Bloom Energy Corporation(BE)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $24.39 – $351.28
- YTD
- +101.64%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 100
- Straddle Price
- $82.78
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.37
- Market Cap
- $61.1B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.55% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.05% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.91% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +37.9pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 0.7% |
| Book / Price | 1.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 29.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 9.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 2.90 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $276.45 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $274.20 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 20.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.3B |
| Market Cap | $55B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $35.19 | 25% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 29.7× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $31.77 | 7% | median 35.5× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $25.57 | 10% | median 6.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $78.23 | 10% | median 7.5× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $276.45 | 23% | stability 47% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $277.67 | 25% | 74 strikes · skew +0.14 |
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL APPARATUS (3620)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $61.1B
Bloom Energy designs, manufactures, sells, and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. Bloom Energy Servers are fuel-flexible and can use natural gas, biogas, and hydrogen to create 24/7 electricity for stationary applications. Bloom sells its systems in the United States and internationally.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +8.36% | 6 |
| Feb | -4.64% | 6 |
| Mar | -1.04% | 6 |
| Apr | +12.99% | 6 |
| May | +8.07% | 6 |
| Jun | +4.56% | 6 |
| Jul | +10.69% | 6 |
| Aug | +0.94% | 5 |
| Sep | +0.46% | 5 |
| Oct | +18.26% | 5 |
| Nov | +36.70% | 5 |
| Dec | -10.71% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 15.94% | 2.39% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 16.75% | 31.30% | 1.87x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-27 | After-Close | 16.47% | 3.21% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2025-04-30 | After-Close | 12.89% | 8.40% | 0.65x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 11.61% | 6.11% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2025-10-28 | After-Close | 16.81% | 16.76% | 1.00x | Within |
| 2026-02-05 | After-Close | 16.93% | 5.42% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | After-Close | 14.42% | 21.90% | 1.52x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 100
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 178.4%
- Straddle (30D)
- $82.78
- Straddle (7D)
- $28.05
- P/C Volume
- 1.37
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 4.16
- Correlation (SPY)
- 47.1%
- R²
- 0.22
- Ann. Volatility
- 111.5%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.6%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $719.11M | 21.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $683.85M | 20.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $656.07M | 19.33% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $514.58M | 15.16% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $120.30M | 3.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC Custodian | $93.21M | 2.75% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $91.40M | 2.69% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $64.71M | 1.91% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Situational Awareness Partners LP | $55.35M | 1.63% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Situational Awareness LP | $55.35M | 1.63% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | PEAK6 LLC | $54.01M | 1.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN Custodian | $41.57M | 1.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Jain Global LLC | $29.47M | 0.87% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $27.40M | 0.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Teilinger Capital Ltd. | $25.76M | 0.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $24.44M | 0.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | BARCLAYS PLC Custodian | $23.71M | 0.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $19.71M | 0.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Caption Management, LLC | $16.26M | 0.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. | $15.83M | 0.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $14.16M | 0.42% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $12.51M | 0.37% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $7.49M | 0.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $5.89M | 0.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $3.20M | 0.09% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $756.29M | 21.30% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $614.68M | 17.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $451.48M | 12.71% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $445.29M | 12.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $259.83M | 7.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $136.18M | 3.83% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN Custodian | $129.30M | 3.64% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $108.77M | 3.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Teilinger Capital Ltd. | $95.22M | 2.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Select Equity Group, L.P. | $71.24M | 2.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $67.75M | 1.91% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $56.51M | 1.59% | 2025-09-30 |
