HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
ETF 24.40 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $23.05 – $25.49
- YTD
- -2.24%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 100.0
- Straddle Price
- $0.57
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.39
- Open
- $24.35
- Day Range
- $24.32 – $24.44
- Volume
- 3,773,953
- Prev Close
- $24.36
State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2011-04-13
- Has Options
- Yes
- Homepage
- https://www.ssga.com/us/en/individual/etfs
- Expense ratio
- 0.35% issuer, Nov 9, 2026
- Assets
- $3.9B issuer-reported, Nov 6, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 4.72% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $152M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 2,087 top 10 are 8.0%
- Listed
- Apr 13, 2011 NYSE Arca
- Net asset value
- $24.23 issuer, Nov 5, 2026 · closed +0.18% to NAV
- 30-day SEC yield
- 5.07% issuer
- Tracking difference
- +3.78 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2026
Moves with. Long Treasuries (41% of its variance, beta 0.35). These factors explain 44% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of an index that tracks the U.S. high yield municipal bond market and to provide income that is exempt from federal income taxes. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 2,087 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll High Yield Muni ETFs
- Nov 5, 2026
- $0 latest day
- Latest 5 trading days
- −$9.6M
- Latest 21 trading days
- +$65M +1.7% of assets
- Year to date
- +$1.1B +$1.2B over 12 months
Each day
| Day | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | $0 |
| Nov 4, 2026 | −$9.6M |
| Nov 3, 2026 | $0 |
| Nov 2, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 30, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 29, 2026 | −$14M |
| Oct 28, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 27, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 26, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 23, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 22, 2026 | −$14M |
| Oct 21, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 20, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 19, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | +$33M |
| Oct 15, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 14, 2026 | +$4.7M |
| Oct 13, 2026 | $0 |
| Oct 12, 2026 | +$28M |
| Oct 9, 2026 | +$37M |
| Oct 8, 2026 | $0 |
Daily figures are the change in shares outstanding times net asset value, both as the issuer publishes them each day.
- Jun 2026
- +$111M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$196M +6.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$391M +12.6% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | +$111M |
| May 2026 | +$55M |
| Apr 2026 | +$30M |
| Mar 2026 | −$133M |
| Feb 2026 | $0 |
| Jan 2026 | +$85M |
| Dec 2025 | +$65M |
| Nov 2025 | +$55M |
| Oct 2025 | +$55M |
| Sep 2025 | −$20M |
| Aug 2025 | +$9.7M |
| Jul 2025 | +$78M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYDVanEck High Yield Muni ETF | — | 0.32% | $4.7B | −2.0% | compare |
| HIMUiShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | — | 0.39% | $2.9B | −2.8% | compare |
| BMOPBNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF | — | 0.54% | $1.7B | — | compare |
| FMHIFirst Trust Municipal High Income ETF | — | 0.70% | $1.1B | −2.4% | compare |
| MINOPIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF | — | 0.39% | $1.0B | −2.3% | compare |
The largest other funds in the High Yield Muni category.
- Authorized participants
- 11 active of 41 with agreements; top 3 did 64%
- Created · redeemed
- $563M · $168M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 100% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 200,000 shares
- Securities lending
- authorized, none lent
- Return vs index
- +3.78 pts after fees; +4.16 before; daily s.d. 0.45
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-05 | $0.1007 | CD |
| 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-06 | $0.0901 | CD |
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | $0.0966 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-06 | $0.0966 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-07 | $0.0955 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-04 | $0.0962 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | PRCGEN 5.000 07/01/58 | 1.98% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | PRCGEN 4.784 07/01/58 | 1.27% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | BUCGEN 5.000 06/01/55 | 1.10% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | PRC 4.000 07/01/46 | 0.66% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | PRCGEN 4.329 07/01/40 | 0.61% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | US DOLLAR | 0.53% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | NYCDEV 5.000 11/15/44 | 0.48% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | PRC 4.000 07/01/41 | 0.48% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | PRCGEN 4.750 07/01/53 | 0.47% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | CHIEDU 6.000 12/01/41 | 0.46% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | MFCFAC 5.000 10/01/39 | 0.46% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | ATRTRN 5.000 10/01/32 | 0.41% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | CHI 6.000 01/01/50 | 0.41% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | MGAUTL 5.000 09/01/35 | 0.37% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | BERFAC 5.000 06/30/39 | 0.36% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | CCEDEV 5.250 01/01/54 | 0.33% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | MPNFAC 4.000 12/15/42 | 0.33% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | BBEUTL 5.500 11/01/56 | 0.29% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | MPNFAC 5.000 06/15/50 | 0.29% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | CASFIN 5.000 12/31/43 | 0.27% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | CHIEDU 5.875 12/01/47 | 0.26% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | TXSUTL 5.000 12/15/32 | 0.26% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | ATRTRN 6.000 01/01/66 | 0.25% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | NCSTRN 5.000 01/01/58 | 0.25% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | NJSDEV 6.625 01/01/45 | 0.25% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | GLDGEN 0.000 06/01/66 | 0.24% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | JEFUTL 