There's a lot to like about this hydrogen stock, but one factor may charge up investors to look elsewhere.
BE Bloom Energy Corporation
XNYS
226.01
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
BE
$226.01
—
Key stats
$226.01
After hours
$228.10
+0.83%
- 52-Week Range
- $75.70 – $351.28
- YTD
- +129.01%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.88
- Straddle Price
- $44.78
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.01
- Market Cap
- $65.2B
- Open
- $233.23
- Day Range
- $224.20 – $233.50
- Volume
- 9,949,800
- Prev Close
- $221.31
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.19% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.83 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 14.56% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 13.99% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +5.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +13bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.6B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 15.2% |
| Book / Price | 2.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 20.1% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.59 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $248.62 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $271.38 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 10.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $62B |
Peers used for multiples: BLDP, CAT, ETN, FCEL, GEV, GNRC, PLUG, PWR
60-Day Conviction
71%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 17, 2026
$232.56
α +2.8%
rank 56%
conviction
97%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 16, 2026
$228.55
α +1.0%
rank 36%
conviction
32%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 14, 2027
$231.44
α +2.3%
rank 49%
conviction
71%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $93.80 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $34.13 | 9% | median 40.8× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $43.19 | 9% | median 27.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $39.76 | 2% | median 6.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $59.65 | 6% | median 4.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $248.62 | 37% | stability 98% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $217.87 | 19% | 51 strikes · skew +0.11 |
As of 2026-10-19 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL APPARATUS (3620) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $65.2B
- Employees
- 2,214
- List Date
- 2018-07-25
- CIK
- 0001664703
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-22 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.56 (5 est.)
- Headquarters
- San Jose, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.bloomenergy.com
Bloom Energy designs, manufactures, sells, and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. Bloom Energy Servers are fuel-flexible and can use natural gas, biogas, and hydrogen to create 24/7 electricity for stationary applications. Bloom sells its systems in the United States and internationally.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 27.92% | -31.89% | 29.91% | -23.31% | 0.90% | 53.38% | 9.49% |
| Feb | -23.41% | 45.86% | -14.67% | -26.98% | 1.91% | -0.29% | -2.93% |
| Mar | -10.93% | 7.05% | -9.00% | 23.79% | -16.05% | -18.38% | -3.92% |
| Apr | -1.44% | -24.37% | -17.41% | -5.12% | -13.75% | 113.94% | 8.64% |
| May | -2.66% | -6.61% | -16.95% | 44.30% | 9.88% | -1.90% | 4.34% |
| Jun | 9.94% | -3.00% | 17.12% | -22.29% | 30.85% | 10.67% | 7.22% |
| Jul | -18.11% | 19.85% | 9.44% | 19.09% | 68.96% | -29.68% | 11.59% |
| Aug | 0.37% | 24.80% | -15.17% | -4.72% | 44.17% | -5.51% | 7.32% |
| Sep | -14.52% | -18.94% | -12.53% | -4.17% | 64.69% | 29.65% | 7.36% |
| Oct | 69.25% | -9.79% | -14.68% | -5.97% | 46.54% | -18.50%* | 11.14% |
| Nov | -15.05% | 16.53% | 44.11% | 176.16% | -23.27% | -- | 39.70% |
| Dec | -14.47% | -11.15% | -3.77% | -17.50% | -12.17% | -- | -11.81% |
| Total | -20.48% | -17.49% | -22.14% | 71.81% | 324.10% | 103.56% | 73.23% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $269.04
SMA 50: $248.76
SMA 200: $217.01
Current: $226.22
EMA 12: $253.16
EMA 26: $258.67
MACD: -5.5092 | Signal: -8.5171
BULLISH
ADX (14): 19.96
RANGE
+DI: 14.86
−DI: 29.00
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 38.56
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 14.78
Stoch %D: 15.43
Williams %R: -87.04
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $312.32
BB Lower: $225.76
NEUTRAL
OBV: 380,576,492
Vol SMA 20: 13,745,921
Vol ROC: 32.54%
ATR: $19.28
True Range: $12.19
HV 20: 84.8%
HV 30: 84.8%
HV 60: 94.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-21T00:00:00 – 2026-10-19T00:00:00
AI Analysis
BLOOM ENERGY (BE) - COMPREHENSIVE STOCK ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH with confidence level 7/10
Bloom Energy presents a conflicted technical and sentiment picture. While recent news sentiment is decidedly positive (4 of 5 recent articles bullish), the stock is trading significantly below its key moving averages with deteriorating momentum indicators and extreme bearish options positioning. The disconnect between bullish narrative and bearish technicals, combined with sky-high realized volatility (99.0% HV60), suggests the market is pricing in meaningful downside risk ahead of earnings on 2026-10-22.
