Record backlog of $2.1 billion and raised earnings guidance signal strong momentum ahead.
OSIS OSI Systems Inc
XNAS
202.58
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
OSIS
$202.58
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$202.58
- 52-Week Range
- $186.50 – $311.72
- YTD
- -20.74%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 14.91
- Straddle Price
- $18.80
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.50
- Market Cap
- $3.1B
- Open
- $199.34
- Day Range
- $196.01 – $203.43
- Volume
- 107,506
- Prev Close
- $196.36
Fair Value
MODEL: NEUTRAL
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.06 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.71% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.51% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +34.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 20.3% |
| Book / Price | 24.5% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 32.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 13.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.28 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +4.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $199.21 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $197.78 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 7.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.8B |
| Market Cap | $3B |
Peers used for multiples: CACI, DDOG, LDOS, MSI, PLTR, TYL, VRNS, YOU
60-Day Conviction
26%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$203.12
α +0.1%
rank 36%
conviction
6%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$204.31
α +0.7%
rank 36%
conviction
26%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$204.90
α +0.9%
rank 47%
conviction
26%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $59.56 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $382.72 | 9% | median 41.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $390.40 | 9% | median 25.7× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $651.97 | 2% | median 13.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $759.60 | 6% | median 6.8× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $199.21 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $196.03 | 19% | 23 strikes · skew -0.09 |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES (3674) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $3.1B
- Employees
- 7,806
- List Date
- 1997-10-02
- CIK
- 0001039065
- Last Earnings
- Oct 29 after close · −4.2% vs ±10.2% expected
- Next Earnings
- ~Jan 28, 2027 (estimated)
- Headquarters
- Hawthorne, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.osi-systems.com
OSI Systems Inc is a designer and manufacturer of electronic systems and components for businesses in the homeland security, healthcare, defense, and aerospace markets. The firm is organized in three business segments: Security, which derives maximum revenue, provides security and inspection systems; Healthcare, which provides patient monitoring, diagnostic, cardiology, ventilation systems, and defibrillators; and Optoelectronics and Manufacturing, which provides specialized electronic components and manufacturing services for the Security and Healthcare segments and external original equipmen…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.70% | -11.49% | 18.20% | -0.71% | 18.75% | -2.13% | 3.49% |
| Feb | 2.74% | -2.95% | -2.23% | 0.70% | 5.75% | 12.85% | 2.81% |
| Mar | 1.16% | 6.84% | 10.15% | 7.85% | -2.77% | -7.38% | 2.64% |
| Apr | -0.35% | -7.17% | 7.02% | -6.56% | 5.16% | 8.85% | 1.16% |
| May | 0.79% | 7.19% | 0.85% | 9.67% | -2.33% | -23.27% | -1.18% |
| Jun | 5.03% | 2.48% | -2.09% | -2.53% | 3.39% | 2.50% | 1.46% |
| Jul | -0.48% | 11.77% | 1.01% | 8.11% | -2.53% | 2.11% | 3.33% |
| Aug | 0.88% | -13.60% | 13.20% | 3.59% | 4.77% | -7.83% | 0.17% |
| Sep | -2.90% | -12.42% | -11.81% | 7.13% | 7.13% | -6.79% | -3.28% |
| Oct | -2.97% | 11.45% | -12.49% | -10.31% | 13.35% | 1.43% | 0.08% |
| Nov | -1.33% | 6.28% | 17.45% | 34.23% | -3.65% | 2.00%* | 9.16% |
| Dec | 5.36% | -12.15% | 4.60% | -6.83% | -4.97% | -- | -2.80% |
| Total | 5.98% | -17.64% | 45.83% | 44.95% | 47.22% | -20.52% | 17.64% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $198.16
SMA 50: $199.14
SMA 200: $235.12
Current: $202.97
EMA 12: $199.13
EMA 26: $199.01
MACD: 0.1175 | Signal: 0.2536
BEARISH
ADX (14): 22.32
WEAK TREND
+DI: 19.52
−DI: 16.03
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 54.30
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 33.33
Stoch %D: 34.85
Williams %R: -35.48
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $206.01
BB Lower: $190.32
NEUTRAL
OBV: -3,017,160
Vol SMA 20: 207,625
Vol ROC: -64.33%
ATR: $6.61
True Range: $7.41
HV 20: 35.9%
HV 30: 30.4%
HV 60: 30.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before OSIS’s Oct 29 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.
OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) - Comprehensive Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 8/10
OSI Systems is facing significant headwinds from a confluence of legal/litigation risks, deteriorating technical momentum, and bearish options market positioning. The stock has broken below critical moving averages and is experiencing strong negative volume flows alongside multiple investor alert lawsuits. While the current price ($198.56) sits near the 20-day SMA ($198.88), the downtrend structure and bearish sentiment suggest further downside pressure toward $192.50 support.
Key Drivers:
- Primary Risk: Securities fraud investigations and class action litigation (4 recent legal alerts)
- Technical Breakdown: Price trading below 50-day and 200-day SMAs; MACD deeply negative (-4.16 histogram)
- Sentiment Crisis: Heavy put buying (6:1 put/call volume ratio; 7.33 OI ratio) signals institutional de-risking
Investment Thesis: OSIS is in a confirmed downtrend with deteriorating technicals and negative catalysts dominating the narrative. Multiple class action investigations create headline risk and potential balance sheet implications, while options market positioning reflects deep institutional skepticism. Risk/reward is asymmetrically skewed to the downside without a material catalyst reversal.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: HIGHLY NEGATIVE The litigation narrative is the dominant force. Four separate investor alert lawsuits (Oct 6, Sep 11, Sep 4 dates) suggest a potential securities event with institutional awareness. The "radioactive" characterization (Aug 21) predates the legal investigations, suggesting the catalyst may have been an unreported earnings miss, guidance cut, or disclosure issue.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction Assessment
Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Price at $198.56 has slipped below the 20-day SMA of $198.88, signaling early weakness
- Currently trading in the upper half of Bollinger Bands (neutral position) but the structure is deteriorating
- The 13% distance below the 50-day SMA ($210.95) confirms downtrend establishment
Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
- Price is 5.8% below the 50-day moving average ($210.95), indicating established downtrend
- The 50/200 SMA spread is bearish: 50-day is $210.95 vs 200-day at $244.41 (massive negative divergence of 13.6%)
- This inverted MA structure is a classic bearish signal suggesting multi-month downtrend
Long-term (3-12 months): BEARISH
- 18.6% drawdown from the 200-day SMA ($244.41 → $198.56) indicates significant trend deterioration
- Price remains deeply below the 200-day average, the primary long-term trend indicator
- Recovery would require a ~22.9% rally just to reclaim the 200-day MA
Support & Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance | Significance | |-------|------|----------|--------------| | $205.27 | Upper BB / Resistance | +3.4% | Near-term resistance; Bollinger Band ceiling | | $201.45 | EMA 26 / Resistance | +1.5% | Intermediate resistance; 26-day trend line | | $198.88 | SMA 20 / Current Support | -0.04% | CRITICAL - Just below current price; immediate support | | $192.50 | Lower BB / Support | -3.1% | KEY SUPPORT - Bollinger Band floor; major breach target | | $210.95 | SMA 50 / Major Resistance | +6.2% | Medium-term resistance; break would signal recovery attempt | | $244.41 | SMA 200 / Major Resistance | +23.1% | Long-term resistance; significant recovery threshold |
Critical Observation: The price is teetering at the 20-day SMA. A close below $198.88 would confirm breakdown and likely trigger acceleration toward $192.50. That level represents a ~3% downside from current levels but could accelerate further on a break below the lower Bollinger Band.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 44.39 — NEUTRAL (concerning given bearish structure)
- Reading of 44.39 is in the neutral 30-70 band but positioned in the LOWER half
- This is a weakness signal: in a downtrend, RSI should trend lower, and 44.39 shows momentum hasn't capitulated yet
- Not yet in oversold (<30) territory, suggesting room for further deterioration
- Implication: No bullish reversal signal present; potential for RSI to approach 30
MACD: -3.54 / Signal: 0.62 / Histogram: -4.16 — BEARISH CROSSOVER
- MACD line (-3.54) is deeply BELOW the signal line (0.62), creating a -4.16 histogram spread
- This is a textbook bearish crossover formation with significant separation (indicating strong bearish momentum)
- The histogram of -4.16 is one of the worst MACD readings, suggesting accelerating downside momentum
- Implication: No bullish reversal signal in sight; bearish momentum is dominant and widening
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 46.80 / %D 41.38 — NEUTRAL/WEAK
- %K above %D (46.80 > 41.38) shows slight bullish alignment, but both are in the midrange
- Neither reading is extreme (not <20 or >80), so no reversal signals present
- The positioning in the middle-to-lower range in a downtrend is structurally bearish
- Implication: Weak momentum; potential for continued drift lower without reversal signal
Williams %R: -47.41 — NEUTRAL/WEAK
- Reading of -47.41 is in the neutral zone (-50 to -20 is considered neutral)
- Positioned slightly into weak territory but not oversold (<-80)
- Implication: Consistent with other momentum indicators showing lack of reversal strength
Aggregate Momentum Assessment: All momentum indicators show BEARISH or NEUTRAL-TO-WEAK positioning. The constellation of signals—especially the deeply negative MACD histogram, neutral RSI in lower half, and weak Stochastic positioning—suggests momentum has not yet established oversold conditions necessary for reversal. This indicates the downtrend has room to run.
