Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Warrant(EOSEW)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (3690)
- Exchange
- XNAS
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc designs develop, manufactures, and markets zinc-based energy storage solutions for utility-scale, microgrid, and commercial & industrial (C&I) applications. The solutions are used in the utility sector, the renewable energy sector, and the industrial sector.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: EOSEW
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: BULLISH (Confidence level: 8/10)
- Key drivers:
- Strong technical signals from moving averages, MACD, and RSI
- Positive news sentiment around the company's growth prospects
- Low risk relative to market beta (15.97 vs SPY)
- Primary risks:
- High volatility could lead to sudden price movements
- Lack of earnings data available for analysis
- Investment thesis: EOSEW is poised for further upside due to its strong technical signals, positive news sentiment, and relatively low risk profile.
- Recent news sentiment impact: The recent surge in stock price is largely driven by positive news headlines highlighting the company's growth prospects.
Technical Analysis
- Trend direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
- Support/Resistance levels: $3.49, $4.10 (SMA 20), and $7.24 (Upper Bollinger Band)
- Momentum signals:
- RSI (14) interpretation: Neutral (48.71)
- MACD signal: Bullish (crossover above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
- Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 364614.80 (decreasing trend)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 5911404.00 (increasing trend)
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent headlines summary: Positive news headlines have driven the stock price higher, highlighting the company's growth prospects.
- Sentiment assessment: Aggregate sentiment is positive, with recent headlines indicating a strong outlook for the company.
- Catalyst identification: Upcoming product launches and growing demand for energy storage solutions are key catalysts for further upside.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta interpretation: High risk relative to market (15.97 vs SPY)
- Volatility regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels
- Options market signals:
- IV rank: N/A (implied richer than realized)
- Put/call ratios: N/A
- Unusual activity: None notable
- Downside protection: Support level at $3.49 and potential stop-loss consideration at $4.10 (SMA 20)
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector performance: Energy storage sector is performing well, driven by renewable energy boom.
- Institutional activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest in the stock.
- Correlation analysis: EOSEW moves relatively independently of the market (R-squared interpretation).
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical price levels:
- Support at $3.49
- Resistance at $4.10 (SMA 20) and $7.24 (Upper Bollinger Band)
- Breakout/breakdown levels: None notable
- Time-sensitive catalysts: Upcoming product launches and earnings reports
- Risk management: Consider stop-loss level at $4.10 (SMA 20) and position sizing considerations based on volatility.
This comprehensive analysis provides an in-depth look at EOSEW's technical, news, and risk profiles, highlighting the stock's bullish trend, positive news sentiment, and relatively low risk profile.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUMMIT SECURITIES GROUP LLC | $88.20K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-08 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +27,833 | $7.11 | -$288.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-03 | Marian Walters | Director | Sell (S) | −50,000 | $7.90 | -$395.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | ALEXANDER DIMITRIEF | Director | Sell (S) | −45,000 | $6.00 | -$270.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +166,666 | $5.94 | -$990.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Mixed | +121,458 | $5.94 | -$590.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Michael W Silberman | General Counsel | Mixed | +80,208 | $5.94 | -$389.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +40,833 | $5.94 | -$104.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-08 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Mixed | +87,239 | $5.02 | -$358.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-08 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +127,151 | $4.92 | -$625.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-27 | Michael W Silberman | General Counsel | Grant (A) | +89,987 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-27 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +391,710 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-27 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Grant (A) | +52,934 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-27 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Grant (A) | +211,735 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-21 | ALEXANDER DIMITRIEF | Director | Grant (A) | +26,963 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-21 | Jeffrey S Bornstein | Director | Grant (A) | +30,815 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.