Howmet Aerospace Inc.(HWM)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$274.74
- 52-Week Range
- $169.45 – $290.63
- YTD
- +29.77%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 27.42
- Straddle Price
- $23.00
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.24
- Market Cap
- $111.1B
Fair Value
-19.4% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.49% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.70% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.75% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +7.2pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +21bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +12.7% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $1.7B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 31.6% |
| Book / Price | 4.9% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 19.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.73 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $256.86 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $261.11 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 6.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.6B |
| Market Cap | $114B |
Peers used for multiples: ATI, AXON, BA, CRS, GE, HXL, PH, RTX
Blended Fair Value
$221.11
Current Price
$274.30
Deviation
-19.4%
Forward-Return Rank
SHORT
gated
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -4.6% | -0.54 | -0.77 | 37.0% | — |
| 42d | -7.8% | -0.98 | -0.77 | 37.0% | — |
| 63d | -8.0% | -0.67 | -0.77 | 37.0% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $99.83 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $292.50 | 9% | median 61.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $239.57 | 9% | median 34.6× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $161.91 | 2% | median 11.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $137.13 | 6% | median 5.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $256.86 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $260.99 | 19% | 42 strikes · skew +0.32 |
As of 2026-06-23 · updated 2026-06-23 19:23:31.970000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- ROLLING DRAWING & EXTRUDING OF NONFERROUS METALS (3350)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $111.1B
Howmet Aerospace Inc offers engineered solutions for the aerospace and transportation industries. The company's products and solutions include investment castings for jet engines and industrial gas turbines; seamless rolled rings for jet engines; fastening systems for aerospace, industrial and commercial transportation applications; forged jet engine components (e.g., jet engine disks); machined and forged aircraft parts; and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels, all of which are sold directly to customers or through distributors. It has four reportable segments: Engine Products, which de…
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +1.22% | 6 |
| Feb | +14.43% | 6 |
| Mar | -0.62% | 6 |
| Apr | -1.00% | 7 |
| May | +8.82% | 7 |
| Jun | +3.82% | 7 |
| Jul | +4.87% | 6 |
| Aug | +1.27% | 6 |
| Sep | -1.38% | 6 |
| Oct | +1.86% | 6 |
| Nov | +11.34% | 6 |
| Dec | +4.60% | 6 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $261.99
SMA 50: $257.28
SMA 200: $224.51
Current: $274.00
EMA 12: $269.70
EMA 26: $263.67
MACD: 6.0343 | Signal: 2.1818
BULLISH
ADX (14): 23.16
WEAK TREND
+DI: 27.19
−DI: 14.28
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 57.94
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 71.69
Stoch %D: 79.74
Williams %R: -35.42
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $284.63
BB Lower: $239.34
NEUTRAL
OBV: 128,000,919
Vol SMA 20: 2,677,447
Vol ROC: -33.47%
ATR: $9.32
True Range: $11.14
HV 20: 37.0%
HV 30: 35.7%
HV 60: 38.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-23T19:20:33.843000
Date Range: 2024-06-24T00:00:00 – 2026-06-22T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Howmet Aerospace posted a nearly sixfold gain over the past three years, but that doesn't mean upside from here is limited.
Earnings History
5 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | Pre-Market | 8.25% | 13.85% | 1.68x | Exceeded |
| 2024-11-06 | Pre-Market | 7.88% | 11.69% | 1.48x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-13 | Pre-Market | 8.61% | 1.54% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | Pre-Market | 7.46% | 6.81% | 0.91x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | Pre-Market | 6.52% | 6.61% | 1.01x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-30 | Pre-Market | 6.51% | 0.84% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2026-02-12 | Pre-Market | 6.41% | 5.74% | 0.90x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | Pre-Market | 6.82% | 6.28% | 0.92x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 27.42
- IV Rank (7D)
- 59.77
- Avg IV
- 48.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $23.00
- Straddle (7D)
- $13.10
- P/C Volume
- 0.24
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.05
- Correlation (SPY)
- 41.3%
- R²
- 0.17
- Ann. Volatility
- 31.8%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 405,000,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
28 filers$455.54M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $138.48M | 30.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $46.85M | 10.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $41.94M | 9.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $33.10M | 7.27% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $26.66M | 5.85% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $23.86M | 5.24% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | PEAK6 LLC | $23.32M | 5.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Alphadyne Asset Management LP | $21.82M | 4.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Oribel Capital Management, LP | $20.95M | 4.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $13.83M | 3.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $11.80M | 2.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $11.48M | 2.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $9.56M | 2.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $7.86M | 1.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | TORNO CAPITAL, LLC | $4.08M | 0.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | BOOTHBAY FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC | $3.87M | 0.85% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.51M | 0.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $2.19M | 0.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.89M | 0.41% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $1.77M | 0.39% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.68M | 0.37% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.59M | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $1.43M | 0.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $1.31M | 0.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | READYSTATE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP | $783.56K | 0.17% | 2026-03-31 |
34 filers$644.50M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Artisan Partners Limited Partnership | $175.15M | 27.18% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | BARCLAYS PLC Custodian | $93.57M | 14.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $68.68M | 10.66% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $38.60M | 5.99% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $30.54M | 4.74% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $30.21M | 4.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $29.91M | 4.64% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $29.78M | 4.62% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Alphadyne Asset Management LP | $22.91M | 3.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | RH Tailwind Management, LLC | $20.74M | 3.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $16.05M | 2.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Caption Management, LLC | $14.86M | 2.31% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $13.43M | 2.08% | 2025-09-30 |
