MATV Mativ Holdings, Inc.
XNYS
12.15
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- 52-Week Range
- $7.07 – $15.48
- YTD
- +2.77%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 10.47
- Straddle Price
- $1.43
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.38
- Market Cap
- $0.6B
- Open
- $11.71
- Day Range
- $11.65 – $12.30
- Volume
- 302,178
- Prev Close
- $11.70
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.25 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.76% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 7.78% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +71.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +7.9% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.08 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 19.0% |
| Book / Price | 72.3% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 19.4% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 6.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 2.11 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | -5.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $11.89 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $11.61 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 11.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.9B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $46.14 | 20% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $7.77 | 16% | |
| Peer P/E | $41.79 | 9% | median 23.5× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $28.66 | 9% | median 10.6× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $29.54 | 2% | median 3.5× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $176.69 | 6% | median 4.6× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.89 | 37% | stability 92% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- PAPER MILLS (2621) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.6B
- Employees
- 5,000
- List Date
- 1995-11-09
- CIK
- 0001000623
- Last Earnings
- Nov 4 after close · +2.1% vs ±11.4% expected
- Next Earnings
- ~Feb 17, 2027 (estimated)
- Headquarters
- Alpharetta, GA
- Homepage
- https://www.mativ.com
Mativ Holdings Inc is a leader in specialty materials, solving its customers' complex challenges by engineering bold, inventive solutions that connect, protect, and purify the world. The company operates in two segments, namely Filtration & advanced Materials, focused on filtration media and components, developed films, coating and converting solutions, and extruded mesh products, and (2) Sustainable & Adhesive Solutions (SAS), focused on tapes, labels, liners, specialty paper, packaging, and healthcare solutions.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 28.97% | -24.20% | -10.91% | 1.95% | -1.05% |
| Feb | -- | -5.20% | 48.08% | -25.47% | -13.63% | 0.94% |
| Mar | -- | -17.52% | 6.53% | 4.36% | -18.54% | -6.29% |
| Apr | -- | -9.10% | -1.62% | -18.76% | 6.42% | -5.77% |
| May | -- | -21.11% | -0.17% | 11.94% | -5.43% | -3.69% |
| Jun | -- | 1.96% | -2.86% | 10.53% | -4.30% | 1.33% |
| Jul | -2.50% | 1.16% | 19.39% | -6.23% | 16.09% | 5.58% |
| Aug | 8.20% | -8.43% | 2.82% | 100.80% | 31.09% | 26.90% |
| Sep | -7.23% | -14.15% | -7.46% | -9.16% | -3.82% | -8.36% |
| Oct | 4.26% | -3.61% | -7.10% | -5.40% | -2.66% | -2.90% |
| Nov | -13.06% | -8.59% | -15.65% | 19.52% | 4.75%* | -2.61% |
| Dec | 1.65% | 11.67% | -18.35% | -1.22% | -- | -1.56% |
| Total | -9.83% | -42.31% | -17.08% | 33.06% | 3.10% | -6.61% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD
- Volatility regime remains high, indicating market uncertainty
- Recent news headlines suggest mixed sentiment, with some positive and negative articles
Primary Risks:
- Continued market volatility could exacerbate bearish trends
- Lack of earnings data hinders fundamental analysis and increases risk
Investment Thesis:
MATV's stock price has been trending downwards due to a combination of bearish technical indicators and high volatility. While there are some positive news headlines, the overall sentiment is mixed, which may lead to further market uncertainty.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines have had a neutral impact on the analysis, as they do not strongly contradict or support the current technical signals. However, the lack of earnings data and high volatility remain key concerns.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: BEARISH (Short-term), BEARISH (Medium-term), NEUTRAL (Long-term)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $7.81 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $8.33 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- MACD signal: Bearish
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (48.60%)
- Bollinger Bands position: Mean reversion
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 581683.20 (increasing)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): -18474365.66 (bearish)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The recent news headlines suggest mixed sentiment, with some positive and negative articles. The Q2 earnings report was a positive surprise, while the industry analysis and Rayonier Advanced Materials' (RYAM) Q1 loss were negative.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification:
- No upcoming events or regulatory changes to drive significant market movements
- Earnings data is lacking, making it difficult to predict future price action
Market Narrative:
The mixed news sentiment and lack of earnings data create a neutral market narrative that does not strongly support or contradict the current technical signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 1.25 (high risk)
- Alpha: -0.03
- Correlation: 0.24
- Stock Volatility: 0.65 (high)
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 12.4% (Low)
- Current IV: 101.1%
- Expected Move: $1.67 (42 DTE), 7-DTE: $0.80
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: SMA 20, Upper Bollinger Band
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels and position sizing
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
MATV's performance is relatively weak compared to its sector and market.
