RPD Rapid7, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
15.15
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
RPD
$15.15
—
Key stats
$15.15
- 52-Week Range
- $4.97 – $19.34
- YTD
- +6.17%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 66.35
- Straddle Price
- $3.73
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.06
- Market Cap
- $1.0B
- Open
- $14.70
- Day Range
- $14.52 – $15.29
- Volume
- 1,052,876
- Prev Close
- $14.73
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.37 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.65% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.99% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +66.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -3.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 10.2% |
| Book / Price | 20.1% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 69.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 16.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.50 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $12.37 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $12.70 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 184.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
Peers used for multiples: CRWD, FTNT, OKTA, PANW, QLYS, RBRK, TENB, ZS
Blended Fair Value
$56.50
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $21.04 | 34% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $122.08 | 10% | median 393.8× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $97.56 | 10% | median 111.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $42.96 | 10% | median 14.5× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $180.58 | 10% | median 14.0× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $12.37 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $14.08 | 24% | 14 strikes · skew +0.56 |
As of 2026-10-23 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.0B
- Employees
- 2,613
- List Date
- 2015-07-17
- CIK
- 0001560327
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-04 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.19 (7 est.)
- Headquarters
- Boston, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.rapid7.com
Founded in 2000, Rapid7 is a cybersecurity company that began providing vulnerability management solutions. It has, however, expanded its portfolio to provide extended detection and response; security information and event management; cloud security, threat intelligence, and application security; and security orchestration, automation, and response. The Boston-based company went public in 2015.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.30% | -18.19% | 14.04% | 0.09% | -2.18% | -16.47% | -4.33% |
| Feb | -14.81% | 6.34% | -9.59% | 3.83% | -24.46% | -47.29% | -14.33% |
| Mar | -8.24% | 6.73% | -2.79% | -16.31% | -6.49% | -11.98% | -6.51% |
| Apr | 5.04% | -15.04% | 8.58% | -8.91% | -11.80% | 8.46% | -2.28% |
| May | 4.72% | -26.79% | -2.07% | -19.47% | -1.96% | 31.97% | -2.27% |
| Jun | 13.40% | -4.71% | -5.61% | 21.54% | -0.56% | -7.32% | 2.79% |
| Jul | 18.46% | -6.22% | 1.59% | -8.87% | -12.15% | 7.52% | 0.06% |
| Aug | 5.12% | -12.21% | 10.89% | 5.82% | 1.72% | 32.22% | 7.26% |
| Sep | -7.16% | -20.66% | -10.02% | 8.87% | -7.04% | 1.75% | -5.71% |
| Oct | 13.26% | 1.98% | 0.43% | 3.77% | -0.70% | 25.12%* | 7.31% |
| Nov | -2.07% | -29.72% | 18.05% | 6.63% | -16.06% | -- | -4.63% |
| Dec | -2.12% | 6.72% | 1.87% | -5.45% | -1.43% | -- | -0.08% |
| Total | 18.34% | -72.50% | 23.15% | -14.83% | -59.45% | -6.95% | -18.71% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $12.87
SMA 50: $12.40
SMA 200: $9.37
Current: $15.10
EMA 12: $13.50
EMA 26: $12.94
MACD: 0.5619 | Signal: 0.2040
BULLISH
ADX (14): 18.87
RANGE
+DI: 29.47
−DI: 11.99
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 68.24
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 89.27
Stoch %D: 80.25
Williams %R: -5.57
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $14.61
BB Lower: $11.14
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: 1,304,133
Vol SMA 20: 1,477,468
Vol ROC: -24.71%
ATR: $0.88
True Range: $0.77
HV 20: 57.6%
HV 30: 86.2%
HV 60: 92.9%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-24T00:00:00 – 2026-10-22T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a neutral trend, with momentum oscillators indicating a neutral RSI reading.
- Recent news headlines highlight the company's advancements in cloud security and AI-driven threats, but also mention a negative acquisition.
Primary Risks:
- Low volatility may indicate a lack of market movement or potential for unexpected price swings.
- Options market sentiment suggests bearish expectations, with a put/call volume ratio indicating a higher proportion of puts to calls.