Bollinger Bands Analysis
- Current Position: Price at $198.56 is between the middle band ($198.88) and lower band ($192.50)
- Band Width: 6.42 width indicates moderate squeeze; not at extreme compression
- Signal: NEUTRAL per the data, but structurally bearish given proximity to lower band
- Interpretation:
- Price is not in an overbought condition (upper band at $205.27 is 3.4% away)
- Lower band at $192.50 is only 3.1% away—a breakdown would place price outside bands
- The squeeze is moderate, suggesting potential for directional breakout (more likely downward given technical context)
- Mean reversion would require price to rise toward $198.88 middle band, but technical structure doesn't support this
Volume Analysis
Volume SMA 20: 215,328.70 shares/day
On-Balance Volume (OBV): -3,232,083.28 (DEEPLY NEGATIVE)
- Massive negative OBV indicates sustained volume on down days exceeds volume on up days
- The magnitude of the negative OBV accumulation suggests consistent institutional selling/exit
- This is a MAJOR RED FLAG: OBV divergence from price suggests the decline is being confirmed by volume
Volume Rate of Change: -33.72% (SHARPLY DECLINING)
- Volume has contracted 33.72% from the 20-day average
- This could indicate either:
- Reduced selling pressure (constructive if reversal is imminent), OR
- Despair/capitulation selling has exhausted itself
- However, given the negative OBV accumulation, the declining volume suggests institutional holders are systematically exiting, not that selling has dried up
Institutional Interest Signals:
- Volume decline during downtrend is typically NEGATIVE (indicates longer-term holders exiting)
- Combined with -33.72% volume rate of change, suggests institutional capitulation is ongoing
- Implication: Large-holder selling pressure rather than retail capitulation/panic
Generated
News
All OSIS news →
Earnings History
13 of 18 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
6.99%
Avg Actual Move
5.74%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | After-Close | 1.64% | 1.62% | 0.99x | Within |
| 2021-10-28 | After-Close | 2.01% | 1.06% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2022-04-28 | After-Close | 3.66% | 2.89% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2022-08-18 | After-Close | 6.21% | 7.20% | 1.16x | Exceeded |
| 2023-08-24 | After-Close | 6.02% | 1.95% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2023-10-26 | After-Close | 5.64% | 6.69% | 1.19x | Exceeded |
| 2024-01-25 | After-Close | 4.62% | 1.34% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2024-04-25 | After-Close | 4.31% | 0.50% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2024-08-22 | After-Close | 5.15% | 2.77% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2024-10-24 | Pre-Market | 8.34% | 3.17% | 0.38x | Within |
| 2025-01-23 | Pre-Market | 9.67% | 14.22% | 1.47x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-01 | Pre-Market | 9.79% | 9.57% | 0.98x | Within |
| 2025-08-21 | Pre-Market | 10.81% | 2.46% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2025-10-30 | After-Close | 9.93% | 14.21% | 1.43x | Exceeded |
| 2026-01-29 | After-Close | 10.25% | 7.27% | 0.71x | Within |
| 2026-05-04 | After-Close | 9.28% | 17.01% | 1.83x | Exceeded |
| 2026-08-20 | After-Close | 8.18% | 5.21% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2026-10-29 | After-Close | 10.23% | 4.19% | 0.41x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
OSIS Options Activity & IV Rank
OSIS IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 35.3%
7-DTE IV: 36.5%
Expected Move: $18.80
7-DTE Move: $10.75
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 2,643
Put Volume: 1,325
P/C Volume: 0.501
BULLISH
Call OI: 5,168
Put OI: 5,326
P/C OI: 1.031
Total OI: 10,494
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $10.60
ATM Put: $8.20
Call %: 5.2%
Put %: 4.0%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 3,968
Chain OI: 10,494
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 13th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
13%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.34
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.76
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.65
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt -0.76: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt +0.65: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 16 ATM contracts, 9k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)5.0LowNov 9
IV Rank (30 DTE)14.9LowNov 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$18.80Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.1656
Alpha: -40.06%
Correlation: 0.3879
R-Squared: 15.0%
Stock Volatility: 41.4%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own OSIS
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $65.3M | #492 of 3716 | +584.4% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $356K | #2268 of 4729 | -3.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