Institutional Activity:
The institutional activity is bearish, with a focus on put options.
Correlation Analysis:
The stock's movement relative to the market (R-squared) indicates high correlation.
Relative Valuation:
MATV is positioned within its trading range, which may indicate future consolidation or further price action.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $7.81
- Upper Bollinger Band: $8.33
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $7.28 (breakout)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- No upcoming events or regulatory changes to drive significant market movements
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: SMA 20 and lower Bollinger Band
- Position sizing: Consider reducing position size due to high volatility and risk
Conclusion
MATV's stock price is trending bearishly, driven by a combination of technical indicators and high volatility. The lack of earnings data and mixed news sentiment create uncertainty, making it challenging to predict future price action. The analysis highlights key levels, risks, and market context, providing a comprehensive framework for investors to assess the stock's potential.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | After-Close | 28.27% | 12.23% | 0.43x | Within |
| 2022-11-09 | After-Close | 11.45% | 11.36% | 0.99x | Within |
| 2023-02-22 | After-Close | 9.77% | 10.74% | 1.10x | Exceeded |
| 2023-05-10 | After-Close | 11.72% | 1.66% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2023-08-09 | After-Close | 6.49% | 0.52% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2023-11-08 | After-Close | 11.46% | 3.79% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2024-02-21 | After-Close | 18.37% | 42.69% | 2.32x | Exceeded |
| 2024-05-08 | After-Close | 12.20% | 0.27% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2024-08-07 | After-Close | 15.30% | 28.44% | 1.86x | Exceeded |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 11.21% | 21.09% | 1.88x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-07 | After-Close | 12.92% | 8.95% | 0.69x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | After-Close | 28.66% | 34.71% | 1.21x | Exceeded |
| 2025-11-05 | After-Close | 19.71% | 21.94% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-18 | After-Close | 15.24% | 7.96% | 0.52x | Within |
| 2026-05-06 | After-Close | 16.15% | 1.18% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2026-08-05 | After-Close | 15.41% | 22.05% | 1.43x | Exceeded |
| 2026-11-04 | After-Close | 11.36% | 2.15% | 0.19x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MATV Options Activity & IV Rank
MATV IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 90th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $3.8M | #2299 of 6285 | +523.2% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $1.7M | #1326 of 1945 | -30.7% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $366K | #2717 of 3138 | -38.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $57K | #3302 of 4729 | -2.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MATV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 71 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $507.64K | 69.95% | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $213.47K | 29.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $4.64K | 0.64% | 2026-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $205.90K | 98.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $2.32K | 1.11% | 2026-09-30 |
MATV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-03| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | Mark W Johnson | CLO and Corporate Secretary | Mixed Exer +6,444 · Disp −6,444 |
— | $11.89 | -$76.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-21 | Marco Levi | Director | Tax (F) | −5,499 | $7.57 | -$41.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | Deborah Borg | Director | Grant (A) | +19,815 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Marco Levi | Director | Grant (A) | +19,815 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Kimberly E Ritrievi | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Bruce Andrew Hausmann | Director | Grant (A) | +19,815 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | John K Stipancich | Director | Grant (A) | +19,815 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | William M Cook | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-28 | Ryan Michael Elwart | Group President | Mixed Exer +11,070 · Tax −3,318 |
+7,752 | $9.76 | -$32.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-23 | Cheryl Allegri | Controller | Tax (F) | −965 | $8.53 | -$8.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-23 | Ryan Michael Elwart | Group President | Tax (F) | −3,562 | $8.53 | -$30.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-23 | Mark W Johnson | CLO and Corporate Secretary | Tax (F) | −2,944 | $8.53 | -$25.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-13 | Shruti Singhal | President, CEO | Mixed Tax −84,016 · Exer +305,677 |
+221,661 | $9.02 | -$757.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-26 | Scott Minder | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +30,556 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-26 | Cheryl Allegri | Controller | Grant (A) | +7,812 RSU | — | EDGAR |
MATV Insider Holdings
15 insiders · @ $12.13| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shruti Singhal | President, CEO | 362,210 | $4.39M | $230.4K | 14 | 2026-03-13 |
| 2 | Julie Schertell | President, CEO | 244,023 | $2.96M | $823.7K | 10 | 2025-03-14 |
| 3 | Ryan Michael Elwart | Group President | 151,994 | $1.84M | $0 | 9 | 2026-04-28 |
