Nebius has tripled revenue in just two years while Innodata grew at a steadier pace, but the gap between them tells a more nuanced story about growth trajectories.
INOD Innodata Inc.
XNAS
60.56
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
INOD
$60.56
—
Key stats
$60.56
Pre-market
$57.59
-4.90%
- 52-Week Range
- $34.23 – $125.14
- YTD
- +14.29%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 64.74
- Straddle Price
- $14.30
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.56
- Market Cap
- $1.9B
- Open
- $56.12
- Day Range
- $55.96 – $61.16
- Volume
- 1,117,603
- Prev Close
- $55.05
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 2.14 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 16.94% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 16.88% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +34.2pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 20.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 29.1% |
| Book / Price | 7.5% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.7% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 57.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +9.7% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $60.34 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $62.64 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 61.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $2B |
Peers used for multiples: AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, MSFT, NVDA, PLTR, QUIK, SNOW
60-Day Conviction
59%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 20, 2026
$60.40
α -0.3%
rank 93%
conviction
19%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 21, 2026
$60.83
α +0.4%
rank 91%
conviction
12%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 19, 2027
$61.61
α +1.7%
rank 98%
conviction
59%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $164.92 | 30% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $51.72 | 14% | median 35.6× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $63.74 | 14% | median 28.7× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $65.79 | 3% | median 14.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $174.45 | 9% | median 17.6× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $60.34 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $58.41 | 30% | 56 strikes · skew +0.27 |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION (7374) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.9B
- Employees
- 10,107
- List Date
- 1993-08-10
- CIK
- 0000903651
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-05 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.24 (3 est.)
- Headquarters
- Ridgefield Park, NJ
- Homepage
- https://www.innodata.com
Innodata Inc is a data engineering company. It is helping companies deploy and integrate AI into their operations and products and providing AI-enabled industry platforms. The Company's operations are classified in three reporting segments: Digital Data Solutions (DDS), Synodex and Agility. Key revenue is generated from DDS segment provides AI data preparation services, collecting or creating training data, annotating training data, and training AI algorithms for its customers, and AI model deployment and integration. It also provides a range of data engineering support services including data…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.59% | -3.08% | 43.79% | 33.12% | -6.13% | 4.62% | 11.45% |
| Feb | 5.60% | -6.87% | 13.80% | -31.48% | 43.49% | -19.95% | 0.77% |
| Mar | 0.00% | 39.80% | 23.05% | -10.45% | -29.28% | -13.14% | 1.66% |
| Apr | -5.29% | 2.82% | -21.75% | -13.48% | 3.50% | 6.48% | -4.62% |
| May | -2.19% | -20.50% | 51.65% | 109.98% | 0.56% | 138.48% | 46.33% |
| Jun | 10.24% | -24.38% | 6.59% | 2.91% | 16.78% | -34.46% | -3.72% |
| Jul | -4.20% | 16.77% | 15.48% | 25.24% | 15.85% | -15.23% | 8.98% |
| Aug | 14.09% | -45.20% | -1.44% | -4.21% | -15.52% | -10.81% | -10.52% |
| Sep | 22.02% | -9.58% | -28.08% | 5.41% | 105.85% | 20.35% | 19.33% |
| Oct | 10.86% | 1.53% | -16.85% | 29.83% | -9.41% | -15.71%* | 0.04% |
| Nov | -40.40% | -4.89% | -9.26% | 94.42% | -20.69% | -- | 3.84% |
| Dec | -4.05% | -12.54% | 11.05% | -2.47% | -7.41% | -- | -3.08% |
| Total | -12.09% | -61.88% | 74.68% | 375.42% | 55.17% | -7.15% | 70.69% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $62.64
SMA 50: $60.34
SMA 200: $61.83
Current: $60.56
EMA 12: $58.54
EMA 26: $60.25
MACD: -1.7137 | Signal: -0.8423
BEARISH
ADX (14): 20.66
WEAK TREND
+DI: 23.46
−DI: 23.69
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 50.38
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 23.95
Stoch %D: 17.58
Williams %R: -59.51
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $74.76
BB Lower: $50.52
NEUTRAL
OBV: 50,343,860
Vol SMA 20: 1,219,870
Vol ROC: -22.04%
ATR: $4.26
True Range: $6.11
HV 20: 77.1%
HV 30: 79.9%
HV 60: 73.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks: High volatility, strong technical signals contradicting recent news sentiment, and potential earnings miss.
