APMU vs PZA

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF against Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
7 bp
PZA is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.7 pts
APMU is ahead
Larger fund
PZA
$4.0B

Side by side

APMUPZA
FundActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETFInvesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
IssuerActivePassiveInvesco
CategoryNational MuniNational Muni
Expense ratio0.35%0.28%
Assets$247M$4.0B
Average daily dollar volume$978K$89M
ListedMay 2, 2023Oct 11, 2007
FrenzyCap score4778
1-month return−1.3%−3.4%
3-month return−3.2%−8.9%
Year to date−4.1%−8.1%
1-year return−4.2%−8.0%
30-day volatility4.3%8.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.4%−10.4%
Trailing 12-month yield2.59%4.12%
Holdings1,2716,664
Top 10 weight11.1%1.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru May 2026+$400M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—13.4%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · APMU holdings · PZA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.