AOA vs MATR

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF against Harbor Multi-Asset Total Return ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
22%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
65 bp
AOA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
AOA
$3.4B

Side by side

AOAMATR
FundiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFHarbor Multi-Asset Total Return ETF
IssueriSharesHarbor
CategoryAllocationMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.15%0.80%
Assets$3.4B$11M
Average daily dollar volume$15M$19K
ListedNov 4, 2008Sep 13, 2023
FrenzyCap score6910
1-month return+0.1%+0.7%
3-month return+1.5%—
Year to date+9.4%—
1-year return+10.5%—
30-day volatility8.7%9.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.2%−1.9%
Trailing 12-month yield2.15%—
Holdings922
Top 10 weight99.9%77.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$77M thru Jul 2026−$686K thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility11.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

56% of AOA · 26% of MATR
HoldingAOAMATR
IVV46.97%13.65%
IEMG8.76%12.08%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOA holdings · MATR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.