MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc
XNAS
12.97
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $7.35 – $51.50
- YTD
- +28.93%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 31.16
- Straddle Price
- $2.92
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.40
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- Open
- $12.83
- Day Range
- $12.32 – $13.12
- Volume
- 491,902
- Prev Close
- $12.59
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.45 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.95% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 13.11% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +73.2pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -3.6% |
| Book / Price | 24.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 52.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -8.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $16.22 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $15.50 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 385.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 36.7× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 25.1× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $17.88 | 14% | median 5.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $27.97 | 14% | median 9.4× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $16.22 | 52% | stability 71% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $12.52 | 19% | 10 strikes · skew +0.55 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES (3674) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- Employees
- 85
- List Date
- 2016-10-07
- CIK
- 0001438423
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-28 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.13 (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Chandler, AZ
- Homepage
- https://www.everspin.com
Everspin Technologies Inc is a manufacturer of Magnetoresistive Random Access Memory (MRAM) technology. The company manufactures MRAM products using both captive and third-party manufacturing capabilities. It purchases industry-standard complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) wafers from semiconductor foundries and perform back end of line (BEOL) processing that includes magnetic-bit technology at leased 200mm fabrication facility in Chandler, Arizona. It also manufactures full-flow 300mm CMOS wafers with STT-MRAM magnetic-bit technology integrated in BEOL. The company's customers are i…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 12.42% | -20.14% | 28.25% | -2.29% | -4.52% | 29.13% | 7.14% |
| Feb | 4.42% | -0.30% | -2.95% | -6.47% | -1.91% | -18.43% | -4.27% |
| Mar | -0.17% | -10.02% | -2.44% | -1.00% | -6.59% | -22.83% | -7.17% |
| Apr | -17.06% | -17.83% | -7.16% | -7.13% | 3.92% | 98.70% | 8.91% |
| May | 19.65% | -13.96% | 35.12% | -20.43% | -5.24% | 22.75% | 6.31% |
| Jun | 2.23% | -15.89% | 5.98% | 4.72% | 12.72% | -19.69% | -1.66% |
| Jul | -7.84% | 20.99% | 2.56% | 0.49% | -7.62% | -35.81% | -4.54% |
| Aug | 30.36% | 21.46% | 9.35% | -7.63% | 6.99% | 5.18% | 10.95% |
| Sep | -6.49% | -15.35% | -1.60% | 11.74% | 46.38% | 16.27% | 8.49% |
| Oct | -4.40% | -0.33% | -3.49% | 9.19% | 5.47% | -31.42%* | -4.16% |
| Nov | 95.00% | 9.03% | -5.51% | 4.60% | -23.33% | -- | 15.96% |
| Dec | -2.33% | -14.98% | 0.78% | 1.91% | 17.62% | -- | 0.60% |
| Total | 143.19% | -51.04% | 63.73% | -15.48% | 33.63% | -14.28% | 26.62% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Trend direction: Short-term neutral, Medium-term bullish, Long-term bearish
- Support/resistance levels: $14.62 (lower Bollinger Band), $16.45 (SMA 50)
- Momentum signals:
- RSI: Neutral (38.91)
- MACD: Bearish (Histogram -0.29)
Primary Risks:
- High volatility, driven by beta (4.23) and IV premium (58.0%)
- Unusual options activity (IV rank: 22.6%, put/call ratio: 0.34)
Technical Analysis Trend Direction: Short-term: Neutral Medium-term: Bullish Long-term: Bearish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $14.62
- SMA 50: $16.45
- Upper Bollinger Band: $18.94
Momentum Signals: RSI (14): 38.91 (Neutral) MACD: -0.40 / Signal: -0.11 / Histogram: -0.29 (Bearish)
Bollinger Bands: Upper: $18.94 Middle: $16.78 Lower: $14.62 Width: 25.74 Signal: Neutral
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary:
- Positive news: This Memory Sector Sleeper Stock Nears a Profitability Turning Point, Is Everspin Technologies the Next AI Edge Breakout?
- Negative news: Short-Seller Attacks Everspin Stock
- Neutral news: Intel: Cheap Valuation, But Past Recession Performance Suggests Caution
Sentiment Assessment:
- Aggregate sentiment: NEUTRAL (due to mixed headlines)
Catalyst Identification: Earnings date not available; no other significant events announced.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.2)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility higher than historical average
Options Market Signals: IV rank: 22.6% (Low) Put/call ratio: 0.34 (Bullish sentiment)
Downside Protection: Support levels: $14.62, $16.45; risk management considerations: position sizing and stop-loss levels.
