POM POMDOCTOR LIMITED Class A Ordinary Shares
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
POM
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- RETAIL-MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL (5900) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 165
- List Date
- 2026-10-21
- CIK
- 0001877971
- Homepage
- https://www.7lk.com
Pomdoctor Ltd is an online medical services platform for chronic diseases in China. With a focus on chronic disease management and pharmaceutical services, its business model forms a one-stop platform for medical services, which organically connects patients to doctors and pharmaceutical products. Its experience in tackling chronic diseases can be traced back to the launch of its platform on mobile devices. The company operates in two segments: Internet hospital, and Pharmaceutical supply chain. The majority of its revenue is derived from the Pharmaceutical supply chain segment.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
Insufficient price history — listed 19 days ago. Seasonality patterns need at least one full year of data.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.38
SMA 50: $1.06
SMA 200: $2.81
Current: $1.53
EMA 12: $1.54
EMA 26: $1.36
MACD: 0.1805 | Signal: -0.0055
BULLISH
ADX (14): 40.75
STRONG TREND
+DI: 34.62
−DI: 10.40
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 52.37
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 42.26
Stoch %D: 42.42
Williams %R: -63.79
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.60
BB Lower: $0.16
NEUTRAL
OBV: 107,255,050
Vol SMA 20: 6,488,885
Vol ROC: -63.94%
ATR: $0.46
True Range: $0.43
HV 20: 655.5%
HV 30: 541.3%
HV 60: 387.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2015-04-30T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: POM
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Recent negative news headlines and class action lawsuits have impacted the stock price, while technical indicators suggest a neutral trend.
Primary Risks: Negative sentiment from recent news and potential regulatory issues could continue to weigh on the stock price. However, the low volatility and relatively stable beta indicate a lower risk environment.
Investment Thesis: POM's current price reflects the impact of negative news headlines, but the company's fundamentals may not be as weak as the market suggests. A careful analysis of technical indicators and recent news sentiment could identify potential buying opportunities.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent class action lawsuits and withdrawal of IPO applications have created a negative narrative around POM, leading to a decline in investor confidence.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Downtrend
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels: $0.86 (current price), $0.79 (EMA 12), and $0.30 (Bollinger Bands lower band)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (42.46)
- MACD: Bearish (-0.23 / Signal: 0.05 / Histogram: -0.28)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral
Volume Analysis: Volume has been decreasing, indicating a potential trend reversal.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly negative, focusing on class action lawsuits and withdrawal of IPO applications.
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE (6/10)
Catalyst Identification: None significant in the near term. However, resolution of the class action lawsuits or positive regulatory developments could positively impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: The market is currently pricing in a negative scenario for POM, reflecting the recent news headlines.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to the market (beta 0.73)
Volatility Regime: Historical volatility is relatively low compared to the current average true range (ATR) of $0.19.
Options Market Signals: No significant options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $0.86 and $0.79 (EMA 12) could provide some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: POM's sector is performing similarly to the market, with no clear outperformance or underperformance.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity signals available.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with the market (R-squared) is 0.04, indicating a relatively low correlation.
Relative Valuation: POM's relative valuation is neutral, reflecting its current price in relation to its peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $0.86 (current price), $0.79 (EMA 12), and $0.30 (Bollinger Bands lower band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A breakout above the Bollinger Bands upper band ($1.49) or a breakdown below the EMA 12 ($0.79) could signal significant moves.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None immediate, but resolution of class action lawsuits or positive regulatory developments could positively impact the stock price in the medium term.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at $0.75 and position sizing considerations are recommended to manage risk.
By analyzing POM's technical indicators, news sentiment, and risk metrics, this report provides a comprehensive view of the stock's current situation and potential future developments. The neutral trend direction and low volatility suggest a lower-risk environment, while the negative news headlines create uncertainty around the company's fundamentals. A careful evaluation of these factors is necessary to determine the best course of action for investors.