Investment Thesis: INOD is a high-volatility stock with mixed signals. While the technical indicators suggest an uptrend, the recent news headlines are mostly neutral or positive, which may not fully justify the current price level. A potential earnings miss could further pressure the stock.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been generally positive, but their impact on the stock's price is limited due to the mixed signals from technical indicators and options market activity.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Bullish (4-week), Medium-term: Bearish (3-month), Long-term: Neutral (12-month)
Support/Resistance Levels: The upper Bollinger Band ($121.29) serves as a strong resistance level, while the lower band ($20.92) provides support.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (>70) with a reading of 69.07
- MACD signal: Bullish (14.00 / Signal: 1.95 / Histogram: 12.05)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines have dominated the past few days, with mentions of AI momentum and a strong Nasdaq.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is positive (70%), with three out of five recent headlines having a positive or neutral tone.
Catalyst Identification: No immediate catalysts are identified, but upcoming earnings reports could provide significant market-moving events.
Market Narrative: The news headlines have not strongly contradicted the technical signals, but the mixed sentiments may lead to volatility and price fluctuations.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta >1.5) with a value of 3.69 compared to SPY.
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime, with a stock volatility of 1.21 and options market pricing a $19.40 move by expiration.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Medium (28.9%)
- Put/call ratios: Bullish sentiment
- Unusual activity: Low
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: INOD is outperforming the sector, with a relative strength of 1.2 compared to SPY.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional interest signals are identified based on volume patterns and options market activity.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a high correlation (0.37) with the broader market, indicating that it may be influenced by market-wide trends.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support level 1: $71.10 (SMA 20)
- Resistance level 1: $86.21 (EMA 12)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The upper Bollinger Band ($121.29) serves as a strong resistance level, while the lower band ($20.92) provides support.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate catalysts are identified, but upcoming earnings reports could provide significant market-moving events.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $71.10 (SMA 20), and position sizing considerations should prioritize risk management to accommodate the high volatility.
By combining the technical analysis with recent news headlines and options market activity, INOD is deemed a BEARISH stock with a confidence level of 6/10. The mixed signals from technical indicators and recent news sentiment may lead to volatility and price fluctuations. A potential earnings miss could further pressure the stock.
Generated
News
All INOD news →
IONQ's revenue has surged sevenfold in two years, while Innodata's growth remains steady — but the gap between them is closing faster than most investors realize.
Innodata boasts profitability and fortress balance sheet strength, while SoundHound AI burns cash but doubles revenue, a classic growth-versus-stability tradeoff.
One company is delivering record results and diversifying its customer base. The other is building something potentially transformative but still years from commercial scale.
One faces a revenue decline and mounting losses, while the other is scaling profitably on AI demand. But customer concentration threatens both.
One company manufactures the chips, while the other cleans the data they train on. Their financial profiles and risks couldn't be more different.
Innodata and BigBear.ai just delivered real, company-reported proof of progress, and their share prices haven't yet caught up to the news.
