Ingersoll Rand Inc. Common Stock(IR)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $68.07 – $100.96
- YTD
- +5.37%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 11.7
- Straddle Price
- $7.43
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.56
- Market Cap
- $33.1B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.65% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.15% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.44% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +23.9pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -2.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $1.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 5.8% |
| Book / Price | 30.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 43.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 14.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.47 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +15.9% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $77.06 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $81.33 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 17.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $3.5B |
| Market Cap | $34B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $23.94 | 23% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $56.34 | 7% | median 38.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $94.56 | 7% | median 20.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $111.23 | 7% | median 4.3× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $41.48 | 7% | median 2.1× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $77.06 | 30% | stability 65% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $71.11 | 19% | 16 strikes · skew +0.81 |
- Industry (SIC)
- GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (3560)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $33.1B
Ingersoll Rand was formed through the merger of Gardner Denver and Ingersoll Rand's industrial segment. The firm's portfolio consists of two business lines: industrial technologies and services, and precision and science technologies. Ingersoll Rand serves a variety of end markets, including industrial, medical, and energy. Its broad portfolio of products includes compression, blower and vacuum, and fluid management. Ingersoll Rand generated roughly $7.7 billion in revenue in 2025.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -0.05% | 23 |
| Feb | +1.69% | 23 |
| Mar | -0.10% | 23 |
| Apr | +4.04% | 23 |
| May | +0.98% | 23 |
| Jun | -0.25% | 23 |
| Jul | +2.36% | 23 |
| Aug | +0.36% | 22 |
| Sep | -3.11% | 23 |
| Oct | +1.03% | 23 |
| Nov | +6.07% | 23 |
| Dec | +0.66% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | Pre-Market | 6.73% | 1.55% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 6.86% | 0.02% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-02-13 | After-Close | 5.70% | 7.50% | 1.32x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-01 | After-Close | 8.93% | 0.17% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 6.74% | 11.40% | 1.69x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-30 | After-Close | 9.34% | 3.05% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-02-12 | Pre-Market | 6.30% | 2.33% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | After-Close | 7.67% | 4.63% | 0.60x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 11.7
- IV Rank (7D)
- 11.7
- Avg IV
- 49.6%
- Straddle (30D)
- $7.43
- Straddle (7D)
- $7.43
- P/C Volume
- 1.56
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.34
- Correlation (SPY)
- 49.5%
- R²
- 0.24
- Ann. Volatility
- 34.9%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.9%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $15.18M | 20.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | BARCLAYS PLC Custodian | $13.62M | 18.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $13.62M | 18.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $11.33M | 15.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $5.77M | 7.64% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $4.94M | 6.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $4.07M | 5.39% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.93M | 2.56% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.27M | 1.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $1.22M | 1.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $801.20K | 1.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $600.90K | 0.80% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $404.50K | 0.54% | 2025-09-30 |
| 14 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $272.41K | 0.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Walleye Trading LLC | $240.36K | 0.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ Custodian | $224.34K | 0.30% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $10.39M | 38.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $3.65M | 13.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $3.58M | 13.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $2.86M | 10.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.71M | 6.25% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.03M | 3.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $993.49K | 3.64% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $560.84K | 2.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $480.72K | 1.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $384.58K | 1.41% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $376.56K | 1.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $312.47K | 1.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Walleye Capital LLC | $288.43K | 1.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $248.37K | 0.91% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | CenterStar Asset Management, LLC | $240.36K | 0.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ Custodian | $184.28K | 0.