Key Drivers:
- Positive sector narrative around AI data center power infrastructure demand
- Upcoming earnings catalyst (9 days away)
- Elevated volatility environment with IV-to-HV compression
Primary Risks:
- Severe technical breakdown: stock -12.5% below SMA20, -3.1% below SMA50
- Extreme bearish options positioning (2.62 put/call OI ratio)
- Deteriorating momentum despite bullish news
- Extraordinary volatility (HV60 99.0%) ahead of earnings
Investment Thesis: Bloom Energy's fundamentals appear strong based on recent positive analyst comparisons and AI infrastructure tailwinds, but technical deterioration and extreme bearish options hedging signal the market is bracing for an earnings disappointment or guidance concern. The 9-day window to earnings creates a binary risk event that has already begun pricing in downside.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent positive sentiment (3 Motley Fool pieces comparing BE favorably to competitors on 2026-10-12, plus sector tailwind coverage) appears to have been unable to prevent a significant recent selloff. This divergence suggests the positive narrative was already priced in, or the market has shifted focus to valuation/earnings execution risks.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Price: $241.12 is trading 12.5% below SMA20 ($275.90) — clear short-term downtrend
- Price: $241.12 is 3.1% below SMA50 ($248.77) — recent breakdown below intermediate support
- EMA positioning: Price below EMA12 ($270.19) and EMA26 ($266.85) confirms downtrend
- ADX (14) = 16.90 indicates weak trend strength; range-bound regime confirmed
Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL-TO-BEARISH
- Price still above SMA200 ($214.91) by 12.2%, suggesting longer-term uptrend remains intact
- However, the gap has been narrowing; proximity to SMA50 and SMA20 breakdown suggests vulnerability to deeper pullback
- Trend direction is deteriorating despite medium-term support
Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
- Price $241.12 remains $26.21 (12.2%) above SMA200 ($214.91)
- Long-term uptrend foundation intact, but under pressure
Support/Resistance Levels
Critical Support (in order of proximity):
- SMA50: $248.77 — broken through; now acts as resistance
- SMA200: $214.91 — major long-term support; 11.1% downside
- Bollinger Band Lower: $250.21 — being tested; below this suggests further weakness
- $230-235 zone — psychological support area (estimated from Bollinger Band width)
Critical Resistance (in order of proximity):
- SMA20: $275.90 — primary resistance; requires 14.5% rally
- SMA50: $248.77 — near-term resistance; $7.65 away (3.2%)
- Bollinger Band Upper: $301.60 — ceiling resistance
Immediate Action Zone:
- $250.21-$248.77 (Bollinger Lower / SMA50) — Keystone support; break below here signals capitulation toward $214.91
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 41.58 — NEUTRAL (leaning bearish)
- Position is in neutral zone (30-70), but closer to oversold (30) than to overbought (70)
- Reading of 41.58 indicates neither extreme, but trending toward weakness
- Not yet at capitulation (oversold <30), suggesting more downside possible before bounce
Stochastic Oscillators: OVERSOLD
- %K: 19.20 (very low)
- %D: 31.68 (near oversold threshold of 30)
- Signal: Potential mean reversion upside, but only after breakdown is confirmed; usually reflects recent weakness cooling
Williams %R: -91.87 — EXTREME OVERSOLD
- Reading near -100 indicates extreme bearish momentum
- Typically precedes bounce, but in context of other signals suggests capitulation may be occurring
- Can persist in strong downtrends; not reliable as sole reversal indicator
MACD: BULLISH DIVERGENCE SIGNAL (caution required)
- MACD: 3.34 (positive territory)
