BND Vanguard Total Bond Market
ETF 70.75 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $69.65 – $75.23
- YTD
- -4.44%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 25.58
- Straddle Price
- $0.95
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.49
- Open
- $70.83
- Day Range
- $70.60 – $70.89
- Volume
- 10,217,616
- Prev Close
- $70.75
Vanguard Total Bond Market (BND) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2007-04-03
- Has Options
- Yes
- Homepage
- https://investor.vanguard.com/etf
- Expense ratio
- 0.03% issuer, Oct 21, 2026
- Assets
- $162.8B shares × price, Oct 20, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 4.15% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $852M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 16,310 top 10 are 4.0%
- Listed
- Apr 3, 2007 Nasdaq
- Net asset value
- $70.72 issuer, Oct 20, 2026 · closed +0.04% to NAV
- 30-day SEC yield
- 5.11% issuer, Oct 16, 2026
- Tracking difference
- -0.18 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. Long Treasuries (70% of its variance, beta 0.33); US large-cap stocks (5% of its variance, beta 0.04); High yield over Treasuries (4% of its variance, beta -0.10). These factors explain 87% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (the Fund) seeks to track the performance of a broad, market-weighted bond index. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 16,310 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Core Bond ETFs
- Jun 2026
- +$2.9B latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$9.3B +2.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$30.5B +7.7% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | +$2.9B |
| May 2026 | +$4.3B |
| Apr 2026 | +$2.1B |
| Mar 2026 | −$1.9B |
| Feb 2026 | +$2.2B |
| Jan 2026 | +$3.5B |
| Dec 2025 | +$3.4B |
| Nov 2025 | +$1.8B |
| Oct 2025 | +$3.7B |
| Sep 2025 | +$4.1B |
| Aug 2025 | +$1.8B |
| Jul 2025 | +$2.7B |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | — | 0.03% | $138.4B | −5.6% | compare |
| IUSBiShares Trust iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | — | 0.06% | $49.3B | −5.5% | compare |
| BIVVanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF | — | 0.03% | $28.3B | −6.6% | compare |
| FBNDFidelity Total Bond ETF | — | 0.36% | $28.1B | −6.2% | compare |
| JCPBJPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | — | 0.37% | $16.1B | −5.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Core Bond category.
- Authorized participants
- 5 active of 40 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $25.8B · $4.6B over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 78% creations 76% in kind
- Creation unit
- 100,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Return vs index
- -0.18 pts after fees; -0.01 before; daily s.d. 0.78
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-05 | $0.2485 | CD |
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-03 | $0.2529 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-05 | $0.2515 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-06 | $0.2445 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-03 | $0.2473 | CD |
| 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-05 | $0.2417 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | MKTLIQ | 0.92% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.41% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.41% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.41% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.41% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.40% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.40% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.39% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.38% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.38% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.36% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.36% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.35% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.35% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.35% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.34% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.34% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.34% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.33% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.33% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.33% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.33% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.32% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.32% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.31% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.31% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.31% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.29% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.29% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.29% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.29% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.29% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.28% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.28% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.28% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.28% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.28% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.27% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.27% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.26% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.26% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.26% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.25% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.24% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.24% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.24% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.24% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.24% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.24% | Treasury | US |