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: Memory sector performing well, with some stocks trending higher
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest, but not significant enough to drive price moves
Correlation Analysis: Stock moves more than market (R-squared >0.5), indicating high correlation with the memory sector.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with no clear signs of overbought or oversold conditions.
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $14.62, $16.45
- Resistance: $18.94
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $18.94 could indicate a bullish trend
- Breakdown below $14.62 could indicate a bearish trend
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No earnings date available; no other significant events announced.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: $13.50, $15.20; position sizing considerations: 2-3% of portfolio.
Conclusion This report presents a mixed technical and news-driven analysis for MRAM stock. The short-term trend is neutral, while the medium-term trend is bullish. However, the long-term trend is bearish due to high volatility and beta. The recent news headlines are generally positive, but the options market signals indicate low volatility and a potential setup for a move higher. To mitigate risks, consider position sizing and stop-loss levels accordingly.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-12 | Pre-Market | 17.48% | 63.22% | 3.62x | Exceeded |
| 2022-03-02 | Pre-Market | 9.92% | 4.34% | 0.44x | Within |
| 2022-05-11 | Pre-Market | 24.38% | 1.09% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2023-05-03 | Pre-Market | 19.42% | 0.15% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2023-08-02 | Pre-Market | 12.71% | 3.05% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2023-11-01 | Pre-Market | 11.69% | 2.48% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2024-02-28 | Pre-Market | 14.04% | 0.22% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2024-05-01 | Pre-Market | 11.19% | 0.94% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2024-07-31 | After-Close | 39.05% | 2.90% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2024-10-30 | Pre-Market | 19.06% | 1.94% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2025-02-26 | Pre-Market | 16.67% | 2.52% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2025-04-30 | Pre-Market | 14.15% | 0.00% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | After-Close | 24.41% | 1.52% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2025-11-05 | Pre-Market | 28.43% | 6.90% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2026-03-04 | Pre-Market | 22.38% | 1.70% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2026-04-29 | Pre-Market | 21.00% | 3.53% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2026-08-05 | Pre-Market | 27.84% | 7.35% | 0.26x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MRAM Options Activity & IV Rank
MRAM IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 7th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $7.6M | #1202 of 3138 | -5.4% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $7.5M | #1799 of 3716 | +0.3% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $2.2M | #1242 of 1945 | +149.4% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $773K | #3996 of 6285 | -60.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MRAM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $8.03M | 34.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $4.48M | 19.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $4.26M | 18.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.41M | 14.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.25M | 5.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.00M | 4.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Capital LLC | $519.87K | 2.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $212.78K | 0.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $12.00M | 36.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $8.55M | 26.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $4.41M | 13.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.98M | 9.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.28M | 3.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.24M | 3.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.11M | 3.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | PEAK6 LLC | $967.20K | 2.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Capital LLC | $159.59K | 0.49% | 2026-06-30 |
MRAM Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-05| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-05 | Sean Michael Dougherty | Vice President, Sales | Sell (S) | −7,691 | $19.08 | -$146.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | William Earl Cooper | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −3,115 | $19.08 | -$59.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | Sanjeev Aggarwal | President and CEO | Sell (S) | −19,572 | $19.08 | -$373.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Vikas Choudhary | Director | Award (A) | +15,693 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Lawrence G Finch | Director | Award (A) | +1,089 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | William Earl Cooper | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +8,610 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Sean Michael Dougherty | Vice President, Sales | Award (A) | +8,610 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Lawrence G Finch | Director | Award (A) | +1,089 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | William Earl Cooper | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +8,610 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Sean Michael Dougherty | Vice President, Sales | Award (A) | +8,610 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-08 | William Earl Cooper | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −1,627 | $8.80 | -$14.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | Sanjeev Aggarwal | President and CEO | Sell (S) | −20,398 | $8.80 | -$179.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | Sean Michael Dougherty | Vice President, Sales | Sell (S) | −422 | $19.65 | -$8.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | Sanjeev Aggarwal | President and CEO | Sell (S) | −36,289 | $19.65 | -$713.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | William Earl Cooper | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −1,821 | $19.65 | -$35.8K | EDGAR |
