Saia, Inc.(SAIA)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $249.32 – $494.71
- YTD
- +1.50%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 9.47
- Straddle Price
- $28.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.20
- Market Cap
- $9.1B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.01% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.23 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.68% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.18% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +11.3pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +42bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +13.9% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 10.2% |
| Book / Price | 29.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 7.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +22.8% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $374.69 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $348.21 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 2.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $9B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $211.11 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $275.78 | 6% | median 24.2× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $392.94 | 6% | median 15.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $384.53 | 6% | median 3.8× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | $794.92 | 6% | median 5.7× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $374.69 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $342.12 | 19% | 29 strikes · skew +0.23 |
- Industry (SIC)
- TRUCKING (NO LOCAL) (4213)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $9.1B
Saia ranks among the 10 largest less-than-truckload carriers in the United States, with more than 210 facilities and a fleet of more than 7,500 tractors and 26,000 trailers. As a national LTL carrier, the firm offers time-definite and expedited options for shipments ranging between 100 and 10,000 pounds. Saia ranks among the top-tier providers in terms of profitability.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +1.33% | 20 |
| Feb | +5.17% | 20 |
| Mar | +1.63% | 20 |
| Apr | +2.51% | 20 |
| May | +2.97% | 20 |
| Jun | +1.72% | 20 |
| Jul | +5.52% | 21 |
| Aug | -1.44% | 21 |
| Sep | -1.52% | 21 |
| Oct | +0.62% | 20 |
| Nov | +3.26% | 20 |
| Dec | +1.73% | 20 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD
- High volatility, indicating increased risk
- Negative news sentiment in recent headlines
Primary Risks:
- Potential breakdown below key support levels
- Increased downside pressure from high volatility
Investment Thesis: SAIA may experience a temporary setback due to bearish momentum and increasing risk. However, the company's strong network growth and continued expansion could lead to a potential rebound.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive news headlines have been outweighed by the negative sentiment in recent headlines, contributing to the bearish assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: BEARISH (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: NEUTRAL (1-3 months)
- Long-term: BULLISH (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key resistance levels: SMA 50 ($420.51), Upper Bollinger Band ($453.36)
- Key support levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($325.11), recent low of $375.27
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (47.16)
- MACD signal: BEARISH (crossover below signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: SQUEEZE
Volume Analysis:
- Volume trends: Increasing volume on the recent downturn
- Institutional interest signals: Low institutional buying and selling activity
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Recent headlines have been mixed, with positive news of network growth and sponsorship deals offset by negative sentiment from earnings misses and high volatility.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (aggregate news sentiment)
Catalyst Identification: No immediate catalysts, but potential for a rebound if the company can stabilize its recent downturn.
Market Narrative: The market is currently reacting to SAIA's recent earnings miss and increased risk, leading to bearish momentum signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High-risk stock relative to market (beta 1.43)
Volatility Regime: Current high volatility regime, with IV rank indicating low volatility
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Low
- Put/call ratios: Bearish sentiment
- Unusual activity: None notable
Downside Protection: Key support levels and risk management considerations are in place to mitigate potential losses.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: SAIA is performing relatively well within its sector, with a correlation coefficient of 0.38.
Institutional Activity: Low institutional buying and selling activity, indicating caution.
Correlation Analysis: SAIA has a moderate positive correlation with the market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative Valuation: SAIA's valuation is slightly above average relative to its sector peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($325.11), recent low of $375.27
- Resistance: SMA 50 ($420.51), Upper Bollinger Band ($453.36)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Breakdown below key support levels could trigger further selling.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate catalysts, but potential for a rebound if the company can stabilize its recent downturn.
Risk Management: Monitor volume and momentum signals, adjusting position sizing as needed to manage risk.