Investment Thesis: RPD's cloud security and AI-driven threat management capabilities are expected to drive growth, but the company's recent acquisition may have negative implications. The stock's low volatility and bearish options market sentiment suggest caution is warranted.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive news headlines (Cloud Security Posture Management Market, Threat Intelligence Market, Emerging AI-Driven Threats) contribute to a neutral overall sentiment, as they highlight the company's advancements in cloud security and AI-driven threats. The negative headline about the acquisition slightly offsets this positivity, resulting in a neutral overall assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Neutral
- Medium-term: Uptrend (SMA 20: $10.73)
- Long-term: Downtrend (SMA 200: $10.27)
Support/Resistance Levels: The stock is trading above the SMA 20 ($10.73) and below the upper Bollinger Band ($13.02).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (63.77)
- MACD signal: Bullish
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume has been increasing, with an OBV reading of -1061357.38 indicating a negative flow.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Cloud Security Posture Management Market Expected to Reach USD 15.62 Billion by 2035
- Threat Intelligence Market: USD 18.85 Billion by 2031 with Strategic Intelligence Segment Accounting for 33.60% Revenue Share
- Emerging AI-Driven Threats Prompt Renewed Focus on Enterprise Cybersecurity
- Rapid7 Buys Kenzo Security To Launch Autonomous AI Security Operations (Negative headline)
- Rapid7 Acquires Kenzo Security to Accelerate Preemptive, AI-Powered Security Operations
- Rapid7 Advances Exposure Command with New Cloud Security Capabilities for Runtime Validation and Data Security Posture Management
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming events: Earnings announcements, product launches.
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines suggest a focus on cloud security and AI-driven threat management, which aligns with the company's growth strategy. The negative headline about the acquisition is a potential risk factor.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment:
- Beta: 0.71 (Low volatility - stock moves less than market)
- Alpha: -0.42
- Correlation: 0.13
- Stock Volatility: 0.71
Options Market Signals: IV rank: 16.9% (Low), Current IV: 136.0%, Expected Move: $3.17, Volume Flow: 36 calls vs 837 puts.
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations should focus on the SMA 20 ($10.73) and lower Bollinger Band ($8.44).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Cybersecurity sector is trending upward.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest in the stock.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves less than the market, indicating low volatility.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($10.73)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($13.02)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout level: $12.50
- Breakdown level: $9.00
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings announcements, product launches.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations should focus on the SMA 20 ($10.73) and lower Bollinger Band ($8.44).
This comprehensive analysis provides a neutral overall assessment of RPD's stock performance, highlighting key drivers, primary risks, and market context.
Generated
News
All RPD news →
Earnings History
18 of 23 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
13.03%
Avg Actual Move
8.82%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-09 | After-Close | 8.60% | 0.81% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2021-05-06 | After-Close | 7.89% | 2.26% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2021-07-19 | After-Close | 4.83% | 3.58% | 0.74x | Within |
| 2021-11-03 | After-Close | 6.90% | 5.82% | 0.84x | Within |
| 2022-02-09 | After-Close | 7.96% | 0.56% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2022-05-04 | After-Close | 9.61% | 17.40% | 1.81x | Exceeded |
| 2022-08-03 | After-Close | 11.17% | 6.05% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2022-11-02 | After-Close | 16.64% | 22.73% | 1.37x | Exceeded |
| 2023-02-08 | After-Close | 11.60% | 0.85% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2023-05-09 | After-Close | 21.08% | 4.50% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2023-08-08 | After-Close | 16.21% | 15.61% | 0.96x | Within |
| 2023-11-01 | After-Close | 12.49% | 2.77% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2024-02-07 | After-Close | 10.88% | 3.05% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2024-05-07 | After-Close | 14.85% | 17.03% | 1.15x | Exceeded |
| 2024-08-06 | After-Close | 15.37% | 9.93% | 0.65x | Within |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 14.18% | 0.77% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2025-02-12 | After-Close | 16.65% | 5.35% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2025-05-12 | After-Close | 11.13% | 8.15% | 0.73x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | After-Close | 12.49% | 9.81% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | After-Close | 14.75% | 19.94% | 1.35x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-10 | After-Close | 16.12% | 28.97% | 1.80x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-05 | After-Close | 18.34% | 1.65% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2026-08-10 | After-Close | 20.03% | 15.25% | 0.76x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
RPD Options Activity & IV Rank
RPD IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 109.6%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $3.73
7-DTE Move: $3.73
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 2,628
Put Volume: 145
P/C Volume: 0.055
BULLISH
Call OI: 7,114
Put OI: 2,793
P/C OI: 0.393
Total OI: 9,907
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $1.75
ATM Put: $1.98
Call %: 11.6%
Put %: 13.0%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 3,551
