ASGM vs SECT

Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF against Main Sector Rotation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
SECT is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.9 pts
ASGM is ahead
Larger fund
SECT
$2.9B

Side by side

ASGMSECT
FundVirtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETFMain Sector Rotation ETF
IssuerVirtusMain Management
CategoryTactical & RotationTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.86%0.69%
Assets$8.5M$2.9B
Average daily dollar volume$78K$10M
ListedAug 4, 2025Sep 5, 2017
FrenzyCap score1454
1-month return+0.5%+2.9%
3-month return+7.0%+2.8%
Year to date+25.5%+13.1%
1-year return+21.3%+14.4%
30-day volatility11.5%11.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.4%−11.0%
Trailing 12-month yield3.60%0.68%
Holdings3713
Top 10 weight69.9%97.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$788K thru Jul 2026+$81M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—15.4%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of ASGM · 0% of SECT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · ASGM holdings · SECT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.