| 4 | Mark W Johnson | CLO and Corporate Secretary | 125,113 | $1.52M | $0 | 11 | 2026-09-03 |
| 5 | Michael W Rickheim | CHRO | 65,763 | $797.7K | $0 | 7 | 2025-06-05 |
| 6 | Marco Levi | Director | 57,201 | $693.8K | $57.8K | 15 | 2026-07-21 |
| 7 | John Rogers | Director | 47,235 | $573.0K | $42.2K | 14 | 2025-04-03 |
| 8 | John K Stipancich | Director | 34,441 | $417.8K | $32.0K | 7 | 2026-07-06 |
| 9 | Kimberly E Ritrievi | Director | 30,640 | $371.7K | $58.8K | 15 | 2026-07-06 |
| 10 | Andrew Downard | Chief Supply Chain Officer | 29,060 | $352.5K | $0 | 5 | 2025-07-02 |
MATV Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 3, 2026Directors 7
- Marco Levi · since Apr 20, 2017
- Kimberly E Ritrievi · since Mar 1, 2018
- Shruti Singhal · since Jul 6, 2022
- William M Cook · since Jul 6, 2022
- John K Stipancich · since Jun 13, 2024
- Deborah Borg · listed since Dec 2025
- Bruce Andrew Hausmann · since Jul 1, 2026
Officers 4
- Shruti Singhal · President, CEO · listed since Mar 2025
- Scott Minder · Chief Financial Officer · since Jan 1, 2026
- Mark W Johnson · CLO and Corporate Secretary · listed since Apr 2024
- Cheryl Allegri · Controller · since May 18, 2022
Changes in the last 10 years (48)
| Jul 1, 2026 | Bruce Andrew Hausmann became a director |
| Mar 30, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Ryan Michael Elwart as Group President in an SEC filing |
| Jan 21, 2026 | Gregory Thomas Weitzel reported in an SEC filing no longer being CFO |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Scott Minder became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Deborah Borg first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2025 | Andrew Downard reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Supply Chain Officer |
| May 23, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Michael W Rickheim as CHRO in an SEC filing |
| Apr 29, 2025 | Ryan Michael Elwart listed as Group President (previously Group President, SAS) in SEC filings |
| Mar 14, 2025 | Shruti Singhal first listed as President, CEO in an SEC filing |
| Mar 14, 2025 | Julie Schertell reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Mar 14, 2025 | Julie Schertell reported in an SEC filing no longer being President, CEO |
| Jun 13, 2024 | John K Stipancich became a director |
| Jun 12, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Jeffrey Keenan from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 30, 2024 | Michael W Rickheim listed as CHRO (previously CHRO & CAO) in SEC filings |
| Apr 30, 2024 | Mark W Johnson listed as CLO and Corporate Secretary (previously CLO, GC & Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Ryan Michael Elwart became Group President, SAS |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Christoph Stenzel became Group President, FAM |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Andrew Downard became Chief Supply Chain Officer |
| Sep 1, 2023 | Mark W Johnson became CLO, GC & Secretary |
| Apr 2, 2023 | Gregory Thomas Weitzel became CFO |
| Mar 15, 2023 | The company announced the departure of R Andrew Wamser Jr as EVP, Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Tracey Peacock reported in an SEC filing no longer being EVP, Ams |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Mark L Bye reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Jeffrey Kramer reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Jeffrey Kramer reported in an SEC filing no longer being CEO |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Deborah Borg reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jul 6, 2022 | William M Cook became a director |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Tony R Thene became a director |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Shruti Singhal became a director |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Michael W Rickheim became CHRO & CAO |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Julie Schertell became a director |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Julie Schertell became President, CEO |
| May 18, 2022 | Cheryl Allegri became Controller |
| Apr 26, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Michael Schmit as Controller in an SEC filing |
| Feb 2, 2022 | Ricardo J Nunez listed as EVP, General Counsel, Sec. (previously EVP, GC, Corp Sec, CCO) in SEC filings |
| Feb 2, 2022 | R Andrew Wamser Jr listed as EVP, Chief Financial Officer (previously EVP Finance, CFO) in SEC filings |
| Apr 12, 2021 | Tracey Peacock became EVP, Ams |
| Feb 20, 2020 | Mark L Bye became a director |
| Jan 1, 2020 | Omar Hoek became EVP Engineered Papers |
| Apr 22, 2019 | Michael Schmit became Controller |
| Feb 21, 2019 | Deborah Borg became a director |
| Jan 2, 2019 | Ricardo J Nunez listed as EVP, GC, Corp Sec, CCO (previously GC, Corp Sec) in SEC filings |
| Mar 1, 2018 | Kimberly E Ritrievi became a director |
| Feb 5, 2018 | R Andrew Wamser Jr became EVP Finance, CFO |
| Sep 1, 2017 | Ricardo J Nunez became GC, Corp Sec |
| Apr 21, 2017 | Jeffrey Kramer became a director |
| Apr 21, 2017 | Jeffrey Kramer became CEO |
| Apr 20, 2017 | Marco Levi became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (15)
- John Rogers · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 3, 2025
- Christoph Stenzel · Last reported as Group President, FAM in an SEC filing dated Mar 21, 2025
- Anderson Davis Warlick · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 3, 2024
- Tony R Thene · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 3, 2024
- Ricardo J Nunez · Last reported as EVP, General Counsel, Sec. in an SEC filing dated Mar 7, 2023
