HAE Haemonetics Corporation
XNYS
120.22
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- 52-Week Range
- $51.00 – $132.00
- YTD
- +50.31%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 2.72
- Straddle Price
- $10.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.60
- Market Cap
- $5.5B
- Open
- $121.16
- Day Range
- $117.48 – $122.97
- Volume
- 485,165
- Prev Close
- $119.93
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.76 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.69% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.11% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +1.0pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +7.8% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.08 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 11.5% |
| Book / Price | 14.0% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 59.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 18.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.53 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +9.1% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $111.47 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $120.10 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 8.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.0B |
| Market Cap | $6B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $109.40 | 20% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $70.96 | 6% | median 32.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $111.60 | 6% | median 16.4× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $53.31 | 6% | median 3.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $94.26 | 6% | median 3.1× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $111.47 | 40% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $119.77 | 15% | 15 strikes · skew +0.20 |

- Industry (SIC)
- SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $5.5B
- Employees
- 3,009
- List Date
- 1991-05-09
- CIK
- 0000313143
- Last Earnings
- Nov 5 before open · −2.6% vs ±11.5% expected
- Next Earnings
- ~Feb 4, 2027 (estimated)
- Headquarters
- Boston, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.haemonetics.com
Haemonetics Corp aims to improve patient care and reduce the cost of healthcare by providing medical products and solutions in the blood and plasma component collection, surgical suite, and hospital transfusion service spaces. As such, the company operates under three segments: plasma, blood center, and hospital. The Plasma segment includes end-to-end collection technologies, automated plasmapheresis systems (such as the NexSys PCS device), and donor management software designed for commercial plasma collectors. Hospital segment includes Blood Management Technologies (hemostasis analyzers, cel…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -4.01% | -11.61% | 9.61% | -10.19% | -11.93% | -16.65% | -7.46% |
| Feb | 10.00% | 18.19% | -7.77% | -6.44% | -0.98% | -3.74% | 1.54% |
| Mar | -14.21% | 9.91% | 7.16% | 15.09% | -2.35% | -11.77% | 0.64% |
| Apr | -39.97% | -20.64% | 1.11% | 8.44% | 0.00% | 6.85% | -7.37% |
| May | -13.95% | 24.45% | 2.14% | -8.74% | 7.49% | 14.43% | 4.30% |
| Jun | 16.87% | 4.64% | -1.65% | -2.67% | 8.46% | 11.57% | 6.20% |
| Jul | -10.25% | 3.22% | 9.97% | 8.85% | -2.99% | 12.73% | 3.59% |
| Aug | 2.35% | 8.98% | -2.74% | -16.14% | -27.06% | 18.76% | -2.64% |
| Sep | 10.61% | -0.52% | -0.73% | 7.07% | -8.97% | 3.29% | 1.79% |
| Oct | -4.57% | 11.98% | -3.32% | -9.92% | 2.46% | 14.64% | 1.88% |
| Nov | -27.59% | 1.61% | -6.39% | 22.37% | 61.83% | -0.30%* | 8.59% |
| Dec | 5.74% | -7.34% | 1.48% | -10.75% | -1.00% | -- | -2.37% |
| Total | -59.40% | 40.00% | 7.30% | -10.44% | 4.97% | 52.63% | 5.84% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION (HAE) - COMPREHENSIVE STOCK ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BULLISH | Confidence Level: 7.5/10
Haemonetics presents a compelling bullish setup driven by exceptionally strong technical momentum, positive sector tailwinds, and an unusual risk/reward profile. The stock has surged 149.3% over the past year and continues to exhibit powerful uptrend characteristics with strong institutional accumulation signals. However, elevated volatility (HV20: 60.7%) and an upcoming earnings date (2026-11-05) introduce meaningful execution risk.
