EverCommerce Inc. Common Stock(EVCM)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$9.34
After hours
$9.31
+0.00%
- 52-Week Range
- $7.66 – $14.41
- YTD
- -19.13%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 42.68
- Straddle Price
- $2.23
- Market Cap
- $1.6B
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.50% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.00% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.89% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +133.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -0.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 4.4% |
| Book / Price | 44.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 77.5% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 13.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.72 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +10.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $10.47 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $9.43 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 366.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.4B |
| Market Cap | $2B |
Peers used for multiples: CDNS, CRM, CRWD, MSFT, NET, NOW, ORCL, PLTR, SHOP, SNPS
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$16.45
Current Price
$9.31
Deviation
+50.0%
Forward-Return Rank
LONG
gates ✓
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -3.4% ⚠ | +0.01 | +0.98 | 79.8% | — |
| 42d | -5.2% ⚠ | +0.07 | +1.01 | 75.8% | — |
| 63d | -5.2% ⚠ | +0.20 | +1.08 | 76.0% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $3.66 | 27% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $12.85 | 6% | median 71.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $29.35 | 8% | median 46.7× · 10 peers |
| Peer P/B | $43.92 | 10% | median 11.3× · 10 peers |
| Peer P/S | $36.04 | 10% | median 11.1× · 10 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $10.47 | 38% | stability 72% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-26 · updated 2026-06-26 20:15:30.871000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.6B
EverCommerce Inc provides tailored Software-as-a-Service solutions for service-based small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) in-home services, health services, and fitness & wellness. The Company served more than 745,000 customers across three core verticals: EverPro for Home Services; EverHealth for Health Services; and EverWell for Wellness Services. Revenue is mostly generated from the United States. Operating in a single segment, their vertically-tailored SaaS offerings cater to SMBs' specialized demands, enabling them to automate processes, generate business, and enhance customer loyalt…
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.58% | 5 |
| Feb | -1.68% | 5 |
| Mar | +3.24% | 5 |
| Apr | +3.18% | 5 |
| May | -3.62% | 5 |
| Jun | +0.21% | 5 |
| Jul | +4.84% | 5 |
| Aug | +0.08% | 5 |
| Sep | -7.40% | 5 |
| Oct | -1.47% | 5 |
| Nov | -12.86% | 5 |
| Dec | +13.32% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $9.35
SMA 50: $10.41
SMA 200: $10.92
Current: $9.36
EMA 12: $9.08
EMA 26: $9.51
MACD: -0.4277 | Signal: 0.0478
BEARISH
ADX (14): 27.95
TREND
+DI: 16.48
−DI: 19.90
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 47.22
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 37.86
Stoch %D: 23.18
Williams %R: -22.75
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $10.79
BB Lower: $7.90
NEUTRAL
OBV: 3,454,531
Vol SMA 20: 159,374
Vol ROC: 34.90%
ATR: $0.58
True Range: $0.91
HV 20: 57.6%
HV 30: 54.6%
HV 60: 58.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-26T19:55:12.115000
Date Range: 2024-06-27T00:00:00 – 2026-06-25T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
This SaaS platform for service businesses reported a notable insider sale.
This SaaS provider for service-oriented businesses reported a notable insider sale, as direct holdings continue to decline year over year.
