ACES vs LIT

ALPS Clean Energy ETF against Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
8%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
ACES is cheaper
1-year return gap
37.8 pts
LIT is ahead
Larger fund
LIT
$1.5B

Side by side

ACESLIT
FundALPS Clean Energy ETFGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
IssuerALPSGlobal X
CategoryClean Energy & ClimateEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.55%0.75%
Assets$98M$1.5B
Average daily dollar volume$759K$13M
ListedJun 27, 2018Jul 22, 2010
FrenzyCap score4441
1-month return−7.7%−2.9%
3-month return−15.6%−0.7%
Year to date−15.2%+7.5%
1-year return−21.0%+16.8%
30-day volatility24.8%18.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−36.1%−27.2%
Trailing 12-month yield0.68%0.72%
Holdings3946
Top 10 weight51.3%57.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+15.4%+3.3%
Holdings above 200-day average5%0%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13K thru May 2026−$194M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility34.5%28.8%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

9% of ACES · 9% of LIT
HoldingACESLIT
TSLA4.23%4.65%
ALB4.17%3.91%
LCID0.96%0.23%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorACESLITGap
Materials7.8%29.5%−21.7%
Industrials28.2%2.1%+26.0%
Technology27.9%0.0%+27.9%
Consumer Discretionary9.3%4.9%+4.4%
Utilities10.3%0.0%+10.3%
Financials4.4%0.0%+4.4%
Other0.3%0.0%+0.3%

More: full overlap table · ACES holdings · LIT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.