Key Drivers:
- Powerful uptrend with strong momentum across all timeframes
- Exceptional trend strength (ADX: 35.30) indicating directional conviction
- Favorable industry dynamics (apheresis market expanding to $4.41B by 2031)
- Positive earnings trajectory positioning HAE as "Top Momentum Stock"
- Unusual defensive characteristics (negative beta) providing downside cushion
Primary Risks:
- Near-term overbought conditions in stochastic indicators (70-74 range)
- Dramatic volume contraction (-86.85% volume rate of change) raising follow-through concerns
- Earnings catalyst in 20 days could trigger profit-taking after 149% rally
- Valuation stretched relative to historical ranges (price well above 200-day MA)
Investment Thesis: HAE exhibits textbook momentum characteristics with a strong uptrend (price above all moving averages), powerful directional trend strength (ADX: 35.30), and favorable sector catalysts supporting the rally. The unusual negative beta (-0.01) provides defensive characteristics uncommon in high-momentum equities, suggesting institutional quality underlying the move. However, deteriorating volume trends and overbought stochastic readings warrant caution on entry timing before the November 5th earnings announcement.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: POSITIVE The recent news flow strongly validates the technical rally, with headlines emphasizing HAE's 149% annual gain and momentum characteristics (Oct 16, Oct 13). The broader industry catalyst (apheresis market growth, July 24) provides fundamental support for the technical advance. Importantly, news sentiment aligns with technical signals—both are bullish—reducing the risk of a "contrarian" breakdown.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Status | Conviction | |-----------|--------|-----------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | STRONG UPTREND | Very High | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | STRONG UPTREND | Very High | | Long-term (3-12 months) | ESTABLISHED UPTREND | Very High |
Detailed Assessment:
Short-term (1-4 weeks): Price at $116.16 trades decisively above all key moving averages—SMA 20 ($112.70), SMA 50 ($107.52)—creating a clean uptrend structure. The EMA 12 ($116.38) sits nearly at current price, confirming very recent strength. The ADX reading of 35.30 is exceptionally strong (>25 indicates established trend), with +DI (26.48) far exceeding -DI (14.07), demonstrating powerful directional conviction. This is textbook uptrend confirmation.
Medium-term (1-3 months): The gap between price ($116.16) and SMA 50 ($107.52) is 8 points (+7.4%), and the uptrend has clearly established itself over weeks. The MACD histogram at +4.04 (and MACD at 3.91 above signal at -0.13) confirms sustained bullish momentum, though the divergence between MACD and signal line warrants monitoring for potential momentum deceleration.
Long-term (3-12 months): The most impressive metric is the price position relative to the 200-day SMA of $77.50—HAE trades 50% above this level. The annualized 149.3% gain confirms a powerful multi-month uptrend. This represents a structural shift in the stock's trajectory and suggests institutional accumulation behind the move.
Support/Resistance Levels
Resistance (in order of proximity):
- Upper Bollinger Band: $127.75 — Currently 9.9% above price. This represents the first technical ceiling. Historical pattern suggests mean reversion when bands widen significantly.
- $120-122 zone — Psychological and technical resistance. Previous earnings/news-driven rallies have peaked in this range.
- $130-135 zone — Pre-announcement resistance based on 149% annual rally structure.
Support (in order of proximity):
- SMA 20: $112.70 — Most important near-term support. A close below this would signal weakening short-term momentum.
- SMA 50: $107.52 — Critical medium-term support. Breach would confirm intermediate-term uptrend failure.
- 200-day SMA: $77.50 — Long-term support. Extremely unlikely given trend strength, but represents absolute foundational support.
- $110 psychological level — Round-number support historically significant.
Critical Observation: The wide Bollinger Band width ($26.71) and neutral BB signal indicates the stock is neither severely extended nor compressed—price sits within normal volatility parameters, though in the upper half of the bands.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 59.60 — NEUTRAL (Not Overbought)
- Interpretation: At 59.60, RSI occupies the neutral zone (30-70 range). Critically, it is NOT overbought (>70), which would typically trigger sell signals. This suggests room for further upside without immediate technical exhaustion. This is a bullish signal often missed—the stock can continue higher without RSI becoming stretched.
- Implication: Momentum is sustained but not extreme. Typical overbought readings in strong trends occur at 70-80 range; HAE is comfortably below this threshold.
MACD: 3.91 / Signal: -0.13 / Histogram: +4.04 — STRONG BULLISH
- Interpretation: The MACD line (3.91) is well above the signal line (-0.13), creating a large positive histogram of +4.04. This is classic bullish momentum configuration.