Showing 1–10 of 15
Page 1 of 2
Earnings History
14 of 19 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
17.23%
Avg Actual Move
19.16%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-11 | After-Close | 15.73% | 6.27% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2021-05-06 | After-Close | 3.07% | 3.07% | 1.00x | Within |
| 2021-08-05 | After-Close | 10.71% | 6.42% | 0.60x | Within |
| 2021-11-04 | After-Close | 13.87% | 1.22% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2022-03-18 | After-Close | 14.40% | 1.05% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2023-02-23 | After-Close | 11.61% | 11.76% | 1.01x | Exceeded |
| 2023-05-12 | After-Close | 17.22% | 4.63% | 0.27x | Within |
| 2023-08-10 | After-Close | 19.89% | 24.56% | 1.23x | Exceeded |
| 2023-10-17 | After-Close | 10.37% | 5.19% | 0.50x | Within |
| 2024-02-22 | After-Close | 22.41% | 16.63% | 0.74x | Within |
| 2024-05-07 | After-Close | 18.25% | 55.34% | 3.03x | Exceeded |
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 27.79% | 13.28% | 0.48x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 28.35% | 75.76% | 2.67x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-08 | After-Close | 22.50% | 15.79% | 0.70x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 21.95% | 18.11% | 0.83x | Within |
| 2025-11-06 | After-Close | 20.20% | 6.90% | 0.34x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | After-Close | 13.92% | 7.17% | 0.52x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | After-Close | 15.28% | 86.00% | 5.63x | Exceeded |
| 2026-08-06 | After-Close | 19.78% | 4.81% | 0.24x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
INOD Options Activity & IV Rank
INOD IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 102.2%
7-DTE IV: 74.7%
Expected Move: $14.30
7-DTE Move: $5.88
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 524
Put Volume: 296
P/C Volume: 0.565
BULLISH
Call OI: 14,863
Put OI: 6,226
P/C OI: 0.419
Total OI: 21,089
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $7.20
ATM Put: $7.10
Call %: 11.9%
Put %: 11.7%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 9,681
Chain OI: 61,264
Last Updated: 10/21/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 31st percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
31%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.03
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.28
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.05
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 115 ATM contracts, 14k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
7%
-3.9
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · ATM 103.3% / Wing 99.4%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)15.5LowOct 21
IV Rank (30 DTE)64.7MediumOct 21
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$14.30Oct 21
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.4519
Alpha: -17.73%
Correlation: 0.3658
R-Squared: 13.4%
Stock Volatility: 119.9%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own INOD
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $22.2M | #656 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $6.1M | #920 of 1945 | +14.1% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $1.8M | #3006 of 6285 | -72.9% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $938K | #2928 of 3716 | -69.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $44K | #3424 of 4729 | -34.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
INOD Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 35,158,500 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
16 filers$258.34M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $99.95M | 38.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $53.42M | 20.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $36.17M | 14.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $30.13M | 11.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $8.00M | 3.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $7.50M | 2.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $6.38M | 2.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $3.27M | 1.26% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.20M | 1.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.62M | 1.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.34M | 0.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.60M | 0.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian | $1.57M | 0.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.39M | 0.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Walleye Capital LLC | $801.15K | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian | $3.91K | <0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
17 filers$258.96M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $62.69M | 24.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $54.05M | 20.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $30.73M | 11.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Broad Bay Capital Management, LP | $30.23M | 11.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $27.33M | 10.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $13.26M | 5.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian | $9.08M | 3.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | PEAK6 LLC | $6.94M | 2.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $6.03M | 2.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $5.00M | 1.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $4.99M | 1.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.22M | 0.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.12M | 0.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.57M | 0.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $1.13M | 0.43% | 2025-09-30 |
