BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

BSMU — —
Key stats
About

Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
XNAS
Inception
2020-09-16
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of Oct 19, 2026issuer datathrough May 2026flows, SEC filings
Expense ratio
0.18%
prospectus, filed Dec 18, 2025
Assets
$258M
SEC filing, May 31, 2026
Trailing yield
2.91%
paid monthly
Average daily volume
$3.0M
30 sessions
Holdings
1,828
top 10 are 4.4%
Listed
Sep 16, 2020
Nasdaq
Closure risk, 12 months
0.9%
low · model
Tracking difference
-0.50 pts
vs index, after fees, FY 2025
FrenzyCap ETF score
68
how it is built
Cost71
Liquidity49
Scale52
Diversification100

Moves with. Long Treasuries (15% of its variance, beta 0.10); US large-cap stocks (8% of its variance, beta 0.06). These factors explain 25% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.

Stated objective. The Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2030 Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)

All 1,828 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Target Maturity Muni ETFs

Fund flows
through May 2026SEC filings
May 2026
+$6.5M
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
+$17M
+6.8% of assets
Latest 12 months
+$94M
+36.5% of assets
Jun 2025: $0Jul 2025: +$2.2MJulAug 2025: +$11MSep 2025: +$6.6MSepOct 2025: +$13MNov 2025: +$8.8MNovDec 2025: +$18M+$18MJan 2026: +$13MJanFeb 2026: +$4.4MMar 2026: +$4.4MMarApr 2026: +$6.6MMay 2026: +$6.5MMay
View as a table
Net flows of BSMU by month, Jun 2025 to May 2026
MonthNet flow
May 2026+$6.5M
Apr 2026+$6.6M
Mar 2026+$4.4M
Feb 2026+$4.4M
Jan 2026+$13M
Dec 2025+$18M
Nov 2025+$8.8M
Oct 2025+$13M
Sep 2025+$6.6M
Aug 2025+$11M
Jul 2025+$2.2M
Jun 2025$0

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 69 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
IBMPiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$689M−0.5%compare
IBMQiShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$684M−1.2%compare
IBMRiShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$509M−1.9%compare
IBMOiShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF—0.10%$508M+0.1%compare
BSMRInvesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF—0.18%$367M−1.4%compare

The largest other funds in the Target Maturity Muni category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to Aug 31, 2025SEC census
Authorized participants
4 active
of 28 with agreements; top 3 did 97%
Created · redeemed
$65M · $0
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
0%
creations 72% in kind
Creation unit
100,000
shares
Securities lending
not authorized
Return vs index
-0.50 pts
after fees; -0.32 before; daily s.d. 0.39

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-05-31
Holdings
1679
AUM
$254.5M
Provider
Nport
Inception
2020-09-16
Exchange
XNAS
Data As Of
2026-05-31
Expense Ratio
0.18%
Dividend Yield
2.90%
Distribution
Monthly
Recent distributions
Ex-Date Pay Date Amount Type
2026-10-19 2026-10-23 $0.0535 CD
2026-09-21 2026-09-25 $0.0517 CD
2026-08-24 2026-08-28 $0.0544 CD
2026-07-20 2026-07-24 $0.0525 CD
2026-06-22 2026-06-26 $0.0527 CD
2026-05-18 2026-05-22 $0.0531 CD
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 50 of 1679 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Green Bonds) 0.59% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.53% Debt US
— Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority (MTA Bridges & Tunnels) 0.46% Debt US
— Los Angeles Department of Water & Power 0.42% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.42% Debt US
— Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Green Bonds) 0.41% Debt US
— New York State Urban Development Corp. 0.40% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY 0.33% Debt US
— University of California 0.33% Debt US
— New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority 0.32% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority 0.30% Debt US
— Curators of the University of Missouri (The) 0.30% Debt US
— County of Cook IL 0.29% Debt US
— Los Angeles Unified School District 0.28% Debt US
— Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1 (Aep Texas Central Co.) 0.27% Debt US
— Salem-Keizer School District No. 24J 0.27% Debt US
— Alabama (State of) Public School & College Authority (Social Bonds) 0.27% Debt US
— New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.26% Debt US
— Omaha (City of), NE Public Power District 0.26% Debt US
— Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Water & Power 0.26% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) 0.25% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.25% Debt US
— New York State Urban Development Corp. 0.25% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) 0.25% Debt US
— California (State of) 0.25% Debt US
— Illinois (State of) 0.25% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority 0.23% Debt US
— New Jersey (State of) 0.23% Debt US
— Utah (County of), UT (IHC Health Services, Inc.) 0.23% Debt US
— Sales Tax Securitization Corp. 0.23% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY 0.22% Debt US
— Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Water & Power 0.22% Debt US
— New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.22% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY 0.22% Debt US
— Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 0.22% Debt US
— Dallas (City of), TX Area Rapid Transit 0.22% Debt US
— Illinois (State of) 0.21% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) 0.21% Debt US
— North Carolina (State of) 0.21% Debt US
— Hawaii (State of) 0.21% Debt US
— New York (City of), NY 0.21% Debt US
— New Mexico (State of) Finance Authority 0.21% Debt US
— Private Colleges & Universities Authority 0.21% Debt US
— New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.21% Debt US
— New Jersey (State of) 0.21% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) (Rail Enhancement Program) 0.21% Debt US
— Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) 0.20% Debt US
— Philadelphia (City of), PA 0.20% Debt US
— California (State of) Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank(Segerstorm Center for The Arts) 0.20% Debt US
— Illinois (State of) Toll Highway Authority 0.20% Debt US
Non-Equity Breakdown
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF · NPORT-P period 2026-05-31 (filed 2026-07-29)
Net assets: $258M · 1679 total positions · equity 0.00% · non-equity 98.70%
Non-equity holdings — 1679 positions, 98.70% of NAV
Category Weight Value Positions
Municipal 98.70% $254.5M 1679
Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan0.33%-3.90%3.05%-0.30%0.28%0.50%-0.01%
Feb-3.24%-1.09%-3.44%-0.84%0.72%0.48%-1.24%
Mar0.56%-5.40%2.44%-0.81%-2.00%-1.87%-1.18%
Apr1.19%-5.14%-0.36%-1.41%-1.50%0.13%-1.18%
May0.57%2.63%-1.08%-0.91%0.09%0.00%0.22%
Jun0.27%-3.42%0.46%0.56%0.75%0.13%-0.21%
Jul0.90%2.26%-0.09%0.92%0.14%-1.41%0.45%
Aug-0.89%-3.42%-1.49%-0.29%-0.07%0.03%-1.02%
Sep-0.78%-3.93%-2.84%0.70%1.32%-3.27%-1.47%
Oct-0.34%-2.08%-0.94%-1.64%0.38%1.05%*-0.59%
Nov1.47%5.37%5.32%1.33%0.13%--2.72%
Dec0.31%-0.39%2.07%-1.54%0.20%--0.13%
Total0.26%-17.55%2.78%-4.20%0.39%-4.23%-3.76%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $20.98
SMA 50: $21.31
SMA 200: $21.80
Current: $21.16
EMA 12: $21.09
EMA 26: $21.12
MACD: -0.0294 | Signal: 0.0462
BEARISH
ADX (14): 26.55
TREND
+DI: 30.04
−DI: 28.83

