Zacks Investment ResearchT3·4d ago
EOSEW Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Warrant
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
EOSEW
—
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (3690) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 787
- List Date
- 2026-08-04
- CIK
- 0001805077
- Headquarters
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Homepage
- https://www.eose.com
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc designs develop, manufactures, and markets zinc-based energy storage solutions for utility-scale, microgrid, and commercial & industrial (C&I) applications. The solutions are used in the utility sector, the renewable energy sector, and the industrial sector.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.58% | -45.04% | 24.14% | -5.00% | 5.65% | -- | -3.73% |
| Feb | -19.96% | -38.30% | 39.64% | -5.87% | -51.29% | -- | -15.16% |
| Mar | -1.10% | 31.53% | 106.66% | 11.06% | -40.00% | -- | 21.63% |
| Apr | -37.69% | -43.09% | -40.51% | -12.50% | 30.59% | -- | -20.64% |
| May | 64.96% | -36.44% | 22.23% | -9.30% | -30.23% | -- | 2.24% |
| Jun | -1.50% | -17.87% | 89.19% | 131.98% | 56.67% | -- | 51.69% |
| Jul | -11.64% | 102.97% | -49.62% | 1.28% | 10.02% | -- | 10.60% |
| Aug | -19.18% | -30.68% | 47.89% | 20.21% | 7.69% | -0.34% | 4.27% |
| Sep | 5.45% | 5.02% | -66.50% | 2.09% | 317.95% | -5.52% | 43.08% |
| Oct | -21.87% | -22.20% | -20.45% | 10.30% | 107.73% | -55.47% | -0.33% |
| Nov | -10.37% | -44.75% | -52.18% | -14.33% | -64.58% | 0.92%* | -30.88% |
| Dec | -22.97% | 14.52% | -9.05% | 356.03% | -- | -- | 84.63% |
| Total | -66.93% | -90.36% | -57.44% | 879.31% | 60.59% | -57.69% | 111.25% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.27
SMA 50: $2.41
SMA 200: $1.85
Current: $1.10
EMA 12: $1.21
EMA 26: $1.58
MACD: -0.3674 | Signal: 0.0521
BEARISH
ADX (14): 21.57
WEAK TREND
+DI: 14.94
−DI: 21.24
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 34.18
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 6.90
Stoch %D: 11.94
Williams %R: -84.48
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.71
BB Lower: $0.82
NEUTRAL
OBV: 6,039,630
Vol SMA 20: 19,517
Vol ROC: -91.86%
ATR: $0.33
True Range: $0.14
HV 20: 166.4%
HV 30: 148.6%
HV 60: 144.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-02-20T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: EOSEW
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: BULLISH (Confidence level: 8/10)
- Key drivers:
- Strong technical signals from moving averages, MACD, and RSI
- Positive news sentiment around the company's growth prospects
- Low risk relative to market beta (15.97 vs SPY)
- Primary risks:
- High volatility could lead to sudden price movements
- Lack of earnings data available for analysis
- Investment thesis: EOSEW is poised for further upside due to its strong technical signals, positive news sentiment, and relatively low risk profile.
- Recent news sentiment impact: The recent surge in stock price is largely driven by positive news headlines highlighting the company's growth prospects.
Technical Analysis
- Trend direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
- Support/Resistance levels: $3.49, $4.10 (SMA 20), and $7.24 (Upper Bollinger Band)
- Momentum signals:
- RSI (14) interpretation: Neutral (48.71)
- MACD signal: Bullish (crossover above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
- Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 364614.80 (decreasing trend)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 5911404.00 (increasing trend)
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent headlines summary: Positive news headlines have driven the stock price higher, highlighting the company's growth prospects.
- Sentiment assessment: Aggregate sentiment is positive, with recent headlines indicating a strong outlook for the company.
