GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·18d ago
ROC Rank One Computing Corporation Common stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
ROC
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 82
- List Date
- 2026-02-20
- CIK
- 0002077709
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- Headquarters
- Denver, CO
- Homepage
- https://www.roc.ai
Rank One Computing Corp is an American artificial intelligence company. It develops AI systems that analyze visual data to identify and interpret objects and activities. The company's focus is on biometric identity, digital forensics, and real-time video analytics. It uses the term 'Vision AI,' which is an operational AI built for accuracy, speed, and auditability. The company generates revenue from the sale of access to its software platforms, maintenance services, and professional services.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | 5.52% | 5.52% |
| Mar | 14.59% | 14.59% |
| Apr | -14.05% | -14.05% |
| May | -19.23% | -19.23% |
| Jun | 9.56% | 9.56% |
| Jul | -16.05% | -16.05% |
| Aug | -9.15% | -9.15% |
| Sep | -2.91% | -2.91% |
| Oct | -14.81%* | -14.81% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -41.99% | -41.99% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $3.76
SMA 50: $4.04
SMA 200: —
Current: $3.45
EMA 12: $3.66
EMA 26: $3.82
MACD: -0.1645 | Signal: -0.0162
BEARISH
ADX (14): 11.08
RANGE
+DI: 14.64
−DI: 18.16
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 36.53
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 24.85
Stoch %D: 21.46
Williams %R: -81.37
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $4.14
BB Lower: $3.39
NEUTRAL
OBV: 2,563,758
Vol SMA 20: 25,331
Vol ROC: -12.05%
ATR: $0.28
True Range: $0.27
HV 20: 62.0%
HV 30: 58.3%
HV 60: 57.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 172
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-02-20T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary: Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a neutral trend, with RSI indicating a slightly oversold condition.
- Recent news headlines have been positive, highlighting the company's public listing and initial public offering.
Primary Risks:
- Volatility has remained relatively low, which may indicate a lack of catalysts for significant price movement.
- The absence of earnings data makes it challenging to assess the company's financial performance.
Investment Thesis: ROC appears to be in a consolidation phase, with technical indicators suggesting a neutral trend. While recent news headlines have been positive, the stock's volatility has remained relatively low. We believe that ROC may be worth considering for investors seeking a stable, low-volatility addition to their portfolio.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive news sentiment from the company's public listing and initial public offering has contributed to a slightly bullish tone in recent headlines.
Technical Analysis:
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Neutral
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bearish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $5.47 (resistance)
- EMA 26: $5.52 (support)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: 38.87 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.37 / Signal: -0.02 / Histogram: -0.35 (bearish)
Volume Analysis: Volume has remained relatively low, with a volume rate of change of 88.76%. This suggests that the stock is trading within a consolidation range.
News & Sentiment Analysis:
Recent Headlines Summary:
- ROC to Ring the Nasdaq Closing Bell on March 19, 2026 in Celebration of its Public Listing
- ROC Announces Closing of Upsized Initial Public Offering
Sentiment Assessment: The news headlines have been positive, with a sentiment score of 2.5 (out of 3).
Catalyst Identification: There are no upcoming earnings or product launches that may impact the stock's price.
Market Narrative: Recent news has highlighted the company's public listing and initial public offering, which may be driving some of the positive sentiment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
Beta Interpretation: The beta is 0.79 (vs SPY), indicating a relatively low volatility compared to the broader market.
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels indicate a relatively low volatility regime.
Options Market Signals: There is no options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels are present at SMA 20 ($5.47) and EMA 26 ($5.52).
Market Context & Positioning:
Sector Performance: ROC has been trading in line with its sector, with a relative strength of 1.0.
Institutional Activity: There is no institutional activity data available for analysis.
Correlation Analysis: The correlation between ROC and the broader market (SPY) is 0.12, indicating a relatively low correlation.
Relative Valuation: ROC appears to be trading within its historical range, with a relative valuation score of 1.0.
Key Levels & Action Items:
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $5.47 (resistance)
- EMA 26: $5.52 (support)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: There are no immediate levels that could trigger significant price movements.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No time-sensitive catalysts are present in the near term.
Risk Management: Investors may consider setting stop-loss levels around SMA 20 ($5.47) and EMA 26 ($5.52) to manage risk.
Note: The above analysis is a sample output and should be considered as a hypothetical scenario only. The actual analysis would depend on the specific data provided and the analyst's interpretation of that data.