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 52.31
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 71.46
Stoch %D: 76.29
Williams %R: -22.83

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $21.26
BB Lower: $20.71
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,318,308
Vol SMA 20: 137,293
Vol ROC: -47.19%
ATR: $0.11
True Range: $0.09
HV 20: 6.2%
HV 30: 6.1%
HV 60: 4.7%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

BSMU Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.0727
Alpha: -5.05%
Correlation: 0.3097
R-Squared: 9.6%
Stock Volatility: 3.0%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

BSMU Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

115 filers8,135,627 shares$177.90M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Wells Fargo & Company Custodian 513,455 $11.25M 6.33% — 2026-06-30
2 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 465,215 $10.20M 5.73% — 2026-06-30
3 Hills Bank & Trust Co 405,165 $8.88M 4.99% — 2026-06-30
4 Morgan Stanley Custodian 327,565 $7.18M 4.04% — 2026-06-30
5 Stratos Wealth Advisors, LLC 319,294 $7.00M 3.93% — 2026-06-30
6 Invesco Ltd. Custodian 315,158 $6.91M 3.88% — 2026-06-30
7 Bank of America Corp Custodian 287,765 $6.31M 3.55% — 2026-06-30
8 Kathmere Capital Management, LLC 275,686 $6.04M 3.40% — 2026-06-30
9 HighTower Advisors, LLC 275,525 $6.04M 3.39% — 2026-06-30
10 Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 251,404 $5.51M 3.10% — 2026-06-30
11 UBS Group AG Custodian 248,848 $5.45M 3.07% — 2026-06-30
12 Raymond James Financial, Inc. Custodian 240,737 $5.28M 2.97% — 2026-06-30
13 NewEdge Advisors, LLC 217,003 $4.76M 2.67% — 2026-06-30
14 Lido Advisors, LLC 201,800 $4.42M 2.49% — 2026-06-30
15 PRECEDENT WEALTH PARTNERS, LLC 199,682 $4.38M 2.46% — 2026-06-30
16 CENTRAL VALLEY ADVISORS, LLC 173,734 $3.81M 2.14% — 2026-06-30
17 MONECO ADVISORS, LLC 166,980 $3.66M 2.06% — 2026-06-30
18 Jones Financial Companies LLLP Custodian 145,748 $3.19M 1.80% — 2026-06-30
19 Kestra Advisory Services, LLC 136,072 $2.98M 1.68% — 2026-06-30
20 Parkway Wealth Management Group, LLC 116,372 $2.55M 1.43% — 2026-06-30
21 Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. 112,964 $2.48M 1.39% — 2026-06-30
22 Clark Asset Management, LLC 112,774 $2.47M 1.39% — 2026-06-30
23 CONFLUENCE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC 111,842 $2.34M 1.31% — 2026-09-30
24 Insight Wealth Partners, LLC 103,724 $2.27M 1.28% — 2026-06-30
25 Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co 103,076 $2.26M 1.27% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month