- Signal Line: -5.65 (negative)
- Histogram: +8.99 (positive and widening)
- Interpretation: MACD is attempting to cross above signal line from below — early stages of bullish momentum setup
- HOWEVER: This occurs after significant price deterioration; classic late-stage momentum setup
- In oversold markets, this often marks exhaustion of selling pressure rather than true reversal
Momentum Verdict: BEARISH SHORT-TERM, POTENTIAL REVERSAL SETUP FORMING
Bollinger Bands Analysis
Configuration: OVERSOLD
- Upper Band: $301.60
- Middle (20-SMA): $275.90
- Lower Band: $250.21
- Band Width: 18.63
Signal Interpretation:
- Price: $241.12 is below the lower band — extreme oversold condition
- This is extraordinarily rare and suggests either:
- Capitulation selling is underway
- Stock is mean-reverting and bounce is imminent
- Data error (unlikely given alignment with other indicators)
- Bollinger Band squeeze (low width) isn't present; bands are moderately wide at 18.63
- Expected mean reversion: Price should drift back toward middle band ($275.90) = 14.5% upside, or toward lower band if breakdown continues
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends: DETERIORATING
- Volume SMA20: 16.58M shares (baseline)
- Volume Rate of Change: -7.64% (volume declining relative to 20-day average)
- Signal: Declining volume during selloff is positive signal for reversal — suggests weak hands are done selling, not capitulation from institutional players
- OBV: 392.14M — without historical context, neutral; but declining VROC suggests volume isn't confirming further downside
Institutional Interest Signals:
- Declining volume on down move typically precedes reversal or consolidation
- Not seeing heavy institutional accumulation (large volume) at these levels — suggests uncertainty about value
- Options OI skew toward puts (6.46M puts vs 2.46M calls) indicates hedging, not accumulation
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
Positive Themes (4 of 5 recent articles):
-
AI Data Center Power Infrastructure Tailwind (2026-10-10, Motley Fool)
- Positions BE among 6 stocks to benefit through 2030 from power-hungry AI data centers
- Sector-wide positive narrative; positions BE as beneficiary of secular trend
-
BE vs. Competitors Comparison (2026-10-12, Motley Fool × 2 articles)
- "Bloom Energy vs. NextEra Energy: Which Industrials Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?"
- "Bloom Energy vs. Vertiv: Which AI Infrastructure Stock Is the Better Buy After the Pullback?"
- Analyst tone suggests post-pullback is attractive buying opportunity
- "After the Pullback" language indicates recognition of recent weakness as tactical opportunity
-
Pre-Earnings Conviction (2026-10-12, Motley Fool)
- "I'm Not Selling Bloom Energy Before Earnings. Here's the 1 Number I'm Watching"
- Shows analyst conviction to hold through earnings (2026-10-22)
Generated
News
All BE news →
One focuses on decentralized fuel cell innovation with explosive growth potential; the other commands a massive nuclear fleet with fortress-like cash flow.
The fuel cell maker's earnings could nearly triple by 2030. Will the stock follow?
Bloom stock has recently exploded. Can it alone make you a millionaire?
Bloom Energy is racing toward profitability with 37% revenue growth, while NextEra commands a massive cash engine and lower valuation, but their risk profiles couldn't be more different.
Two AI infrastructure stocks have pulled back hard this year. Here's which one offers investors the better risk-reward.
The fuel cell maker had the largest quarter in its history. Why hasn't the stock rebounded this time?
The SOFC system maker continues to benefit from the AI market's breakneck growth.
Bloom Energy has grown 15-fold in five years. But are there still good days ahead?
