TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc.
XNAS
51.70
−0.15%
Pre-market
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $15.72 – $52.55
- YTD
- +127.80%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 15.73
- Straddle Price
- $6.00
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.36
- Market Cap
- $5.4B
- Open
- $45.73
- Day Range
- $45.42 – $52.55
- Volume
- 7,170,314
- Prev Close
- $48.72
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.99% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.13 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.23% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.75% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +39.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +6.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.06 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 3.4% |
| Book / Price | 3.2% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 78.1% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 25.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.78 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +14.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $37.69 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $41.68 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 97.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $6B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $32.58 | 22% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $6.99 | 5% | median 131.5× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $123.06 | 7% | median 163.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $23.04 | 9% | median 13.8× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $138.95 | 9% | median 14.8× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $37.69 | 27% | stability 62% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $53.49 | 22% | 28 strikes · skew +0.34 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $5.4B
- Employees
- 1,995
- List Date
- 2018-07-26
- CIK
- 0001660280
- Headquarters
- Columbia, MD
- Homepage
- https://www.tenable.com
Founded in 2002, Tenable is a cybersecurity company that began providing vulnerability management solutions under its Nessus software. In recent years, Tenable has expanded its portfolio to provide a broader range of exposure management modules. Solutions include cloud security and compliance, active directory management, operational technology security and advanced vulnerability analytics. The Maryland-based company went public in 2018.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -5.26% | -4.27% | 6.15% | 7.12% | 10.57% | -2.95% | 1.89% |
| Feb | -19.42% | 6.63% | -0.09% | 1.24% | -11.88% | -12.67% | -6.03% |
| Mar | -12.66% | 2.85% | 7.63% | 2.77% | -7.09% | -13.87% | -3.39% |
| Apr | 0.09% | -6.01% | -19.41% | -8.86% | -13.08% | 22.52% | -4.12% |
| May | 10.67% | -10.74% | 12.80% | -6.31% | 4.81% | 32.97% | 7.37% |
| Jun | 0.29% | -10.01% | 6.53% | 6.09% | 4.91% | 25.78% | 5.60% |
| Jul | 5.16% | -16.27% | 13.90% | 7.06% | -6.76% | -15.54% | -2.07% |
| Aug | -1.40% | 3.69% | -7.78% | -2.82% | 1.14% | 9.09% | 0.32% |
| Sep | 2.19% | -6.43% | -1.10% | 1.12% | -4.36% | 2.59% | -1.00% |
| Oct | 14.20% | 13.84% | -7.80% | -2.96% | 0.52% | 43.40%* | 10.20% |
| Nov | -7.70% | -4.29% | -1.38% | 8.25% | -8.61% | -- | -2.75% |
| Dec | 17.97% | -3.86% | 12.98% | -6.37% | -10.43% | -- | 2.06% |
| Total | -2.41% | -32.55% | 17.97% | 4.47% | -35.79% | 102.76% | 9.08% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Recent news headlines highlighting positive partnerships and market trends
- Technical indicators pointing to a possible uptrend
Primary Risks:
- Volatility risk due to the stock's beta above 1.0
- Potential pullback if momentum slows down or negative news emerges
Investment Thesis: Tenable Holdings (TENB) is likely to continue its upward trajectory, driven by positive market trends and recent partnerships.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, which has contributed to the stock's upward movement. This sentiment aligns with the technical indicators' bullish signals.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Uptrend
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish momentum
- Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key resistance: $42.19 (Bollinger Bands' upper band)
- Support: $35.46 (SMA 20)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (57.59) - indicates no strong buying or selling pressure
- MACD signal: Bullish (0.40 / Signal: -0.01 / Histogram: 0.41) - suggests a potential uptrend
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price touching middle band)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 3610452.85 - indicates above-average trading volume
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 27458119.49 - shows increasing buying pressure
- Volume Rate of Change: 72.04% - suggests a potentially strong trend
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines highlight Tenable's positive partnerships and market trends, which have contributed to the stock's upward movement.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive (aggregate sentiment from last 10 news articles)
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings reports and product launches may continue to drive the stock's momentum.
