AOM vs NDOW

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF against Anydrus Advantage ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
200 bp
AOM is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.8 pts
NDOW is ahead
Larger fund
AOM
$2.0B

Side by side

AOMNDOW
FundiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETFAnydrus Advantage ETF
IssueriSharesAnydrus
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%2.15%
Assets$2.0B$68M
Average daily dollar volume$28M$298K
ListedNov 4, 2008May 13, 2024
FrenzyCap score6923
1-month return−1.5%−0.4%
3-month return−0.7%−1.2%
Year to date+1.9%+3.8%
1-year return+2.5%+5.3%
30-day volatility6.3%6.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.1%−7.2%
Trailing 12-month yield3.19%1.19%
Holdings987
Top 10 weight99.9%45.3%
Look-through P/E—22.9
Holdings vs fair value—+5.1%
Holdings above 200-day average—54%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$18M thru Jul 2026+$5.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility33.2%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 15, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of AOM · 0% of NDOW

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorAOMNDOWGap
Technology0.0%8.1%−8.1%
Industrials0.0%7.0%−7.0%
Health Care0.0%4.6%−4.6%
Materials0.0%3.1%−3.1%
Utilities0.0%3.0%−3.0%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%2.2%−2.2%
Financials0.0%1.9%−1.9%
Energy0.0%1.7%−1.7%
Real Estate0.0%1.5%−1.5%
Consumer Staples0.0%1.3%−1.3%
Communication Services0.0%1.1%−1.1%

More: full overlap table · AOM holdings · NDOW holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.