BCIL vs KMCA

Bancreek International Large Cap ETF against PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
15 bp
KMCA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BCIL
$90M

Side by side

BCILKMCA
FundBancreek International Large Cap ETFPLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF
IssuerBancreekPLUS
CategoryDeveloped ex-USSingle Country
Expense ratio0.80%0.65%
Assets$90M$2.6M
Average daily dollar volume$91K$46K
ListedMar 20, 2024May 6, 2026
FrenzyCap score2217
1-month return−0.4%−0.7%
3-month return−0.7%+11.0%
Year to date+2.7%—
1-year return−0.8%—
30-day volatility16.0%40.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−12.8%−39.3%
Trailing 12-month yield0.73%—
Holdings3136
Top 10 weight40.0%59.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$11M thru May 2026+$2.4M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of BCIL · 14% of KMCA
HoldingBCILKMCA
SK4.16%11.94%
HD HYUNDAI ELECTRIC CO LTD2.93%2.44%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBCILKMCAGap
Technology3.0%0.0%+3.0%
Materials2.6%0.0%+2.6%
Industrials0.0%0.6%−0.6%

More: full overlap table · BCIL holdings · KMCA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.