Market Narrative: The news sentiment aligns with the technical indicators' bullish signals, indicating a potential uptrend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Risk Interpretation:
- Beta: 1.10 (above average) - suggests the stock is more volatile than the market
- Stock Volatility: 0.52 - above-average volatility
Volatility Regime:
- Current vs historical volatility levels: Higher than usual
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 60.6% (Medium) - indicates historically medium-high volatility
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 8.26 (Bearish sentiment) - suggests caution in the options market
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: $35.46 (SMA 20), $28.74 (Bollinger Bands' lower band)
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss at $34.50 and position sizing to manage risk
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: Tenable's sector, cybersecurity, has been performing well recently.
Institutional Activity: Above-average institutional interest has contributed to the stock's upward movement.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves relatively strongly with the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.27)
Relative Valuation: Tenable is positioned within a trading range, indicating potential support and resistance levels.
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Resistance: $42.19 (Bollinger Bands' upper band)
- Support: $35.46 (SMA 20), $28.74 (Bollinger Bands' lower band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $42.19 to confirm the uptrend
- Breakdown below $28.74 to indicate a potential downtrend
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings reports: Potential for increased volatility and stock price movement
- Product launches: May continue to drive the stock's momentum
Risk Management: Stop-loss at $34.50 and position sizing to manage risk.
By analyzing the technical indicators, recent news headlines, and market context, it appears that Tenable Holdings (TENB) is likely to continue its upward trajectory. However, the high volatility and potential risks should be considered when making investment decisions.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | After-Close | 13.56% | 11.56% | 0.85x | Within |
| 2021-04-27 | After-Close | 12.59% | 5.01% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2021-07-27 | After-Close | 11.77% | 0.99% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2021-10-26 | After-Close | 10.57% | 1.12% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2022-02-01 | After-Close | 12.71% | 2.81% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2022-04-26 | After-Close | 14.01% | 2.14% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2022-07-26 | After-Close | 13.38% | 15.59% | 1.17x | Exceeded |
| 2022-10-25 | After-Close | 13.58% | 14.99% | 1.10x | Exceeded |
| 2023-02-07 | After-Close | 11.17% | 5.11% | 0.46x | Within |
| 2023-04-24 | After-Close | 11.26% | 19.14% | 1.70x | Exceeded |
| 2023-07-25 | After-Close | 14.80% | 10.19% | 0.69x | Within |
| 2023-11-01 | After-Close | 11.68% | 15.82% | 1.35x | Exceeded |
| 2024-02-06 | After-Close | 13.71% | 5.29% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2024-05-01 | After-Close | 12.17% | 0.40% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2024-07-31 | After-Close | 17.31% | 7.49% | 0.43x | Within |
| 2024-10-30 | After-Close | 11.10% | 3.93% | 0.35x | Within |
| 2025-02-05 | After-Close | 10.88% | 7.78% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2025-04-29 | After-Close | 9.43% | 9.23% | 0.98x | Within |
| 2025-07-30 | After-Close | 11.63% | 2.88% | 0.25x | Within |
| 2025-10-29 | After-Close | 12.48% | 0.72% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2026-02-04 | After-Close | 12.68% | 0.20% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-04-29 | After-Close | 16.19% | 2.70% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2026-07-29 | After-Close | 17.07% | 3.40% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2026-10-28 | After-Close | 17.24% | 6.28% | 0.36x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
TENB Options Activity & IV Rank
TENB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 99th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $35.9M | #786 of 3716 | +69.7% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $35.8M | #453 of 3138 | -23.0% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $20.9M | #575 of 1945 | +422.4% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $17.0M | #1244 of 6285 | -38.7% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $64K | #3233 of 4729 | +24.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
TENB Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PEAK6 LLC | $11.07M | 33.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $6.87M | 20.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $3.79M | 11.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $3.51M | 10.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.13M | 6.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Caption Management, LLC | $1.84M | 5.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | DRW Securities, LLC | $1.59M | 4.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.15M | 3.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $593.77K | 1.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $324.54K | 0.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $244.77K | 0.74% | 2025-09-30 |
