AOR vs SPYA

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF against Twin Oak Endure ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
34 bp
AOR is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.9 pts
SPYA is ahead
Larger fund
AOR
$4.0B

Side by side

AORSPYA
FundiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFTwin Oak Endure ETF
IssueriSharesTwin Oak
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%0.49%
Assets$4.0B$133M
Average daily dollar volume$36M$829
ListedNov 4, 2008Jun 2, 2025
FrenzyCap score7230
1-month return−0.2%+2.5%
3-month return+0.5%+3.1%
Year to date+5.9%+10.7%
1-year return+6.5%+12.4%
30-day volatility7.6%10.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−9.6%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%0.34%
Holdings912
Top 10 weight99.9%99.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$124M thru Jul 2026+$130K thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility12.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of AOR · 0% of SPYA

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOR holdings · SPYA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.