PAVS Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

PAVS — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION (7374) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.0B
Employees
29
List Date
2019-10-25
CIK
0001751876
Homepage
https://www.pavs.ai

Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd engages in product sales through offline and e-commerce channels and provides TikTok-related e-commerce solutions to customers. Its Offline Product Sales mainly consist of wholesale sales of footwear, including branded sneakers, and other consumer products acquired in bulk or in lot purchases from third-party suppliers. Its segments are Bomie and Wookoo. The Bomie segment generates maximum revenue.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan---2.45%-2.90%-34.16%-13.17%
Feb---12.83%2.58%-18.35%-9.53%
Mar34.74%-9.50%-4.90%-86.35%-16.50%
Apr-34.36%-41.85%-1.48%-44.23%-30.48%
May-26.40%-2.86%-30.91%-1.69%-15.46%
Jun-8.47%-6.88%-15.99%-93.37%-31.18%
Jul-47.36%10.53%9.07%-32.49%-15.06%
Aug146.58%-8.04%-20.44%5.89%31.00%
Sep-13.48%-46.07%50.72%-16.04%-6.22%
Oct-36.74%-0.86%-40.60%-13.32%-22.88%
Nov13.95%-2.66%69.35%-7.28%*18.34%
Dec10.31%48.70%-77.82%---6.27%
Total-46.79%-68.16%-84.19%-99.87%-74.75%
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $2.96
SMA 50: $3.66
SMA 200: $315.03
Current: $2.72
EMA 12: $2.99
EMA 26: $3.23
MACD: -0.2443 | Signal: 0.0520
BEARISH
ADX (14): 45.96
STRONG TREND
+DI: 41.16
−DI: 19.81

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 38.07
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 25.44
Stoch %D: 27.36
Williams %R: -84.39

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $3.43
BB Lower: $2.49
NEUTRAL
OBV: 52,013,623
Vol SMA 20: 46,386
Vol ROC: 259.71%
ATR: $0.37
True Range: $0.21
HV 20: 112.8%
HV 30: 95.6%
HV 60: 83.8%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-01T00:00:00 – 2026-11-10T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: PAVS

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key Drivers and Primary Risks:

  • Bearish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
  • Strong trend strength indicators, but not aligned with current price movement
  • High risk due to high volatility and beta >1.2

Investment Thesis: PAVS is trading in a downtrend, reflecting bearish momentum signals. The stock's high volatility and beta indicate a higher risk profile, which may be exacerbated by recent news sentiment.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive news headline from Benzinga (2026-06-16) has had no significant impact on the stock price, indicating that investors are not responding positively to the news. The neutral news headlines from GlobeNewswire Inc. and Benzinga (2023-03-17) have also had minimal effect.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term: Downtrend (1-4 weeks) Medium-term: Bearish momentum (1-3 months) Long-term: Trendless (3-12 months)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • Upper Bollinger Band: $7.08
  • Middle Bollinger Band: $5.52
  • Lower Bollinger Band: $3.97

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI: Neutral (32.76), potential buy signal if it falls below 30
  • MACD: Bearish momentum, with a histogram at -1.93 indicating further selling pressure
  • Bollinger Bands: Squeeze, indicating potential volatility breakout

Volume Analysis: Volume is declining, suggesting distribution and potentially negative price action.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines are mostly neutral, with one positive headline having little impact on the stock price. The lack of significant market-moving news has allowed technical signals to dominate the narrative.

Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (positive news sentiment is not driving price action)

Catalyst Identification: No immediate catalysts identified; focus remains on bearish momentum and trend strength indicators.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Moderate risk (beta 0.92) relative to the market.

Volatility Regime: High volatility, with an IV Premium vs HV30 indicating a richly priced option market.

Options Market Signals: No options data available; focus remains on technical and news signals.

Downside Protection: The lower Bollinger Band ($3.97) represents potential support; however, the stock's high volatility makes it challenging to predict price movements with certainty.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: PAVS is underperforming its sector peers.

Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity detected.

Correlation Analysis: PAVS is moderately correlated (R-squared 0.05) with the broader market, indicating some price movement synchronization.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • Upper Bollinger Band: $7.08
  • Middle Bollinger Band: $5.52
  • Lower Bollinger Band: $3.97

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Watch for potential price movements that could trigger further buying or selling pressure.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate catalysts identified; focus remains on bearish momentum and trend strength indicators.

Risk Management: Use stop-loss levels at the lower Bollinger Band ($3.97) to manage risk, considering position sizing and volatility considerations.

I hope this comprehensive analysis meets your expectations!

Generated

PAVS Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 1.2761
Alpha: -594.58%
Correlation: 0.0760
R-Squared: 0.6%
Stock Volatility: 229.6%
Market Volatility: 13.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

PAVS Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 1 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

4 filers110,869 shares$703.14K value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 SABBY MANAGEMENT, LLC 75,440 $560.52K 79.72% — 2026-06-30
2 Geode Capital Management, LLC Custodian 35,389 $142.62K 20.28% — 2026-09-30
3 UBS Group AG Custodian 1 $7 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
4 Royal Bank of Canada Custodian 39 $0 0.00% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

PAVS Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Apr 6, 2026

Directors 5

  • Alexander Lightman · since Mar 18, 2026
  • David Sean Lu · since Mar 18, 2026
  • George Yijian Xu · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Minzhu Xu · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Xiaoyue Zhang · since Mar 18, 2026

Officers 2

  • Xiaoyue Zhang · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Ling Guo · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (7)
Mar 18, 2026Xiaoyue Zhang became a director
Mar 18, 2026Xiaoyue Zhang became Chief Executive Officer
Mar 18, 2026Minzhu Xu became a director
Mar 18, 2026Ling Guo became Chief Financial Officer
Mar 18, 2026George Yijian Xu became a director
Mar 18, 2026David Sean Lu became a director
Mar 18, 2026Alexander Lightman became a director
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

PAVS vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
ADP Automatic Data Processing $119.2B 27.0 +6.5% +20.2% 24
WDAY Workday, Inc. Class A Common Stock $45.8B 38.5 +13.3% −7.8% 37
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. Common Stock $25.7B 30.5 +4.9% −8.8% 28
TOST Toast, Inc. $20.2B 36.9 +22.1% −0.3% 26
RDDT Reddit, Inc. $19.5B 20.7 +62.2% −58.1% 22
HNGE Hinge Health, Inc. $9.9B 40.8 +49.8% +170.6% 20
RNG RINGCENTRAL, INC. $6.1B 9.8 +5.5% +167.7% 19
BILI Bilibili Inc. American Depositary Shares $5.7B — — −47.3% 35
PAVS Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. $3M — — −99.9% —
Peer median $19.8B 30.5 +13.3% −4.1% 25

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.