Generated
News
All POM news →
POM Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Insufficient price history — listed 19 days ago. Beta and correlation vs SPY require ~1 year of daily returns to be statistically meaningful.
Notable investors who own POM
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $31K | #6106 of 6285 | -94.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
POM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 1 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
POM Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2016-03-24Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-03-24 | Patricia A. Oelrich | Director | Disp (D) | −16,165 | $27.25 | -$440.5K | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | David M Velazquez | EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT | Disp (D) | −192,577 | $27.25 | -$5.25M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Jack B Dunn IV | Director | Disp (D) | −22,394 | $27.25 | -$610.2K | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Thomas H Graham | VICE PRESIDENT | Disp (D) | −32,136 | $27.25 | -$875.7K | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | John U Huffman | PRESIDENT AND CEO - PES | Disp (D) | −95,178 | $27.25 | -$2.59M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Hallie M Reese | VICE PRESIDENT- PHI SERVICE CO | Disp (D) | −51,052 | $27.25 | -$1.39M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Kevin C Fitzgerald | EXECUTIVE VP AND GEN COUNSEL | Disp (D) | −174,070 | $27.25 | -$4.74M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Terence C Golden | Director | Disp (D) | −56,839 | $27.25 | -$1.55M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Frederick J Boyle | SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CFO | Disp (D) | −90,216 | $27.25 | -$2.46M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Paul M Barbas | Director | Disp (D) | −7,365 | $27.25 | -$200.7K | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Lester P Silverman | Director | Disp (D) | −13,197 | $27.25 | -$359.6K | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Joseph M Rigby | CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO | Disp (D) | −867,488 | $27.25 | -$23.64M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Lawrence C Nussdorf | Director | Disp (D) | −22,706 | $27.25 | -$618.8K | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | Ronald K Clark | VICE PRESIDENT AND CONTROLLER | Disp (D) | −68,573 | $27.25 | -$1.87M | EDGAR |
| 2016-03-24 | H Russell Frisby Jr | Director | Disp (D) | −10,790 | $27.25 | -$294.0K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
POM Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Apr 30, 2026Directors 5
- Daxue Donnelly Li · since Mar 18, 2026
- Guoji Luo · since Mar 18, 2026
- Wenqing Bao · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yuanyuan Crystal Jing · since Mar 18, 2026
- Zhenyang Shi · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 4
- Zhenyang Shi · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Dexiang Wei · Vice President · since Mar 18, 2026
- Guoji Luo · Vice President · since Mar 18, 2026
- Li jinfuhua Xu · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
10% owners 1
- Zhenyang Shi · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (10)
| Mar 18, 2026 | Zhenyang Shi became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Zhenyang Shi became a 10% owner |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Zhenyang Shi became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yuanyuan Crystal Jing became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Wenqing Bao became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Li jinfuhua Xu became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Guoji Luo became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Guoji Luo became Vice President |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Dexiang Wei became Vice President |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Daxue Donnelly Li became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
POM vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc. Common Stock | $8.0B | 20.3 | +22.7% | +19.3% | 51 |
| EZPW Ezcorp Inc | $1.8B | 14.9 | +28.6% | +47.4% | 14 |
| REAL The RealReal, Inc. Common Stock | $1.6B | — | +18.1% | −7.7% | 10 |
| SVV Savers Value Village, Inc. | $1.5B | 65.8 | +10.0% | +11.4% | 100 |
| SPH Suburban Propane Partners L P | $1.1B | 8.7 | −2.2% | −7.9% | 40 |
| WINA Winmark Corp | $944M | — | — | −31.0% | — |
| TMS Teamshares Inc. Common Stock | $353M | — | — | −59.9% | — |
| LOKV Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V Class A Ord | $325M | — | — | +11.8% | — |
| POM POMDOCTOR LIMITED Class A Ordinary Share | $5M | — | — | −73.9% | — |
| Peer median | $1.3B | 17.6 | +18.1% | +1.9% | 40 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.