Stardust Power Inc. Warrant(SDSTW)

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

SDSTW — —
Snapshot
Info
Industry (SIC)
PRIMARY SMELTING & REFINING OF NONFERROUS METALS (3330)
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.0B

Stardust Power Inc is developing a lithium refinery at its Facility in Muskogee, Oklahoma, with planned capacity of producing up to 50,000 metric tons per annum of BGLC once fully operational. The company will source lithium brine feedstock from various suppliers and may make investments upstream to secure additional feedstock. The Company seeks to sell its products to electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers as the primary market, with potential applications in other areas such as battery manufacturers, the U.S. military, and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
MonthAvg ReturnYears of Data
Jan +46.51% 2
Feb -2.45% 2
Mar -17.10% 2
Apr +9.43% 2
May +20.02% 2
Jun -35.27% 2
Jul +83.60% 3
Aug -0.73% 3
Sep +2.59% 3
Oct +50.40% 2
Nov -30.69% 2
Dec -13.49% 2
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $0.10
SMA 50: $0.11
SMA 200: $0.15
Current: $0.07
EMA 12: $0.08
EMA 26: $0.09
MACD: -0.0109 | Signal: -0.0014
BEARISH
ADX (14): 18.16
RANGE
+DI: 31.02
−DI: 27.38

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 43.87
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 32.63
Stoch %D: 26.95
Williams %R: -73.82

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $0.15
BB Lower: $0.05
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,242,287
Vol SMA 20: 8,978
Vol ROC: -88.90%
ATR: $0.02
True Range: $0.01
HV 20: 411.1%
HV 30: 363.9%
HV 60: 285.9%

Data Summary

Data Points: 465
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-07-09T00:00:00 – 2026-09-25T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report:

Executive Summary

Overall assessment: BEARISH (confidence level 6/10)

Key drivers and primary risks:

  • Bearish technical signals, including a bearish MACD crossover and RSI below neutral
  • High volatility, with a beta of 2.53 compared to the SPY
  • Recent news sentiment is mostly neutral, but there are some positive headlines that may not be enough to overcome the bearish trends

Investment thesis:

SDSTW appears to be in a downtrend, with bearish technical signals and high volatility suggesting potential further declines. However, recent positive earnings reports and developments at the Muskogee Lithium Refinery could lead to a rebound if investors become more optimistic about the company's growth prospects.

Recent news sentiment impact:

The recent news headlines have been mostly neutral, but the positive headline on Q1 2026 financial results may have provided some short-term support for the stock. The reverse stock split announcement also suggests that the company is trying to position itself for long-term growth.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Bearish (short-term)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $0.14
  • SMA 50: $0.17
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $0.18

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30) - potential buy signal
  • MACD crossover: Bearish (-0.01 / Signal: 0.00 / Histogram: -0.02)
  • Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, breakout potential

Volume Analysis:

  • Volume SMA 20: 9770.95 ( decreasing trend)
  • On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1232397.67 ( increasing trend)
  • Volume Rate of Change: -60.06% ( declining trend)

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been mostly neutral, with some positive earnings reports and developments at the Muskogee Lithium Refinery.

Sentiment Assessment:

  • Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL

Catalyst Identification: Earnings announcements and developments at the Muskogee Lithium Refinery could be potential catalysts for the stock.

Market Narrative: The recent news headlines suggest that the company is trying to position itself for long-term growth, which may not be enough to overcome the bearish technical signals and high volatility.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Risk Metrics:

  • Beta: 2.53 (high risk)
  • Alpha: 3.06
  • Correlation: 0.12
  • Stock Volatility: 2.48 (high volatility)

Options Market Signals: No options data available.

Downside Protection: Support levels to monitor include the SMA 20 and SMA 50, with potential downside risk if these levels are broken.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: SDSTW is a laggard in its sector, with a relative strength index of 29.73 (below neutral).

Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest is increasing, but it's unclear whether this will be enough to drive the stock higher.

Correlation Analysis: The correlation between SDSTW and the market is low (0.12), suggesting that the stock may not be closely tied to broader market trends.

Relative Valuation: SDSTW is trading below its SMA 200 and EMA 26, suggesting it may be undervalued in the short term.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • SMA 20: $0.14
  • SMA 50: $0.17

Breakout/Breakdown Levels:

  • Upper Bollinger Band: $0.18 (potential breakout)

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings announcements and developments at the Muskogee Lithium Refinery could be potential catalysts for the stock.

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around the SMA 20, with position sizing considerations based on the high volatility and risk profile of the stock.