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
17 of 23 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
15.41%
Avg Actual Move
9.50%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-10 | After-Close | 14.85% | 3.28% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2021-05-05 | After-Close | 15.63% | 2.82% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2021-08-04 | After-Close | 14.06% | 3.49% | 0.25x | Within |
| 2021-11-04 | After-Close | 13.59% | 6.10% | 0.45x | Within |
| 2022-02-10 | After-Close | 15.82% | 8.97% | 0.57x | Within |
| 2022-05-05 | After-Close | 17.92% | 20.24% | 1.13x | Exceeded |
| 2022-08-09 | After-Close | 14.94% | 18.34% | 1.23x | Exceeded |
| 2022-11-03 | After-Close | 16.02% | 11.67% | 0.73x | Within |
| 2023-02-09 | After-Close | 13.58% | 1.73% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2023-05-09 | After-Close | 12.52% | 8.49% | 0.68x | Within |
| 2023-08-03 | After-Close | 14.36% | 4.16% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2023-11-08 | After-Close | 13.26% | 8.37% | 0.63x | Within |
| 2024-02-15 | After-Close | 16.54% | 17.46% | 1.06x | Exceeded |
| 2024-05-09 | After-Close | 15.59% | 4.94% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 17.08% | 9.01% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 15.70% | 23.43% | 1.49x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-27 | After-Close | 17.80% | 4.25% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2025-04-30 | After-Close | 12.96% | 8.24% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 10.76% | 1.79% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-10-28 | After-Close | 16.99% | 18.03% | 1.06x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-05 | After-Close | 16.78% | 4.71% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | After-Close | 14.95% | 27.21% | 1.82x | Exceeded |
| 2026-07-28 | After-Close | 22.84% | 1.85% | 0.08x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
BE Options Activity & IV Rank
BE IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 84.9%
7-DTE IV: 110.6%
Expected Move: $44.78
7-DTE Move: $24.77
Days to Exp: 32 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 4,122
Put Volume: 4,165
P/C Volume: 1.01
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 44,955
Put OI: 56,458
P/C OI: 1.256
Total OI: 101,413
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $23.30
ATM Put: $21.48
Call %: 10.3%
Put %: 9.5%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 111,037
Chain OI: 910,948
Last Updated: 10/19/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 3rd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
3%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.35
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.17
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.17
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 241 ATM contracts, 178k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
65%
+5.8
pts
EXTREME
ATM 100.5% / Wing 106.3%
30 DTE / 10d
58%
+5.7
pts
EXTREME
ATM 84.4% / Wing 90.1%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)24.2LowOct 19
IV Rank (30 DTE)8.9LowOct 19
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$44.78Oct 19
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 4.3298
Alpha: 66.62%
Correlation: 0.4939
R-Squared: 24.4%
Stock Volatility: 111.6%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own BE
6 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $763.5M | #13 of 3716 | +551.5% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $204.5M | #54 of 3138 | +26.1% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $196.9M | #196 of 6285 | +97.5% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $93.5M | #184 of 1945 | +580.4% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $41.4M | #280 of 4729 | -2.0% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $8.5M | #362 of 997 | -38.4% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BE Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 279,593,000 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
65 filers$7.66B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.55B | 33.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.12B | 27.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.32B | 17.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | HSBC Holdings plc Custodian | $213.16M | 2.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $210.16M | 2.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $128.65M | 1.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | PEAK6 LLC | $122.38M | 1.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $108.00M | 1.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $93.99M | 1.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $91.40M | 1.19% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $65.08M | 0.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $61.05M | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $60.63M | 0.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Caption Management, LLC | $55.85M | 0.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Situational Awareness Partners LP | $55.35M | 0.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Situational Awareness LP | $44.13M | 0.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $43.53M | 0.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Jain Global LLC | $32.54M | 0.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Tidal Investments LLC | $30.27M | 0.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $28.54M | 0.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Gobi Capital LLC | $27.06M | 0.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $23.04M | 0.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Custodian | $18.92M | 0.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $17.22M | 0.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $14.05M | 0.18% | 2026-06-30 |