OSIS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 150 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 16,974,750 (as of 2026-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
8 filers$23.88M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $9.16M | 38.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $5.97M | 24.99% | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $3.28M | 13.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.73M | 11.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.42M | 5.95% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.05M | 4.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $218.70K | 0.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $43.74K | 0.18% | 2026-06-30 |
5 filers$15.98M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $6.63M | 41.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $4.48M | 28.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $3.46M | 21.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.07M | 6.69% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $349.92K | 2.19% | 2026-06-30 |
OSIS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-26Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 | Michael Tropeano | PRESIDENT, RAPISCAN SYSTEMS | Mixed Grant +287 · Tax −99 |
+188 | $206.73 | $38.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Cary M. Okawa | CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER | Mixed Grant +908 · Tax −460 |
+448 | $206.73 | $92.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Victor S Sze | GENERAL COUNSEL | Mixed Tax −14,999 · Grant +16,845 |
+1,846 | $206.73 | $381.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Paul Keith Morben | PRES., OPTOELECTRONICS DIV | Mixed Tax −1,331 · Grant +1,083 |
−248 | $206.73 | -$51.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Deepak Chopra | Director | Mixed Tax −23,540 · Grant +20,403 |
−3,137 | $206.73 | -$648.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Glenn Grindstaff | CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER | Mixed Grant +1,969 · Tax −1,708 |
+261 | $206.73 | $54.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Cary M. Okawa | CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER | Tax (F) | −118 | $206.73 | -$24.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Ajay Mehra | PRESIDENT AND CEO | Mixed Grant +20,073 · Tax −19,986 |
+87 | $206.73 | $18.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Alan I Edrick | EVP & CFO | Mixed Grant +21,871 · Tax −19,377 |
+2,494 | $206.73 | $515.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Kelli Bernard | Director | Tax (F) | −78 | $220.92 | -$17.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Deepak Chopra | Director | Tax (F) | −153 | $220.92 | -$33.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Gerald M Chizever | Director | Tax (F) | −88 | $220.92 | -$19.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | James B Hawkins | Director | Tax (F) | −90 | $220.92 | -$19.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | Kelli Bernard | Director | Tax (F) | −126 | $228.56 | -$28.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | Gerald M Chizever | Director | Tax (F) | −141 | $228.56 | -$32.2K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
OSIS Insider Holdings
16 insiders · @ $202.97
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alan I Edrick | EVP & CFO | 306,538 | $62.22M | -$36.23M | 113 | 2026-08-25 |
| 2 | Deepak Chopra | Director | 274,218 | $55.66M | -$162.26M | 160 | 2026-08-25 |
| 3 | Victor S Sze | GENERAL COUNSEL | 115,994 | $23.54M | -$36.53M | 125 | 2026-08-26 |
| 4 | Ajay Mehra | PRESIDENT AND CEO | 115,578 | $23.46M | -$44.61M | 132 | 2026-08-25 |
| 5 | Manoocher M Aliabadi | PRES., OPTOELECTRONICS DIV | 109,356 | $22.20M | -$4.33M | 76 | 2024-12-13 |
| 6 | William Francis Ballhaus JR | Director | 29,475 | $5.98M | -$1.17M | 45 | 2026-07-21 |
| 7 | Meyer/ Luskin | Director | 16,271 | $3.30M | -$2.59M | 44 | 2025-08-22 |
| 8 | Paul Keith Morben | PRES., OPTOELECTRONICS DIV | 11,386 | $2.31M | -$1.42M | 47 | 2026-08-26 |
| 9 | Kelli Bernard | Director | 10,781 | $2.19M | $0 | 14 | 2026-08-21 |
| 10 | Gerald M Chizever | Director | 10,447 | $2.12M | -$2.00M | 22 | 2026-08-21 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
OSIS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 26, 2026Directors 7
- Deepak Chopra · on file since 2006
- Meyer/ Luskin · on file since 2006
- William Francis Ballhaus JR · since May 10, 2010
- James B Hawkins · since Dec 8, 2015
- Gerald M Chizever · since Oct 10, 2016
- Kelli Bernard · since Dec 12, 2019
- Ajay Mehra · listed since Jan 2025
Officers 8
- Ajay Mehra · President and CEO · listed since Jan 2025
- Michael Tropeano · President, Rapiscan Systems · since Jul 15, 2025
- Alan I Edrick · EVP & CFO · listed since Jun 2015
- Glenn Grindstaff · Chief Human Resources Officer · since Feb 25, 2020
- Cary M. Okawa · Chief Accounting Officer · since Aug 21, 2024
- Victor S Sze · General Counsel · listed since Jul 2023
- W Paul Constantine · Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare · since Feb 1, 2025