| 16 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.06M | 0.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $529.06K | 0.20% | 2026-06-30 |
INOD Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-13Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Michael S Rogers | Director | Award (A) | +2,159 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-15 | Louise C Forlenza | Director | Mixed | — | $27.48 | -$521.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-04 | Louise C Forlenza | Director | Mixed | — | $28.20 | -$536.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Jayant Chauhan | EVP and CFO | Award (A) | +8,889 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-16 | Jack Abuhoff | CEO | Mixed | — | $55.59 | -$31.27M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Richard D Clarke | Director | Award (A) | +1,481 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Don Callahan | Director | Award (A) | +1,481 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Louise C Forlenza | Director | Award (A) | +1,481 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Stewart R Massey | Director | Award (A) | +1,481 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Ashok Mishra | EVP and COO | Mixed | −12,000 | $85.23 | -$3.27M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-01 | Marissa B Espineli | Interim CFO | Mixed | — | $62.70 | -$1.70M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-01 | Jack Abuhoff | CEO | Mixed | — | $54.25 | -$10.40M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Jack Abuhoff | CEO | Mixed | — | $52.69 | -$3.63M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Louise C Forlenza | Director | Mixed | — | $47.85 | -$1.68M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Jack Abuhoff | CEO | Mixed | — | $50.31 | -$13.60M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
INOD Insider Holdings
11 insiders · @ $60.56
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nauman Sabeeh Toor | Director | 3,032,635 | $183.66M | -$41.55M | 34 | 2025-06-09 |
| 2 | Jack Abuhoff | CEO | 1,340,456 | $81.18M | -$164.93M | 34 | 2026-06-16 |
| 3 | Rahul Singhal | President & CRO | 127,979 | $7.75M | $0 | 2 | 2026-01-05 |
| 4 | Ashok Mishra | EVP and COO | 96,329 | $5.83M | -$71.01M | 45 | 2026-06-03 |
| 5 | Stewart R Massey | Director | 41,686 | $2.52M | -$7.72M | 32 | 2026-06-08 |
| 6 | Marissa B Espineli | Interim CFO | 39,681 | $2.40M | -$6.56M | 12 | 2026-06-01 |
| 7 | Jayant Chauhan | EVP and CFO | 8,889 | $538.3K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-07 |
| 8 | Louise C Forlenza | Director | 5,424 | $328.5K | -$10.72M | 38 | 2026-09-15 |
| 9 | Don Callahan | Director | 3,154 | $191.0K | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-08 |
| 10 | Richard D Clarke | Director | 3,154 | $191.0K | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-08 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
INOD Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 13, 2026Directors 6
- Jack Abuhoff · on file since 2006
- Louise C Forlenza · on file since 2006
- Stewart R Massey · since Mar 23, 2009
- Don Callahan · since Nov 5, 2025
- Richard D Clarke · since Nov 5, 2025
- Michael S Rogers · since Sep 10, 2026
Officers 4
- Jack Abuhoff · CEO · listed since Dec 2025
- Rahul Singhal · President & CRO · since Nov 5, 2025
- Jayant Chauhan · EVP and CFO · since Jul 6, 2026
- Ashok Mishra · EVP and COO · listed since Sep 2009
Changes in the last 10 years (21)
| Sep 10, 2026 | Michael S Rogers became a director |
| Jul 6, 2026 | Jayant Chauhan became EVP and CFO |
| Dec 22, 2025 | Jack Abuhoff listed as CEO (previously President and CEO) in SEC filings |
| Nov 5, 2025 | Richard D Clarke became a director |
| Nov 5, 2025 | Rahul Singhal became President & CRO |
| Nov 5, 2025 | Don Callahan became a director |
| Nov 4, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Nauman Sabeeh Toor from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 16, 2022 | Marissa B Espineli became Interim CFO |
| Mar 15, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Mark A Spelker as EVP & Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Aug 4, 2021 | Jack Abuhoff listed as President and CEO (previously CEO) in SEC filings |
| Mar 18, 2021 | Jack Abuhoff listed as CEO (previously President and CEO) in SEC filings |
| Oct 2, 2020 | Mark A Spelker became EVP & Chief Financial Officer |
| Aug 8, 2019 | Nauman Sabeeh Toor no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Aug 8, 2019 | Nauman Sabeeh Toor first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Apr 17, 2019 | Robert Michael O'Connor became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 1, 2018 | Luzich Partners LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Nauman Sabeeh Toor became a 10% owner |
| Apr 16, 2018 | Douglas J Manoni became a director |
| Apr 16, 2018 | David B Atkinson became a director |
| Apr 16, 2018 | Brian E Kardon became a director |
| Dec 1, 2017 | Rajat Jain became VP-Finance and Principal Financial Officer |
Not reported recently (12)
- Marissa B Espineli · Last reported as Interim CFO in an SEC filing dated Jun 1, 2026
- David B Atkinson · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 18, 2020
- Luzich Partners LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jan 2, 2020
- Michael J. Opat · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 5, 2019
- Douglas J Manoni · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 5, 2019
- Brian E Kardon · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 5, 2019
- Robert Michael O'Connor · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Apr 22, 2019
