BATT vs ILIT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF against iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
8%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
12 bp
ILIT is cheaper
1-year return gap
18.1 pts
BATT is ahead
Larger fund
BATT
$112M

Side by side

BATTILIT
FundAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETFiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
IssuerAmplifyiShares
CategoryEVs & BatteriesEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.59%0.47%
Assets$112M$12M
Average daily dollar volume$534K$93K
ListedJun 4, 2018Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score4034
1-month return−3.0%−13.8%
3-month return+2.7%−16.6%
Year to date+6.4%−21.3%
1-year return+9.4%−8.7%
30-day volatility23.1%24.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−23.0%−48.3%
Trailing 12-month yield1.74%2.62%
Holdings5343
Top 10 weight47.1%58.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru Jun 2026−$2.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility39.8%76.2%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

8% of BATT · 37% of ILIT
HoldingBATTILIT
TINCI1.53%4.35%
ALB1.52%7.16%
PLS Group Ltd1.36%7.12%
Mineral Resources Ltd1.28%8.02%
Yunnan Energy New Material1.16%2.72%
Liontown Ltd0.80%7.17%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBATTILITGap
Materials15.9%24.6%−8.7%
Consumer Discretionary10.9%0.0%+10.9%
Industrials6.6%0.0%+6.6%

More: full overlap table · BATT holdings · ILIT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.