52 filers$12.00B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $3.07B | 25.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.69B | 22.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.98B | 16.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.49B | 12.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $614.60M | 5.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $511.56M | 4.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $305.88M | 2.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $167.03M | 1.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $158.92M | 1.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Select Equity Group, L.P. | $155.53M | 1.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $107.97M | 0.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Hudson Bay Capital Management LP | $104.13M | 0.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Teilinger Capital Ltd. | $101.10M | 0.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Sculptor Capital LP | $85.33M | 0.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | PEAK6 LLC | $75.28M | 0.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Jain Global LLC | $60.54M | 0.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $56.51M | 0.47% | 2025-09-30 |
| 18 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $29.24M | 0.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $29.12M | 0.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $22.70M | 0.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $22.28M | 0.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $19.98M | 0.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $14.83M | 0.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Crawford Fund Management, LLC | $14.05M | 0.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $13.64M | 0.11% | 2025-09-30 |
BE Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Cynthia J Warner | Director | Award (A) | +83 | $276.98 | $23.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Aman Joshi | Chief Commercial Officer | Sell (S) | −8,437 | $277.17 | -$2.34M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Jeffrey R Immelt | Director | Award (A) | +81 | $276.98 | $22.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | Shawn Marie Soderberg | See Remarks | Sell (S) | −2,870 | $270.07 | -$775.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | Satish Chitoori | Chief Operations Officer | Sell (S) | −2,870 | $270.06 | -$775.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | Aman Joshi | Chief Commercial Officer | Sell (S) | −3,601 | $269.94 | -$972.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | Maciej Kurzymski | Chief Accounting Officer | Sell (S) | −2,295 | $268.42 | -$616.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-03 | KR Sridhar | Chairman & CEO | Mixed | −290,312 | $30.96 | $299.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Simon Stephen Edwards | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +15,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-18 | Jeffrey R Immelt | Director | Sell (S) | −30,000 | $238.91 | -$7.17M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Satish Chitoori | Chief Operations Officer | Sell (S) | −2,053 | $241.64 | -$496.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Aman Joshi | Chief Commercial Officer | Sell (S) | −4,677 | $241.75 | -$1.13M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Shawn Marie Soderberg | See Remarks | Sell (S) | −2,895 | $233.60 | -$676.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | John T Chambers | Director | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $250.00 | -$3.75M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | John T Chambers | Director | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $205.58 | -$3.08M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
BE Insider Holdings
16 insiders · @ $226.22
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SK ecoplant Co., Ltd. | 10%+ Owner | 13,491,701 | $3.05B | -$276.00M | 6 | 2025-07-14 |
| 2 | KR Sridhar | Chairman & CEO | 3,424,013 | $774.58M | -$92.94M | 48 | 2026-09-03 |
| 3 | Shawn Marie Soderberg | See Remarks | 468,231 | $105.92M | -$56.80M | 76 | 2026-09-18 |
| 4 | John T Chambers | Director | 347,220 | $78.55M | -$24.58M | 18 | 2026-08-14 |
| 5 | Satish Chitoori | Chief Operations Officer | 202,494 | $45.81M | -$11.57M | 20 | 2026-09-18 |
| 6 | Jeffrey R Immelt | Director | 201,324 | $45.54M | -$5.37M | 30 | 2026-10-02 |
| 7 | Aman Joshi | Chief Commercial Officer | 147,092 | $33.28M | -$18.71M | 19 | 2026-10-02 |
| 8 | Mary K Bush | Director | 106,087 | $24.00M | -$11.71M | 20 | 2026-05-26 |
| 9 | Michael J Boskin | Director | 102,898 | $23.28M | $0 | 8 | 2026-05-26 |
| 10 | Eddy Zervigon | Director | 78,101 | $17.67M | -$4.17M | 16 | 2026-05-26 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
BE Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-10-01
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $2.3M notice value
· Last 90d:
11 filings
· $21.5M notice value
· 6 unique filers
· 82% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