Chain OI: 40,246
Last Updated: 10/23/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 66th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
66%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.86
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.40
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.56
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.40: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.56: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 21 ATM contracts, 6k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 111.8% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)66.3MediumOct 23
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$3.73Oct 23
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.6316
Alpha: 2.16%
Correlation: 0.0996
R-Squared: 1.0%
Stock Volatility: 80.8%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own RPD
6 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $12.1M | #1449 of 6285 | +152.0% | 13F | |
| Oaktree Capital Asset manager Howard Marks | $9.7M | #74 of 130 | +503.2% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $7.6M | #852 of 1945 | +3.3% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $3.5M | #1655 of 3138 | +186.3% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $2.8M | #2391 of 3716 | -63.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $14K | #3868 of 4729 | +30.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
RPD Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 66,477,841 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
15 filers$14.25M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Centiva Capital, LP | $2.94M | 20.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $2.02M | 14.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.52M | 10.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.43M | 10.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.37M | 9.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Voss Capital, LP | $810.00K | 5.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $792.18K | 5.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $721.71K | 5.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $619.65K | 4.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $514.35K | 3.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $486.00K | 3.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Walleye Capital LLC | $442.26K | 3.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $338.08K | 2.37% | 2025-09-30 |
| 14 | Rangeley Capital, LLC | $151.47K | 1.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $90.72K | 0.64% | 2026-06-30 |
11 filers$7.47M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.25M | 30.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $2.03M | 27.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $903.96K | 12.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $767.49K | 10.27% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $439.83K | 5.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $354.78K | 4.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $319.14K | 4.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Capital LLC | $191.16K | 2.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $160.38K | 2.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $50.22K | 0.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $4.05K | 0.05% | 2026-06-30 |
RPD Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-19Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Scott M Murphy | Chief Accounting Officer | Tax (F) | −344 | $13.08 | -$4.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Maria Bettina Barrett | Director | Award (A) | +34,909 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-17 | Scott M Murphy | Chief Accounting Officer | Tax (F) | −1,060 | $13.00 | -$13.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | Corey E. Thomas | Executive Chairman | Tax (F) | −7,726 | $13.00 | -$100.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | Scott M Murphy | Chief Accounting Officer | Tax (F) | −344 | $12.25 | -$4.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Wael Mohamed | CEO | Award (A) | +841,515 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Marc Evan Brown | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Kevin G. Galligan | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Benjamin Holzman | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Judy Bruner | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Jeffrey Kalowski | Director | Award (A) | +57,390 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Reeny Sondhi | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Benjamin Nye | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | JANA Partners Management, LP | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Mike Burns | Director | Award (A) | +15,208 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
RPD Insider Holdings
17 insiders · @ $15.10
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benjamin Holzman | Director | 9,062,544 | $136.84M | -$806.0K | 18 | 2026-06-10 |
| 2 | JANA Partners Management, LP | Director | 6,775,357 | $102.31M | $18.66M | 6 | 2026-06-10 |
| 3 | Wael Mohamed | CEO | 857,315 | $12.95M | $0 | 4 | 2026-06-16 |
| 4 | Corey E. Thomas | Executive Chairman | 673,274 | $10.17M | -$83.04M | 81 | 2026-08-17 |
| 5 | Rafeal E. Brown | Chief Financial Officer | 466,999 | $7.05M | $0 | 2 | 2026-04-01 |
| 6 | Timothy M Adams | Chief Financial Officer | 186,863 | $2.82M | -$475.9K | 16 | 2025-11-17 |
| 7 | Benjamin Nye | Director | 95,502 | $1.44M | -$226.48M | 19 | 2026-06-10 |
| 8 | Judy Bruner | Director | 69,820 | $1.05M | -$2.03M | 16 | 2026-06-10 |
| 9 | Marc Evan Brown | Director | 67,090 | $1.01M | -$506.1K | 13 | 2026-06-10 |
| 10 | Thomas E Schodorf | Director | 65,668 | $991.6K | -$1.70M | 67 | 2026-06-10 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
RPD Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 19, 2026Directors 14
- Benjamin Holzman · since Jul 16, 2015
- Benjamin Nye · since Jul 16, 2015