MRAM Insider Holdings
12 insiders · @ $12.79| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanjeev Aggarwal | President and CEO | 813,627 | $10.41M | -$9.61M | 69 | 2026-10-05 |
| 2 | Lawrence G Finch | Director | 173,484 | $2.22M | -$8.18M | 29 | 2026-08-06 |
| 3 | William Earl Cooper | Chief Financial Officer | 154,626 | $1.98M | -$771.0K | 11 | 2026-10-05 |
| 4 | Darin G Billerbeck | Director | 127,925 | $1.64M | -$2.48M | 33 | 2026-05-22 |
| 5 | David Schrenk | VP SALES & BUS. DEVELOPMENT | 110,330 | $1.41M | -$506.5K | 30 | 2025-05-29 |
| 6 | Sean Michael Dougherty | Vice President, Sales | 100,028 | $1.28M | -$163.0K | 7 | 2026-10-05 |
| 7 | Geoffrey G Ribar | Director | 97,915 | $1.25M | -$1.32M | 13 | 2026-05-22 |
| 8 | Tara Long | Director | 84,466 | $1.08M | -$57.8K | 5 | 2026-05-22 |
| 9 | Glen Hawk | Director | 43,403 | $555.1K | -$1.84M | 5 | 2026-05-22 |
| 10 | Douglas M Mitchell | Director | 32,100 | $410.6K | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-22 |
MRAM Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 5, 2026Directors 7
- Darin G Billerbeck · since Aug 20, 2018
- Geoffrey G Ribar · since Dec 3, 2018
- Glen Hawk · since Mar 28, 2022
- Tara Long · since Mar 28, 2022
- Sanjeev Aggarwal · listed since May 2022
- Douglas M Mitchell · since Feb 26, 2024
- Vikas Choudhary · since Aug 9, 2026
Officers 4
- Sanjeev Aggarwal · President and CEO · listed since Mar 2022
- Sean Michael Dougherty · Vice President, Sales · since Aug 5, 2025
- William Earl Cooper · Chief Financial Officer · since Jan 6, 2025
- David Schrenk · VP Sales & Bus. Development · listed since Mar 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (43)
| Aug 9, 2026 | Vikas Choudhary became a director |
| Aug 6, 2026 | Lawrence G Finch reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 5, 2025 | Sean Michael Dougherty became Vice President, Sales |
| Jan 6, 2025 | William Earl Cooper became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 29, 2024 | Matthew Tenorio listed as Interim CFO (previously Interim CFO, PFO and PAO) in SEC filings |
| Jul 12, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Anuj Aggarwal as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Feb 26, 2024 | Douglas M Mitchell became a director |
| Mar 13, 2023 | David Schrenk listed as VP Sales & Bus. Development (previously VP Sales and Business) in SEC filings |
| Feb 28, 2023 | David Schrenk became VP Sales and Business |
| Nov 8, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Darin G Billerbeck as Executive Chairman in an SEC filing |
| May 12, 2022 | Sanjeev Aggarwal first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 12, 2022 | Darin G Billerbeck listed as Executive Chairman (previously Interim CEO) in SEC filings |
| Mar 28, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Michael B Gustafson from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 28, 2022 | Tara Long became a director |
| Mar 28, 2022 | Glen Hawk became a director |
| Mar 16, 2022 | Sanjeev Aggarwal listed as President and CEO (previously CTO & VP, Technology R&D) in SEC filings |
| Mar 16, 2022 | Anuj Aggarwal listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Interim CFO) in SEC filings |
| Nov 29, 2021 | Thomas M Uhlman reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 29, 2021 | Nvpg IV, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 29, 2021 | Nv Partners IV L P reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 29, 2021 | Nv Partners IV C L P reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 29, 2021 | Andrew Garman reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 24, 2021 | Stephen Socolof reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Nov 24, 2021 | Stephen Socolof reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 18, 2021 | Geoffrey Tate reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 30, 2021 | Anuj Aggarwal became Interim CFO |
| Apr 16, 2021 | Aparna Oka became Corporate Controller |
| Jan 25, 2021 | Sanjeev Aggarwal listed as CTO & VP, Technology R&D (previously Vice President, Technology R&D) in SEC filings |
| Jan 25, 2021 | Darin G Billerbeck first listed as Interim CEO in an SEC filing |
| Jul 15, 2020 | Daniel Berenbaum became CFO, Pfo & Pao |
| Mar 26, 2020 | Troy Winslow listed as VP, Sales and Marketing (previously Vice President of Global Sales) in SEC filings |
| Jan 31, 2020 | Matthew Tenorio became Interim CFO, PFO and PAO |
| Jan 24, 2020 | Sanjeev Aggarwal listed as Vice President, Technology R&D (previously VP, Manuf. & Process Develop.) in SEC filings |
| Mar 18, 2019 | Troy Winslow became Vice President of Global Sales |
| Dec 3, 2018 | Geoffrey G Ribar became a director |
| Aug 20, 2018 | Darin G Billerbeck became a director |
| Mar 15, 2018 | Angelo Ugge listed as VP, Business Development (previously VP, Operations and Bus. Dev.) in SEC filings |
| Nov 15, 2017 | Norm Armour became Vice President of Operations |
| Sep 6, 2017 | Kevin Conley first listed as President and CEO in an SEC filing |
| May 4, 2017 | Annie Flaig became Senior VP, Worldwide Sales |
| Mar 24, 2017 | Michael B Gustafson became a director |
| Mar 24, 2017 | Kevin Conley became a director |
| Jan 16, 2017 | Patrick Patla became Senior VP, Marketing |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (19)
- Matthew Tenorio · Last reported as Interim CFO in an SEC filing dated Jan 6, 2025
- Troy Winslow · Last reported as VP, Sales and Marketing in an SEC filing dated Jul 5, 2022
- Aparna Oka · Last reported as Corporate Controller in an SEC filing dated May 26, 2021
- Daniel Berenbaum · Last reported as CFO, Pfo & Pao in an SEC filing dated Mar 3, 2021
- Peter Hebert · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 20, 2020
