MasTec, Inc.(MTZ)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $160.08 – $441.43
- YTD
- +48.40%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 38.95
- Straddle Price
- $54.65
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.68
- Market Cap
- $28.4B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.63% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.13% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.65% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +13.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +8.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.08 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.6% |
| Book / Price | 12.2% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 12.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 1.7% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.69 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $377.98 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $372.28 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 7.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $2.1B |
| Market Cap | $28B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $32.27 | 24% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $272.76 | 7% | median 44.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $585.89 | 7% | median 37.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $505.80 | 7% | median 11.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $834.04 | 7% | median 4.0× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $377.98 | 48% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- WATER, SEWER, PIPELINE, COMM & POWER LINE CONSTRUCTION (1623)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $28.4B
MasTec is a leading infrastructure construction company operating mainly in North America across a range of industries. Its primary activities include engineering, building, installing, maintaining, and upgrading communications, oil and gas, utility, renewable energy, and other infrastructure. MasTec reports its results under five segments: communications; clean energy and infrastructure; pipeline infrastructure; power delivery; and other.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.36% | 23 |
| Feb | +4.21% | 23 |
| Mar | +0.23% | 23 |
| Apr | -0.60% | 23 |
| May | +4.69% | 23 |
| Jun | +2.70% | 23 |
| Jul | +1.02% | 23 |
| Aug | +0.70% | 22 |
| Sep | -1.04% | 23 |
| Oct | +3.79% | 23 |
| Nov | +2.79% | 23 |
| Dec | +6.45% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-02 | Pre-Market | 11.16% | 8.77% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 11.25% | 1.89% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-02-28 | Pre-Market | 14.67% | 2.43% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-05-02 | Pre-Market | 9.86% | 4.88% | 0.49x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 8.32% | 9.79% | 1.18x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-30 | After-Close | 13.55% | 0.57% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | After-Close | 13.40% | 2.15% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2026-04-30 | After-Close | 11.98% | 5.13% | 0.43x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 38.95
- IV Rank (7D)
- 38.95
- Avg IV
- 78.5%
- Straddle (30D)
- $54.65
- Straddle (7D)
- $54.65
- P/C Volume
- 0.68
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.82
- Correlation (SPY)
- 52.7%
- R²
- 0.28
- Ann. Volatility
- 43.9%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $54.53M | 26.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $30.89M | 15.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $26.74M | 13.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Arosa Capital Management LP | $24.13M | 11.84% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $22.52M | 11.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $15.73M | 7.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $10.49M | 5.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $4.86M | 2.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $4.82M | 2.36% | 2025-09-30 |
| 10 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN Custodian | $3.22M | 1.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.22M | 0.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.16M | 0.57% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.09M | 0.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Walleye Capital LLC | $965.22K | 0.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $772.18K | 0.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $353.91K | 0.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $289.57K | 0.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | COOPER CREEK PARTNERS MANAGEMENT LLC | $25.74K | 0.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $51.99M | 28.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | Paloma Partners Management Co | $36.68M | 20.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $21.97M | 12.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $18.47M | 10.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $11.90M | 6.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $9.65M | 5.30% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Intrinsic Edge Capital Management LLC | $6.43M | 3.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $5.34M | 2.93% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $3.41M | 1.87% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | PEAK6 LLC | $3.22M | 1.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC | $2.90M | 1.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Walleye Trading LLC | $2.77M | 1.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $2.03M | 1.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $1.48M | 0.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.25M | 0.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.09M | 0.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $965.22K | 0.