| 12 | Tidal Investments LLC | $143.83K | 0.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | CAPTRUST FINANCIAL ADVISORS | $3.69K | 0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.78M | 33.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | PEAK6 LLC | $1.60M | 30.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.49M | 28.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Trading LLC | $236.03K | 4.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $202.84K | 3.82% | 2026-06-30 |
TENB Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-06| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | Charles H Bell | Director | Grant (A) | +10,386 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-25 | Matthew Charles Brown | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +7,144 | $34.38 | -$254.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Stephen A Vintz | Co-Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +14,292 | $33.94 | -$445.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Barron Anschutz | Mixed | +2,202 | $33.94 | -$68.6K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-25 | Mark C. Thurmond | Co-Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +13,101 | $33.94 | -$416.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | Linda Kay Zecher | Director | Sell (S) | −1,390 | $35.61 | -$49.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | Linda Kay Zecher | Director | Sell (S) | −2,620 | $34.98 | -$91.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | Raymond Vicks Jr. | Director | Sell (S) | −1,819 | $35.94 | -$65.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Stephen A Vintz | Co-Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +122,698 | $24.63 | -$4.11M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Stephen A Vintz | Co-Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +122,698 | $24.63 | -$4.11M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Margaret M Keane | Director | Exer (M) | +3,188 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Matthew Charles Brown | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +9,325 | $25.17 | -$131.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Mark C. Thurmond | Co-Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +13,101 | $25.45 | -$312.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Stephen A Vintz | Co-Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +14,292 | $25.45 | -$333.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Barron Anschutz | Mixed | +2,202 | $25.45 | -$51.4K | EDGAR |
TENB Insider Holdings
13 insiders · @ $51.78| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephen A Vintz | Co-Chief Executive Officer | 626,176 | $32.42M | -$49.92M | 70 | 2026-08-25 |
| 2 | Amit Yoran | President, CEO and Chairman | 292,638 | $15.15M | -$98.11M | 99 | 2024-11-26 |
| 3 | Mark C. Thurmond | Co-Chief Executive Officer | 197,401 | $10.22M | -$9.12M | 50 | 2026-08-25 |
| 4 | Barron Anschutz | 75,212 | $3.89M | -$345.3K | 16 | 2026-08-25 | |
| 5 | Arthur W Coviello Jr | Director | 57,793 | $2.99M | -$9.47M | 22 | 2026-05-15 |
| 6 | Matthew Charles Brown | Chief Financial Officer | 54,410 | $2.82M | $258.5K | 7 | 2026-08-25 |
| 7 | John C Huffard Jr | Director | 37,909 | $1.96M | -$10.79M | 26 | 2026-05-15 |
| 8 | George Alex Tosheff | Director | 31,344 | $1.62M | -$254.9K | 9 | 2026-05-15 |
| 9 | A Brooke Seawell | Director | 30,292 | $1.57M | -$3.50M | 17 | 2026-05-15 |
| 10 | Niloofar Razi Howe | Director | 29,839 | $1.55M | $0 | 7 | 2026-05-15 |
TENB Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 6, 2026Directors 11
- A Brooke Seawell · since Jul 25, 2018
- Arthur W Coviello Jr · since Jul 25, 2018
- John C Huffard Jr · since Jul 25, 2018
- Linda Kay Zecher · since Aug 8, 2019
- Niloofar Razi Howe · since May 25, 2021
- Raymond Vicks Jr. · since Jan 7, 2022
- George Alex Tosheff · since Sep 28, 2022
- Margaret M Keane · since Jun 13, 2023
- Mark C. Thurmond · listed since May 2025
- Stephen A Vintz · listed since May 2025
- Charles H Bell · since Oct 5, 2026
Officers 3
- Mark C. Thurmond · Co-Chief Executive Officer · listed since May 2025
- Stephen A Vintz · Co-Chief Executive Officer · listed since May 2025
- Matthew Charles Brown · Chief Financial Officer · since Aug 21, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (80)
| Oct 5, 2026 | Charles H Bell became a director |
| Aug 21, 2025 | Matthew Charles Brown became Chief Financial Officer |
| May 27, 2025 | Stephen A Vintz listed as Co-Chief Executive Officer (previously Co-CEO,Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| May 27, 2025 | Stephen A Vintz first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 27, 2025 | Mark C. Thurmond listed as Co-Chief Executive Officer (previously Co-CEO,Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| May 27, 2025 | Mark C. Thurmond first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 18, 2025 | Stephen A Vintz listed as Co-CEO,Chief Financial Officer (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Feb 18, 2025 | Mark C. Thurmond listed as Co-CEO,Chief Operating Officer (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jan 4, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Amit Yoran from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 4, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Amit Yoran as President, CEO and Chairman in an SEC filing |
| Jun 13, 2023 | Margaret M Keane became a director |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Mark C. Thurmond became Chief Operating Officer |
| Sep 28, 2022 | George Alex Tosheff became a director |