| 13 | BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ Custodian | $54.86M | 1.54% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Sculptor Capital LP | $38.19M | 1.08% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Hudson Bay Capital Management LP | $34.96M | 0.98% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Jain Global LLC | $31.30M | 0.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $28.98M | 0.82% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Temasek Holdings (Private) Ltd | $27.02M | 0.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | PEAK6 LLC | $17.02M | 0.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $13.64M | 0.38% | 2025-09-30 |
| 21 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $12.57M | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $10.01M | 0.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Tidal Investments LLC | $9.70M | 0.27% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC Custodian | $9.32M | 0.26% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | Crawford Fund Management, LLC | $8.26M | 0.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | CYNTHIA J WARNER | Director | Award (A) | +76 | $302.70 | $23.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | JEFFREY R IMMELT | Director | Award (A) | +85 | $302.70 | $25.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Aman Joshi | Chief Commercial Officer | Sell (S) | −8,343 | $300.37 | -$2.51M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Aman Joshi | Chief Commercial Officer | Sell (S) | −3,558 | $289.14 | -$1.03M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | SHAWN MARIE SODERBERG | See Remarks | Sell (S) | −2,842 | $288.63 | -$820.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Maciej Kurzymski | Chief Accounting Officer | Sell (S) | −2,259 | $288.62 | -$652.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Satish Chitoori | Chief Operations Officer | Sell (S) | −2,837 | $289.11 | -$820.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | JOHN T CHAMBERS | Director | Sell (S) | −55,000 | $297.69 | -$16.37M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | JEFFREY R IMMELT | Director | Award (A) | +1,417 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | CYNTHIA J WARNER | Director | Award (A) | +1,063 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | MICHAEL J BOSKIN | Director | Award (A) | +1,063 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Barbara J Burger | Director | Award (A) | +1,063 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Gary S Pinkus | Director | Award (A) | +1,063 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | MARY K BUSH | Director | Award (A) | +1,063 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | EDDY ZERVIGON | Director | Award (A) | +1,063 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SK ecoplant Co., Ltd. | 10%+ Owner | 13,491,701 | $2.66B | -$276.00M | 6 | 2025-07-14 |
| 2 | KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & BYERS IX A LP | 10%+ Owner | 6,000,000 | $1.18B | $0 | 1 | 2019-11-22 |
| 3 | Alberta Investment Management Corp | 10%+ Owner | 5,360,549 | $1.06B | -$11.91M | 4 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4 | KR Sridhar | Chairman & CEO | 3,714,325 | $731.94M | -$92.94M | 47 | 2026-05-21 |
| 5 | MOBIUS VI LLC | 10%+ Owner | 1,433,978 | $282.58M | -$16.26M | 1 | 2019-01-23 |
| 6 | PETER J BARRIS | 10%+ Owner | 1,333,333 | $262.75M | $80.00M | 1 | 2018-07-31 |
| 7 | SOFTBANK U S VENTURES VI L P | 10%+ Owner | 1,272,711 | $250.80M | -$22.10M | 1 | 2019-01-28 |
| 8 | Colin Powell | Director | 556,203 | $109.61M | $5.00M | 12 | 2021-05-14 |
| 9 | SHAWN MARIE SODERBERG | See Remarks | 473,996 | $93.41M | -$55.35M | 74 | 2026-06-17 |
| 10 | Glen Griffiths | EVP Quality, Reliability &EH&S | 405,875 | $79.98M | -$3.40M | 45 | 2023-04-04 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 | AMAN JOSHI | Officer | 8,343 | $2.53M | 2026-07-01 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | SATISH CHITOORI | Officer | 2,837 | $778.8K | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | AMAN JOSHI | Officer | 3,558 | $976.7K | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | MACIEJ KURZYMSKI | Officer | 2,259 | $652.0K | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | SHAWN M. SODERBERG | Officer | 2,842 | $820.3K | 2026-06-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | JC2 INVESTMENTS, LLC | Director | 55,000 | $16.16M | 2026-05-28 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | SHAWN SODERBERG | Officer | 2,746 | $757.8K | 2026-05-18 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | SHAWN SODERBERG | Officer | 2,879 | $834.2K | 2026-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | AMAN JOSHI | Officer | 4,813 | $1.39M | 2026-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | SATISH PRABHU CHITOORI | Officer | 2,111 | $611.7K | 2026-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 66.3 |
| P/S Ratio | 25.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 284.7 |
| TTM Revenue | $2.4B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.04 |
| ROE | 0.7% |
| Debt/Equity | 3.06 |