- Concern: The signal line at -0.13 (near zero) and positioned below MACD suggests the signal line is lagging. In mature trends, MACD can remain above signal for extended periods. However, watch for a MACD histogram contraction—this would be the first warning of momentum deceleration before a crossover.
- Implication: Momentum is strong, but with ADX at 35.30 already indicating "maximum trend conviction," further MACD expansion may be limited. Any histogram compression toward zero should trigger caution.
Stochastic %K: 70.56 / %D: 73.69 — OVERBOUGHT WARNING
- Interpretation: Both K (70.56) and D (73.69) are in overbought territory (>70). This is a near-term exhaustion signal that suggests short-term consolidation or pullback is likely. The K line touching 70 typically precedes corrective moves in 3-5 day periods.
- Critical Nuance: Stochastic overbought in a strong uptrend (confirmed by ADX: 35.30, RSI: 59.60) often triggers short-term profit-taking but rarely reverses the primary trend. This suggests near-term pullback risk, not trend reversal.
- Implication: Aggressive traders should reduce position size ahead of the earnings date. Conservative traders should wait for a stochastic reset below 50 before adding exposure.
Williams %R: -33.89 — NEUTRAL TO BULLISH
- Interpretation: Williams %R between -50 and 0 indicates a stock trading in the upper portion of its recent range but not yet at extremes. At -33.89, the stock has room to run upward without hitting the maximum overbought level (-20 to 0).
- Implication: Confirms that while stochastic is overbought, Williams %R suggests the stock retains upside potential if momentum persists.
Momentum Synthesis: The divergence between RSI (neutral 59.60), Stochastic (overbought 70+), and Williams %R (neutral -33.89) suggests near-term consolidation is likely, but the primary uptrend remains intact. The market may be pricing in earnings anticipation (due 11/5), causing
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | Pre-Market | 12.78% | 12.98% | 1.02x | Exceeded |
| 2021-05-13 | Pre-Market | 14.21% | 13.40% | 0.94x | Within |
| 2021-08-11 | Pre-Market | 10.56% | 7.29% | 0.69x | Within |
| 2021-11-09 | Pre-Market | 11.74% | 15.37% | 1.31x | Exceeded |
| 2022-02-08 | Pre-Market | 10.86% | 16.16% | 1.49x | Exceeded |
| 2022-05-10 | Pre-Market | 12.34% | 10.37% | 0.84x | Within |
| 2022-08-10 | Pre-Market | 6.69% | 8.89% | 1.33x | Exceeded |
| 2022-11-07 | Pre-Market | 12.12% | 3.61% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2023-02-07 | Pre-Market | 5.70% | 5.91% | 1.04x | Exceeded |
| 2023-05-11 | Pre-Market | 10.95% | 3.30% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2023-08-08 | Pre-Market | 7.78% | 1.46% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2023-11-02 | Pre-Market | 9.26% | 1.08% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2024-02-08 | Pre-Market | 8.82% | 1.30% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2024-05-09 | Pre-Market | 8.72% | 0.70% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2024-08-08 | Pre-Market | 7.12% | 10.84% | 1.52x | Exceeded |
| 2024-11-07 | Pre-Market | 13.24% | 10.71% | 0.81x | Within |
| 2025-02-06 | Pre-Market | 11.76% | 11.58% | 0.98x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | Pre-Market | 11.87% | 5.85% | 0.49x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | Pre-Market | 8.94% | 26.58% | 2.97x | Exceeded |
| 2025-11-06 | Pre-Market | 16.07% | 32.31% | 2.01x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-05 | Pre-Market | 13.04% | 1.41% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | Pre-Market | 13.15% | 3.23% | 0.25x | Within |
| 2026-08-06 | Pre-Market | 12.17% | 1.70% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2026-11-05 | Pre-Market | 11.46% | 2.60% | 0.23x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
HAE Options Activity & IV Rank
HAE IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 56th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $113.3M | #366 of 6285 | +485.0% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $58.5M | #541 of 3716 | +164152.0% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $9.8M | #1068 of 3138 | +200.9% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $8.2M | #817 of 1945 | +92.1% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $4.5M | #499 of 997 | +23.5% | 13F | |
| Oaktree Capital Asset manager Howard Marks | $2.1M | #112 of 130 | +149.7% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $39K | #3471 of 4729 | -41.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