- Corey E. Thomas · since Jul 16, 2015
- Marc Evan Brown · since Jul 15, 2016
- Thomas E Schodorf · since Jul 15, 2016
- Reeny Sondhi · since Aug 4, 2020
- Judy Bruner · listed since Jun 2024
- Mike Burns · since Apr 15, 2025
- Wael Mohamed · since Apr 15, 2025
- JANA Partners Management, LP (entity) · since Apr 22, 2025
- Kevin G. Galligan · since Apr 22, 2025
- Jeffrey Kalowski · listed since Jun 2026
- Julian Wendell Waits Sr. · since Sep 1, 2026
- Maria Bettina Barrett · since Sep 1, 2026
Officers 4
- Corey E. Thomas · CEO · listed since May 2019
- Wael Mohamed · CEO · listed since Jun 2026
- Rafeal E. Brown · Chief Financial Officer · since Dec 1, 2025
- Scott M Murphy · Chief Accounting Officer · since Mar 4, 2024
10% owners 1
- JANA Partners Management, LP (entity) · listed since Nov 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (59)
| Sep 1, 2026 | Maria Bettina Barrett became a director |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Julian Wendell Waits Sr. became a director |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Wael Mohamed first listed as CEO in an SEC filing |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Jeffrey Kalowski first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 5, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Michael J Berry from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Rafeal E. Brown became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 25, 2025 | JANA Partners Management, LP first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Aug 6, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Timothy M Adams as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Kevin G. Galligan became a director |
| Apr 22, 2025 | JANA Partners Management, LP became a director |
| Apr 15, 2025 | Wael Mohamed became a director |
| Apr 15, 2025 | Mike Burns became a director |
| Jan 30, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Christina Luconi as Chief People Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2024 | Judy Bruner first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jun 4, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Andrew F. Burton as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Scott M Murphy became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Jun 12, 2023 | Judy Bruner reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 3, 2022 | Timothy M Adams became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 23, 2021 | The company announced the departure of Jeffrey Kalowski as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Aug 19, 2020 | Lee David Weiner listed as Chief Innovation Officer (previously Chief Product Officer) in SEC filings |
| Aug 4, 2020 | Reeny Sondhi became a director |
| Jul 31, 2019 | Christina Kosmowski became a director |
| May 28, 2019 | Timothy P McAdam first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 10, 2019 | Corey E. Thomas listed as CEO (previously President and CEO) in SEC filings |
| Feb 19, 2019 | Jay C Hoag no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Feb 14, 2019 | Jay C Hoag first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 14, 2018 | Peter Kaes became SVP, General Counsel |
| Dec 14, 2018 | Christina Luconi became Chief People Officer |
| Jun 14, 2018 | Timothy P McAdam no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Robert Trudeau no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Rick Kimball no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Jon Q Reynolds Jr no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | John Drew no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Jay C Hoag no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Christopher P Marshall no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Michael A Krupka reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Benjamin Nye no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Bcip Venture Associates-B reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Bain Capital Venture Partners 2007, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Bain Capital Venture Investors, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Bain Capital Venture Fund 2007, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 19, 2018 | BCIP Venture Associates reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Ajay Agarwal reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Timothy P McAdam no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Technology Crossover Management VII, L.P. no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Tcv Vii(a) L P no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Tcv Vii LP no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TCV Member Fund, L.P. no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Michael A Krupka no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | John C. Rosenberg no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | David Yuan no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Bcip Venture Associates-B no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Bain Capital Venture Partners 2007, L.P. no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Bain Capital Venture Investors, LLC no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Bain Capital Venture Fund 2007, L.P. no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | BCIP Venture Associates no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Ajay Agarwal first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jan 9, 2017 | Jeffrey Kalowski became Chief Financial Officer |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Judy Bruner became a director |
Not reported recently (7)
- Christina Kosmowski · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 12, 2023
- Peter Kaes · Last reported as SVP, General Counsel in an SEC filing dated Nov 17, 2021
- Lee David Weiner · Last reported as Chief Innovation Officer in an SEC filing dated May 18, 2021
- Timothy P McAdam · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 28, 2019