| 14 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $6.71M | 1.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $6.43M | 1.00% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $5.76M | 0.89% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | Walleye Trading LLC | $5.69M | 0.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Cavalier Investments, LLC | $4.61M | 0.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $4.46M | 0.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG\ Custodian | $3.92M | 0.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $3.73M | 0.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.93M | 0.45% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.79M | 0.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | Capula Management Ltd | $2.28M | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $2.26M | 0.35% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-05-26
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-26 | JAMES F ALBAUGH | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Amy E Alving | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Sharon R Barner | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | JOSEPH S CANTIE | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | ROBERT F LEDUC | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Jody Miller | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | ULRICH SCHMIDT | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-26 | Gunner Smith | Director | Award (A) | +731 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Neil Edward Marchuk | EVP, CAO | Sell (S) | −41,932 | $269.50 | -$11.30M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-17 | Jonathan A Arena | EVP, CL&CO and Secretary | Award (A) | +3,544 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | JOSEPH S CANTIE | Director | Award (A) | +155 | $232.68 | $36.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-27 | Barbara Lou Shultz | Vice President and Controller | Sell (S) | −1,000 | $260.00 | -$260.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | MICHAEL NIEM CHANATRY | Vice President | Mixed | −17,627 | $250.21 | -$5.08M | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Neil Edward Marchuk | EVP, CAO | Mixed | −69,920 | $251.12 | -$18.53M | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Barbara Lou Shultz | Vice President and Controller | Mixed | −2,246 | $250.21 | -$673.6K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
14 insiders · @ $274.00
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JOHN C PLANT | Executive Chairman & CEO | 3,022,553 | $828.18M | $0 | 1 | 2026-02-18 |
| 2 | MICHAEL NIEM CHANATRY | Vice President | 175,388 | $48.06M | $0 | 2 | 2026-02-18 |
| 3 | Neil Edward Marchuk | EVP, CAO | 65,115 | $17.84M | -$22.66M | 4 | 2026-05-12 |
| 4 | JAMES F ALBAUGH | Director | 59,442 | $16.29M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-26 |
| 5 | ULRICH SCHMIDT | Director | 58,561 | $16.05M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-26 |
| 6 | Amy E Alving | Director | 57,820 | $15.84M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-26 |
| 7 | JOSEPH S CANTIE | Director | 43,948 | $12.04M | $0 | 3 | 2026-05-26 |
| 8 | ROBERT F LEDUC | Director | 35,824 | $9.82M | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-26 |
| 9 | Jody Miller | Director | 30,605 | $8.39M | $0 | 2 | 2026-05-26 |
| 10 | Barbara Lou Shultz | Vice President and Controller | 23,874 | $6.54M | -$260.0K | 3 | 2026-02-27 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-11
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $11.3M notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
Top 90-day filers:
Marchuk Neil Edward (1, $11.3M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | Marchuk Neil Edward | Officer | 41,932 | $11.30M | 2026-05-11 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-26 | Shultz Barbara Lou | Officer | 1,000 | $260.0K | 2026-02-26 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Marchuk Neil Edward | Officer | 45,150 | $11.36M | 2026-02-18 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Giacobbe Ken | Officer | 37,471 | $9.46M | 2026-02-18 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Giacobbe Ken | Officer | 108,987 | $27.40M | 2026-02-17 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | LIN LOLA FELICE | Officer | 13,102 | $2.37M | 2025-08-05 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-12 | John Plant | Executive Chairman and CEO | 800,000 | $125.93M | 2025-05-12 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-12 | Marchuk Neil Edward | Officer | 30,000 | $4.76M | 2025-05-12 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | Shultz Barbara Lou | Officer | 1,250 | $194.0K | 2025-05-05 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-18 | LIN LOLA FELICE | Officer | 6,620 | $902.9K | 2025-02-18 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-05-28
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-28 | 0001104659-26-067497 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | 0001104659-26-066305 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-07 | 0001104659-26-056645 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | 0001104659-26-039791 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | 0001104659-26-039959 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-10 | 0001104659-26-025539 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | 0001104659-26-022905 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | 0001104659-26-015914 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | 0001104659-26-016568 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0001104659-26-013832 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-12 | 0000004281-26-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-14 | 0000004281-25-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-13 | 0000004281-24-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-14 | 0000004281-23-000004 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-14 | 0000004281-22-000004 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-16 | 0000004281-21-000049 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-27 | 0000004281-20-000038 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-21 | 0000004281-19-000031 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-26 | 0000004281-18-000042 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 0000004281-26-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001628280-25-047584 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0000004281-25-000033 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0000004281-25-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-07 | 0000004281-24-000034 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-30 | 0000004281-24-000026 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-02 | 0000004281-24-000014 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-02 | 0000004281-23-000020 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-01 | 0000004281-23-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-02 | 0000004281-23-000008 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 63.7 |
| P/B Ratio | 20.1 |
| P/S Ratio | 12.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 43.8 |
| TTM Revenue | $8.6B |
| TTM Net Income | $1.7B |
| TTM EPS | $4.31 |
| ROE | 31.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.86 |