IMMELT JEFFREY R (1, $7.2M) · JC2 INVESTMENTS, LLC (2, $6.6M) · AMAN JOSHI (3, $4.4M) · SHAWN M. SODERBERG (2, $1.4M) · SATISH CHITOORI (2, $1.2M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | AMAN JOSHI | Officer | 8,437 | $2.34M | 2026-10-01 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | SHAWN SODERBERG | Officer | 2,870 | $744.3K | 2026-09-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | SATISH CHITOORI | Officer | 2,870 | $744.3K | 2026-09-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | AMAN JOSHI | Officer | 3,601 | $933.9K | 2026-09-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | MACIEJ KURZYMSKI | Officer | 2,295 | $616.0K | 2026-09-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | IMMELT JEFFREY R | Director | 30,000 | $7.17M | 2026-08-17 | THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | SATISH CHITOORI | Officer | 2,053 | $485.0K | 2026-08-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | AMAN JOSHI | Officer | 4,677 | $1.10M | 2026-08-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | SHAWN M. SODERBERG | Officer | 2,895 | $676.3K | 2026-08-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-13 | JC2 INVESTMENTS, LLC | Director | 15,000 | $3.56M | 2026-08-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
266 ETFs hold BE
25 shown · $12.11B total exposure · 0.15% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.11% | $2.5B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | Vanguard | 0.12% | $2.1B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VO Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.77% | $1.7B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $925.8M | $879.6B | 2026-10-15 |
| 5 | VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.23% | $910.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | SPY State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 0.10% | $857.9M | $823.1B | 2026-10-15 |
| 7 | VOT Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 1.83% | $608.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | XLI State Street® Industrial Select Sector SPDR® ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 1.30% | $395.8M | $30.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 9 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.19% | $247.9M | $124.6B | 2026-10-15 |
| 10 | SCHM Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF | Nport | 1.36% | $198.9M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 11 | SPYM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.10% | $191.6M | $183.9B | 2026-10-15 |
| 12 | ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 8.53% | $179.0M | $2.1B | 2026-10-15 |
| 13 | RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | Invesco | 0.16% | $162.1M | — | 2026-10-17 |
| 14 | IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.19% | $148.3M | $76.9B | 2026-10-15 |
| 15 | BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.09% | $144.8M | $12.7B | 2026-10-15 |
| 16 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.23% | $125.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | SPYG State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® Growth ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.19% | $107.4M | $56.7B | 2026-10-15 |
| 18 | VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | Vanguard | 1.13% | $96.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | VV Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.12% | $91.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 20 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.09% | $90.2M | $96.0B | 2026-10-15 |
| 21 | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.43% | $82.5M | $18.5B | 2026-10-15 |
| 22 | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.11% | $78.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 23 | CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF | Capitalgroup | 2.04% | $72.0M | $3.5B | 2026-10-15 |
| 24 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $66.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 25 | VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.22% | $61.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
297.66
TTM Diluted EPS
$0.76
TTM Revenue
$3.11B
TTM Net Income
$244.94M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$737.78M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $1.07B | $196.29M | $0.62 | $226.43M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $751.05M | $70.65M | $0.23 | $73.61M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $777.68M | $1.09M | $0.01 | $418.07M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $519.05M | $-23.09M | $-0.10 | $19.67M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $401.24M | $-42.62M | $-0.18 | $-213.11M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $326.02M | $-23.81M | $-0.10 | $-110.68M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $572.39M | $104.80M | $0.46 | $484.23M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $330.40M | $-14.71M | $-0.06 | $-69.47M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $335.77M | $-61.79M | $-0.27 | $-175.50M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $235.30M | $-57.52M | $-0.25 | $-147.27M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $356.92M | $4.51M | $0.05 | $121.83M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $400.27M | $-169.00M | $-0.80 | $-133.17M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-07-28
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
297.66
P/B
38.55
P/S
20.32
EV/EBITDA
156.92
EV/Sales
20.30
ROE
14.9%
ROA
4.4%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
1.17%
Debt/Equity
1.59
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$63.25B
as of 2026-10-19
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
20.98M
SI % of Float
7.83%
Days to Cover
1.03
Short Vol Ratio
53.1%
Free Float
268.08M
Float %
91.0%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-16 • Float 2026-08-24