By analyzing the data provided, SAIA appears to be in a state of bearish momentum, driven by high volatility and negative news sentiment. The stock's beta is relatively high, indicating increased risk. While there are no immediate catalysts for a turnaround, the company's recent network growth and expansion could lead to a potential rebound if it can stabilize its recent downturn.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | Pre-Market | 14.41% | 11.78% | 0.82x | Within |
| 2025-02-03 | Pre-Market | 12.65% | 0.20% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-04-25 | Pre-Market | 15.28% | 30.50% | 2.00x | Exceeded |
| 2025-07-25 | Pre-Market | 14.21% | 7.00% | 0.49x | Within |
| 2025-10-30 | Pre-Market | 15.78% | 0.52% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2026-02-10 | Pre-Market | 12.69% | 5.07% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2026-04-30 | Pre-Market | 13.17% | 6.35% | 0.48x | Within |
| 2026-07-30 | Pre-Market | 13.03% | 11.11% | 0.85x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 9.47
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 49.5%
- Straddle (30D)
- $28.90
- Straddle (7D)
- $5.80
- P/C Volume
- 0.20
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.40
- Correlation (SPY)
- 38.4%
- R²
- 0.15
- Ann. Volatility
- 47.1%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.9%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $11.24M | 26.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $5.96M | 14.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $5.60M | 13.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $4.67M | 11.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $4.25M | 10.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $3.83M | 9.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.94M | 4.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $1.68M | 4.01% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.36M | 3.24% | 2025-09-30 |
| 10 | PEAK6 LLC | $842.32K | 2.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $421.16K | 1.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $10.99M | 31.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $9.69M | 27.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $5.77M | 16.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $4.00M | 11.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.12M | 6.10% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $926.55K | 2.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $778.34K | 2.24% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $294.81K | 0.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $84.23K | 0.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Walleye Capital LLC | $84.23K | 0.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $42.12K | 0.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 | Anthony R Norwood | EVP & CHRO | Sell (S) | −292 | $468.77 | -$136.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-15 | FREDERICK J HOLZGREFE III | President & CEO | Other (J) | 10,000 (reclass) | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-13 | FREDERICK J HOLZGREFE III | President & CEO | Gift (G) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | DI-ANN EISNOR | Director | Award (A) | +660 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Donald R James | Director | Award (A) | +395 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | RICHARD D ODELL | Director | Award (A) | +395 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Susan F Ward | Director | Award (A) | +395 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | DONNA E EPPS | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | JOHN P GAINOR JR | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | KEVIN A HENRY | Director | Grant (A) | +623 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Randolph W Melville | Director | Grant (A) | +395 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | JEFFREY C WARD | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-11 | PATRICK D SUGAR | EVP Operations | Tax (F) | −204 | $368.78 | -$75.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-19 | DI-ANN EISNOR | Director | Sell (S) | −500 | $389.88 | -$194.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | RAYMOND R RAMU | Exec. VP & Chief Customer Off. | Mixed | −2,927 | $387.95 | -$2.03M | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HERBERT A TRUCKSESS III | Director | 311,319 | $106.54M | -$7.31M | 40 | 2019-05-03 |
| 2 | JAMES A DARBY | VP of Finance & CFO | 45,917 | $15.71M | -$2.29M | 16 | 2014-08-14 |
| 3 | ANTHONY D ALBANESE | Sr. VP Operations & Sales | 27,000 | $9.24M | $25.9K | 12 | 2010-03-10 |
| 4 | FREDERICK J HOLZGREFE III | President & CEO | 22,743 | $7.78M | -$32.46M | 44 | 2026-05-15 |
| 5 | Brian A Balius | VP-Transportation and Engineer | 15,712 | $5.38M | -$2.68M | 12 | 2017-03-09 |
| 6 | SALLY R BUCHHOLZ | VP Marketing/Customer Service | 12,556 | $4.30M | -$2.10M | 20 | 2015-02-19 |
| 7 | Rohit Lal | EVP IT and CIO | 9,108 | $3.12M | -$2.17M | 9 | 2025-02-11 |
| 8 | PATRICK D SUGAR | EVP Operations | 8,917 | $3.05M | -$4.51M | 22 | 2026-03-11 |
| 9 | RAYMOND R RAMU | Exec. VP & Chief Customer Off. | 8,857 | $3.03M | -$17.50M | 44 | 2026-02-17 |
| 10 | JEFFREY C WARD | Director | 7,079 | $2.42M | -$403.0K | 25 | 2026-05-06 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | ANTHONY NORWOOD | Officer | 292 | $136.9K | 2026-05-20 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | EISNOR DI-ANN | Director | 500 | $194.9K | 2026-02-17 | Wells Fargo Clearing Services | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | RAYMOND RAMU | Officer | 5,226 | $2.03M | 2026-02-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | MATTHEW BATTEH | Officer | 916 | $356.4K | 2026-02-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | KELLY BENTON | Officer | 800 | $311.2K | 2026-02-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | PATRICK SUGAR | Officer | 2,706 | $1.05M | 2026-02-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | FREDERICK J. HOLZGREFE | Officer | 4,775 | $1.86M | 2026-02-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | MATTHEW BATTEH | Officer | 1,110 | $417.0K | 2026-02-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-08 | EISNOR DI-ANN | Director | 297 | $100.0K | 2025-12-08 | Wells Fargo Clearing Services | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-02 | KELLY BENTON | Officer | 1,000 | $314.4K | 2025-12-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-02 | 0001193125-26-252530 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | 0001193125-26-209411 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | 0001193125-26-206817 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-30 | 0001193125-26-194062 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | 0001193125-26-086706 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | 0001193125-26-055047 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | 0001193125-26-043714 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-02 | 0001193125-25-304538 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-05 | 0001193125-25-267032 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001193125-25-257441 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-24 | 0001193125-26-067030 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-24 | 0000950170-25-025702 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-23 | 0000950170-24-019368 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-23 | 0000950170-23-004094 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-23 | 0001564590-22-006259 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-24 | 0001564590-21-008077 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-25 | 0001564590-20-006382 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-25 | 0001564590-19-004105 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-22 | 0001564590-18-002882 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-24 | 0001564590-17-002318 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 0001193125-26-197324 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001193125-25-258666 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-25 | 0000950170-25-098789 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-28 | 0000950170-25-059315 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-25 | 0000950170-24-117401 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | 0000950170-24-086878 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-26 | 0000950170-24-049188 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-27 | 0000950170-23-055988 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | 0000950170-23-035483 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-28 | 0000950170-23-015859 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 33.0 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.3 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7 |
| TTM Revenue | $3.4B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.3B |
| TTM EPS | $10.36 |
| ROE | 10.2% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.04 |