- Rajat Jain · Last reported as VP-Finance and Principal Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 5, 2017
- Haig S Bagerdjian · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2017
- Anthea Stratigos · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2017
- O'Neil Nalavadi · Last reported as SVP and CFO in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2017
- Andargachew S Zelleke · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
INOD Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-14
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
2 filings
· $1.1M notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
LOUISE FORLENZA (2, $1.1M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-14 | LOUISE FORLENZA | Officer | 10,000 | $535.5K | 2026-09-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-04 | LOUISE FORLENZA | Officer | 10,000 | $550.1K | 2026-09-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | JACK ABUHOFF | Officer | 200,000 | $22.04M | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | JACK ABUHOFF | Officer | 94,059 | $9.94M | 2026-06-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA | Officer | 38,666 | $4.42M | 2026-06-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-29 | MARISSA ESPINELI | Officer | 19,667 | $2.08M | 2026-05-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-29 | JACK ABUHOFF | Officer | 105,586 | $10.93M | 2026-05-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-22 | JACK ABUHOFF | Officer | 38,056 | $3.82M | 2026-05-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | JACK ABUHOFF | Officer | 150,000 | $14.35M | 2026-05-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | LOUISE FORLENZA | Officer | 18,000 | $1.70M | 2026-05-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
70 ETFs hold INOD
25 shown · $253.67M total exposure · 0.04% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $68.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $44.7M | $75.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $25.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.12% | $16.2M | $13.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $16.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 6 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $12.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | Nport | 1.09% | $10.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 8 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $9.4M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.33% | $7.7M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.43% | $5.3M | $1.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 11 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $4.9M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.06% | $4.3M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.32% | $4.3M | $1.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.10% | $3.0M | $3.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $2.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $2.4M | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.14% | $2.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 18 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $2.2M | $4.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 19 | ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | Nport | 1.81% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | DUSG Dimensional US Small Cap Growth ETF | Dimensional | 0.11% | $2.1M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $1.9M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 22 | FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.10% | $1.4M | $1.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 23 | JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | Janus | 0.37% | $1.3M | $363.1M | 2026-10-20 |
| 24 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.13% | $1.3M | $1.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 25 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $1.3M | — | 2026-10-20 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$1.32
TTM Revenue
$317.16M
TTM Net Income
$46.48M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$196.09M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $92.14M | $14.41M | $0.41 | $127.18M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $90.10M | $14.90M | $0.42 | $37.26M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $72.38M | $8.83M | $0.25 | $12.88M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $62.55M | $8.34M | $0.24 | $18.77M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $58.39M | $7.22M | $0.20 | $4.20M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $58.34M | $7.79M | $0.22 | $10.79M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $59.18M | $10.30M | $0.34 | $17.18M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $52.22M | $17.39M | $0.51 | $11.37M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $32.55M | $-14.00K | — | $-454.00K |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $26.50M | $989.00K | $0.03 | $6.77M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $26.11M | $1.65M | $0.06 | $114.00K |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $22.17M | $371.00K | $0.01 | $1.61M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-06
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
45.88
P/B
13.35
P/S
6.71
EV/EBITDA
29.82
EV/Sales
5.98
ROE
29.1%
ROA
13.0%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
9.21%
Debt/Equity
0.06
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$2.13B
as of 2026-10-21
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
4.66M
SI % of Float
14.34%
Days to Cover
2.32
Short Vol Ratio
55.5%
Free Float
32.52M
Float %
94.6%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21 • Float 2026-09-22