- Catalyst identification: Upcoming product launches and growing demand for energy storage solutions are key catalysts for further upside.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta interpretation: High risk relative to market (15.97 vs SPY)
- Volatility regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels
- Options market signals:
- IV rank: N/A (implied richer than realized)
- Put/call ratios: N/A
- Unusual activity: None notable
- Downside protection: Support level at $3.49 and potential stop-loss consideration at $4.10 (SMA 20)
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector performance: Energy storage sector is performing well, driven by renewable energy boom.
- Institutional activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest in the stock.
- Correlation analysis: EOSEW moves relatively independently of the market (R-squared interpretation).
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical price levels:
- Support at $3.49
- Resistance at $4.10 (SMA 20) and $7.24 (Upper Bollinger Band)
- Breakout/breakdown levels: None notable
- Time-sensitive catalysts: Upcoming product launches and earnings reports
- Risk management: Consider stop-loss level at $4.10 (SMA 20) and position sizing considerations based on volatility.
This comprehensive analysis provides an in-depth look at EOSEW's technical, news, and risk profiles, highlighting the stock's bullish trend, positive news sentiment, and relatively low risk profile.
Generated
News
All EOSEW news →
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·5d ago
The Motley FoolT3·21d ago
The Motley FoolT3·1mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·2mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·2mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·13mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·13mo ago
BenzingaT3·13mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·15mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 14
Page 1 of 2
EOSEW Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 6.5887
Alpha: -288.92%
Correlation: 0.3660
R-Squared: 13.4%
Stock Volatility: 261.9%
Market Volatility: 14.6%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 75
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 75
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
EOSEW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
EOSEW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-09-08Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-08 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed Exer +68,334 · Sell −40,501 |
+27,833 | $7.11 | -$288.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-03 | Marian Walters | Director | Sell (S) | −50,000 | $7.90 | -$395.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | Alexander Dimitrief | Director | Sell (S) | −45,000 | $6.00 | -$270.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed Sell −166,667 · Exer +333,333 |
+166,666 | $5.94 | -$990.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Mixed Sell −99,375 · Exer +220,833 |
+121,458 | $5.94 | -$590.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Michael W Silberman | General Counsel | Mixed Exer +145,833 · Sell −65,625 |
+80,208 | $5.94 | -$389.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed Sell −17,500 · Exer +58,333 |
+40,833 | $5.94 | -$104.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-08 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Mixed Sell −71,378 · Exer +158,617 |
+87,239 | $5.02 | -$358.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-08 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed Exer +254,303 · Sell −127,152 |
+127,151 | $4.92 | -$625.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-27 | Michael W Silberman | General Counsel | Grant (A) | +89,987 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-27 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +391,710 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-27 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Grant (A) | +52,934 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-27 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Grant (A) | +211,735 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-21 | Alexander Dimitrief | Director | Grant (A) | +26,963 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-21 | Jeffrey S Bornstein | Director | Grant (A) | +30,815 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-05
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-05 | Earnings results · Restructuring costs | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-19 | Earnings results · Regulation FD disclosure · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-14 | New debt obligation · Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Director or officer change · Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Material agreement · Unregistered share sale | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-05 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-23 | Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-15 | Earnings results · Regulation FD disclosure · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | Director or officer change · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Other events | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
EOSEW vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAE CAE Inc. Common Shares | $8.6B | — | — | −10.6% | 40 |
| ENS EnerSys, Inc. | $5.3B | 16.4 | +3.7% | +1.4% | 100 |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. Common Stock | $5.1B | 93.2 | +7.6% | +31.6% | 81 |
| ATKR Atkore Inc. | $3.2B | — | +1.6% | +47.4% | 1 |
| QS QuantumScape Corporation Class A Common | $2.6B | — | — | −58.2% | 27 |
| SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | $2.0B | 17.4 | −3.8% | +48.3% | 61 |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc | $1.6B | 20.9 | +2.2% | +25.8% | 81 |
| AMPX Amprius Technologies, Inc. | $1.3B | — | +143.6% | +10.3% | 66 |
| EOSEW Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Warrant | — | — | — | −62.7% | — |
| Peer median | $2.9B | 19.1 | +3.0% | +18.0% | 63 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.