Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.(HII)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $228.69 – $460.00
- YTD
- -18.39%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 26.94
- Straddle Price
- $21.80
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.38
- Market Cap
- $11.2B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.43% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.78 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.32% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.71% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +45.7pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +0.6% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.01 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.8B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 11.8% |
| Book / Price | 45.8% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 12.4% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 6.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.52 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +3.6% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $334.93 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $301.45 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 5.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $2.5B |
| Market Cap | $11B |
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | +2.6% | +1.87 | +0.80 | 69.6% | — |
| 42d | +5.9% | +2.48 | +1.10 | 80.7% | — |
| 63d | +11.5% | +3.08 | +1.40 | 90.1% | — |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $241.81 | 17% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $71.10 | 13% | |
| Peer P/E | $655.28 | 5% | median 42.4× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $341.45 | 5% | median 16.1× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $344.66 | 5% | median 2.6× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | $481.01 | 5% | median 1.5× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $334.93 | 33% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $271.00 | 17% | 34 strikes · skew -0.27 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SHIP & BOAT BUILDING & REPAIRING (3730)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $11.2B
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the largest independent military shipbuilder in the US, spun out from Northrop Grumman in 2011. It operates three segments, two of which are storied shipyards: Ingalls produces non-nuclear-powered ships, including amphibious landing ships and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, while Newport News produces nuclear-powered ships as the only producer of Gerald Ford-class aircraft carriers and a major subcontractor on Virginia- and Columbia-class nuclear submarines. HII shares production of destroyers and nuclear submarines with General Dynamics' Bath Iron Works and El…
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +4.69% | 15 |
| Feb | +4.08% | 15 |
| Mar | +1.27% | 16 |
| Apr | +1.32% | 16 |
| May | -3.33% | 16 |
| Jun | +0.02% | 16 |
| Jul | +2.56% | 15 |
| Aug | -0.69% | 15 |
| Sep | -1.39% | 15 |
| Oct | +3.85% | 15 |
| Nov | +3.65% | 15 |
| Dec | +1.85% | 15 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | Pre-Market | 6.40% | 7.57% | 1.18x | Exceeded |
| 2024-10-31 | Pre-Market | 6.41% | 25.71% | 4.01x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-06 | Pre-Market | 9.13% | 18.19% | 1.99x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-01 | Pre-Market | 8.85% | 0.87% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | Pre-Market | 8.43% | 6.81% | 0.81x | Within |
| 2025-10-30 | Pre-Market | 10.07% | 6.92% | 0.69x | Within |
| 2026-02-05 | Pre-Market | 9.18% | 12.03% | 1.31x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-05 | Pre-Market | 9.00% | 10.22% | 1.14x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 26.94
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 79.3%
- Straddle (30D)
- $21.80
- Straddle (7D)
- $7.65
- P/C Volume
- 0.38
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.75
- Correlation (SPY)
- 26.5%
- R²
- 0.07
- Ann. Volatility
- 35.2%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.4%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $90.95M | 35.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $70.97M | 27.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $45.63M | 17.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $16.37M | 6.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $13.60M | 5.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | PEAK6 LLC | $5.13M | 1.99% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $3.63M | 1.41% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $3.12M | 1.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.85M | 1.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.90M | 0.74% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.06M | 0.41% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $987.74K | 0.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $759.80K | 0.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Walleye Trading LLC | $607.84K | 0.24% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $151.96K | 0.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Raiffeisen Bank International AG | $72.94K | 0.03% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $16.07M | 21.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $12.42M | 16.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $10.94M | 14.44% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $10.45M | 13.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $9.92M | 13.10% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $4.03M | 5.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $3.42M | 4.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $2.85M | 3.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Walleye Capital LLC | $2.66M | 3.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.79M | 2.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $645.83K | 0.85% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $493.87K | 0.65% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $75.98K | 0.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | Christopher D Kastner | Director, President & CEO | Grant (A) | +86 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Victoria D Harker | Director | Award (A) | +36 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | LEO P DENAULT | Director | Award (A) | +20 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Nicolas G Schuck | Corp VP, Controller & CAO | Grant (A) | +4 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Brian D. Blanchette | Ex VP and President, Ingalls | Grant (A) | +13 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Stephanie L. O'Sullivan | Director | Award (A) | +18 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Augustus L Collins | Director | Award (A) | +50 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Nick L Stanage | Director | Award (A) | +1 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Kara R. Wilkinson | Ex. VP and President, NNS | Grant (A) | +15 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | KIRKLAND H DONALD | Director | Award (A) | +31 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Frank R Jimenez | Director | Award (A) | +15 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | THOMAS C SCHIEVELBEIN | Director | Award (A) | +106 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Chad N. Boudreaux | Ex VP & Chief Legal Officer | Grant (A) | +16 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Thomas E. Stiehle | Ex. VP and CFO | Grant (A) | +18 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Edmond E. Jr. Hughes | Ex VP & Chief HR Officer | Grant (A) | +10 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C MICHAEL PETTERS | Exec. Vice Chairman | 467,369 | $133.40M | $0 | 29 | 2022-03-15 |
| 2 | MATTHEW J MULHERIN | Ex. VP, President Newport News | 113,940 | $32.52M | -$5.47M | 17 | 2017-03-03 |
| 3 | Christopher D Kastner | Director, President & CEO | 91,773 | $26.19M | -$9.61M | 49 | 2026-06-15 |
| 4 | Brian J. Cuccias | Ex. VP & President, Ingalls | 61,152 | $17.45M | -$2.76M | 20 | 2021-04-05 |
| 5 | Mitchell B Waldman | Ex. VP-Govt & Cust Relations | 53,281 | $15.21M | -$746.2K | 24 | 2021-03-16 |
| 6 | Douglass II Fontaine | Corp. VP, CAO & Controller | 48,623 | $13.88M | $0 | 12 | 2015-02-27 |
| 7 | BARBARA A NILAND | Corp VP and CFO | 47,973 | $13.69M | -$6.62M | 14 | 2016-01-11 |
| 8 | George M. Jr. Simmerman | Corp VP, Dep Gen Counsel | 45,318 | $12.94M | -$195.9K | 6 | 2013-03-11 |
| 9 | THOMAS C SCHIEVELBEIN | Director | 44,271 | $12.64M | $1.18M | 119 | 2026-06-15 |
| 10 | IRWIN F EDENZON | Corp. VP, Strategic Projects | 31,886 | $9.10M | -$2.03M | 11 | 2014-11-12 |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | 0001501585-26-000027 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-01 | 0001501585-26-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | 0001501585-26-000004 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001501585-25-000109 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0001501585-25-000097 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | 0001501585-25-000092 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | 0001501585-25-000040 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0001501585-25-000035 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-06 | 0001501585-25-000004 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-18 | 0001193125-24-260914 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | 0001501585-26-000029 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001501585-25-000112 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0001501585-25-000099 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0001501585-25-000037 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-31 | 0001501585-24-000042 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-01 | 0001501585-24-000036 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-02 | 0001501585-24-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-02 | 0001501585-23-000033 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-03 | 0001501585-23-000026 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-04 | 0001501585-23-000016 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 18.6 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.2 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.9 |
| TTM Revenue | $12.8B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.6B |
| TTM EPS | $15.37 |
| ROE | 11.8% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.90% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.52 |