- Paul Keith Morben · Pres., Optoelectronics Div · listed since Jul 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (23)
| Jan 2, 2026 | Deepak Chopra no longer listed as Executive Chairman in SEC filings |
| Jul 15, 2025 | Michael Tropeano became President, Rapiscan Systems |
| Jul 1, 2025 | Paul Keith Morben listed as Pres., Optoelectronics Div (previously Pres., Osi Electronics) in SEC filings |
| Feb 1, 2025 | W Paul Constantine became Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare |
| Jan 2, 2025 | Deepak Chopra listed as Executive Chairman (previously President and CEO) in SEC filings |
| Jan 2, 2025 | Ajay Mehra listed as President and CEO (previously Executve Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Jan 2, 2025 | Ajay Mehra first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 12, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Ajay Mehra from the board in an SEC filing |
| Aug 21, 2024 | Cary M. Okawa became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Victor S Sze first listed as General Counsel in an SEC filing |
| Oct 6, 2022 | Victor S Sze reported in an SEC filing no longer being General Counsel |
| Jul 5, 2022 | Ajay Mehra listed as Executve Vice President (previously Executive Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Jul 1, 2021 | Ajay Mehra listed as Executive Vice President (previously Executve Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Feb 25, 2020 | Glenn Grindstaff became Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Jan 2, 2020 | Ajay Mehra listed as Executve Vice President (previously Executive Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Dec 12, 2019 | Kelli Bernard became a director |
| Sep 9, 2019 | Shalabh Chandra became Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare |
| Jul 8, 2019 | James W Green reported in an SEC filing no longer being Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare |
| Jul 2, 2019 | Ajay Mehra listed as Executive Vice President (previously Executve Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Nov 5, 2018 | Deborah Lee Cegielski became SVP, Chief HR Officer |
| Apr 27, 2018 | James W Green became Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare |
| Jul 29, 2017 | Malcolm Peter Maginnis became Pres., Rapiscan Systems |
| May 1, 2017 | Michael Shawn Thompson became President, OSI Electronics |
Not reported recently (8)
- Shalabh Chandra · Last reported as Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare in an SEC filing dated Jan 2, 2025
- Manoocher M Aliabadi · Last reported as Pres., Optoelectronics Div in an SEC filing dated Dec 13, 2024
- Malcolm Peter Maginnis · Last reported as Pres., Rapiscan Systems in an SEC filing dated Aug 29, 2022
- Steven C Good · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jul 8, 2022
- Deborah Lee Cegielski · Last reported as SVP, Chief HR Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 2, 2020
- Michael Shawn Thompson · Last reported as President, OSI Electronics in an SEC filing dated Sep 19, 2019
- Richard Edward Merritt · Last reported as SVP, Chief HR Officer in an SEC filing dated Jul 25, 2018
- Sujit Shamsunder Kumar · Last reported as Pres., Spacelabs Healthcare in an SEC filing dated Sep 21, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
OSIS Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-04
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-04 | CHOPRA FAMILY TRUST U/A DTD12/20/2004 | Director, Officer | 20,000 | $5.65M | 2026-05-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | CHOPRA FAMILY TRUST U/A DTD12/20/2004 | Director, Officer | 20,000 | $5.00M | 2026-02-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-10 | CHOPRA FAMILY TRUST U/A DTD12/20/2004 | Director, Officer | 20,000 | $5.70M | 2025-11-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-07 | PAUL MORBEN | Officer | 416 | $116.1K | 2025-11-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-07 | JAMES HAWKINS | Director | 1,500 | $424.7K | 2025-11-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-01 | CHOPRA FAMILY TRUST U/A DTD12/20/2004 | Director, Officer | 20,000 | $4.98M | 2025-10-01 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-12 | BALLHAUS TRUST | Director | 562 | $133.7K | 2025-09-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-04 | PAUL MORBEN | Officer | 1,671 | $395.6K | 2025-09-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-12 | LUSKIN MEYER/ | Director | 1,000 | $236.7K | 2025-06-12 | merrill lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-21 | BALLHAUS TRUST | Director | 750 | $171.7K | 2025-05-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-10-29
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-21 | 0001104659-26-099752 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-29 | 0001104659-26-120281 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
106 ETFs hold OSIS