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $8.01K | 0.03% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | Michelle Swanenburg | Director | Exer (M) | +1,876 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-15 | Vicente Reynal | See Remarks | Mixed | — | $49.30 | -$2.36M | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Vicente Reynal | See Remarks | Mixed | — | $52.36 | -$9.86M | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | John Humphrey | Director | Exer (M) | +2,609 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-02 | JoAnna Sohovich | Director | Exer (M) | +2,429 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-02 | Mark P Stevenson | Director | Exer (M) | +2,309 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-02 | Marc Ellis Jones | Director | Exer (M) | +2,489 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-02 | Jennifer Hartsock | Director | Exer (M) | +2,429 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-02 | WILLIAM P DONNELLY | Director | Exer (M) | +3,029 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-02 | Vicente Reynal | See Remarks | Mixed | +7,398 | $94.38 | -$534.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Kathleen M. Keene | See Remarks | Mixed | +884 | $94.39 | -$33.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Matthew J Emmerich | See Remarks | Mixed | +411 | $94.36 | -$21.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Michael A Weatherred | See Remarks | Mixed | +1,257 | $94.40 | -$94.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Vikram Kini | Senior Vice President and CFO | Mixed | +2,037 | $94.38 | -$147.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Andrew R Schiesl | See Remarks | Mixed | +990 | $94.35 | -$71.7K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KKR Associates North America XI L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 56,888,635 | $4.78B | -$1.99B | 1 | 2020-05-29 |
| 2 | KKR & Co. Inc. | 10%+ Owner | 56,888,635 | $4.78B | -$2.38B | 1 | 2020-05-29 |
| 3 | KKR Management LLP | 10%+ Owner | 44,788,635 | $3.76B | -$2.21B | 1 | 2020-06-23 |
| 4 | WILLIAM E KASSLING | Director | 334,598 | $28.11M | $0 | 1 | 2020-02-25 |
| 5 | Vicente Reynal | See Remarks | 284,534 | $23.90M | -$145.44M | 45 | 2026-04-15 |
| 6 | TODD D WYMAN | See Remarks | 279,778 | $23.50M | -$2.55M | 44 | 2021-01-05 |
| 7 | NICKOLAS VANDE STEEG | Director | 181,515 | $15.25M | $0 | 1 | 2020-02-25 |
| 8 | Vikram Kini | Senior Vice President and CFO | 103,172 | $8.67M | -$14.48M | 31 | 2026-03-02 |
| 9 | Gary E Gillespie | See Remarks | 69,721 | $5.86M | -$6.27M | 14 | 2023-06-07 |
| 10 | Michael A Weatherred | See Remarks | 67,308 | $5.65M | -$11.4K | 29 | 2026-03-02 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Reynal Vicente | Officer, Director | 30,492 | $2.68M | 2026-04-13 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Reynal Vicente | Officer, Director | 118,044 | $11.11M | 2026-03-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-20 | Kini Vikram | Officer | 28,367 | $2.74M | 2026-02-20 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-19 | Humphrey John | Director | 4,300 | $412.4K | 2026-02-19 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Reynal Vicente | Officer, Director | 900 | $90.0K | 2026-02-18 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Keene Kathleen M. | Officer | 12,000 | $1.19M | 2026-02-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Reynal Vicente | Officer, Director | 36,482 | $3.56M | 2026-02-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Scheske Michael J | Director | 19,122 | $1.87M | 2026-02-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Hepding Elizabeth Meloy | Officer | 18,246 | $1.77M | 2026-02-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Schiesl Andrew R | Officer | 18,000 | $1.76M | 2026-02-17 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | 0001628280-26-027949 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0001628280-26-007710 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-17 | 0001628280-25-057497 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001628280-25-047573 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0001628280-25-037035 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-15 | 0001140361-25-025837 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-17 | 0001140361-25-022750 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-16 | 0001140361-25-022666 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0001628280-25-021577 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-03 | 0001140361-25-011979 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-17 | 0001628280-26-008617 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-19 | 0001628280-25-006391 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-23 | 0001628280-24-006642 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-21 | 0001628280-23-004287 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-25 | 0001628280-22-003991 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-26 | 0001628280-21-003454 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-26 | 0001140361-20-004146 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-27 | 0001140361-19-004014 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-16 | 0001140361-18-008833 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | 0001628280-26-028401 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-31 | 0001628280-25-047838 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0001628280-25-037049 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | 0001628280-25-021883 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-01 | 0001628280-24-044749 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-02 | 0001628280-24-034400 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-03 | 0001628280-24-020267 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-03 | 0001628280-23-036698 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-04 | 0001628280-23-027540 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-05 | 0001628280-23-016124 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 56.8 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.3 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $7.8B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.6B |
| TTM EPS | $1.48 |
| ROE | 5.8% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.47 |