5.250 10/01/43 | 0.24% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | TOBGEN 5.000 06/01/46 | 0.24% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | CASGEN 5.250 12/01/56 | 0.23% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | MPNFAC 5.000 06/15/57 | 0.23% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | PRC 5.750 07/01/31 | 0.23% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | ATRTRN 5.500 01/01/61 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | CASDEV 12.000 01/01/65 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | CHIEDU 5.000 12/01/31 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | DTRDEV 0.000 12/01/33 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | PRC 4.000 07/01/35 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | PUBGEN 5.000 06/01/41 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | SLTPWR 5.000 12/01/37 | 0.22% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | BLWPOL 5.000 06/01/55 | 0.21% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | CASGEN 5.250 12/01/44 | 0.21% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | CDAHSG 3.000 03/01/57 | 0.21% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | CUYMED 5.500 02/15/52 | 0.21% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | METAPT 4.000 10/01/52 | 0.21% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | PRC 4.000 07/01/37 | 0.21% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | FLSDEV 4.375 10/01/54 | 0.20% | Municipal Bond | US |
| — | MAIUTL 4.000 08/01/52 | 0.20% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | OKSMED 5.500 08/15/57 | 0.20% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | PRCGEN 4.329 07/01/40 | 0.20% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | PRCUTL 5.000 07/01/29 | 0.20% | Municipal Bond | — |
| — | PRCUTL 5.000 07/01/33 | 0.20% | Municipal Bond | — |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 98.30% | $3.04B | 1868 |
| Short-term investment | 0.85% | $26.4M | 2 |
| Derivative (equity) | 0.01% | $228180 | 1 |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.87% | -3.58% | 4.60% | 1.83% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.94% |
| Feb | -1.74% | -0.84% | -3.63% | -0.43% | 1.32% | 1.68% | -0.61% |
| Mar | 1.09% | -4.12% | 1.95% | 0.63% | -2.78% | -1.98% | -0.87% |
| Apr | 0.93% | -3.88% | 0.08% | -1.29% | -1.82% | 1.09% | -0.81% |
| May | 1.19% | 1.22% | 0.20% | 0.44% | 0.20% | 0.92% | 0.69% |
| Jun | 1.00% | -3.28% | 1.01% | 0.83% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 0.29% |
| Jul | 0.66% | 2.90% | -0.12% | 2.29% | -1.50% | -1.76% | 0.41% |
| Aug | -0.18% | -3.24% | -0.56% | -0.46% | -0.78% | -0.20% | -0.90% |
| Sep | -1.19% | -5.15% | -3.45% | 1.31% | 3.40% | -4.20% | -1.55% |
| Oct | -0.38% | -2.66% | -2.03% | -1.41% | 1.33% | 2.65% | -0.42% |
| Nov | 1.06% | 6.16% | 6.33% | 1.71% | 0.36% | 1.99%* | 2.94% |
| Dec | 0.15% | -2.06% | 2.26% | -2.29% | -0.24% | -- | -0.44% |
| Total | 4.49% | -17.55% | 6.34% | 3.09% | 0.75% | 1.70% | -0.20% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
HYMB Stock Analysis Report
State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL | Confidence Level: 6/10
HYMB is a passively managed municipal bond ETF offering defensive characteristics typical of fixed-income products. The fund is experiencing positive investor flows (+$391M over 12 months, +6.3% quarterly growth) and offers a competitive 5.21% trailing yield with an expense ratio of 0.35%—cheaper than 59% of category peers. However, the technical picture shows conflicting signals: price ($24.05) trades slightly above the 20-day SMA ($23.68) but below the 200-day SMA ($24.80), suggesting consolidation within a range rather than directional conviction.
Key Drivers: Municipal bond demand, Fed policy stance, tax-advantaged yield appeal, fund inflows
Primary Risks: Interest rate sensitivity (bond inverse correlation), credit quality of underlying issuers, liquidity in municipal bond market
Investment Thesis:
HYMB provides tax-efficient income exposure to high-yield municipal bonds with modest positive fund flows suggesting institutional adoption. Technical consolidation and extreme overbought stochastic readings (87.54) indicate the fund has rallied into resistance rather than breaking out decisively. Investors should view this as a yield-play positioned defensively within fixed income rather than growth exposure.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
All six recent headlines (dating back to 2022-2024) carry NEUTRAL sentiment and focus on macro themes (Fed policy, recession shelter, yield curve) rather than fund-specific catalysts. News does not provide directional conviction. The oldest headlines suggest this data feed may be stale or incomplete for current analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Assessment | Detail | |-----------|-----------|--------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | NEUTRAL-TO-CONSOLIDATING | Price at $24.05 oscillates narrowly between SMA 20 ($23.68) and resistance near Bollinger Band upper ($24.20). ADX (26.11) confirms a trending regime exists, but +DI (20.33) and -DI (20.12) are nearly equal, indicating balanced directional pressure. | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | MILD DOWNTREND | Price ($24.05) trades below the 200-day SMA ($24.80), a -3.1% deficit. The fund has not convincingly broken above its longer-term moving average, suggesting sellers emerge on rallies. | | Long-term (3-12 months) | RANGE-BOUND | The 200-day SMA at $24.80 acts as soft resistance; price has consolidated in a $23.16–$24.80 range (Bollinger Band lower to 200-day MA). No clear breakout pattern. |
Support & Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Significance | |-------|------|--------------| | $23.16 | Support (Bollinger Band Lower) | Hard floor; break below signals volatility expansion or portfolio stress | | $23.68 | Support (SMA 20) | Primary short-term anchor; loss would confirm downtrend acceleration | | $24.05 | Current Price | Neutral midpoint between $23.68 and $24.20 | | $24.20 | Resistance (Bollinger Band Upper) | Short-term ceiling; overbought stochastics suggest rejection imminent | | $24.80 | Resistance (SMA 200) | Critical ceiling; break above would signal medium-term uptrend resumption |
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 59.85 — NEUTRAL
Positioned mid-range (neutral zone 30–70), showing neither overbought nor oversold conditions. Lacks conviction in either direction. Not signaling mean reversion.