25 shown · $863.49M total exposure · 0.16% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.18% | $184.1M | $103.8B | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $92.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $81.7M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $78.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $66.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $43.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $33.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.22% | $29.8M | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | Global X | 0.50% | $29.6M | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 10 | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.38% | $27.5M | $7.3B | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.17% | $27.4M | $15.7B | 2026-11-05 |
| 12 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.08% | $25.5M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 13 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.10% | $18.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | SLYG State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Growth ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.37% | $17.0M | $4.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 15 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $15.3M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 16 | PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | Invesco | 0.19% | $13.7M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 17 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $10.8M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 18 | VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | Vanguard | 0.17% | $10.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.14% | $10.6M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 20 | FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.68% | $10.2M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 21 | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.05% | $9.7M | $19.1B | 2026-11-05 |
| 22 | IDEF iShares Defense Industrials and Tech Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.25% | $8.8M | $3.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 23 | PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | Invesco | 1.47% | $6.5M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 24 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.28% | $6.4M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.27% | $6.4M | $2.3B | 2026-11-05 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
21.74
TTM Diluted EPS
$9.33
TTM Revenue
$1.80B
TTM Net Income
$158.73M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$295.86M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '27 | 2026-09-30 | $403.47M | $24.57M | $1.51 | $37.09M |
| Q4 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $484.06M | $55.24M | $3.27 | $182.11M |
| Q3 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $453.25M | $40.22M | $2.33 | $14.46M |
| Q2 '26 | 2025-12-31 | $464.06M | $38.70M | $2.22 | $62.20M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-09-30 | $384.62M | $20.56M | $1.18 | $17.14M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $504.99M | $52.75M | $3.02 | $562.00K |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $444.35M | $41.13M | $2.40 | $81.64M |
| Q2 '25 | 2024-12-31 | $419.82M | $37.82M | $2.22 | $52.55M |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-09-30 | $344.01M | $17.94M | $1.05 | $-37.16M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $480.91M | $44.68M | $2.55 | $-29.04M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $405.41M | $34.04M | $1.95 | $-52.07M |
| Q2 '24 | 2023-12-31 | $373.24M | $36.55M | $2.11 | $-23.53M |
Q1 2027 • period ending 2026-09-30 • filed 2026-10-29
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
21.74
P/B
4.21
P/S
1.96
EV/EBITDA
14.90
EV/Sales
2.32
ROE
18.6%
ROA
6.2%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
7.87%
Debt/Equity
1.20
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$3.51B
as of 2026-11-09
OSIS vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. Class A Commo | $386.4B | 118.7 | +87.1% | +1.1% | 28 |
| MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. New | $85.1B | 42.4 | +11.4% | +38.4% | 17 |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $64.6B | 361.7 | +31.5% | +35.2% | 31 |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | $16.7B | 53.0 | +8.0% | −3.4% | 11 |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | $16.2B | 12.2 | +2.7% | −25.5% | 52 |
| CACI CACI INTERNATIONAL CLA | $13.5B | 26.6 | +10.1% | +20.5% | 28 |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | $5.6B | — | +15.2% | +52.8% | 1 |
| YOU Clear Secure, Inc. | $5.6B | 32.7 | +22.9% | +61.5% | 0 |
| OSIS OSI Systems Inc | $3.1B | 21.8 | +2.9% | −20.6% | 15 |
| Peer median | $16.5B | 42.4 | +13.3% | +27.8% | 22 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
2.01M
SI % of Float
13.26%
Days to Cover
12.30
Short Vol Ratio
53.0%
Free Float
15.19M
Float %
95.3%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-08-24