Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF(AUSM · ETF)
ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) ETF
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2025-07-07
- Has Options
- No
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-28 | $0.0563 | CD |
| 2026-08-25 | 2026-08-27 | $0.0597 | CD |
| 2026-07-24 | 2026-07-28 | $0.0530 | CD |
| 2026-06-24 | 2026-06-26 | $0.0549 | CD |
| 2026-05-22 | 2026-05-27 | $0.0533 | CD |
| 2026-04-24 | 2026-04-28 | $0.0617 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | County of Hamilton OH | 2.66% | Debt | US |
| — | Port of Port Arthur Navigation District | 2.66% | Debt | US |
| — | JPMorgan Chase Putters/Drivers Trust | 2.49% | Debt | US |
| — | Denton Independent School District | 2.40% | Debt | US |
| — | County of Dane WI | 2.35% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority | 2.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities Authority | 2.09% | Debt | US |
| — | Westfield-Washington Multi-School Building Corp | 1.73% | Debt | US |
| — | Prosper Independent School District | 1.72% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Ohio | 1.69% | Debt | US |
| — | Chicago Midway International Airport | 1.69% | Debt | US |
| — | Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Authority | 1.69% | Debt | US |
| — | City of McCook NE | 1.68% | Debt | US |
| — | Public Finance Authority | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | Akron City School District | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | Kilgore Independent School District | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | Chandler Industrial Development Authority | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | Town of Hudson MA | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | City of San Antonio TX Electric & Gas Systems Revenue | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency | 1.67% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Chicago IL | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Forest Lake MN | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Jacksonville FL | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Dormitory Authority | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Philadelphia PA | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Plymouth MN | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | West Jefferson Industrial Development Board | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | Main Street Natural Gas Inc | 1.66% | Debt | US |
| — | Florida Housing Finance Corp | 1.64% | Debt | US |
| — | Scranton-Lackawanna Health and Welfare Authority | 1.52% | Debt | US |
| — | FW Chaparral PFC | 1.51% | Debt | US |
| — | Hutto Independent School District | 1.37% | Debt | US |
| — | Westfield-Washington Multi-School Building Corp | 1.36% | Debt | US |
| — | Parlier Unified School District | 1.35% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Richmond Heights OH | 1.34% | Debt | US |
| — | County of Logan OH | 1.34% | Debt | US |
| — | Lee County Industrial Development Authority/FL | 1.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Michigan State Building Authority | 1.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority | 1.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority | 1.33% | Debt | US |
| — | South Carolina Public Service Authority | 1.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Tender Option Bond Trust Receipts/Certificates | 1.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Seward County Rural Fire Protection District/NE | 1.25% | Debt | US |
| — | Central Bradford Progress Authority | 1.25% | Debt | US |
| — | Oklahoma Development Finance Authority | 1.25% | Debt | US |
| — | Tulsa County Industrial Authority | 1.23% | Debt | US |
| — | Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency | 1.17% | Debt | US |
| — | Columbus County Housing Authority | 1.09% | Debt | US |
| — | Chicago Board of Education | 1.08% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 98.80% | $29.7M | 73 |
| Short-term investment | 0.26% | $78834 | 1 |
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.12% | 1 |
| Feb | +0.16% | 1 |
| Mar | -0.40% | 1 |
| Apr | -0.04% | 1 |
| May | +0.04% | 1 |
| Jun | +0.02% | 1 |
| Jul | -0.06% | 2 |
| Aug | +0.02% | 2 |
| Sep | -0.44% | 2 |
| Oct | -0.08% | 1 |
| Nov | +0.08% | 1 |
| Dec | +0.10% | 1 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for AUSM:
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10
- Key drivers: Oversold RSI, bearish MACD, and strong volume activity suggest a potential bounce.
- Primary risks: Weak trend strength and negative beta may lead to further declines if market turns sour.
- Investment thesis: AUSM's oversold condition and technical signals point towards a short-term bounce. However, the lack of recent news and weak trend strength make it difficult to confidently call an outright buy.
- Recent news sentiment impact: N/A (no recent news available)
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Bearish
- Medium-term: Neutral
- Long-term: Bullish
- Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $25.11
- Lower Bollinger Band: $24.98
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (27.91) with potential for a bounce.
- MACD signal: Bearish crossover, suggesting further declines are possible.
- Bollinger Bands position: Oversold, indicating a potential mean reversion or breakout.
- Volume Analysis: Strong volume activity suggests institutional interest and a potential bounce.
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: N/A (no recent news available)
- Sentiment Assessment: N/A (no recent news available)
- Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or major events announced.
- Market Narrative: AUSM's technical signals are currently dominated by bearish momentum, which may be influenced by the lack of recent news.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Negative beta (-0.00) suggests a potential short-term decline if market turns sour.
- Volatility Regime: Low volatility (ATR 0.02), indicating a calm market.
- Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: N/A (no options data available)
- Put/call ratios: N/A (no options data available)
- Unusual activity: N/A (no options data available)
- Downside Protection: Support levels at $24.98 and $24.72, with a potential bounce possible.
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: AUSM's sector is relatively weak, which may contribute to the stock's decline.
- Institutional Activity: Strong volume activity suggests institutional interest, but no clear buying or selling pressure.
- Correlation Analysis: AUSM has a negative correlation with the market (-0.05), indicating potential declines if the market turns sour.
- Relative Valuation: AUSM is relatively cheap compared to its peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- Support at $24.98 and $24.72
- Resistance at $25.11 and $25.50
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Short-term breakout above $25.11 could trigger a strong bounce.
- Downtrend continuation below $24.98 could lead to further declines.
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No major events or earnings announcements scheduled.
- Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at $24.72 and position sizing considerations.
Overall, AUSM's technical signals point towards a potential bounce, but the lack of recent news and weak trend strength make it difficult to confidently call an outright buy. Institutional interest is present, but no clear buying or selling pressure exists. Risk management is crucial in this environment, with support levels at $24.98 and $24.72 serving as key stops.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- -0.00
- Correlation (SPY)
- -5.8%
- R²
- 0.00
- Ann. Volatility
- 1.1%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|