Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Class A Common Stock(EOSE)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $3.11 – $19.86
- YTD
- -73.94%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 66.0
- Straddle Price
- $1.07
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.04
- Market Cap
- $1.3B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.61% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.11% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.34% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +110.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.4B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 116.7% |
| Book / Price | -73.2% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -101.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -240.1% |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $5.98 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $4.14 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1252.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 40.0× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 20.0× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 3.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $2.40 | 11% | median 4.5× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $5.98 | 55% | stability 77% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $7.61 | 34% | 19 strikes · skew +0.28 |
- Industry (SIC)
- MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (3690)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.3B
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc designs develop, manufactures, and markets zinc-based energy storage solutions for utility-scale, microgrid, and commercial & industrial (C&I) applications. The solutions are used in the utility sector, the renewable energy sector, and the industrial sector.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +3.09% | 6 |
| Feb | -18.69% | 6 |
| Mar | +11.56% | 6 |
| Apr | -9.80% | 6 |
| May | +12.07% | 6 |
| Jun | +20.43% | 6 |
| Jul | +8.52% | 6 |
| Aug | +9.68% | 5 |
| Sep | -3.14% | 5 |
| Oct | +0.28% | 5 |
| Nov | -22.40% | 5 |
| Dec | +15.93% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | After-Close | 30.40% | 17.61% | 0.58x | Within |
| 2024-11-05 | After-Close | 22.64% | 19.81% | 0.87x | Within |
| 2025-01-16 | After-Close | 6.08% | 2.55% | 0.42x | Within |
| 2025-03-04 | After-Close | 18.78% | 26.14% | 1.39x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-06 | After-Close | 15.64% | 30.86% | 1.97x | Exceeded |
| 2025-07-30 | After-Close | 17.38% | 2.90% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-11-05 | After-Close | 14.73% | 0.79% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | After-Close | 7.49% | 16.86% | 2.25x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-13 | After-Close | 10.71% | 1.77% | 0.17x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 66.0
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 234.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $1.07
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.69
- P/C Volume
- 0.04
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 3.81
- Correlation (SPY)
- 42.6%
- R²
- 0.18
- Ann. Volatility
- 115.5%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.9%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $41.52M | 18.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $34.85M | 15.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $27.13M | 12.08% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Caption Management, LLC | $20.78M | 9.25% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $17.35M | 7.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $13.84M | 6.16% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $13.06M | 5.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $10.21M | 4.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $9.49M | 4.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $8.77M | 3.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Crystal Cove Asset Management, LLC | $7.52M | 3.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $3.99M | 1.78% | 2025-09-30 |
| 13 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $2.98M | 1.33% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $2.48M | 1.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | PEAK6 LLC | $1.54M | 0.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | CIBC WORLD MARKETS CORP | $1.51M | 0.67% | 2025-12-31 |
| 17 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.40M | 0.62% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $1.34M | 0.60% | 2025-09-30 |
| 19 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $967.20K | 0.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Walleye Capital LLC | $575.36K | 0.26% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $570.40K | 0.25% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Shay Capital LLC | $525.76K | 0.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Kultura Capital Management LP | $508.90K | 0.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $409.70K | 0.18% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | LMR Partners LLP | $347.20K | 0.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $42.57M | 24.78% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $19.10M | 11.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $19.01M | 11.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $17.27M | 10.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | Graham Capital Management, L.P. | $13.17M | 7.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $9.54M | 5.56% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $9.04M | 5.26% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $8.22M | 4.78% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Caption Management, LLC | $7.79M | 4.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $6.06M | 3.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | DLD Asset Management, LP | $5.94M | 3.46% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $4.59M | 2.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $4.01M | 2.34% | 2025-09-30 |
| 14 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $939.42K | 0.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Skaana Management L.P. | $840.22K | 0.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $744.00K | 0.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $734.08K | 0.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $490.05K | 0.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $446.88K | 0.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | LMR Partners LLP | $347.20K | 0.20% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | Dockside LLC | $322.60K | 0.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. | $245.02K | 0.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | CSS LLC/IL | $99.20K | 0.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $90.27K | 0.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | Walleye Capital LLC | $83.33K | 0.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-28 | Nathan Kroeker | Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | +110,417 | $3.36 | -$371.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +29,167 | $3.36 | -$98.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +174,180 | $3.61 | -$574.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-27 | ALEXANDER DIMITRIEF | Director | Grant (A) | +5,942 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-27 | Marian Walters | Director | Grant (A) | +5,942 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-27 | Joseph Nigro | Director | Grant (A) | +5,942 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-15 | Marie Batz Martin | Chief Legal Officer | Grant (A) | +216,731 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-15 | Haiyan Song | Director | Grant (A) | +29,980 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-07 | Nathan Kroeker | CCO and Interim CFO | Mixed | +79,309 | $4.68 | -$371.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +133,059 | $5.06 | -$613.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +83,354 | $3.08 | -$438.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-09 | Alessandro Lagi | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +277,773 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-09 | ALEXANDER DIMITRIEF | Director | Grant (A) | +21,253 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-09 | David Urban | Director | Grant (A) | +18,217 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-09 | Joseph Nigro | Director | Grant (A) | +24,289 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Russell Monoki Stidolph | Director | 2,518,395 | $8.51M | -$11.47M | 1 | 2025-12-08 |
| 2 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | 1,947,586 | $6.58M | -$72.3K | 5 | 2026-07-28 |
| 3 | Nathan Kroeker | Chief Commercial Officer | 997,944 | $3.37M | -$1.54M | 3 | 2026-07-28 |
| 4 | Jeff McNeil | Director | 349,562 | $1.18M | $0 | 3 | 2026-06-09 |
| 5 | Michael W Silberman | Chief Legal Officer | 283,279 | $957.5K | -$739.2K | 1 | 2026-01-23 |
| 6 | ALEXANDER DIMITRIEF | Director | 272,184 | $920.0K | $90.6K | 5 | 2026-07-27 |
| 7 | Sumeet Puri | Chief Accounting Officer | 231,446 | $782.3K | -$98.0K | 1 | 2026-07-28 |
| 8 | Marian Walters | Director | 165,227 | $558.5K | -$1.28M | 8 | 2026-07-27 |
| 9 | Claude Demby | Director | 164,819 | $557.1K | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-09 |
| 10 | Jeffrey S Bornstein | Director | 135,748 | $458.8K | -$612.5K | 3 | 2026-06-09 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-28 | Puri Sumeet | Officer | 29,167 | $100.0K | 2026-07-28 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Silberman Michael W | Former Officer | 72,917 | $250.1K | 2026-07-28 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Kroeker Nathan | Officer | 110,417 | $378.7K | 2026-07-28 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Kroeker Nathan | Officer | 79,309 | $412.4K | 2026-07-07 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | Puri Sumeet | Officer | 8,823 | $52.8K | 2026-06-30 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | Silberman Michael W | Officer | 14,998 | $89.8K | 2026-06-30 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | Kroeker Nathan | Officer | 35,289 | $211.4K | 2026-06-30 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | Buczkowski Michelle | Officer | 11,469 | $68.7K | 2026-06-30 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | Marian Walters | Officer | 30,000 | $275.4K | 2026-05-28 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Marian Walters | Officer | 30,000 | $212.1K | 2026-05-19 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | -1.5 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | -5.7 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.2B |
| TTM Net Income | $-1.0B |
| TTM EPS | $-6.47 |
| ROE | 116.7% |
| Debt/Equity | -0.71 |