| Sep 8, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Stephen A Riddick as General Counsel & Secretary in an SEC filing |
| Aug 22, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Jerry M Kennelly from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 7, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Richard Wells from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 7, 2022 | Raymond Vicks Jr. became a director |
| May 25, 2021 | Niloofar Razi Howe became a director |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners IX, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners IX (Co-Investors), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund (Delaware), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund (Cayman), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund (B), L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners (Delaware) IX, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Partners (Cayman) IX, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Associates IX, Ltd. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Associates IX, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Associates Growth-Buyout Coinvestment, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Venture Associates Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Ltd. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Insight Holdings Group, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 9, 2021 | Ping Li no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Feb 8, 2021 | Insight Venture Associates X, Ltd. first on file as a 10% owner |
| Feb 8, 2021 | IVP GP (Venice), LLC first on file as a 10% owner |
| Aug 4, 2020 | IVP (Venice), L.P. first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 18, 2019 | Accel Growth Fund Investors 2014 L.L.C. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 18, 2019 | Accel Growth Fund III Strategic Partners L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 18, 2019 | Accel Growth Fund III L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 18, 2019 | Accel Growth Fund III Associates L.L.C. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 18, 2019 | Accel Growth Fund II Strategic Partners L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 8, 2019 | Linda Kay Zecher became a director |
| May 30, 2019 | IVP (Venice), L.P. first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Stephen A Vintz became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Stephen A Riddick became General Counsel & Secretary |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Richard Wells became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Ping Li became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Ping Li became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Kimberly Hammonds became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | John Negron became Chief Revenue Officer |
| Jul 25, 2018 | John C Huffard Jr became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Jerry M Kennelly became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners IX, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners IX (Co-Investors), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund (Delaware), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund (Cayman), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Fund (B), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners (Delaware) IX, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Partners (Cayman) IX, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Associates IX, Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Associates IX, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Associates Growth-Buyout Coinvestment, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Venture Associates Growth-Buyout Coinvestment Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Insight Holdings Group, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Arthur W Coviello Jr became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Amit Yoran became a director |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Amit Yoran became President, CEO and Chairman |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel XI Strategic Partners L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel XI L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel XI Associates L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Investors 2013 L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund Investors 2014 L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund Investors 2012 L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund III Strategic Partners L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund III L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund III Associates L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund II Strategic Partners L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund II L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | Accel Growth Fund II Associates L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jul 25, 2018 | A Brooke Seawell became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (13)
- Kimberly Hammonds · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 26, 2022
- Ping Li · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 4, 2021
- IVP (Venice), L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 8, 2021
- IVP GP (Venice), LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 8, 2021
- Insight Venture Associates X, Ltd. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 8, 2021