Earnings History
8 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Pre-Market | 28.86% | 3.97% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2024-11-12 | Pre-Market | 9.64% | 1.72% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2025-03-13 | Pre-Market | 20.15% | 8.50% | 0.42x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | Pre-Market | 12.85% | 1.88% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | Pre-Market | 20.96% | 2.50% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2025-11-06 | Pre-Market | 80.52% | 0.35% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2026-03-12 | Pre-Market | 30.24% | 1.33% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | Pre-Market | 21.53% | 5.71% | 0.27x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 42.68
- IV Rank (7D)
- 42.68
- Avg IV
- 172.1%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.23
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.23
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.99
- Correlation (SPY)
- 21.7%
- R²
- 0.05
- Ann. Volatility
- 56.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 183,062,450 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
1 filers$1.14K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.14K | 100.00% | 2026-03-31 |
2 filers$118.87K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $117.73K | 99.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.14K | 0.96% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-23
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | Amy Guggenheim Shenkan | Director | Award (A) | +22,346 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-23 | Penny Rose Baldwin-Leonard | Director | Award (A) | +22,346 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-23 | Richard A Simonson | Director | Award (A) | +22,346 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Eric Richard Remer | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −4,004,644 | $9.05 | -$42.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-11 | Eric Richard Remer | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −19,200 | $9.11 | -$174.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Ryan H Siurek | Chief Financial Officer | Tax (F) | −8,204 | $9.20 | -$75.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Lisa E Storey | Chief Legal Officer | Tax (F) | −3,003 | $9.20 | -$27.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Eric Richard Remer | Chief Executive Officer | Tax (F) | −27,417 | $9.20 | -$252.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Matthew David Feierstein | President | Tax (F) | −10,302 | $9.20 | -$94.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Lisa E Storey | Chief Legal Officer | Tax (F) | −1,170 | $9.43 | -$11.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Eric Richard Remer | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −32,722 | $9.91 | -$324.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Matthew David Feierstein | President | Mixed | −25,325 | $10.62 | -$268.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | Eric Richard Remer | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −19,200 | $10.60 | -$203.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Lisa E Storey | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | −5,228 | $10.46 | -$54.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Ryan H Siurek | Chief Financial Officer | Tax (F) | −1,397 | $10.69 | -$14.9K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
19 insiders · @ $9.36
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eric Richard Remer | Chief Executive Officer | 6,900,270 | $64.59M | -$20.40M | 132 | 2026-06-18 |
| 2 | Joseph Osnoss | Director | 4,358,390 | $40.79M | $0 | 1 | 2021-07-08 |
| 3 | Matthew David Feierstein | President | 2,230,627 | $20.88M | -$6.37M | 68 | 2026-06-08 |
| 4 | Marc Christopher Thompson | Chief Financial Officer | 1,243,870 | $11.64M | -$702.3K | 26 | 2024-09-04 |
| 5 | Ryan H Siurek | Chief Financial Officer | 369,436 | $3.46M | -$232.1K | 32 | 2026-06-08 |
| 6 | Lisa E Storey | Chief Legal Officer | 239,598 | $2.24M | -$1.34M | 57 | 2026-06-08 |
| 7 | Evan Berlin | Chief Operating Officer | 238,376 | $2.23M | -$186.0K | 25 | 2025-01-03 |
| 8 | Shane Driggers | Chief Human Resources Officer | 163,478 | $1.53M | -$248.3K | 14 | 2024-03-06 |
| 9 | Sarah Michelle Jordan | Chief Marketing Officer | 161,413 | $1.51M | -$572.6K | 20 | 2024-03-06 |
| 10 | Samuel Christopher Alaimo | Chief Technology Officer | 153,038 | $1.43M | -$102.0K | 12 | 2023-10-05 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-23
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
8 filings
· $535K notice value
· Last 90d:
30 filings
· $3.6M notice value
· 2 unique filers
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
Top 90-day filers:
Remer Eric Richard (29, $2.4M) · MATTHEW FEIERSTEIN (1, $1.2M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 1,100 | $9.7K | 2026-06-23 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 4,644 | $42.0K | 2026-06-16 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-10 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 7,517 | $68.8K | 2026-06-10 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-09 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 11,683 | $106.1K | 2026-06-09 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 5,658 | $54.2K | 2026-06-03 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 13,542 | $142.6K | 2026-06-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 4,500 | $48.4K | 2026-05-28 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 5,974 | $62.9K | 2026-05-27 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 8,726 | $92.3K | 2026-05-26 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Remer Eric Richard | Officer and Director | 3,210 | $32.8K | 2026-05-21 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 51.9 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.2 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.8 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.6B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $0.18 |
| ROE | 4.4% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.73 |