- Omar Hoek · Last reported as EVP Engineered Papers in an SEC filing dated Sep 6, 2022
- K C Caldabaugh · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 1, 2020
- Daniel R Lister · Last reported as EVP Advanced Materials & Struc in an SEC filing dated Mar 2, 2020
- Claire L Arnold · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 1, 2019
- Robert J Cardin · Last reported as Controller in an SEC filing dated Mar 1, 2019
- Michel Fievez · Last reported as EVP Engineered Papers in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2019
- William Finn · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2018
- Allison Aden · Last reported as EVP Finance, CFO in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2018
- Heinrich Fischer · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 4, 2017
- Frederic Villoutreix · Last reported as CEO and Chairman of the Board in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2017
MATV Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2024-08-14What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | JULIE A SCHERTELL | Officer | 12,000 | $213.7K | 2024-08-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.14% | $44.8M | $31.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $20.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $16.5M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $12.4M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 5 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $7.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $6.0M | $13.9B | 2026-11-06 |
| 7 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $6.0M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $5.0M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 9 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.05% | $4.9M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 10 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $3.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $3.1M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 12 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $2.7M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 13 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $2.5M | $4.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 14 | DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | Nport | 0.10% | $2.2M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | Nport | 0.09% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $2.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.16% | $1.5M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 18 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.04% | $1.3M | $3.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 19 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $1.3M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 20 | JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | JPMorgan | 0.21% | $1.2M | $560.5M | 2026-11-06 |
| 21 | BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | Invesco | 0.19% | $1.1M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 22 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $830,394 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 23 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $788,393 | $93.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 24 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.08% | $779,014 | $1.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 25 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.01% | $623,822 | $6.6B | 2026-11-05 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-09-30 | $499.50M | $-1.20M | $-0.03 | $48.50M |
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $531.80M | $3.60M | $0.06 | $67.90M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $479.60M | $-11.70M | $-0.22 | $1.00M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $463.10M | $100.80M | $1.85 | $19.30M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $513.70M | $-3.20M | $-0.06 | $72.80M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $525.40M | $-9.50M | $-0.18 | $57.60M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $484.80M | $-425.50M | $-7.82 | $-15.90M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $458.60M | $1.50M | $0.03 | $24.10M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $498.50M | $-20.80M | $-0.38 | $37.60M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $523.80M | $-1.40M | $-0.03 | $46.10M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $500.20M | $-28.00M | $-0.52 | $-13.00M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $452.30M | $157.70M | $2.88 | $54.20M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
MATV vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN Linde plc Ordinary Share | $236.5B | 34.7 | +8.2% | +21.7% | 13 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | $125.6B | 14.7 | +23.7% | +24.6% | 33 |
| FCX Freeport-McMoran Inc. | $85.3B | 31.0 | +0.2% | +21.1% | 48 |
| APD Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. | $67.9B | 33.0 | +3.7% | +24.5% | 19 |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | $55.6B | 19.8 | +17.2% | +46.2% | 63 |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company(Holding Company | $36.3B | 34.6 | +1.6% | −0.1% | 51 |
| CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | $15.8B | 18.3 | +111.7% | −5.0% | 11 |
| HL Hecla Mining Company | $9.9B | 27.9 | +60.4% | −17.2% | 13 |
| MATV Mativ Holdings, Inc. | $646M | 7.4 | −0.4% | +2.6% | 10 |
| Peer median | $61.7B | 29.4 | +12.7% | +21.4% | 26 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.