- Accel Growth Fund II L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Dec 9, 2019
- Accel Growth Fund Investors 2012 L.L.C. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Dec 9, 2019
- Accel Growth Fund II Associates L.L.C. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Dec 9, 2019
- John Negron · Last reported as Chief Revenue Officer in an SEC filing dated Jul 18, 2019
- Accel XI Associates L.L.C. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 6, 2019
- Accel XI L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 6, 2019
- Accel XI Strategic Partners L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 6, 2019
- Accel Investors 2013 L.L.C. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 6, 2019
TENB Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-18What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-18 | Linda Zecher-Higgins | Director | 1,400 | $52.4K | 2026-08-18 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Vicks Raymond Jr. | Director | 1,819 | $65.4K | 2026-08-07 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-15 | SEAWELL A BROOKE | Director | 115,000 | $2.85M | 2025-12-15 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-17 | Anschutz Barron | Officer | 976 | $28.4K | 2025-10-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-09 | SEAWELL A BROOKE | Director | 15,000 | $462.0K | 2025-09-09 | Rockefeller Capital Management | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-04 | SEAWELL A BROOKE | Director | 4,622 | $139.2K | 2025-09-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-26 | Vintz Stephen A | Officer | 3,464 | $103.4K | 2025-08-26 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-26 | Anschutz Barron | Officer | 670 | $20.0K | 2025-08-26 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-26 | Thurmond Mark C. | Officer | 2,541 | $75.8K | 2025-08-26 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-25 | Thurmond Mark C. | Officer | 28,500 | $862.2K | 2025-08-25 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.31% | $321.6M | $106.5B | 2026-10-28 |
| 2 | HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | Amplify | 4.16% | $153.6M | $3.7B | 2026-10-29 |
| 3 | BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | Global X | 5.89% | $138.2M | — | 2026-10-29 |
| 4 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.18% | $137.3M | $77.1B | 2026-10-28 |
| 5 | CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | First Trust | 0.72% | $135.4M | $18.7B | 2026-10-28 |
| 6 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $128.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $98.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $90.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | IHAK iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 5.26% | $70.8M | $1.3B | 2026-10-28 |
| 10 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.36% | $50.7M | $14.3B | 2026-10-28 |
| 11 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.11% | $50.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.31% | $49.0M | $16.0B | 2026-10-28 |
| 13 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $45.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.10% | $33.3M | — | 2026-10-28 |
| 15 | IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.18% | $26.1M | $14.2B | 2026-10-28 |
| 16 | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.34% | $25.2M | $7.6B | 2026-10-28 |
| 17 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.13% | $23.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 18 | IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.28% | $21.3M | $7.8B | 2026-10-28 |
| 19 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.29% | $19.7M | $6.8B | 2026-10-28 |
| 20 | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.08% | $17.2M | $21.9B | 2026-10-28 |
| 21 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $16.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 22 | SLYG State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Growth ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.34% | $15.8M | $4.7B | 2026-10-28 |
| 23 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.19% | $14.3M | — | 2026-10-28 |
| 24 | VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | Vanguard | 0.23% | $14.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 25 | SLYV State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.28% | $13.6M | $4.8B | 2026-10-28 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $268.51M | $3.81M | $0.03 | $44.72M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $262.06M | $1.41M | $0.01 | $87.97M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $260.53M | $-737.00K | $-0.01 | $83.03M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $252.44M | $2.26M | $0.02 | $53.85M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $247.29M | $-14.71M | $-0.12 | $42.46M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $239.14M | $-22.93M | $-0.19 | $87.41M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $235.73M | $1.87M | $0.01 | $81.12M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $227.09M | $-9.21M | $-0.08 | $54.61M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $221.24M | $-14.57M | $-0.12 | $31.42M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $215.96M | $-14.39M | $-0.12 | $50.33M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $213.31M | $-21.65M | $-0.19 | $38.51M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $201.53M | $-15.56M | $-0.13 | $42.41M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.