AGQ vs SHNY

ProShares Ultra Silver against MicroSectors Gold 3x Leveraged ETN: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
13.9 pts
AGQ is ahead
Larger fund
AGQ
$1.3B

Side by side

AGQSHNY
FundProShares Ultra SilverMicroSectors Gold 3x Leveraged ETN
IssuerProSharesMicroSectors
CategoryLeveraged & Inverse CommodityLeveraged & Inverse Commodity
Expense ratio——
Assets$1.3B—
Average daily dollar volume$229M$11M
ListedDec 1, 2008Feb 22, 2023
FrenzyCap score90—
1-month return−10.3%−11.7%
3-month return+5.3%+4.5%
Year to date−56.5%−37.8%
1-year return−17.9%−31.8%
30-day volatility77.4%70.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−85.1%−69.4%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings——
Top 10 weight——
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months——
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as of

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · AGQ holdings · SHNY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.