| — | United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.23% | Treasury | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Treasury | 48.14% | $191.18B | 299 |
| Corporate | 27.11% | $107.64B | 7862 |
| Mortgage-backed (US Govt-Sponsored Entity) | 15.03% | $59.70B | 6223 |
| Mortgage-backed (US Govt Agency) | 4.74% | $18.84B | 1602 |
| Non-US Sovereign | 1.71% | $6.80B | 332 |
| Short-term investment | 0.90% | $3.57B | 1 |
| Mortgage-backed (Corporate) | 0.73% | $2.90B | 448 |
| US Govt-Sponsored Entity | 0.41% | $1.65B | 31 |
| CBO/CDO (Corporate) | 0.41% | $1.62B | 347 |
| Municipal | 0.39% | $1.56B | 245 |
| US Govt Agency | 0.08% | $302.6M | 19 |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.73% | -1.40% | 2.77% | 0.26% | 0.56% | 0.26% | 0.29% |
| Feb | -1.58% | -1.10% | -3.29% | -1.95% | 2.06% | 1.70% | -0.69% |
| Mar | -1.14% | -3.26% | 3.29% | 0.43% | -0.22% | -1.34% | -0.37% |
| Apr | 0.54% | -3.76% | 0.16% | -1.74% | 0.08% | 0.11% | -0.77% |
| May | 0.13% | 1.35% | -0.14% | 1.32% | -0.40% | 0.14% | 0.40% |
| Jun | 0.90% | -1.22% | -0.49% | 0.32% | 1.74% | 0.31% | 0.26% |
| Jul | 1.18% | 1.57% | 0.17% | 2.90% | -0.19% | -1.13% | 0.75% |
| Aug | -0.43% | -3.22% | -0.04% | 1.07% | 0.29% | 0.12% | -0.37% |
| Sep | -1.03% | -3.66% | -2.01% | 0.89% | 1.32% | -2.28% | -1.13% |
| Oct | -0.27% | -1.98% | -0.84% | -2.74% | 0.35% | 0.94%* | -0.76% |
| Nov | 0.28% | 3.56% | 3.54% | 1.46% | 0.71% | -- | 1.91% |
| Dec | -0.69% | -1.86% | 2.42% | -2.06% | -0.24% | -- | -0.49% |
| Total | -2.84% | -14.25% | 5.42% | -0.01% | 6.19% | -1.22% | -1.12% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) - Comprehensive Analysis
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 7/10
BND is a defensive, broadly-diversified fixed-income ETF showing technical weakness but supported by fundamental strength and positive sentiment. The fund exhibits a bearish technical setup with a strong downtrend (ADX 39.14) and negative MACD momentum (-0.48 histogram), yet this aligns logically with the broader bond market environment rather than fund-specific deterioration. Recent news sentiment is uniformly positive, reflecting investor interest in bond allocations amid economic uncertainty. This is a low-volatility, buy-and-hold vehicle experiencing normal tactical pullback rather than a breakdown requiring concern.
Key Drivers:
- Strong fund inflows ($30.5B over 12 months, +7.7% of assets) indicating institutional and retail demand
- Extremely low expense ratio (0.03%, cheaper than 93% of peers) creating competitive advantage
- Rising interest rate environment creating headwinds for bond valuations
- Positive sentiment focused on recession hedging and long-term value proposition
Primary Risks:
- Further yield increases would extend current downtrend
- Duration risk in rising rate environment
- Technical momentum deeply bearish despite fundamental soundness
- IV Premium at +24% suggests options market pricing elevated moves relative to realized volatility
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Price $70.22 trading below all major moving averages (SMA 20: $70.59, SMA 50: $71.54, SMA 200: $73.12)
- EMA 12 ($70.29) below EMA 26 ($70.76) indicating bearish crossover structure
- Fund down approximately 4% from 200-day MA ($73.12)
Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
- ADX at 39.14 indicates a strong established downtrend (ADX >35 = powerful trend)
- -DI (34.80) substantially exceeds +DI (16.01), confirming bearish direction strength
- Price consistently below key moving averages across all timeframes
Long-term (3-12 months): BEARISH (structural)
- Multi-month downtrend structure intact
- However, this reflects bond market fundamentals (rising yields) rather than fund-specific deterioration
Support/Resistance Levels
Immediate Support:
- Bollinger Band lower envelope: $69.50 (next technical floor)
- Recent trading zone: $70.00-$70.50
Secondary Support:
- SMA 20: $70.59 (currently acting as resistance, not support)
- Round psychological level: $69.00
Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $70.59 (weak resistance)
- SMA 50: $71.54 (primary resistance)
- SMA 200: $73.12 (major resistance, ~$2.90 above current price, 4.1% upside)
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 35.30 - NEUTRAL (slight bearish bias)
- Reading sits in neutral zone (30-70), closer to oversold threshold (30)
- Not yet at oversold extremes but approaching potential capitulation
- Suggests room for further weakness before reversal signal
