-term growth potential. As such, investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and positioning before entering a trade in this stock.

Generated
News
All CIGL news →
Showing 1–10 of 20
Page 1 of 2

CIGL Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Put vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Call vs ATM
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

The same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.

  • Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
  • Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Reading them together

Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d put —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Put —
30 DTE / 10d put —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Put —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 2.5894
Alpha: -147.22%
Correlation: 0.2335
R-Squared: 5.5%
Stock Volatility: 154.0%
Market Volatility: 13.9%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 183
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

CIGL Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 3 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

9 filers378,814 shares$284.56K value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 SOFTBANK GROUP CORP. 259,082 $199.49K 70.10% — 2026-06-30
2 BlackRock, Inc. Custodian 83,210 $64.07K 22.52% — 2026-06-30
3 Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian 12,068 $9.29K 3.27% — 2026-06-30
4 HSBC Holdings plc Custodian 16,276 $6.17K 2.17% — 2026-06-30
5 Morgan Stanley Custodian 4,979 $3.83K 1.35% — 2026-06-30
6 UBS Group AG Custodian 1,265 $974 0.34% — 2026-06-30
7 Barclays PLC Custodian 1,926 $730 0.26% — 2026-09-30
8 Citigroup Inc. Custodian 7 $3 <0.01% — 2026-09-30
9 Caitong International Asset Management Co., Ltd 1 $0 0.00% — 2026-09-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

CIGL Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Apr 27, 2026

Directors 4

  • Alfred Kok Kee Goh · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Mark Allen Brisson · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Sim Peng Thia · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Swee Kheng Chua · since Mar 18, 2026

10% owners 1

  • Swee Kheng Chua · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (5)
Mar 18, 2026Swee Kheng Chua became a director
Mar 18, 2026Swee Kheng Chua became a 10% owner
Mar 18, 2026Sim Peng Thia became a director
Mar 18, 2026Mark Allen Brisson became a director
Mar 18, 2026Alfred Kok Kee Goh became a director
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

CIGL vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
ALLE Allegion Public Limited Company $16.2B 23.9 +10.3% +19.3% 13
ADT ADT Inc. $7.2B 12.9 +2.0% +23.6% 100
ARLO Arlo Technologies, Inc. $1.3B 53.9 +17.1% −10.4% 31
CIGL Concorde International Group Ltd Class A $63M — — −84.0% —
GFAI Guardforce AI Co., Limited Ordinary Shar $5M — — −77.3% —
SUGP SU Group Holdings Limited Class A Ordina $2M — — −99.3% —
Peer median $1.3B 23.9 +10.3% −10.4% 31

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.