HAE Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 142 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $7.50M | 28.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $6.75M | 25.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $6.51M | 24.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $3.68M | 13.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.74M | 6.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | CSS LLC/IL | $375.00K | 1.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $6.75M | 76.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.10M | 12.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $525.00K | 5.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $360.00K | 4.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $42.12K | 0.48% | 2026-09-30 |
HAE Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-11-03| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-03 | Roy Galvin | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Tax (F) | −146 | $119.65 | -$17.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Ellen M Zane | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Lloyd Emerson Johnson | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Martin D Madaus | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Diane M Bryant | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Robert E Abernathy | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Michael J Coyle | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Mark W Kroll | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-28 | Claire Pomeroy | Director | Award (A) | +2,538 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Farris Maryanne Maunsell | VP, Chief Accounting Officer | Tax (F) | −259 | $71.28 | -$18.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Laurie A. Miller | SVP, Human Resources | Tax (F) | −313 | $71.28 | -$22.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Christopher Simon | President & CEO | Mixed Grant +78,344 · Tax −9,681 |
+68,663 | $56.29 | -$544.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Laurie A. Miller | SVP, Human Resources | Mixed Grant +13,323 · Tax −948 |
+12,375 | $56.29 | -$53.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Roy Galvin | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed Tax −879 · Grant +27,535 |
+26,656 | $56.29 | -$49.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Farris Maryanne Maunsell | VP, Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed Grant +2,220 · Tax −197 |
+2,023 | $56.29 | -$11.1K | EDGAR |
HAE Insider Holdings
16 insiders · @ $120.34| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christopher Simon | President & CEO | 366,360 | $44.09M | -$20.14M | 44 | 2026-05-19 |
| 2 | Michelle L Basil | EVP and General Counsel | 68,829 | $8.28M | -$11.60M | 41 | 2026-05-19 |
| 3 | James DArecca | EVP, Chief Financial Officer | 54,444 | $6.55M | $0 | 13 | 2026-05-19 |
| 4 | Laurie A. Miller | SVP, Human Resources | 40,987 | $4.93M | -$40.4K | 23 | 2026-06-08 |
| 5 | Roy Galvin | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | 39,805 | $4.79M | $0 | 12 | 2026-11-03 |
| 6 | Robert E Abernathy | Director | 27,519 | $3.31M | $323.7K | 11 | 2026-07-28 |
| 7 | Mark W Kroll | Director | 27,295 | $3.28M | -$7.06M | 32 | 2026-07-28 |
| 8 | Charles J Dockendorff | Director | 25,041 | $3.01M | -$2.53M | 13 | 2025-07-25 |
| 9 | Ellen M Zane | Director | 21,911 | $2.64M | $0 | 14 | 2026-07-28 |
| 10 | Claire Pomeroy | Director | 19,410 | $2.34M | $0 | 9 | 2026-07-28 |
HAE Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 3, 2026Directors 9
- Mark W Kroll · since Jan 3, 2006
- Ellen M Zane · since Jul 27, 2012
- Robert E Abernathy · since Oct 17, 2017
- Christopher Simon · listed since Jun 2018
- Claire Pomeroy · since Apr 24, 2019
- Michael J Coyle · since Apr 16, 2020
- Lloyd Emerson Johnson · since Aug 6, 2021
- Diane M Bryant · since Aug 4, 2023
- Martin D Madaus · since Jul 24, 2026
Officers 7
- Christopher Simon · President & CEO · since May 16, 2016
- James DArecca · EVP, Chief Financial Officer · since Apr 11, 2022
- Frank Chan · EVP, Chief Operating Officer · since Apr 7, 2025
- Farris Maryanne Maunsell · VP, Chief Accounting Officer · since Oct 17, 2022
- Roy Galvin · EVP, Chief Commercial Officer · listed since Jun 2025
- Michelle L Basil · EVP and General Counsel · since Mar 6, 2017
- Laurie A. Miller · SVP, Human Resources · since Aug 30, 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (25)
| Jul 24, 2026 | Martin D Madaus became a director |
| Apr 27, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Charles J Dockendorff from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 13, 2025 | Roy Galvin listed as EVP, Chief Commercial Officer (previously President, Global Plasma & BC) in SEC filings |
| Apr 7, 2025 | Frank Chan became EVP, Chief Operating Officer |
| Aug 4, 2023 | Diane M Bryant became a director |
| Oct 17, 2022 | Farris Maryanne Maunsell became VP, Chief Accounting Officer |
| Oct 10, 2022 | Roy Galvin became President, Global Plasma & BC |
| Aug 5, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Dan Goldstein as VP, Corporate Controller in an SEC filing |