MACD: BEARISH MOMENTUM
- MACD line (-0.46) significantly below signal line (0.02)
- Histogram deeply negative at -0.48, indicating strong bearish momentum
- No bullish crossover signal present; momentum clearly deteriorating
- This is the strongest bearish signal in the technical setup
Stochastic Oscillators: BEARISH
- %K at 27.36 and %D at 22.75 indicate momentum in oversold territory
- Both readings below 30 threshold suggest potential for reversal, but trend strength remains dominant
- Williams %R at -68.58 confirms oversold conditions
Bollinger Bands: NEUTRAL (slight compression)
- Width of 3.11 shows moderate band width (neither extreme squeeze nor wide expansion)
- Price near middle band ($70.59) and lower band ($69.50)
- No extreme overbought or oversold positioning within bands
- Neutral setting suggests equilibrium before potential breakout
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends:
- Volume SMA 20: 12.2M shares (baseline for daily trading)
- Volume Rate of Change: +20.41% (elevated volume above recent average)
- Recent volume increase suggests renewed institutional interest during selloff
On-Balance Volume (OBV): -125.5B (BEARISH)
- Significantly negative OBV indicates sustained selling pressure
- Volume has accumulated on down days, not supporting price floor
- This is a warning that weakness is backed by volume conviction
Institutional Activity Signal:
- Rising inflows ($2.9B in latest reported month) contradict negative OBV signal
- This divergence suggests: (1) data timing lag in fund flows reporting (2-5 months old per SEC), or (2) institutional rebalancing into weakness as rate environment stabilizes
- Volume surge of +20.41% likely reflects rebalancing demand into the technical weakness
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
All 6 recent headlines [as of 2026-10-06] express uniformly positive sentiment toward BND:
- Motley Fool (2026-10-06): Direct endorsement—"BND Is the Best Bond ETF for Most Investors"
- Motley Fool (2026-10-02): Recession hedging narrative—"3 of the Best ETFs to Buy and Hold if a Recession Is Coming"
- Motley Fool (2026-10-02): Comparative positioning—"Most Investors Pick the Wrong Bond ETF. I'd Buy BND and Never Look Back"
- Motley Fool (2026-09-20): Long-term value thesis—20-year holding period analysis
- Motley Fool (2026-08-25): Portfolio diversification strategy—AI boom/bust hedging
- Motley Fool (2026-08-22): Entry point narrative—"Treasury Yields Have Surged. Is It Finally Time to Buy Bond ETFs?"
Sentiment Assessment
POSITIVE - 100% of headlines
The news narrative is decisively pro-BND, emphasizing:
- Fund-specific quality advantage: Low cost (0.03% expense ratio) and broad diversification
- Market timing narrative: Rising treasury yields creating entry opportunity
- Economic hedging: Bond allocations as recession protection
- Long-term value: Historical returns and patient capital thesis
Catalyst Identification & Timeline
Immediate Catalysts (1-7 days):
- None identified; fund has no earnings or product launch events
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Further Federal Reserve communications regarding interest rate trajectory
- Treasury yield movements (primary driver of BND price action)
- Potential volatility from economic data releases (employment, inflation, GDP revisions)
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- Earnings season for equity holdings within fund's modest equity allocation (if any)
- Potential recession confirmation/denial (directly impacts fund flows)
- End-of-year rebalancing activity (typically supports bond allocations)
Market Narrative vs. Technical Signals
CRITICAL CONFLICT IDENTIFIED:
| Signal | Direction | Interpretation | |--------|-----------|-----------------| | News Sentiment | BULLISH | Buy-and-hold thesis, recession hedge, valuation attractive | | Technical Trend | BEARISH | Strong downtrend (ADX 39), momentum negative (MACD), below all MAs | | Fund Flows | BULLISH | +$30.5B YTD (+7.7% of assets), +$9.3B in 3 months | | Volume Pattern | BEARISH | OBV deeply negative, selling pressure on volume |
Reconciliation: This divergence is normal and expected for a bond ETF in a rising-yield environment. The technical weakness reflects bond market fundamentals (duration losses from rate increases), not fund deterioration. Positive sentiment focuses on eventual value creation as yields stabilize or rates decline—a forward-looking thesis. The current price action represents a tactical correction within a fundamental accumulation phase, as evidenced by sustained inflows despite technical weakness.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: VERY LOW RISK
Beta: 0.11 vs SPY
BND Options Activity & IV Rank
BND IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 17th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
BND Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.60M | 53.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.19M | 24.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $601.96K | 12.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $438.96K | 9.09% | 2025-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $800.17K | 69.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $352.37K | 30.57% | 2026-06-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|