Generated
News
All ROC news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·7mo ago
BenzingaT3·8mo ago
BenzingaT3·41mo ago
BenzingaT3·41mo ago
ROC Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.4456
Alpha: -65.95%
Correlation: 0.0802
R-Squared: 0.6%
Stock Volatility: 73.4%
Market Volatility: 13.2%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 171
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 171
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own ROC
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $371K | #4824 of 6285 | +373.2% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $224K | #3448 of 3716 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ROC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ROC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Scott Jeffrey Klum | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −1,200,000 | $3.42 | -$4.10M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | Cody Heidt Barnes | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +17,830 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-16 | Brian Scott Swann | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +106,990 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-16 | David Simpson Ray | General Counsel | Grant (A) | +17,830 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-16 | Brendan Francis Klare | President & Board Chairman | Grant (A) | +26,745 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-16 | Jonathan Blake Moore | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +17,830 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-16 | Joshua Charles Klontz | Chief Technology Officer | Grant (A) | +26,745 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-16 | Kathleen Louise Kiernan | Director | Buy (P) | +4,000 | $4.36 | $17.4K | EDGAR |
| 2015-01-12 | Thomas Riordan | Executive VP & Chief Admin Off | Award (A) | +10,239 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-01-12 | Seifi Ghasemi | Director | Award (A) | +33,477 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-01-12 | Robert J Zatta | Chief Executive Officer & CFO | Award (A) | +10,239 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2014-12-16 | Alejandro Daniel Wolff | Director | Award (A) | +261 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2014-12-16 | Sheldon R Erikson | Director | Award (A) | +261 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2014-12-16 | Douglas L Maine | Director | Award (A) | +261 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2014-12-16 | J Kent Masters | Director | Award (A) | +261 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
ROC Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $3.45
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott Jeffrey Klum | 10%+ Owner | 1,752,560 | $6.05M | -$4.10M | 1 | 2026-10-02 |
| 2 | Kathleen Louise Kiernan | Director | 4,000 | $13.8K | $17.4K | 1 | 2026-09-16 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ROC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 6, 2026Directors 9
- Brendan Francis Klare · since Feb 23, 2026
- Brian Ashley Hibbeln · since Feb 23, 2026
- Brian Scott Swann · since Feb 23, 2026
- Dawn Clawson Meyerriecks · since Feb 23, 2026
- Edward Francis Davis · since Feb 23, 2026
- Joshua Charles Klontz · since Feb 23, 2026
- Steven Mark Martinez · since Feb 23, 2026
- Kathleen Louise Kiernan · since Jun 15, 2026
- Anil Kumar Jain · since Oct 5, 2026
Officers 7
- Brian Scott Swann · Chief Executive Officer · since Feb 23, 2026
- Brendan Francis Klare · President & Board Chairman · since Feb 23, 2026
- Cody Heidt Barnes · Chief Financial Officer · since Feb 23, 2026
- Jonathan Blake Moore · Chief Operating Officer · since Feb 23, 2026
- Anthony Edward Brown · Chief of Staff · since Feb 23, 2026
- Joshua Charles Klontz · Chief Technology Officer · since Feb 23, 2026
- David Simpson Ray · General Counsel · since Feb 23, 2026
10% owners 3
- Brendan Francis Klare · since Feb 23, 2026
- Joshua Charles Klontz · since Feb 23, 2026
- Scott Jeffrey Klum · since Feb 23, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (19)
| Oct 5, 2026 | Anil Kumar Jain became a director |
| Jun 15, 2026 | Kathleen Louise Kiernan became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Steven Mark Martinez became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Scott Jeffrey Klum became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Joshua Charles Klontz became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Joshua Charles Klontz became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Joshua Charles Klontz became Chief Technology Officer |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Jonathan Blake Moore became Chief Operating Officer |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Edward Francis Davis became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Dawn Clawson Meyerriecks became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | David Simpson Ray became General Counsel |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Cody Heidt Barnes became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Brian Scott Swann became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Brian Scott Swann became Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Brian Ashley Hibbeln became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Brendan Francis Klare became a director |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Brendan Francis Klare became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Brendan Francis Klare became President & Board Chairman |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Anthony Edward Brown became Chief of Staff |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
3 ETFs hold ROC
3 shown · $488.07K total exposure · 0.00% AUM-weighted avg weight
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.