- TCV VII Management, L.L.C. · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 1, 2018
- Richard Moseley · Last reported as SR VP, Global Sales in an SEC filing dated Nov 17, 2016
- Steven Gatoff · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 17, 2016
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
RPD Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-04
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $57K notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
BURNS MIKE (1, $57K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | BURNS MIKE | Former Director | 5,000 | $56.7K | 2026-09-02 | Charles Schwab & Co | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-22 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 827 | $5.2K | 2026-04-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-23 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 1,267 | $8.3K | 2026-02-23 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-22 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 764 | $9.6K | 2026-01-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 1,370 | $19.1K | 2025-11-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-22 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 826 | $15.9K | 2025-10-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-22 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 1,370 | $27.6K | 2025-08-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-19 | SCOTT MURPHY | Officer | 5,461 | $117.2K | 2025-08-19 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-07 | CHRISTINA LUCONI | Officer | 12,551 | $297.2K | 2025-04-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-07 | CHRISTINA LUCONI | Officer | 21,488 | $607.9K | 2025-03-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
61 ETFs hold RPD
25 shown · $191.75M total exposure · 0.04% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | Global X | 1.19% | $25.2M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $24.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $22.7M | $74.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 4 | CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | First Trust | 0.13% | $22.3M | $17.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $17.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | IHAK iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.10% | $13.4M | $1.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.13% | $8.3M | $6.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 8 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $8.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $7.6M | $13.9B | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.26% | $6.7M | $2.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $4.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | XSW State Street® SPDR® S&P® Software & Services ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.90% | $4.3M | $482.7M | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | FITE State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 2.49% | $3.8M | $151.0M | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | SFLO VictoryShares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | Nport | 0.54% | $3.3M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.22% | $2.7M | $1.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 16 | CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | Nport | 0.08% | $2.7M | — | 2026-04-30 |
| 17 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $2.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 18 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.09% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | Nport | 1.72% | $1.8M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.05% | $1.6M | $3.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 21 | VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.14% | $1.4M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.05% | $1.3M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 23 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.1M | $96.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 24 | VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | Vanguard | 0.09% | $1.0M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $1.0M | — | 2026-10-21 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
48.68
TTM Diluted EPS
$0.31
TTM Revenue
$855.92M
TTM Net Income
$20.14M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$153.33M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $210.88M | $6.07M | $0.09 | $36.99M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $209.69M | $1.13M | $0.02 | $39.82M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $217.39M | $3.13M | $0.05 | $37.58M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $217.96M | $9.81M | $0.15 | $38.95M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $214.19M | $8.34M | $0.13 | $47.54M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $210.25M | $2.10M | $0.03 | $29.76M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $216.26M | $2.17M | $0.09 | $63.77M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $214.65M | $15.41M | $0.21 | $43.97M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $207.99M | $6.54M | $0.09 | $32.86M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $205.10M | $1.41M | $0.02 | $31.07M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $205.27M | $16.49M | $0.28 | $63.47M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $198.84M | $-76.61M | $-1.25 | $3.67M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-10
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
48.68
P/B
5.10
P/S
1.17
EV/EBITDA
15.29
EV/Sales
1.02
ROE
10.2%
ROA
1.2%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
15.29%
Debt/Equity
1.50
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$1.00B
as of 2026-10-23
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
7.65M
SI % of Float
12.93%
Days to Cover
4.20
Short Vol Ratio
75.0%
Free Float
59.17M
Float %
88.6%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-22 • Float 2026-04-09