AOR vs SFGV

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF against Sequoia Global Value ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
10%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
18 bp
AOR is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
AOR
$4.0B

Side by side

AORSFGV
FundiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFSequoia Global Value ETF
IssueriSharesSequoia
CategoryAllocationGlobal
Expense ratio0.15%0.33%
Assets$4.0B$1.2B
Average daily dollar volume$36M$517K
ListedNov 4, 2008Jan 17, 2024
FrenzyCap score7258
1-month return−0.2%−1.1%
3-month return+0.5%+0.9%
Year to date+5.9%+12.6%
1-year return+6.5%—
30-day volatility7.6%8.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−8.4%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%2.26%
Holdings9524
Top 10 weight99.9%45.9%
Look-through P/E—20.7
Holdings vs fair value—+10.6%
Holdings above 200-day average—60%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$124M thru Jul 2026−$6.0M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility12.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of May 29, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

17% of AOR · 10% of SFGV
HoldingAORSFGV
IDEV16.94%10.08%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorAORSFGVGap
Industrials0.0%13.0%−13.0%
Health Care0.0%7.7%−7.7%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%7.5%−7.5%
Technology0.0%7.4%−7.4%
Consumer Staples0.0%6.4%−6.4%
Financials0.0%5.4%−5.4%
Energy0.0%4.7%−4.7%
Materials0.0%2.6%−2.6%
Communication Services0.0%1.6%−1.6%
Utilities0.0%0.5%−0.5%
Other0.0%0.1%−0.1%
Real Estate0.0%0.0%−0.0%

More: full overlap table · AOR holdings · SFGV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.