- Ronald C Foster · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 20, 2020
- Kevin Conley · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 8, 2020
- Thomas Andre · Last reported as VP, Design Engineering in an SEC filing dated Oct 3, 2019
- Jeffrey G Winzeler · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 28, 2019
- Angelo Ugge · Last reported as VP, Business Development in an SEC filing dated Mar 28, 2019
- Norm Armour · Last reported as Vice President of Operations in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2019
- Patrick Patla · Last reported as Senior VP, Marketing in an SEC filing dated Mar 15, 2018
- Annie Flaig · Last reported as Senior VP, Worldwide Sales in an SEC filing dated May 22, 2017
- Jon Slaughter · Last reported as VP, Technology R&D in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2016
- Thomas Scott Sewell · Last reported as VP, Worldwide Sales & Market. in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2016
- Terry Hulett · Last reported as VP, Storage Solutions in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2016
- Phillip LoPresti · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2016
- Bryan Kang · Last reported as VP, MRAM Tech & Prod. Dev. in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2016
- Robert W. England · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2016
MRAM Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-29What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | LAWRENCE G FINCH | Director | 268,130 | $7.08M | 2026-05-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | WILLIAM COOPER | Officer | 10,000 | $291.3K | 2026-05-20 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | GEOFFREY RIBAR | Director | 27,488 | $793.5K | 2026-05-20 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | SANJEEV AGGARWAL | Officer, Director | 102,192 | $3.33M | 2026-05-18 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-15 | SANJEEV AGGARWAL | Officer, Director | 8,784 | $351.4K | 2026-05-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-15 | GLEN HAWK | Director | 48,563 | $1.84M | 2026-05-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | DARIN G BILLERBECK | Director | 30,000 | $1.11M | 2026-05-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | WILLIAM COOPER | Officer | 11,000 | $239.2K | 2026-05-06 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | SANJEEV AGGARWAL | Officer, Director | 28,459 | $557.4K | 2026-05-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-25 | TARA LONG | Director | 7,500 | $57.8K | 2025-11-25 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $12.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $7.1M | $74.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 3 | XSD State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.25% | $6.1M | $2.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $4.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $2.5M | $13.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 6 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $2.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $1.8M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 8 | VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.09% | $1.7M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 9 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $886,651 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 10 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $805,634 | $1.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 11 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $704,750 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $424,433 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $207,722 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 14 | IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $189,215 | $670.4M | 2026-10-23 |
| 15 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $130,432 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 16 | QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | Invesco | 0.44% | $89,439 | — | 2026-10-24 |
| 17 | DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $62,610 | $13.0B | 2026-10-23 |
| 18 | DFUS Dimensional US Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $54,024 | $21.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 19 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $29,578 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 20 | OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | Invesco | 0.01% | $28,025 | — | 2026-10-24 |
| 21 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.01% | $15,463 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 22 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $11,856 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 23 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $8,314 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 24 | RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $895 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $333 | — | 2026-10-26 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $18.74M | $-3.59M | $-0.15 | $159.00K |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $14.87M | $-296.00K | $-0.01 | $570.00K |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $14.80M | $1.20M | $0.05 | $2.62M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $14.06M | $54.00K | — | $881.00K |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $13.20M | $-670.00K | $-0.03 | $5.01M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $13.14M | $-1.17M | $-0.05 | $1.44M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $13.24M | $1.21M | $0.06 | $3.83M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $12.09M | $2.27M | $0.10 | $2.84M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $10.64M | $-2.50M | $-0.12 | $1.72M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $14.43M | $-202.00K | $-0.01 | $-1.29M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $16.71M | $1.97M | $0.09 | $2.04M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $16.47M | $2.44M | $0.11 | $3.56M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.