| Apr 11, 2022 | James DArecca became EVP, Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 9, 2021 | The company announced the departure of William P. Mr. Burke as EVP, Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Sep 9, 2021 | Josep Llorens listed as EVP, Global Manufacturing (previously SVP, Global Manufacturing) in SEC filings |
| Aug 30, 2021 | Laurie A. Miller became SVP, Human Resources |
| Aug 6, 2021 | Stewart W Strong became President, Global Hospital |
| Aug 6, 2021 | Lloyd Emerson Johnson became a director |
| Aug 6, 2021 | Chad M. Nikel became President, Global Plasma & BC |
| Apr 16, 2020 | Michael J Coyle became a director |
| Apr 1, 2020 | Anila Lingamneni became EVP, Chief Technology Officer |
| Apr 24, 2019 | Claire Pomeroy became a director |
| Aug 20, 2018 | Josep Llorens became SVP, Global Manufacturing |
| Jun 8, 2018 | Christopher Simon first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 21, 2018 | Said Bolorforosh became EVP, Chief Technology Officer |
| Apr 10, 2018 | Dan Goldstein listed as VP, Corporate Controller (previously Chief Accounting Officer) in SEC filings |
| Oct 17, 2017 | Robert E Abernathy became a director |
| Jul 27, 2017 | Jacqueline Scanlan became SVP, Global Human Resources |
| Mar 6, 2017 | Michelle L Basil became EVP and General Counsel |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (13)
- Stewart W Strong · Last reported as President, Global Hospital in an SEC filing dated Jul 29, 2024
- Anila Lingamneni · Last reported as EVP, Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Jul 15, 2024
- Josep Llorens · Last reported as EVP, Global Manufacturing in an SEC filing dated May 29, 2024
- Catherine M Burzik · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 8, 2022
- Chad M. Nikel · Last reported as President, Global Plasma & BC in an SEC filing dated Aug 16, 2021
- Jacqueline Scanlan · Last reported as SVP, Global Human Resources in an SEC filing dated Jun 9, 2021
- Richard J Meelia · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 5, 2021
- Ronald G Gelbman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 13, 2019
- Said Bolorforosh · Last reported as EVP, Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 13, 2019
- Pedro P Granadillo · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 9, 2018
- Neil Mr. Ryding · Last reported as EVP, Global Manufacturing in an SEC filing dated Jun 8, 2018
- Susan Bartlett Foote · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 14, 2017
- Ronald Merriman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 24, 2017
HAE Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-06-26What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-26 | Llorens Josep | Former Officer | 18,630 | $1.40M | 2025-06-26 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-12 | Strong Stewart W | Former Officer | 708 | $50.6K | 2025-06-12 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-04 | Strong Stewart W | Officer | 7,705 | $538.6K | 2025-06-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-02 | Strong Stewart W | Officer | 2,835 | $191.3K | 2025-06-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-19 | Llorens Josep | Officer | 1,547 | $107.3K | 2025-05-19 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-12 | Lingamneni Anila | Former Officer | 6,238 | $565.7K | 2024-11-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | Strong Stewart W | Officer | 4,312 | $393.0K | 2024-07-26 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-12 | Lingamneni Anila | Officer | 79 | $7.1K | 2024-07-12 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-11 | Lingamneni Anila | Officer | 2,136 | $192.2K | 2024-07-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-29 | Basil Michelle L | Officer | 12,990 | $1.14M | 2024-05-29 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-05 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-08 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Director or officer change · Shareholder vote results | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-07 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-01 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | 0000313143-26-000050 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-21 | 0000313143-25-000025 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-20 | 0000313143-24-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-22 | 0000313143-23-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2022-05-25 | 0000313143-22-000024 | EDGAR |
| 2021-05-26 | 0000313143-21-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2020-05-20 | 0000313143-20-000028 | EDGAR |
