BAMO vs KPO

Brookstone Opportunities ETF against Kensington Premium Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BAMO
$45M

Side by side

BAMOKPO
FundBrookstone Opportunities ETFKensington Premium Opportunities ETF
IssuerBrookstoneKensington
CategoryUS Equity (Other)US Equity (Other)
Expense ratio——
Assets$45M—
Average daily dollar volume$182K$523K
ListedSep 27, 2023Aug 27, 2026
FrenzyCap score16—
1-month return+1.2%+2.8%
3-month return+1.3%—
Year to date+7.5%—
1-year return+8.7%—
30-day volatility6.3%10.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−1.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.35%—
Holdings——
Top 10 weight——
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months——
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as of

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BAMO holdings · KPO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.