MACD: 0.05 / Signal: 0.07 / Histogram: -0.02 — BEARISH DIVERGENCE
- MACD (0.05) sits below signal line (0.07), generating a bearish crossover signal.
- The negative histogram (-0.02) confirms momentum is fading or rolling over.
- This is a low-magnitude divergence given both values near zero, suggesting weak momentum in either direction—consistent with a consolidating fund.
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 87.54 / %D 85.92 — EXTREME OVERBOUGHT
- Both %K and %D well above 80 (standard overbought threshold).
- Williams %R (-7.69) also confirms extreme overbought condition (below -80 is typically overbought).
- This reading suggests price has pushed hard into the upper Bollinger Band and faces immediate mean-reversion risk. In a low-volatility ETF, this may trigger profit-taking or redemptions.
Bollinger Bands: Width 4.39 — NEUTRAL (NOT SQUEEZED)
- Bands are neither compressed (squeeze) nor widely separated (volatility breakout).
- Price near upper band with neutral width suggests the fund has drifted upward within normal volatility range rather than experiencing a volatility expansion event.
Volume Analysis
Volume SMA 20: 6,208,604 shares
- Current volume flow of 706 calls vs. 55 puts (options volume; not directly comparable to equity volume baseline) shows call dominance.
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.08 — Extremely bullish skew (typical neutral ≈0.5–1.0). Investors are 12.7x more likely buying calls than puts, suggesting bullish sentiment despite technical overbought.
On-Balance Volume (OBV): -8,294,174
- Negative OBV indicates cumulative selling volume exceeds buying volume over the lookback period.
- This contradicts the bullish call/put flow signal and suggests institutional sellers (bond redemptions, position reductions) have outweighed buyers despite short-term upside push.
- Red Flag: Bullish options sentiment + negative OBV divergence indicates potential weakness ahead if call buyers are late-stage retail positioning.
Volume Rate of Change: +27.26%
- Trading volume has surged 27% above its 20-day average, indicating heightened activity—consistent with fund inflows and increased liquidity demand.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
| # | Headline | Date | Sentiment | Relevance | |---|----------|------|-----------|-----------| | 1 | Income With A Side Of Growth Potential | 2024-06-08 | NEUTRAL | Generic ETF positioning; no fund-specific detail | | 2 | Global Small-Cap ETFs as Recession Shelter | 2023-04-28 | NEUTRAL | Not relevant to muni bonds; data is 18+ months old | | 3 | Yield Curve Inversion | 2022-12-08 | NEUTRAL | Macro commentary; no HYMB mention | | 4 | The Fed Pivots - Finally | 2022-11-24 | NEUTRAL | Fed policy backdrop; outdated (pre-2024 rate cycle) | | 5 | High-Yield Munis & Materials Volume Watch | 2022-10-05 | NEUTRAL | Tangentially relevant but aged | | 6 | Short-Maturity High-Yield Bonds Yield | 2022-08-26 | NEUTRAL | Related to muni bond theme; over 18 months old |
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (STALE DATA)
Critical Issue: The most recent headline dates to June 2024, with the majority from late 2022–early 2023. This is a 12–24 month lag in news coverage for what should be an actively-managed fund with $3.8B AUM and significant quarterly flows.
Aggregate Sentiment: All six articles are classified NEUTRAL with no mentions of fund-specific events, portfolio changes, or catalysts. The headlines reflect macro themes (Fed policy, recession hedging, yield curves) rather than HYMB-specific news.
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days): None identified from available headlines.
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Fed interest rate decisions (if scheduled within this window)—directly impact municipal bond valuations and fund NAV
- Month-end/quarter-end portfolio rebalancing flows
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- Municipal bond auction cycles and new issuance supply
- Credit
HYMB Options Activity & IV Rank
HYMB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 2nd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
HYMB Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $524.06K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|