| 2019-05-22 | 0000313143-19-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2018-05-23 | 0000313143-18-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2017-05-24 | 0000313143-17-000017 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-05 | 0000313143-26-000152 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | 0000313143-26-000120 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | 0000313143-26-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-06 | 0000313143-25-000075 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-07 | 0000313143-25-000058 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-06 | 0000313143-25-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-07 | 0000313143-24-000063 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-08 | 0000313143-24-000054 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-08 | 0000313143-24-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-02 | 0000313143-23-000057 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.16% | $197.4M | $121.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $152.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.19% | $143.6M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $107.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $54.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.36% | $49.3M | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 7 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.13% | $43.8M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | MDY State Street® SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 0.17% | $43.1M | $25.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 9 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $35.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | SPMD State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.17% | $31.0M | $18.3B | 2026-11-05 |
| 11 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $30.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.16% | $28.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $22.9M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 14 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.10% | $22.8M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 15 | IJK iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.20% | $20.0M | $10.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 16 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.26% | $19.5M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 17 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.17% | $15.6M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 18 | VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $14.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.35% | $11.2M | $3.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 20 | IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.13% | $11.2M | $8.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 21 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $9.8M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 22 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.14% | $9.6M | $6.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 23 | JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF | JPMorgan | 0.31% | $8.8M | $2.9B | 2026-11-06 |
| 24 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.35% | $8.3M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | Vanguard | 0.14% | $8.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '26 | 2026-03-28 | $346.35M | $-20.15M | $-0.41 | $70.94M |
| Q3 '26 | 2025-12-27 | $338.97M | $44.74M | $0.95 | $93.56M |
| Q2 '26 | 2025-09-27 | $327.31M | $38.68M | $0.81 | $111.32M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-06-28 | $321.39M | $34.03M | $0.70 | $17.39M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-03-29 | $330.60M | $57.98M | $1.17 | $116.56M |
| Q3 '25 | 2024-12-28 | $348.54M | $37.49M | $0.74 | $43.77M |
| Q2 '25 | 2024-09-28 | $345.51M | $33.83M | $0.66 | $48.82M |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-06-29 | $336.17M | $38.37M | $0.74 | $-27.42M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-03-30 | $343.29M | $20.37M | $0.40 | $64.08M |
| Q3 '24 | 2023-12-30 | $336.25M | $31.24M | $0.61 | $-3.41M |
| Q2 '24 | 2023-09-30 | $318.18M | $24.91M | $0.48 | $102.00M |
| Q1 '24 | 2023-07-01 | $311.33M | $41.04M | $0.80 | $19.09M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
HAE vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEHC GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. Common S | $37.2B | 17.8 | +6.9% | +2.0% | 30 |
| GKOS Glaukos Corporation | $13.3B | — | +46.9% | +113.1% | 25 |
| PODD Insulet Corporation | $10.2B | 28.1 | +29.4% | −47.0% | 33 |
| HAE Haemonetics Corporation | $5.5B | 58.7 | −2.0% | +50.5% | 3 |
| MMSI Merit Medical Systems Inc | $5.2B | 33.5 | +9.1% | +3.2% | 23 |
| NVST Envista Holdings Corporation Common stoc | $4.0B | 45.4 | +11.9% | +21.5% | 47 |
| NEOG Neogen Corp | $2.6B | — | −0.3% | +73.9% | 8 |
| UFPT UFP Technologies Inc | $2.4B | 35.2 | +7.3% | +45.8% | 44 |
| ENOV Enovis Corporation | $1.6B | — | +4.9% | +6.5% | 41 |
| Peer median | $4.6B | 33.5 | +8.2% | +14.0% | 32 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.