ABUF vs BALT

Aptus Laddered Buffer ETF against Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
39 bp
ABUF is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BALT
$3.0B

Side by side

ABUFBALT
FundAptus Laddered Buffer ETFInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
IssuerAptusInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.30%0.69%
Assets$7.4M$3.0B
Average daily dollar volume$161K$21M
ListedMar 31, 2026Jun 30, 2021
FrenzyCap score3562
1-month return+2.0%+1.2%
3-month return+3.6%+2.1%
Year to date—+4.7%
1-year return—+6.8%
30-day volatility4.6%3.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.5%−1.1%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings55
Top 10 weight99.8%101.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.7M thru Jul 2026+$317M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—14.6%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · ABUF holdings · BALT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.