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $643.48K | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | Ernst N Csiszar | Director | Sell (S) | −6,500 | $371.17 | -$2.41M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | JULIA L JOHNSON | Director | Award (A) | +95 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-19 | Javier Alberto Palomarez | Director | Mixed | +74 | $434.77 | -$9.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | C Robert Campbell | Director | Award (A) | +95 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-19 | Ava L Parker | Director | Mixed | +107 | $434.77 | -$6.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Robert J Dwyer | Director | Mixed | +74 | $434.77 | -$9.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Ernst N Csiszar | Director | Mixed | +81 | $434.77 | -$10.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | C Robert Campbell | Director | Sell (S) | −3,000 | $417.00 | -$1.25M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-17 | Timothy Michael Love | CAO | Award (A) | +492 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-27 | Javier Alberto Palomarez | Director | Sell (S) | −950 | $325.43 | -$309.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-20 | JOSE RAMON MAS | CEO | Award (A) | +26,397 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-20 | JORGE MAS | Director | Award (A) | +15,838 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-20 | Alberto de Cardenas | EVP, General Counsel | Award (A) | +6,269 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-20 | Robert E Apple | COO | Award (A) | +11,548 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-20 | Paul DiMarco | CFO | Award (A) | +9,074 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JORGE MAS | Director | 4,656,686 | $1.57B | -$51.61M | 25 | 2026-03-20 |
| 2 | JOSE RAMON MAS | CEO | 4,535,149 | $1.53B | -$21.03M | 45 | 2026-03-20 |
| 3 | AUSTIN J SHANFELTER | Director | 626,678 | $211.72M | -$6.32M | 8 | 2008-08-08 |
| 4 | Robert E Apple | COO | 195,659 | $66.10M | -$24.74M | 57 | 2026-03-20 |
| 5 | George Pita | CFO | 157,922 | $53.35M | -$7.49M | 20 | 2023-03-21 |
| 6 | Alberto de Cardenas | EVP, General Counsel | 110,863 | $37.45M | -$8.94M | 49 | 2026-03-20 |
| 7 | Paul DiMarco | CFO | 76,639 | $25.89M | -$95.0K | 7 | 2026-03-20 |
| 8 | JULIA L JOHNSON | Director | 73,335 | $24.78M | -$5.11M | 90 | 2026-05-19 |
| 9 | JOHN VAN HEUVELEN | Director | 70,946 | $23.97M | -$1.85M | 37 | 2017-05-17 |
| 10 | Ray Harris | President | 54,025 | $18.25M | -$865.4K | 4 | 2013-01-02 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | ERNEST N CSISZAR | Director | 6,500 | $2.41M | 2026-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | Campbell C Robert | Director | 3,000 | $1.25M | 2026-05-04 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-25 | Palomarez Javier Alberto | Director | 950 | $306.9K | 2026-03-25 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | ERNEST N CSISZAR | Director | 6,500 | $1.95M | 2026-03-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-03 | Love Timothy Michael | Officer | 1,929 | $397.7K | 2025-11-03 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-30 | Campbell C Robert | Director | 2,000 | $420.6K | 2025-09-29 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-18 | Robert E Apple | Officer | 10,000 | $2.00M | 2025-09-18 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-11 | Campbell C Robert | Director | 3,000 | $571.2K | 2025-09-11 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | de Cardenas Alberto | Officer | 20,000 | $3.60M | 2025-08-04 | MERRILL LYNCH | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-16 | Apple Robert E | Officer | 10,000 | $1.75M | 2025-07-16 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 | 0001193125-26-236909 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-30 | 0000015615-26-000052 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-26 | 0000015615-26-000018 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0000015615-25-000130 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-27 | 0001193125-25-189769 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0000015615-25-000080 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-27 | 0001193125-25-151280 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-27 | 0001193125-25-127576 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | 0001193125-25-110270 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-22 | 0001193125-25-089313 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-26 | 0000015615-26-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-28 | 0000015615-25-000021 | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-01 | 0000015615-24-000021 | EDGAR |
| 2023-03-16 | 0000015615-23-000009 | EDGAR |
| 2022-03-01 | 0000015615-22-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-25 | 0000015615-21-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-27 | 0000015615-20-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-28 | 0000015615-19-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-27 | 0000015615-18-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-24 | 0000015615-17-000007 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 0000015615-26-000050 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0000015615-25-000128 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0000015615-25-000079 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0000015615-25-000052 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-31 | 0000015615-24-000107 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-01 | 0000015615-24-000075 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-02 | 0000015615-24-000045 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-02 | 0000015615-23-000036 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-03 | 0000015615-23-000029 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-04 | 0000015615-23-000018 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 59.2 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.6 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $15.3B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.4B |
| TTM EPS | $5.71 |
| ROE | 13.6% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.77 |