Digi International Inc(DGII)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$70.81
- 52-Week Range
- $30.69 – $71.55
- YTD
- +64.06%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.19
- Straddle Price
- $5.65
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.20
- Market Cap
- $2.6B
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.50% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.00% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.66% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +30.3pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +21.6% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 6.5% |
| Book / Price | 25.3% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 63.4% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 26.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +9.1% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $63.03 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $67.99 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 11.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.1B |
| Market Cap | $3B |
Peers used for multiples: AAOI, ANET, CIEN, CSCO, EXTR, FFIV, LITE, VIAV
Blended Fair Value
$120.60
Current Price
$70.55
Deviation
+50.0%
Forward-Return Rank
LONG
gated
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | +0.0% | +1.51 | +1.61 | 94.4% | — |
| 42d | -0.5% ⚠ | +1.73 | +1.72 | 94.4% | — |
| 63d | -2.2% ⚠ | +0.96 | +1.33 | 85.8% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $155.42 | 25% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $127.09 | 7% | median 102.2× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $197.37 | 7% | median 68.1× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $258.65 | 7% | median 14.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $142.22 | 7% | median 10.3× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $63.03 | 46% | stability 94% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-26 · updated 2026-06-26 20:59:30.580000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (3576)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $2.6B
Digi International Inc is a Minnesota corporation that provides business and mission-critical Internet of Things (IoT) connectivity products and services. It operates through two segments: IoT Products & Services, which supports OEMs, enterprise, and government customers in deploying secure IoT connectivity solutions, and IoT Solutions, consisting of SmartSense and its Managed Network-as-a-Service (MNaaS) business offering wireless temperature and condition-based monitoring, employee task management, label printing, and other services. The company generates the majority of its revenue from the…
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -2.72% | 6 |
| Feb | +2.45% | 6 |
| Mar | +0.81% | 6 |
| Apr | -2.31% | 6 |
| May | +7.72% | 6 |
| Jun | +4.50% | 6 |
| Jul | +7.70% | 5 |
| Aug | +2.69% | 5 |
| Sep | -2.23% | 5 |
| Oct | -0.61% | 5 |
| Nov | +5.12% | 5 |
| Dec | +1.06% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $68.11
SMA 50: $63.36
SMA 200: $48.31
Current: $70.55
EMA 12: $68.53
EMA 26: $66.91
MACD: 1.6175 | Signal: -0.1622
BULLISH
ADX (14): 18.67
RANGE
+DI: 21.27
−DI: 16.54
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 61.26
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 75.47
Stoch %D: 71.55
Williams %R: -11.94
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $70.95
BB Lower: $65.27
NEUTRAL
OBV: 11,935,633
Vol SMA 20: 382,782
Vol ROC: 528.48%
ATR: $2.85
True Range: $4.10
HV 20: 39.8%
HV 30: 39.3%
HV 60: 39.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-26T21:15:17.966000
Date Range: 2024-06-28T00:00:00 – 2026-06-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
This IoT connectivity specialist, known for its strong recurring revenue, reported a notable insider sale amid an 84% one-year stock gain.