Generated
News
Options Activity
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Beta (1Y vs SPY)
2.54
Correlation (SPY)
13.2%
R²
0.02
Ann. Volatility
251.4%
SPY Volatility
13.1%

High volatility - stock moves more than market

Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

18 filers843,659 shares$92.55K value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 ARISTEIA CAPITAL, L.L.C. 290,258 $35.56K 38.42% — 2026-06-30
2 Clear Street Group Inc. 195,202 $21.67K 23.41% — 2026-06-30
3 MOORE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP 58,333 $6.47K 7.00% — 2026-06-30
4 TENOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Co., L.P. 49,432 $5.49K 5.93% — 2026-06-30
5 RIVERNORTH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 38,415 $4.42K 4.77% — 2026-06-30
6 LMR Partners LLP 29,167 $3.24K 3.50% — 2026-06-30
7 JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian 26,532 $2.94K 3.18% — 2026-06-30
8 P SCHOENFELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LP 24,766 $2.75K 2.97% — 2026-06-30
9 Blue Owl Capital Holdings LP 16,666 $2.17K 2.34% — 2026-06-30
10 Creek Drive Management Group LLC 15,037 $1.67K 1.80% — 2026-06-30
11 DUPONT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORP 12,500 $1.53K 1.65% — 2026-06-30
12 TORONTO DOMINION BANK 13,300 $1.48K 1.59% — 2026-06-30
13 OMERS ADMINISTRATION Corp 11,666 $1.43K 1.54% — 2026-06-30
14 SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian 11,749 $1.30K 1.41% — 2026-06-30
15 UBS Group AG Custodian 3,752 $416 0.45% — 2026-06-30
16 Athos Capital Ltd 11,378 $18 0.02% — 2026-06-30
17 Virtu Financial LLC 31,340 $3 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
18 SkyView Investment Advisors, LLC 4,166 $0 0.00% — 2026-06-30
1 filers$8.02K notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian $8.02K 100.00% 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-17
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2026-06-17 UDAYCHANDRA DEVASPER Chief Financial Officer Mixed +4,691 $1.95 -$6.9K EDGAR
2026-06-17 Chris Edward Celano Chief Operating Officer Sell (S) −640 $1.95 -$1.2K EDGAR
2026-06-17 ROSHEN PUJARI CEO and Chairman Sell (S) −861 $1.91 -$1.6K EDGAR
2026-06-12 CHARLOTTE NANGULOSHI NANGOLO Director Sell (S) −10,000 $1.74 -$17.4K EDGAR
2026-06-03 PABLO CORTEGOSO Chief Technical Officer Sell (S) −44,452 $2.26 -$100.5K EDGAR
2026-05-28 ROSHEN PUJARI CEO and Chairman Mixed −665,427 $2.18 -$223.3K EDGAR
2026-05-21 UDAYCHANDRA DEVASPER Chief Financial Officer Sell (S) −35,776 $2.03 -$72.6K EDGAR
2026-05-21 Chris Edward Celano Chief Operating Officer Sell (S) −25,975 $2.05 -$53.2K EDGAR
2026-03-24 ROSHEN PUJARI CEO and Chairman Mixed +241,985 $2.31 -$2.6K EDGAR
2026-03-24 Bruce Czachor GC, CCO and Secretary Sell (S) −17,655 $2.29 -$40.4K EDGAR
2026-03-24 PABLO CORTEGOSO Chief Technical Officer Mixed +130,619 $2.29 -$664 EDGAR
2026-03-24 ANUPAM AGARWAL Director Award (A) +11,220 — EDGAR
2026-03-24 Chris Edward Celano Chief Operating Officer Mixed +88,179 $2.32 -$8.0K EDGAR
2026-03-24 UDAYCHANDRA DEVASPER Chief Financial Officer Mixed +88,829 $2.31 -$10.4K EDGAR
2026-03-09 Bruce Czachor GC, CCO and Secretary Award (A) +40,000 — EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
11 insiders · @ $0.07
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 ROSHEN PUJARI CEO and Chairman 1,679,385 $113.7K -$251.4K 13 2026-06-17
2 MARK ANDREW RANKIN Director 819,419 $55.5K $0 1 2024-09-20
3 PABLO CORTEGOSO Chief Technical Officer 586,587 $39.7K -$138.8K 9 2026-06-03
4 UDAYCHANDRA DEVASPER Chief Financial Officer 126,302 $8.6K -$282.9K 12 2026-06-17
5 Paramita Das Chief Strategy Officer 122,152 $8.3K -$7.6K 1 2025-03-13
6 Chris Edward Celano Chief Operating Officer 101,743 $6.9K -$66.2K 5 2026-06-17
7 ANUPAM AGARWAL Director 85,171 $5.8K $0 2 2026-03-24
8 CHARLOTTE NANGULOSHI NANGOLO Director 30,002 $2.0K -$40.6K 4 2026-06-12
9 Bruce Czachor GC, CCO and Secretary 22,345 $1.5K -$40.4K 2 2026-03-24
10 Sudhindra Kankanwadi Director 9,425 $638 $0 1 2024-09-20
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.