ALTS ALT5 Sigma Corporation
XNAS 0.85 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $0.82 – $2.74
- YTD
- -29.34%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 28.36
- Straddle Price
- $0.25
- P/C Vol Ratio (May 15 expiry)
- 14.00
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Open
- $0.84
- Day Range
- $0.84 – $0.87
- Volume
- 1,159,864
- Prev Close
- $0.85
- Industry (SIC)
- COMMODITY CONTRACTS BROKERS & DEALERS (6221) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 16
- List Date
- 1991-11-07
- CIK
- 0000862861
- Last Earnings
- Aug 11 before open · −26.4% vs ±22.3% expected
- Headquarters
- Las Vegas, NV
- Homepage
- https://www.alt5sigma.com
ALT5 Sigma Corp is a fintech company. The company operates in three operating segments: Fintech: provides next generation blockchain-powered technologies for tokenization, trading, clearing, settlement, payment, and safe-keeping of digital assets, Biotechnology: Biotechnology segment is focused on finding treatments for conditions that cause severe pain and bringing to market drugs with non-addictive pain-relieving properties; Corporate and Others: Corporate and Other segment consists of certain corporate general and administrative costs. Company has revenue from Fintech Segment.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for ALTS:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend, with MACD indicating a potential sell signal.
- High volatility and beta indicate a high-risk stock.
- Recent news sentiment is mixed, but largely negative.
Investment Thesis: ALTS is a high-risk, high-volatility stock that may experience significant price movements due to its technical trends and recent negative news. The company's earnings information is not available, which adds uncertainty to the analysis.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive news headlines (NA and ALTS partnership; AlphaTON Capital Corp investment) have been largely offset by the negative news sentiment (Hagens Berman scrutiny over potential disclosure violations). This mixed signal contributes to the overall bearish assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Bearish trend
- Medium-term: Weak trend
- Long-term: Uptrend, but recently weakening
Support/Resistance Levels: The recent low of $0.77 is a key support level. The upper Bollinger Band at $1.19 provides resistance.
Momentum Signals: RSI (14) is neutral at 34.11, indicating no clear buy or sell signal. MACD is bearish, with the MACD line below the signal line and the histogram indicating a potential sell signal.
Volume Analysis: The volume rate of change is negative (-75.68%), suggesting low buying pressure. The OBV is also negative, reinforcing this trend.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Positive news: NA and ALTS partnership; AlphaTON Capital Corp investment
- Negative news: Hagens Berman scrutiny over potential disclosure violations
Sentiment Assessment: The aggregate sentiment is largely neutral to bearish due to the mixed news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts are identified, as the company's earnings information is not available.
Market Narrative: The recent negative news headlines contradict the positive technical signals, suggesting a possible correction in the short term.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: ALTS has a high beta of 3.06, indicating high risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility is higher than historical levels, with an IV rank of 26.0% (Medium) and a current IV of 339.8%.
Options Market Signals: The put/call ratio is 2.35, indicating bearish sentiment. The open interest suggests some buying pressure, but overall the options market is pricing in a potential correction.
Downside Protection: The recent low at $0.77 provides support for the stock. However, the high volatility and beta indicate that there may be significant price movements downward.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ALTS is outperforming its sector and market due to its relatively strong technical trends.
Institutional Activity: There is moderate institutional interest in ALTS, with some buying pressure evident in the options market.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves more than the market (R-squared: 0.29), indicating a high degree of volatility.
Relative Valuation: ALTS is trading within its normal range, but recent price movements suggest that there may be some uncertainty ahead.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support at $0.77
- Resistance at $1.19
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Technical breakdown below $0.77 could lead to further declines.
- Break above $1.19 could indicate a potential reversal.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts are identified, as the company's earnings information is not available.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around $0.70, with position sizing considering the high volatility and beta of ALTS.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-14 | Pre-Market | 17.37% | 6.80% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2025-08-11 | Pre-Market | 22.30% | 26.42% | 1.18x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
ALTS Options Activity & IV Rank
ALTS IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · May 15 expiry
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 13th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
ALTS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $42.24K | 38.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $40.94K | 37.55% | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $25.84K | 23.70% | 2026-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $58.74K | 57.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $40.94K | 39.83% | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.10K | 3.01% | 2026-09-30 |
ALTS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 13, 2025Directors 7
- Antonios Isaac · since May 18, 2015
- Nael Hajjar · since Aug 6, 2018
- John Bitar · since Jan 6, 2020
- David C. Danziger · since Jul 2, 2025
- World Liberty Financial, Inc. (entity) · since Aug 12, 2025
- Zachary David Witkoff · since Aug 12, 2025
- Zachary S. Folkman · since Oct 20, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (15)
| Oct 20, 2025 | Zachary S. Folkman became a director |
| Aug 12, 2025 | Zachary David Witkoff became a director |
| Aug 12, 2025 | World Liberty Financial, Inc. became a director |
| Aug 12, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Virland A Johnson as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2025 | David C. Danziger became a director |
| Aug 28, 2024 | Peter Tassiopoulos became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jan 6, 2020 | John Bitar became a director |
| Sep 9, 2019 | Eric Bolling became a director |
| Sep 9, 2019 | Eric Bolling became President and Chairman |
| Sep 11, 2018 | Jon Isaac became a 10% owner |
| Aug 14, 2018 | Virland A Johnson listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Aug 14, 2018 | Timothy Matula reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 14, 2018 | Antonios Isaac first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Aug 6, 2018 | Nael Hajjar became a director |
| Aug 21, 2017 | Virland A Johnson became Executive Officer |
Not reported recently (7)
- Richard Butler · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 18, 2024
- Peter Tassiopoulos · Last reported as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing dated Sep 11, 2024
- Eric Bolling · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 12, 2019
- Isaac Capital Group, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Apr 30, 2019
- Jon Isaac · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Apr 30, 2019
- Bradley Bremer · Last reported as President of ApplianceSmart in an SEC filing dated Aug 24, 2017
- Dennis Gao · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 13, 2017
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (7 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-28 | $4.71M | $-271.49M | $-2.14 | $-12.29M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-27 | $5.37M | $-381.49M | $-6.19 | $8.31M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-27 | $7.58M | $48.96M | $0.29 | $-8.74M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-28 | $6.38M | $-9.12M | $-0.49 | $-5.18M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-29 | $4.85M | $-2.39M | $-0.15 | $-1.42M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-28 | $4.78M | $-5.19M | $-0.44 | $-1.95M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-28 | $4.94M | $-822.00K | $-0.06 | $4.19M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
ALTS vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UROY Uranium Royalty Corp. Common Stock | $1.2B | — | — | −21.4% | 19 |
| XRPN Evernorth Holdings Inc. Class A Ordinary | $693M | — | — | −21.1% | — |
| ALTS ALT5 Sigma Corporation Common Stock | $120M | — | +43.6% | −29.3% | — |
| AIB AIB Data Centers Inc. | $54M | — | — | −73.2% | — |
| ANTA Antalpha Platform Holding Company Class | $39M | — | — | −81.1% | — |
| AIFC AI Financial Corporation Common Stock | $27M | — | — | −77.4% | — |
| BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | — | — | — | +2852.5% | 79 |
| BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | — | — | — | −18.3% | 7 |
| BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | — | — | — | −23.9% | — |
| Peer median | $54M | — | — | −22.6% | 19 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.