Earnings History
6 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-07 | After-Close | 16.59% | 18.88% | 1.14x | Exceeded |
| 2024-11-13 | After-Close | 11.81% | 12.00% | 1.02x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-05 | Pre-Market | 13.00% | 5.46% | 0.42x | Within |
| 2025-05-07 | Pre-Market | 14.02% | 0.18% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | After-Close | 18.00% | 0.47% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2025-11-12 | After-Close | 11.00% | 3.99% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2026-02-04 | After-Close | 13.44% | 4.63% | 0.34x | Within |
| 2026-05-06 | After-Close | 9.61% | 2.73% | 0.28x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.19
- IV Rank (7D)
- 8.19
- Avg IV
- 56.3%
- Straddle (30D)
- $5.65
- Straddle (7D)
- $5.65
- P/C Volume
- 0.20
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.45
- Correlation (SPY)
- 49.1%
- R²
- 0.24
- Ann. Volatility
- 36.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 38,028,250 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
1 filers$212.08K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $212.08K | 100.00% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-09
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-09 | Ronald Konezny | PRESIDENT AND CEO | Mixed | +20,878 | $39.45 | -$1.35M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-04 | James J. Loch | SR VP, CFO AND TREASURER | Mixed | +40,096 | $40.02 | -$8.26M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | James E. Freeland | VP, Chief Information Officer | Sell (S) | −450 | $68.00 | -$30.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | David H. Sampsell | VP, CORP. DEV, GC & CORP. SEC. | Sell (S) | −6,375 | $65.11 | -$415.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | Terrence G. Schneider | VP, SUPPLY CHAIN | Mixed | — | $41.18 | -$692.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | James E. Freeland | VP, Chief Information Officer | Tax (F) | −700 | $58.85 | -$41.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | James E. Freeland | VP, Chief Information Officer | Sell (S) | −1,354 | $45.84 | -$62.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-11 | Hughes Allison West | Director | Award (A) | +4,066 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-11 | Spiro C. Lazarakis | Director | Award (A) | +4,066 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-11 | Hatem H. Naguib | Director | Award (A) | +4,066 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-11 | VALERIE A HEUSINKVELD | Director | Award (A) | +4,066 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-11 | David H. Sampsell | VP, CORP. DEV, GC & CORP. SEC. | Mixed | −5,776 | $44.40 | -$271.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-11 | Christopher Heim | Director | Award (A) | +4,066 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-11 | Satbir Khanuja | Director | Mixed | −1,934 | $46.00 | -$276.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-01 | David H. Sampsell | VP, CORP. DEV, GC & CORP. SEC. | Tax (F) | −7,547 | $41.91 | -$316.3K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
30 insiders · @ $70.55
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ronald Konezny | PRESIDENT AND CEO | 649,955 | $45.85M | -$1.94M | 54 | 2026-06-09 |
| 2 | James J. Loch | SR VP, CFO AND TREASURER | 335,534 | $23.67M | -$7.13M | 30 | 2026-06-04 |
| 3 | AHMED NAWAZ | Director | 148,944 | $10.51M | $839.8K | 17 | 2018-12-04 |
| 4 | BRADLEY JAMES WILLIAMS | Director | 94,982 | $6.70M | -$66.0K | 16 | 2012-11-23 |
| 5 | Satbir Khanuja | Director | 91,298 | $6.44M | -$498.3K | 16 | 2026-02-11 |
| 6 | David H. Sampsell | VP, CORP. DEV, GC & CORP. SEC. | 83,228 | $5.87M | -$7.21M | 64 | 2026-05-14 |
| 7 | Spiro C. Lazarakis | Director | 83,010 | $5.86M | $0 | 13 | 2026-02-11 |
| 8 | Kevin C. Riley | President, Digi SmartSense | 82,890 | $5.85M | -$5.59M | 36 | 2021-12-03 |
| 9 | Michael A. Ueland | President, IoT, Prod & Serv | 80,947 | $5.71M | -$183.4K | 8 | 2020-05-14 |
| 10 | Michael C. Goergen | Senior VP/CFO/Treasurer | 79,903 | $5.64M | $0 | 10 | 2018-05-01 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-02
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $6.9M notice value
· Last 90d:
3 filings
· $8.3M notice value
· 3 unique filers
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
Top 90-day filers:
JAMES LOCH (1, $6.9M) · TERRENCE G SCHNEIDER (1, $930K) · DAVID H SAMPSELL (1, $415K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-02 | JAMES LOCH | Officer | 100,000 | $6.94M | 2026-06-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | DAVID H SAMPSELL | Officer | 6,376 | $415.1K | 2026-05-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | TERRENCE G SCHNEIDER | Officer | 14,182 | $930.5K | 2026-05-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | SATBIR KHANUJA | Director | 6,000 | $276.0K | 2026-02-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | DAVID H SAMPSELL | Officer | 5,000 | $228.7K | 2026-02-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | JAMES FREELAND | Officer | 1,356 | $62.2K | 2026-02-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-09 | DAVID H SAMPSELL | Officer | 1,100 | $49.5K | 2026-02-09 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-25 | Terrence G Schneider | Officer | 4,208 | $175.4K | 2025-11-25 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-25 | DAVID H SAMPSELL | Officer | 8,748 | $363.2K | 2025-11-25 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | DAVID H SAMPSELL | Officer | 4,727 | $189.1K | 2025-11-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 62.7 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.9 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 26.7 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.5B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $1.13 |
| ROE | 6.5% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.21 |